The morphological development of mammalian retinal ganglion cells

A general principle governs vision-dependent dendritic patterning of retinal ganglion cells

Dendritic arbors of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) collect information over a certain area of the visual scene. The coverage territory and the arbor density of dendrites determine what fraction of the visual field is sampled by a single cell and at what resolution. However, it is not clear whether visual stimulation is required for the establishment of branching patterns of RGCs, and whether a general principle directs the dendritic patterning of diverse RGCs. By analyzing the geometric structures of RGC dendrites, we found that dendritic arbors of RGCs underwent a substantial spatial rearrangement after eye-opening. Light deprivation blocked both the dendritic growth and the branch patterning, suggesting that visual stimulation is required for the acquisition of specific branching patterns of RGCs. We further showed that vision-dependent dendritic growth and arbor refinement occurred mainly in the middle portion of the dendritic tree. This nonproportional growth and selective refinement suggest that the late-stage dendritic development of RGCs is not a passive stretching with the growth of eyes, but rather an active process of selective growth/elimination of dendritic arbors of RGCs driven by visual activity. Finally, our data showed that there was a power law relationship between the coverage territory and dendritic arbor density of RGCs on a cell-by-cell basis. RGCs were systematically less dense when they cover larger territories regardless of their cell type, retinal location, or developmental stage. These results suggest that a general structural design principle directs the vision-dependent patterning of RGC dendrites.

Do first order and higher order regions of the thalamic reticular nucleus have different developmental timetables?

The thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN) can been subdivided into sectors based on thalamic and cortical input. Additionally, in carnivores the visual sector of the TRN can be subdivided into first order (perigeniculate nucleus: PGN) and higher order (TRN) regions. This report examines whether TRN development reflects the nature of its higher order visual connections. 170 cells from 12 kittens aged between postnatal day 0 (P0) and P125 were fully analysed after single cell injections in 400-500 microm fixed brain slices. TRN cells have a period of exuberant dendritic branching that peaks between P3 and P12, around the time of eye opening (P7), followed by branch pruning until P68. Similarly, most dendritic appendages are added between P12 and P22 followed by pruning, which is also largely complete by P68. Most branch points occur within the first 10-30% of the dendritic arbor, peaking between 10 and 20% (roughly equivalent to 100 mum from the soma), while appendages were concentrated between 20 and 30% of the arbour; appendages tend to be distributed over a larger proportion of the arbor up to P14 compared to later ages. TRN and PGN maturation were not significantly different. The present data suggest that clear distinctions cannot be made between the maturation of first and higher order pathways and indicate that GABAergic cells of the ventral thalamus may mature earlier than relay cells of the dorsal thalamus. Furthermore, dendritic development in the TRN may be less dependent on extrinsic factors than an intrinsic growth pattern or factors other than a functional hierarchy within the visual pathway.

Does the development of the perigeniculate nucleus support the notion of a hierarchical progression within the visual pathway?

The development of the visual pathway has been extensively studied. However, despite of the importance of the perigeniculate nucleus within this pathway, there is a lack of information concerning its development. The present study examined the dendritic development of perigeniculate nucleus cells using single cell injections in 400-500 microm thick fixed brain slices from kittens of different ages between postnatal day 0 and postnatal day 125. A total of 189 perigeniculate nucleus cells were reconstructed from serial sections for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Cells during the first month were characterized by an abundance of branch points and appendages. There was a significant (P>0.05), albeit variable, increase in the number of branch points and appendages up to about postnatal day 12 after which the numbers were rapidly reduced over the next two weeks. Similarly, appendage numbers significantly increased over the first two weeks until postnatal day 17 and then fell to near adult levels by postnatal day 34. The majority of branch points and appendages occur within 100-200 microm of the soma (10-30% of the dendritic diameter). The data indicate that perigeniculate nucleus dendritic maturation lags shortly behind that of the retina but may precede that of its dorsal thalamic target, the lateral geniculate nucleus. Thus, it may be that the earlier maturation of the perigeniculate nucleus and its inhibitory input is a necessary requirement for the proper development of retinogeniculate and corticothalamic topographic maps within the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus and perigeniculate nucleus.

A gene regulatory hierarchy for retinal ganglion cell specification and differentiation

Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) are the first cell type to be specified during vertebrate retinogenesis. Specification and differentiation of the RGC lineage are a stepwise process involving a hierarchical gene regulatory network. During the past decade, a framework of the network has emerged and key transcriptional regulators have been identified. Pax6, Notch, Ath5, and the Brn3 (Pou4f) factors act at different levels of the regulatory hierarchy. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the functions of these and other transcriptional factors in the specification and differentiation of the RGC lineage. We emphasize the regulatory relationships among transcription factors at different steps of RGC development. We discuss critical issues that need to be addressed before a complete understanding of the gene regulatory network for RGC development can be achieved. Future directions in RGC development will inevitably rely on combined genetic and genomics approaches.

Retinal ganglion cell dendritic development and its control. Filling the gaps

The way in which central neurons acquire their complex and precise dendrite arbors is of considerable developmental interest. Using retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) as a model, the mechanisms that pattern dendritic development are beginning to emerge. As in other systems, final dendrite phenotype is achieved by a mixture of intrinsic and extrinsic determinants. The extrinsic determinants of RGC dendrite shape reflect the anatomical constraints of producing a paracrystalline mosaic of arbors that laminates the inner plexiform layer of the retina. In this article, the key features of RGC dendrite development are reviewed. The emerging molecular mechanisms behind dendritic laminar segregation and "dendritic competition" are described. The role of afferent extrinsic influences are contrasted with those of retrograde, activity-dependent target influences that may regulate the final maturational phase of dendrite remodeling.