Treatment of hypercalcaemia of malignancy with clodronate

The Effectiveness of Bisphosphonate to Reduce Pain in Lung Cancer Patients with Bone Metastasis

Background: Bisphosphonates (BPs) are commonly used as supportive therapy to prevent skeletal-related events in lung cancer patients with bone metastasis, including severe bone pain, hypercalcemia, and pathological fractures. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of bisphosphonate therapy to reduce pain in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with bone metastasis.  Methods: This was a cross-sectional study carried on 38 patients diagnosed with lung cancer based on cytology or histopathology findings. Radiological examination such as thoracic CT scan, bone survey, and bone scan was performed to determine bone metastasis. Multimodality therapy is carried out for lung cancer palliative therapy including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and bisphosphonate therapy (zoledronic acid and ibandronate) as supportive therapy to reducing cancer pain. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) determined by patients themselves. Statistical tests were performed by paired T-test in which p< 0.05 was considered significant.  Results: As many as 38 patients enrolled in this study consisting of 29 men (76.3%) and 9 women (23.7%). The subtype of adenocarcinoma was mostly found in 31 cases (81.58%) and 7 cases (18.42%) was Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancer pain was found in all patients. Measurement of pain prior to treatment showed that most patients had VAS level of 7-10. After bisphosphonate therapy, the VAS level significantly decreased to 1-3 (p<0.01).  Conclusion: Bisphosphonate therapy was proven to effectively decrease the severity level of cancer pain in lung cancer patients with bone metastasis.

Bisphosphonates in the treatment of patients with lung cancer and metastatic bone disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Bisphosphonates are known to prevent skeletal-related events (SREs) in advanced breast cancer, prostate cancer, and multiple myeloma. This systematic review assessed the efficacy of bisphosphonates in preventing SREs, controlling pain, and overall survival in patients with bone metastases from lung cancer.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases through November 10, 2011 for controlled trials that included lung cancer patients with bone metastases treated with bisphosphonates. Two reviewers independently extracted data on pain control, survival, and SREs and evaluated the quality of each study. Meta-analyses were performed when there were two or more trials with similar outcomes.

RESULTS

Twelve trials met our inclusion criteria and included 1,767 patients. Studies were placebo-controlled, or had compared bisphosphonates with other modalities (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or radioisotope therapy), or had used different bisphosphonates as active controls. Randomized controlled trials did not report adequate descriptions of randomization procedures, allocation concealment, and blinding, resulting in low-quality scores. Patients treated with zoledronic acid + chemotherapy had fewer SREs than those receiving chemotherapy alone (relative risk (RR) 0.81, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.97). Pain control improved when a bisphosphonate was added to another treatment modality (chemotherapy or radiation; RR 1.18, 95 %CI 1.0-1.4). Bisphosphonate therapy improved survival compared to controls, but the difference failed to reach statistical significance (mean of 72 days, 95 %CI -8.9 to 152.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with bisphosphonates reduced SREs, improved pain control, and showed a trend to increased survival. Bisphosphonates should be used in the treatment of patients with lung cancer and bone metastases.

A randomized, controlled trial of intravenous clodronate in patients with metastatic bone disease and pain

To evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous clodronate in ameliorating refractory bone pain in patients with metastatic bone disease, 60 patients with established osseous metastases and persistent bone pain were randomized to receive either clodronate (600 mg or 1500 mg in 500 mL of normal saline) or 500 mL of saline as placebo. After 2 weeks, the patients were crossed over to receive the alternate treatment. After another 2 weeks, each patient and investigator made a blinded choice. Daily visual analogue scales (VAS) and analgesic diaries were recorded throughout the study period. Forty-six patients were evaluable (77%). A treatment x period interaction was identified in the VAS and daily morphine equivalent dose (DMED) scores. First period analysis of the VAS scores for general pain, pain at rest, and pain upon movement demonstrated an average reduction of 13, 14, and 24 mm, respectively, from baseline, but were not significantly different from changes following placebo. The average change in DMED was -6.4 (SE = 2.9) following clodronate and was +24.6 (SE = 14.9) following placebo (p = 0.03). In the blinded choice of which agent resulted in improvement in pain, 26 (57%) patients chose clodronate, 12 (26%) chose placebo, and eight (17%) had no preference (p = 0.0021). For the investigators who also made a blinded selection, clodronate was chosen in 30 (65%) patients, placebo in ten (22%) patients, and no difference was apparent in six (13%) (p < 0.0001). Intravenous clodronate appeared to have analgesic effect in patients with refractory bone pain due to metastatic bone disease. The optimal dose and duration of effect require further evaluation, particularly in patients with stable disease and persistent bone pain.

Use of clodronate in multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma is characterized by bone disease including osteoporosis, osteolytic lesions, pathological fractures and hypercalcaemia leading to pain, immobilization and decrease in the quality of life. Clodronate, a bisphosphonate, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of hypercalcaemia in patients with multiple myeloma. In addition, clodronate reduces the progression of osteolytic lesions and the amount of vertebral fractures and may also relieve pain in these patients. Recent studies suggest that oral clodronate should be considered in the adjunctive treatment of all patients with active multiple myeloma independently of the presence of bone lesions at diagnosis. Due to its safety and efficacy, clodronate seems to have gained an important role in the management of patients with multiple myeloma.

Effective treatment of malignant hypercalcaemia with a single intravenous infusion of clodronate

Thirty patients with hypercalcaemia due to malignancy that persisted following rehydration, were treated with a single dose of the bisphosphonate, clodronate. Clodronate (1.5 g) was administered intravenously in 500 ml normal saline over 4 h. Serum and urine biochemistry were measured before and after treatment and the results were compared with data from 15 patients given the recommended regimen 300 mg intravenous clodronate daily for 5 consecutive days. The single infusion induced a rapid and significant fall in serum calcium, apparent at day 3 (P < 0.0001) that persisted to the end of follow-up at day 10 (P < 0.001). Eighty per cent (24/30) of patients became normocalcaemic. The response was associated with a significant decrease in fasting urinary calcium excretion, and no change in renal function, as judged by serum creatinine. The same dose of clodronate, given as 5 daily infusions, induced a comparable decrease in serum calcium, but was less rapid in onset so that at day 3 the serum calcium was significantly lower with the single infusion (P = 0.02). The calcium lowering effect of both regimens depended on the tumour type. We conclude that the single infusion of 1500 mg clodronate is as effective in reducing serum calcium as the same dose given over 5 days. The single infusion has a more rapid onset of effect, is more convenient than multiple infusions, and has no adverse effect on renal function.