17 beta-estradiol increases calcium content in fetal mouse parietal bones cultured in serum-free medium only at physiological concentrations

Effects of Estrogen Replacement on Bone Geometry and Microarchitecture in Adolescent and Young Adult Oligoamenorrheic Athletes: A Randomized Trial

Oligoamenorrheic athletes (OAs) have lower bone mineral density (BMD) and greater impairment of bone microarchitecture, and therefore higher fracture rates compared to eumenorrheic athletes. Although improvements in areal BMD (aBMD; measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) in OAs have been demonstrated with transdermal estrogen treatment, effects of such treatment on bone microarchitecture are unknown. Here we explore effects of transdermal versus oral estrogen versus no estrogen on bone microarchitecture in OA. Seventy-five OAs (ages 14 to 25 years) were randomized to (i) a 100-μg 17β-estradiol transdermal patch (PATCH) administered continuously with 200 mg cyclic oral micronized progesterone; (ii) a combined 30 μg ethinyl estradiol and 0.15 mg desogestrel pill (PILL); or (iii) no estrogen/progesterone (NONE) and were followed for 12 months. Calcium (≥1200 mg) and vitamin D (800 IU) supplements were provided to all. Bone microarchitecture was assessed using high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT at the distal tibia and radius at baseline and 1 year. At baseline, randomization groups did not differ by age, body mass index, percent body fat, duration of amenorrhea, vitamin D levels, BMD, or bone microarchitecture measurements. After 1 year of treatment, at the distal tibia there were significantly greater increases in total and trabecular volumetric BMD (vBMD), cortical area and thickness, and trabecular number in the PATCH versus PILL groups. Trabecular area decreased significantly in the PATCH group versus the PILL and NONE groups. Less robust differences between groups were seen at the distal radius, where percent change in cortical area and thickness was significantly greater in the PATCH versus PILL and NONE groups, and changes in cortical vBMD were significantly greater in the PATCH versus PILL groups. In conclusion, in young OAs, bone structural parameters show greater improvement after 1 year of treatment with transdermal 17β-estradiol versus ethinyl estradiol-containing pills, particularly at the tibia. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

The effects of fulvestrant, an estrogen receptor antagonist, on the proliferation, differentiation and mineralization of osteoprecursor cells

Fulvestrant is a novel type of endocrine treatment and is considered to be a potent inhibitor of breast cancer cell proliferation. Fulvestrant is reported to work by downregulating as well as degrading the estrogen receptor, leading to an inhibition of estrogen signaling through the estrogen receptor. The effects of various doses of fulvestrant for bone cells have not yet been fully investigated. In the present study, the effects of fulvestrant on osteoprecursor cells were evaluated. The effect on cell viability was determined using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and protein measurement. Differentiation and mineralization were examined using an alkaline phosphatase activity (ALP) test and Alizarin red S staining. The protein expression of osteocalcin was evaluated using western blot analysis. Cultures grown in the presence of fulvestrant at concentrations of 0.1-10 µM did not show any significant change in cell proliferation. Cultures grown in the presence of fulvestrant showed a dose-dependent reduction in ALP activity, however, statistically significant differences were not achieved. Cultures grown in the presence of fulvestrant presented with a dose-dependent reduction in mineralization with a statistically significant difference at the 10 µM concentration. The use of fulvestrant may produce negative effects on the mineralization of osteoprecursor cells, while long-term use of fulvestrant may have detrimental effects on osteoblastic activity.

Hormesis and Female Sex Hormones

Hormone replacement after menopause has in recent years been the subject of intense scientific debate and public interest and has sparked intense research efforts into the biological effects of estrogens and progestagens. However, there are reasons to believe that the doses used and plasma concentrations produced in a large number of studies casts doubt on important aspects of their validity. The concept of hormesis states that a substance can have diametrically different effects depending on the concentration. Even though estrogens and progestagens have proven prone to this kind of dose-response relation in a multitude of studies, the phenomenon remains clearly underappreciated as exemplified by the fact that it is common practice to only use one hormone dose in animal experiments. If care is not taken to adjust the concentrations of estrogens and progestagens to relevant biological conditions, the significance of the results may be questionable. Our aim is to review examples of female sexual steroids demonstrating bidirectional dose-response relations and to discuss this in the perspective of hormesis. Some examples are highlighted in detail, including the effects on cerebral ischemia, inflammation, cardiovascular diseases and anxiety. Hopefully, better understanding of the hormesis phenomenon may result in improved future designs of studies of female sexual steroids.

In vitro evaluation of the direct effect of estradiol on human osteoblasts (HOB) and human mesenchymal stem cells (h-MSCs)

Estrogen may increase the proliferation of osteoblasts depending upon their differentiation stage. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that estradiol could stimulate the proliferation of primary human osteoblast (HOB) cells or human mesenchymal stem cells (h-MSCs). To test this hypothesis, we investigated two synthetic estradiol preparations: (a) a commercially available one (in clinical use) whose effect was evaluated using MTT assay, trypan blue cell counts and total protein assays; (b) a novel synthetic preparation (not in clinical use) using Alamar Blue assays and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Commercial estradiol increased HOB proliferation in a concentration-dependant manner between 1 nM and 8 nM reaching significance at a concentration of 8 nM (p<0.001). Small doses of 1 nM and 2 nM increased h-MSC proliferation (p<0.001) but higher doses had no effect. All novel synthetic estradiol preparations decreased HOB proliferation (p<0.001) whereas no direct effect was observed on h-MSCs. Commercial estradiol appears to induce proliferation of HOBs, although its effects on h-MSCs appears to be highly dose-dependent and requires further investigation.

Fulvestrant: a review of its use in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women with disease progression following antiestrogen therapy

Fulvestrant (Faslodex) is a novel estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist that competitively binds to the ER with a much greater affinity than that of tamoxifen. The downregulation of cellular levels of the ER protein results in complete abrogation of estrogen-sensitive gene transcription. This distinct mechanism of action ensures a lack of cross resistance with other hormonal agents and, in contrast to tamoxifen, fulvestrant has no known estrogen-agonist effects. Fulvestrant is administered via monthly intramuscular injections (250mg) and is recommended for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women with disease progression following antiestrogen therapy. The efficacy of fulvestrant was similar to that of the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole (1 mg/day) in two, well designed studies in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer that had progressed during prior antiestrogen therapy. Time to disease progression (primary endpoint) and treatment failure, rates of objective response and clinical benefit, overall survival and quality of life were similar in patients treated with fulvestrant or anastrozole. In retrospective noninferiority analyses, fulvestrant was at least as effective as anastrozole in all randomised patients, and in those with or without visceral metastases. Fulvestrant is generally well tolerated and was tolerated as well as anastrozole in clinical trials. Treatment-related adverse events were mostly mild to moderate and led to treatment withdrawal in about 1% of patients who received fulvestrant or anastrozole. The main adverse effects associated with therapy are nausea, asthenia, pain, vasodilation and headache.In conclusion, monthly intramuscular injections of fulvestrant are at least as effective and as well tolerated as oral anastrozole once daily in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer that has progressed on prior antiestrogen therapy. Because of a different mode of action to that of other hormonal agents, fulvestrant is effective in the treatment of tamoxifen-resistant disease and, unlike tamoxifen, has no known estrogen agonist effects. Thus, fulvestrant provides an effective and well tolerated option for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women with disease progression following antiestrogen therapy.

Fulvestrant (Faslodex): current status in the therapy of breast cancer

Fulvestrant (Faslodex, formerly ICI 182,780) is a potent steroidal antiestrogen that mediates its effects by estrogen receptor downregulation. It appears to act as a pure antiestrogen and exhibits none of the negative side effects associated with the partial agonist activity of tamoxifen. It has been shown to be as effective as the oral aromatase inhibitor anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who have progressed on prior endocrine therapy, principally tamoxifen. It therefore provides the clinician with an alternative therapeutic strategy following the development of tamoxifen resistance. Fulvestrant might also have potential as a follow-on therapy after tamoxifen in an adjuvant setting and help alleviate some of the concerns surrounding long-term (up to 5 years) tamoxifen therapy.

Fulvestrant

Fulvestrant is a 7alpha-alkylsulphinyl analogue of estradiol that competes with endogenous estrogen for binding to the estrogen receptor. Once bound to the receptor, fulvestrant attenuates receptor dimerisation, effecting a rapid degradation of the estrogen receptor protein and inhibition of transcription. Fulvestrant is a potent inhibitor of the growth of human breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. It has demonstrated pure anti-estrogenic activity in animal systems. Intramuscular fulvestrant 250 mg once a month was as effective as the oral aromatase inhibitor anastrozole 1 mg/day in 2 phase III trials in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who had received prior endocrine therapy. Median time to disease progression (the primary end-point) with fulvestrant and anastrozole was 5.4 and 3.4 months (North American trial) and 5.5 and 5.1 months (European trial). The median duration of response was 19.3 and 10.5 months (North American trial) and 14.3 and 14.0 months (European trial). The most common adverse events with fulvestrant are gastrointestinal disturbances and hot flushes. Fulvestrant showed similar tolerability to anastrozole in 2 phase III trials.

Estrogen and related compounds: biphasic dose responses

This article documents and quantitatively assesses the capacity of estrogen, phytoestrogens, and antiestrogens to affect biphasic dose-response relationships in animal/human models and across a broad range of cell types, affecting multiple endpoints. The range of endpoints displaying such biphasic dose responses includes plasminogen activation, oxytocin secretion, angiogenesis, cell proliferation, bone growth, monocyte chemotaxis, secretion of various cytokines, and other effects. The quantitative features of the dose response relationships revealed that the magnitude of the stimulatory responses was typically less than twofold, whereas the stimulatory responses were markedly variable ranging from about 5- to 10(6)-fold. Mechanistic explanations of the biphasic responses are addressed.

Selective estrogen receptor modulators: Women's panacea for the next millennium?

The purpose of this review is to assimilate relevant experimental and clinical information available on selective estrogen receptor modulators with respect to their potential use as agents to improve women's health in the postmenopausal years. In addition, the mechanisms of action of these drugs are outlined. Selective estrogen receptor modulators represent an exciting group of antiestrogens that possess agonist action on bone, lipids, and lipoproteins and antagonistic action in the endometrium and breast. Thus in theory these drugs may preserve bone density and reduce the risk of osteoporotic fracture and coronary heart disease at the same time that they lower the incidences of breast and endometrial neoplasms. Short-term data with the use of raloxifene suggest that bone is preserved and lipid profiles are less atherogenic. Long-term studies are needed to determine whether raloxifene or other selective estrogen receptor modulators are associated with any decrease in the risk of breast or endometrial cancer.

Saccharated ferric oxide (SFO)-induced osteomalacia: in vitro inhibition by SFO of bone formation and 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D production in renal tubules

A 60-year-old man with portal hypertensive gastropathy due to type C liver cirrhosis developed severe bone pains, marked hypophosphatemia with inappropriately increased urinary excretion of phosphate (%TRP; 9.6%), and hyperalkaline phosphatasia, after intravenous administration of saccharated ferric oxide (SFO) at a dose of 80-240 mg/week over a period of more than 5 years. The total iron infused was estimated to be more than 25 g. On a diagnosis of SFO-induced osteomalacia, the infusion of iron was immediately discontinued, and phosphate and vitamin D2 (1000 IU/day) were administered. Serum levels of 25-OHD2 increased after 1 week, whereas levels of 1,25-(OH)2D2 did not increase until 3 months later, accompanied by improvement of renal tubular reabsorption of phosphate and gradual improvement of the bone pains. The patient has been doing well for the last 2 years, with normal serum levels of phosphate, calcium, and alkaline phosphatase, without any supplementation of phosphate, vitamin D, or iron-containing agents. In primary culture of neonatal mouse renal tubules, in which 1,25-(OH)2D3 was produced from 25-OHD3 in response to PTH, SFO significantly inhibited PTH-induced production of 1,25-(OH)2D3 at 30 mumol/L, which is attainable in the urine of patients receiving a therapeutic intravenous dose of SFO. Furthermore, SFO decreased the calcium content and inhibited 45Ca incorporation in cultured fetal mouse parietal bones at 3 mumol/L. Such SFO concentration may be transiently observed in the plasma of patients receiving excessive intravenous doses of SFO for a prolonged period. These in vitro findings together with the clinical observations suggest that SFO, after filtration through the glomerulus and reabsorption in the proximal renal tubules, impaired proximal renal tubular function, such as tubular reabsorption of phosphate and 1 alpha-hydroxylase activity, leading to hypophosphatemic osteomalacia. Furthermore, it is highly likely that SFO in the peripheral blood, when transferrin is saturated with iron, may impair bone formation and aggravate osteomalacia. Although SFO-induced osteomalacia is reversible simply by discontinuation of the agent, excessive and prolonged administration of SFO should be avoided.