Multiscale computational methods for mapping conformational ensembles of G-protein-coupled receptors

Activation Microswitches in Adenosine Receptor A2A Function as Rheostats in the Cell Membrane

Although multiple components of the cell membrane modulate the stability and activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), insights into the dynamics of GPCR structures come from biophysical studies conducted in detergents. This is because of the challenges of studying activation in a multicomponent lipid bilayer. To understand the role of cellular membrane lipids and cations in GPCR activation, we performed multiscale molecular dynamics simulations (56 μs) on three different conformational states of adenosine receptor A2AR, in both the cell membrane-like lipid bilayer and in detergent micelles. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations show that the phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate (PIP2) interacts with the basic residues in the intracellular regions of A2AR, thereby reducing the flexibility of the receptor in the inactive state and limiting the transition to the active-intermediate state. In the G protein-coupled fully active state, PIP2 stabilizes the GPCR:G protein complex. Such stiffening effects are absent in non-ionic detergent micelles, and therefore, more transitions have been observed in detergents. The inter-residue distances that change significantly upon GPCR activation are known as activation microswitches. The activation microswitches show different levels of activation in the cell membrane, in the pure POPC bilayer, and in detergents. Thus, the temporal heat map of different activation microswitches calculated from the MD simulations suggests a rheostat model of GPCR activation microswitches rather than the binary switch model. These simulation results connect the chemistry of cell membrane lipids to receptor activity, which is useful for the design of detergents mimicking the cell membrane.

Protein Ensembles: How Does Nature Harness Thermodynamic Fluctuations for Life? The Diverse Functional Roles of Conformational Ensembles in the Cell

All soluble proteins populate conformational ensembles that together constitute the native state. Their fluctuations in water are intrinsic thermodynamic phenomena, and the distributions of the states on the energy landscape are determined by statistical thermodynamics; however, they are optimized to perform their biological functions. In this review we briefly describe advances in free energy landscape studies of protein conformational ensembles. Experimental (nuclear magnetic resonance, small-angle X-ray scattering, single-molecule spectroscopy, and cryo-electron microscopy) and computational (replica-exchange molecular dynamics, metadynamics, and Markov state models) approaches have made great progress in recent years. These address the challenging characterization of the highly flexible and heterogeneous protein ensembles. We focus on structural aspects of protein conformational distributions, from collective motions of single- and multi-domain proteins, intrinsically disordered proteins, to multiprotein complexes. Importantly, we highlight recent studies that illustrate functional adjustment of protein conformational ensembles in the crowded cellular environment. We center on the role of the ensemble in recognition of small- and macro-molecules (protein and RNA/DNA) and emphasize emerging concepts of protein dynamics in enzyme catalysis. Overall, protein ensembles link fundamental physicochemical principles and protein behavior and the cellular network and its regulation.

Structure and dynamics of G-protein coupled receptors

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are seven helical transmembrane proteins that mediate cell-to-cell communication. They also form the largest superfamily of drug targets. Hence detailed studies of the three dimensional structure and dynamics are critical to understanding the functional role of GPCRs in signal transduction pathways, and for drug design. In this chapter we compare the features of the crystal structures of various biogenic amine receptors, such as β1 and β2 adrenergic receptors, dopamine D3 receptor, M2 and M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. This analysis revealed that conserved residues are located facing the inside of the transmembrane domain in these GPCRs improving the efficiency of packing of these structures. The NMR structure of the chemokine receptor CXCR1 without any ligand bound, shows significant dynamics of the transmembrane domain, especially the helical kink angle on the transmembrane helix6. The activation mechanism of the β2-adrenergic receptor has been studied using multiscale computational methods. The results of these studies showed that the receptor without any ligand bound, samples conformations that resemble some of the structural characteristics of the active state of the receptor. Ligand binding stabilizes some of the conformations already sampled by the apo receptor. This was later observed in the NMR study of the dynamics of human β2-adrenergic receptor. The dynamic nature of GPCRs leads to a challenge in obtaining purified receptors for biophysical studies. Deriving thermostable mutants of GPCRs has been a successful strategy to reduce the conformational heterogeneity and stabilize the receptors. This has lead to several crystal structures of GPCRs. However, the cause of how these mutations lead to thermostability is not clear. Computational studies are beginning to shed some insight into the possible structural basis for the thermostability. Molecular Dynamics simulations studying the conformational ensemble of thermostable mutants have shown that the stability could arise from both enthalpic and entropic factors. There are regions of high stress in the wild type GPCR that gets relieved upon mutation conferring thermostability.