Conformational changes of DEAD-box helicases monitored by single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer

The domains of yeast eIF4G, eIF4E and the cap fine-tune eIF4A activities through an intricate network of stimulatory and inhibitory effects

Translation initiation in eukaryotes starts with the recognition of the mRNA 5'-cap by eIF4F, a hetero-trimeric complex of eIF4E, the cap-binding protein, eIF4A, a DEAD-box helicase, and eIF4G, a scaffold protein. eIF4G comprises eIF4E- and eIF4A-binding domains (4E-BD, 4A-BD) and three RNA-binding regions (RNA1-RNA3), and interacts with eIF4A, eIF4E, and with the mRNA. Within the eIF4F complex, the helicase activity of eIF4A is increased. We showed previously that RNA3 of eIF4G is important for the stimulation of the eIF4A conformational cycle and its ATPase and helicase activities. Here, we dissect the interplay between the eIF4G domains and the role of the eIF4E/cap interaction in eIF4A activation. We show that RNA2 leads to an increase in the fraction of eIF4A in the closed state, an increased RNA affinity, and faster RNA unwinding. This stimulatory effect is partially reduced when the 4E-BD is present. eIF4E binding to the 4E-BD then further inhibits the helicase activity and closing of eIF4A, but does not affect the RNA-stimulated ATPase activity of eIF4A. The 5'-cap renders the functional interaction of mRNA with eIF4A less efficient. Overall, the activity of eIF4A at the 5'-cap is thus fine-tuned by a delicately balanced network of stimulatory and inhibitory interactions.

Measuring the impact of cofactors on RNA helicase activities

RNA helicases are the largest class of enzymes in eukaryotic RNA metabolism. In cells, protein cofactors regulate RNA helicase functions and impact biochemical helicase activities. Understanding how cofactors affect enzymatic activities of RNA helicases is thus critical for delineating physical roles and regulation of RNA helicases in cells. Here, we discuss approaches and conceptual considerations for the design of experiments to interrogate cofactor effects on RNA helicase activities in vitro. We outline the mechanistic frame for helicase reactions, discuss optimization of experimental setup and reaction parameters for measuring cofactor effects on RNA helicase activities, and provide basic guides to data analysis and interpretation. The described approaches are also instructive for determining the impact of small molecule inhibitors of RNA helicases.

Determination of rate constants for conformational changes of RNA helicases by single-molecule FRET TIRF microscopy

RNA helicases couple nucleotide-driven conformational changes to the unwinding of RNA duplexes. Interaction partners can regulate helicase activity by altering the rate constants of these conformational changes. Single-molecule FRET experiments on donor/acceptor-labeled, immobilized molecules are ideally suited to monitor conformational changes in real time and to extract rate constants for these processes. This article provides guidance on how to design, perform, and analyze single-molecule FRET experiments by TIRF microscopy. It covers the theoretical background of FRET and single-molecule TIRF microscopy, the considerations to prepare proteins of interest for donor/acceptor labeling and surface immobilization, and the principles and procedures of data analysis, including image analysis and the determination of FRET time traces, the extraction of rate constants from FRET time traces, and the general conclusions that can be drawn from these data. A case study, using the DEAD-box protein eIF4A as an example, highlights how single-molecule FRET studies have been instrumental in understanding the role of conformational changes for duplex unwinding and for the regulation of helicase activities. Selected examples illustrate which conclusions can be drawn from the kinetic data obtained, highlight possible pitfalls in data analysis and interpretation, and outline how kinetic models can be related to functionally relevant states.

DEAD-box RNA Helicase DDX3: Functional Properties and Development of DDX3 Inhibitors as Antiviral and Anticancer Drugs

This short review is focused on enzymatic properties of human ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX3 and the development of antiviral and anticancer drugs targeting cellular helicases. DDX3 belongs to the DEAD-box proteins, a large family of RNA helicases that participate in all aspects of cellular processes, such as cell cycle progression, apoptosis, innate immune response, viral replication, and tumorigenesis. DDX3 has a variety of functions in the life cycle of different viruses. DDX3 helicase is required to facilitate both the Rev-mediated export of unspliced/partially spliced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA from nucleus and Tat-dependent translation of viral genes. DDX3 silencing blocks the replication of HIV, HCV, and some other viruses. On the other hand, DDX displays antiviral effect against Dengue virus and hepatitis B virus through the stimulation of interferon beta production. The role of DDX3 in different types of cancer is rather controversial. DDX3 acts as an oncogene in one type of cancer, but demonstrates tumor suppressor properties in other types. The human DDX3 helicase is now considered as a new attractive target for the development of novel pharmaceutical drugs. The most interesting inhibitors of DDX3 helicase and the mechanisms of their actions as antiviral or anticancer drugs are discussed in this short review.

Approaches for measuring the dynamics of RNA-protein interactions

RNA-protein interactions are pivotal for the regulation of gene expression from bacteria to human. RNA-protein interactions are dynamic; they change over biologically relevant timescales. Understanding the regulation of gene expression at the RNA level therefore requires knowledge of the dynamics of RNA-protein interactions. Here, we discuss the main experimental approaches to measure dynamic aspects of RNA-protein interactions. We cover techniques that assess dynamics of cellular RNA-protein interactions that accompany biological processes over timescales of hours or longer and techniques measuring the kinetic dynamics of RNA-protein interactions in vitro. This article is categorized under: RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein-RNA Interactions: Functional Implications RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein-RNA Recognition RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > RNA-Protein Complexes RNA Evolution and Genomics > Ribonomics.

Single-stranded regions modulate conformational dynamics and ATPase activity of eIF4A to optimize 5'-UTR unwinding

Eukaryotic translation initiation requires unwinding of secondary structures in the 5′-untranslated region of mRNA. The DEAD-box helicase eIF4A is thought to unwind structural elements in the 5′-UTR in conjunction with eIF4G and eIF4B. Both factors jointly stimulate eIF4A activities by modulation of eIF4A conformational cycling between open and closed states. Here we examine how RNA substrates modulate eIF4A activities. The RNAs fall into two classes: Short RNAs only partially stimulate the eIF4A ATPase activity, and closing is rate-limiting for the conformational cycle. By contrast, longer RNAs maximally stimulate ATP hydrolysis and promote closing of eIF4A. Strikingly, the rate constants of unwinding do not correlate with the length of a single-stranded region preceding a duplex, but reach a maximum for RNA with a single-stranded region of six nucleotides. We propose a model in which RNA substrates affect eIF4A activities by modulating the kinetic partitioning of eIF4A between futile, unproductive, and productive cycles.

The role of DEAD-box RNA helicase p68 (DDX5) in the development and treatment of breast cancer

RNA helicase p68 or DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 5 (DDX5) is a unique member of the highly conserved protein family, which is involved in a broad spectrum of biological processes, including transcription, translation, precursor messenger RNA processing or alternative splicing, and microRNA (miRNA) processing. It has been shown that p68 is necessary for cell growth and participates in the early development and maturation of some organs. Interestingly, p68 is a transcriptional coactivator of numerous oncogenic transcription factors, including nuclear factor-κβ (NF-κβ), estrogen receptor α (ERα), β-catenin, androgen receptor, Notch transcriptional activation complex, p53 and signal transducer, and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3). Recent studies on the role of p68 (DDX5) in multiple dysregulated cellular processes in various cancers and its abnormal expression indicate the importance of this factor in tumor development. Discussion of the precise role of p68 in cancer is complex and depends on the cellular microenvironment and interacting factors. In terms of the deregulated expression of p68 in breast cancer and the high prevalence of this cancer among women, it can be informative to review the precise function of this factor in the breast cancer. Therefore, an attempt will be made in this review to clarify the tumorigenic function of p68 in association with its targeting potential for the treatment of breast cancer.

Allosteric regulation of helicase core activities of the DEAD-box helicase YxiN by RNA binding to its RNA recognition motif

DEAD-box proteins share a structurally similar core of two RecA-like domains (RecA_N and RecA_C) that contain the conserved motifs for ATP-dependent RNA unwinding. In many DEAD-box proteins the helicase core is flanked by ancillary domains. To understand the regulation of the DEAD-box helicase YxiN by its C-terminal RNA recognition motif (RRM), we investigated the effect of RNA binding to the RRM on its position relative to the core, and on core activities. RRM/RNA complex formation substantially shifts the RRM from a position close to the RecA_C to the proximity of RecA_N, independent of RNA contacts with the core. RNA binding to the RRM is communicated to the core, and stimulates ATP hydrolysis and RNA unwinding. The conformational space of the core depends on the identity of the RRM-bound RNA. Allosteric regulation of core activities by RNA-induced movement of ancillary domains may constitute a general regulatory mechanism of DEAD-box protein activity.

eIF4B stimulates eIF4A ATPase and unwinding activities by direct interaction through its 7-repeats region

Eukaryotic translation initiation starts with binding of the eIF4F complex to the 5'-m⁷G cap of the mRNA. Recruitment of the 43S pre-initiation complex (PIC), formed by the 40S ribosomal subunit and other translation initiation factors, leads to formation of the 48S PIC that then scans the 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) toward the start codon. The eIF4F complex consists of eIF4E, the cap binding protein, eIF4A, a DEAD-box RNA helicase that is believed to unwind secondary structures in the 5'-UTR during scanning, and eIF4G, a scaffold protein that binds to both eIF4E and eIF4A. The ATPase and helicase activities of eIF4A are jointly stimulated by eIF4G and the translation initiation factor eIF4B. Yeast eIF4B mediates recruitment of the 43S PIC to the cap-bound eIF4F complex by interacting with the 40S subunit and possibly with eIF4A. However, a direct interaction between yeast eIF4A and eIF4B has not been demonstrated yet. Here we show that eIF4B binds to eIF4A in the presence of RNA and ADPNP, independent of the presence of eIF4G. A stretch of seven moderately conserved repeats, the r1-7 region, is responsible for complex formation, for modulation of the conformational energy landscape of eIF4A by eIF4B, and for stimulating the RNA-dependent ATPase- and ATP-dependent RNA unwinding activities of eIF4A. The isolated r1-7 region only slightly stimulates eIF4A conformational changes and activities, suggesting that communication of the repeats with other regions of eIF4B is required for full stimulation of eIF4A activity, for recruitment of the PIC to the mRNA and for translation initiation.

DNA gyrase with a single catalytic tyrosine can catalyze DNA supercoiling by a nicking-closing mechanism

The topological state of DNA is important for replication, recombination and transcription, and is regulated in vivo by DNA topoisomerases. Gyrase introduces negative supercoils into DNA at the expense of ATP hydrolysis. It is the accepted view that gyrase achieves supercoiling by a strand passage mechanism, in which double-stranded DNA is cleaved, and a second double-stranded segment is passed through the gap, converting a positive DNA node into a negative node. We show here that gyrase with only one catalytic tyrosine that cleaves a single strand of its DNA substrate can catalyze DNA supercoiling without strand passage. We propose an alternative mechanism for DNA supercoiling via nicking and closing of DNA that involves trapping, segregation and relaxation of two positive supercoils. In contrast to DNA supercoiling, ATP-dependent relaxation and decatenation of DNA by gyrase lacking the C-terminal domains require both tyrosines and strand passage. Our results point towards mechanistic plasticity of gyrase and might pave the way for finding novel and specific mechanism-based gyrase inhibitors.

Recent adaptations of fluorescence techniques for the determination of mechanistic parameters of helicases and translocases

Helicases and translocases are nucleic acid (NA)-based molecular motors that use the free energy liberated during the nucleoside triphosphate (NTP, usually ATP) hydrolysis cycle for unidirectional translocation along their NA (DNA, RNA or heteroduplex) substrates. Determination of the kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of their mechanoenzymatic cycle serves as a basis for the exploration of their physiological behavior and various cellular functions. Here we describe how recent adaptations of fluorescence-based solution kinetic methods can be used to determine practically all important mechanistic parameters of NA-based motor proteins. We outline practically useful analysis procedures for equilibrium, steady-state and transient kinetic data. This analysis can be used to quantitatively characterize the enzymatic steps of the NTP hydrolytic cycle, the binding site size, stoichiometry and energetics of protein-NA interactions, the rate and processivity of translocation along and unwinding of NA strands, and the mechanochemical coupling between these processes. The described methods yield insights into the functional role of the enzymes, and also greatly aid the design and interpretation of single-molecule experiments as well as the engineering of enzymatic properties for biotechnological applications.

Comparative Evolution of Duplicated Ddx3 Genes in Teleosts: Insights from Japanese Flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus

Following the two rounds of whole-genome duplication that occurred during deuterostome evolution, a third genome duplication event occurred in the stem lineage of ray-finned fishes. This teleost-specific genome duplication is thought to be responsible for the biological diversification of ray-finned fishes. DEAD-box polypeptide 3 (DDX3) belongs to the DEAD-box RNA helicase family. Although their functions in humans have been well studied, limited information is available regarding their function in teleosts. In this study, two teleost Ddx3 genes were first identified in the transcriptome of Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). We confirmed that the two genes originated from teleost-specific genome duplication through synteny and phylogenetic analysis. Additionally, comparative analysis of genome structure, molecular evolution rate, and expression pattern of the two genes in Japanese flounder revealed evidence of subfunctionalization of the duplicated Ddx3 genes in teleosts. Thus, the results of this study reveal novel insights into the evolution of the teleost Ddx3 genes and constitute important groundwork for further research on this gene family.

Fluorescence methods in the investigation of the DEAD-box helicase mechanism

DEAD-box proteins catalyze the ATP-dependent unwinding of RNA duplexes and accompany RNA molecules throughout their cellular life. Conformational changes in the helicase core of DEAD-box proteins are intimately linked to duplex unwinding. In the absence of ligands, the two RecA domains of the helicase core are separated. ATP and RNA binding induces a closure of the cleft between the RecA domains that is coupled to the distortion of bound RNA, leading to duplex destabilization and dissociation of one RNA strand. Reopening of the helicase core occurs after ATP hydrolysis and is coupled to phosphate release and dissociation of the second RNA strand.Fluorescence spectroscopy provides an array of approaches to study intermolecular interactions, local structural rearrangements, or large conformational changes of biomolecules. The fluorescence intensity of a fluorophore reports on its environment, and fluorescence anisotropy reflects the size of the molecular entity the fluorophore is part of. Fluorescence intensity and anisotropy are therefore sensitive probes to report on binding and dissociation events. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) reports on the distance between two fluorophores and thus on conformational changes. Single-molecule FRET experiments reveal the distribution of conformational states and the kinetics of their interconversion. This chapter summarizes fluorescence approaches for monitoring individual aspects of DEAD-box protein activity, from nucleotide and RNA binding and RNA unwinding to protein and RNA conformational changes in the catalytic cycle, and illustrates exemplarily how fluorescence-based methods have contributed to understanding the mechanism of DEAD-box helicase-catalyzed RNA unwinding.

P68 RNA helicase as a molecular target for cancer therapy

The DEAD-box family of RNA helicase is known to be required in virtually all cellular processes involving RNA, and p68 is a prototypic one of the family. Reports have indicated that in addition to ATPase and RNA helicase ability, p68 can also function as a co-activator for transcription factors such as estrogen receptor alpha, tumor suppressor p53 and beta-catenin. More than that, post-translational modification of p68 including phosphorylation, acetylation, sumoylation, and ubiquitylation can regulate the coactivation effect. Furthermore, aberrant expression of p68 in cancers highlights that p68 plays an important role for tumorgenesis and development. In this review, we briefly introduce the function and modulation of p68 in cancer cells, and put forward envisagement about future study about p68.

DEAD-box RNA helicase domains exhibit a continuum between complete functional independence and high thermodynamic coupling in nucleotide and RNA duplex recognition

DEAD-box helicases catalyze the non-processive unwinding of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) at the expense of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis. Nucleotide and RNA binding and unwinding are mediated by the RecA domains of the helicase core, but their cooperation in these processes remains poorly understood. We therefore investigated dsRNA and nucleotide binding by the helicase cores and the isolated N- and C-terminal RecA domains (RecA_N, RecA_C) of the DEAD-box proteins Hera and YxiN by steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence methods. Both helicases bind nucleotides predominantly via RecA_N, in agreement with previous studies on Mss116, and with a universal, modular function of RecA_N in nucleotide recognition. In contrast, dsRNA recognition is different: Hera interacts with dsRNA in the absence of nucleotide, involving both RecA domains, whereas for YxiN neither RecA_N nor RecA_C binds dsRNA, and the complete core only interacts with dsRNA after nucleotide has been bound. DEAD-box proteins thus cover a continuum from complete functional independence of their domains, exemplified by Mss116, to various degrees of inter-domain cooperation in dsRNA binding. The different degrees of domain communication and of thermodynamic linkage between dsRNA and nucleotide binding have important implications on the mechanism of dsRNA unwinding, and may help direct RNA helicases to their respective cellular processes.

Reverse gyrase--recent advances and current mechanistic understanding of positive DNA supercoiling

Reverse gyrases are topoisomerases that introduce positive supercoils into DNA in an ATP-dependent reaction. They consist of a helicase domain and a topoisomerase domain that closely cooperate in catalysis. The mechanism of the functional cooperation of these domains has remained elusive. Recent studies have shown that the helicase domain is a nucleotide-regulated conformational switch that alternates between an open conformation with a low affinity for double-stranded DNA, and a closed state with a high double-stranded DNA affinity. The conformational cycle leads to transient separation of DNA duplexes by the helicase domain. Reverse gyrase-specific insertions in the helicase module are involved in binding to single-stranded DNA regions, DNA unwinding and supercoiling. Biochemical and structural data suggest that DNA processing by reverse gyrase is not based on sequential action of the helicase and topoisomerase domains, but rather the result of an intricate cooperation of both domains at all stages of the reaction. This review summarizes the recent advances of our understanding of the reverse gyrase mechanism. We put forward and discuss a refined, yet simple model in which reverse gyrase directs strand passage toward increasing linking numbers and positive supercoiling by controlling the conformation of a bound DNA bubble.

Reprint of "The mechanism of negative DNA supercoiling: a cascade of DNA-induced conformational changes prepares gyrase for strand passage"

DNA topoisomerases inter-convert different DNA topoisomers in the cell. They catalyze the introduction or relaxation of DNA supercoils, as well as catenation and decatenation. Members of the type I topoisomerase family cleave a single strand of their double-stranded DNA substrate, whereas enzymes of the type II family cleave both DNA strands. Bacterial DNA gyrase, a type II topoisomerase, catalyzes the introduction of negative supercoils into DNA in an ATP-dependent reaction. Gyrase is not present in humans, and constitutes an attractive drug target for the treatment of bacterial and parasite infections. DNA supercoiling by gyrase is believed to occur by a strand passage mechanism, in which one segment of the double-stranded DNA substrate is passed through a (transient) break in a second segment. This mechanism requires the coordinated opening and closing of three protein interfaces, so-called gates, to ensure the directionality of strand passage toward negative supercoiling. Single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments are ideally suited to investigate conformational changes during the catalytic cycle of DNA topoisomerases. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the cascade of DNA- and nucleotide-induced conformational changes in gyrase that lead to strand passage and negative supercoiling of DNA. We discuss how these conformational changes couple ATP hydrolysis to DNA supercoiling in gyrase, and how the common mechanistic principle of coordinated gate opening and closing is modulated to allow for the catalysis of different reactions by different type II topoisomerases.

Single-molecule kinetics of the eukaryotic initiation factor 4AI upon RNA unwinding

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4AI (eIF4AI) is the prototypical DEAD-box RNA helicase. It has a "dumbbell" structure consisting of two domains connected by a flexible linker. Previous studies demonstrated that eIF4AI, in conjunction with eIF4H, bind to loop structures and repetitively unwind RNA hairpins. Here, we probe the conformational dynamics of eIF4AI in real time using single-molecule FRET. We demonstrate that eIF4AI/eIF4H complex can repetitively unwind RNA hairpins by transitioning between an eIF4AI "open" and a "closed" conformation using the energy derived from ATP hydrolysis. Our experiments directly track the conformational changes in the catalytic cycle of eIF4AI and eIF4H, and this correlates precisely with the kinetics of RNA unwinding. Furthermore, we show that the small-molecule eIF4A inhibitor hippuristanol locks eIF4AI in the closed conformation, thus efficiently inhibiting RNA unwinding. These results indicate that the large conformational changes undertaken by eIF4A during the helicase catalytic cycle are rate limiting.

The mechanism of negative DNA supercoiling: a cascade of DNA-induced conformational changes prepares gyrase for strand passage

DNA topoisomerases inter-convert different DNA topoisomers in the cell. They catalyze the introduction or relaxation of DNA supercoils, as well as catenation and decatenation. Members of the type I topoisomerase family cleave a single strand of their double-stranded DNA substrate, whereas enzymes of the type II family cleave both DNA strands. Bacterial DNA gyrase, a type II topoisomerase, catalyzes the introduction of negative supercoils into DNA in an ATP-dependent reaction. Gyrase is not present in humans, and constitutes an attractive drug target for the treatment of bacterial and parasite infections. DNA supercoiling by gyrase is believed to occur by a strand passage mechanism, in which one segment of the double-stranded DNA substrate is passed through a (transient) break in a second segment. This mechanism requires the coordinated opening and closing of three protein interfaces, so-called gates, to ensure the directionality of strand passage toward negative supercoiling. Single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments are ideally suited to investigate conformational changes during the catalytic cycle of DNA topoisomerases. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the cascade of DNA- and nucleotide-induced conformational changes in gyrase that lead to strand passage and negative supercoiling of DNA. We discuss how these conformational changes couple ATP hydrolysis to DNA supercoiling in gyrase, and how the common mechanistic principle of coordinated gate opening and closing is modulated to allow for the catalysis of different reactions by different type II topoisomerases.

The acidic C-terminal tail of the GyrA subunit moderates the DNA supercoiling activity of Bacillus subtilis gyrase

Gyrase is a type II DNA topoisomerase that introduces negative supercoils into DNA in an ATP-dependent reaction. It consists of a topoisomerase core, formed by the N-terminal domains of the two GyrA subunits and by the two GyrB subunits, that catalyzes double-stranded DNA cleavage and passage of a second double-stranded DNA through the gap in the first. The C-terminal domains (CTDs) of the GyrA subunits form a β-pinwheel and bind DNA around their positively charged perimeter. As a result, DNA is bound as a positive supercoil that is converted into a negative supercoil by strand passage. The CTDs contain a conserved 7-amino acid motif that connects blades 1 and 6 of the β-pinwheel and is a hallmark feature of gyrases. Deletion of this so-called GyrA-box abrogates DNA bending by the CTDs and DNA-induced narrowing of the N-gate, affects T-segment presentation, reduces the coupling of DNA binding to ATP hydrolysis, and leads to supercoiling deficiency. Recently, a severe loss of supercoiling activity of Escherichia coli gyrase upon deletion of the non-conserved acidic C-terminal tail (C-tail) of the CTDs has been reported. We show here that, in contrast to E. coli gyrase, the C-tail is a very moderate negative regulator of Bacillus subtilis gyrase activity. The C-tail reduces the degree of DNA bending by the CTDs but has no effect on DNA-induced conformational changes of gyrase that precede strand passage and reduces DNA-stimulated ATPase and DNA supercoiling activities only 2-fold. Our results are in agreement with species-specific, differential regulatory effects of the C-tail in gyrases from different organisms.

Molecular dynamics simulation of the allosteric regulation of eIF4A protein from the open to closed state, induced by ATP and RNA substrates

BACKGROUND

Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A (eIF4A) plays a key role in the process of protein translation initiation by facilitating the melting of the 5' proximal secondary structure of eukaryotic mRNA for ribosomal subunit attachment. It was experimentally postulated that the closed conformation of the eIF4A protein bound by the ATP and RNA substrates is coupled to RNA duplex unwinding to promote protein translation initiation, rather than an open conformation in the absence of ATP and RNA substrates. However, the allosteric process of eIF4A from the open to closed state induced by the ATP and RNA substrates are not yet fully understood.

METHODOLOGY

In the present work, we constructed a series of diplex and ternary models of the eIF4A protein bound by the ATP and RNA substrates to carry out molecular dynamics simulations, free energy calculations and conformation analysis and explore the allosteric properties of eIF4A.

RESULTS

The results showed that the eIF4A protein completes the conformational transition from the open to closed state via two allosteric processes of ATP binding followed by RNA and vice versa. Based on cooperative allosteric network analysis, the ATP binding to the eIF4A protein mainly caused the relative rotation of two domains, while the RNA binding caused the proximity of two domains via the migration of RNA bases in the presence of ATP. The cooperative binding of ATP and RNA for the eIF4A protein plays a key role in the allosteric transition.

eIF4B and eIF4G jointly stimulate eIF4A ATPase and unwinding activities by modulation of the eIF4A conformational cycle

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A (eIF4A) is a DEAD-box protein that participates in translation initiation. As an ATP-dependent RNA helicase, it is thought to resolve secondary structure elements from the 5'-untranslated region of mRNAs to enable ribosome scanning. The RNA-stimulated ATPase and ATP-dependent helicase activities of eIF4A are enhanced by auxiliary proteins, but the underlying mechanisms are still largely unknown. Here, we have dissected the effect of eIF4B and eIF4G on eIF4A RNA-dependent ATPase- and RNA helicase activities and on eIF4A conformation. We show for the first time that yeast eIF4B, like its mammalian counterpart, can stimulate RNA unwinding by eIF4A, although it does not affect the eIF4A conformation. The eIF4G middle domain enhances this stimulatory effect and promotes the formation of a closed eIF4A conformation in the presence of ATP and RNA. The closed state of eIF4A has been inferred but has not been observed experimentally before. eIF4B and eIF4G jointly stimulate ATP hydrolysis and RNA unwinding by eIF4A and favor the formation of the closed eIF4A conformer. Our results reveal distinct functions of eIF4B and eIF4G in synergistically stimulating the eIF4A helicase activity in the mRNA scanning process.

The RNA helicase Ddx5/p68 binds to hUpf3 and enhances NMD of Ddx17/p72 and Smg5 mRNA

Non-sense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) is a mechanism of translation-dependent mRNA surveillance in eukaryotes: it degrades mRNAs with premature termination codons (PTCs) and contributes to cellular homeostasis by downregulating a number of physiologically important mRNAs. In the NMD pathway, Upf proteins, a set of conserved factors of which Upf1 is the central regulator, recruit decay enzymes to promote RNA cleavage. In mammals, the degradation of PTC-containing mRNAs is triggered by the exon–junction complex (EJC) through binding of its constituents Upf2 and Upf3 to Upf1. The complex formed eventually induces translational repression and recruitment of decay enzymes. Mechanisms by which physiological mRNAs are targeted by the NMD machinery in the absence of an EJC have been described but still are discussed controversially. Here, we report that the DEAD box proteins Ddx5/p68 and its paralog Ddx17/p72 also bind the Upf complex by physical interaction with Upf3, thereby interfering with the binding of EJC. By activating the NMD machinery, Ddx5 is shown to regulate the expression of its own, Ddx17 and Smg5 mRNAs. For NMD triggering, the adenosine triphosphate-binding activity of Ddx5 and the 3′-untranslated region of substrate mRNAs are essential.

DEAD-box helicases as integrators of RNA, nucleotide and protein binding

DEAD-box helicases perform diverse cellular functions in virtually all steps of RNA metabolism from Bacteria to Humans. Although DEAD-box helicases share a highly conserved core domain, the enzymes catalyze a wide range of biochemical reactions. In addition to the well established RNA unwinding and corresponding ATPase activities, DEAD-box helicases promote duplex formation and displace proteins from RNA. They can also function as assembly platforms for larger ribonucleoprotein complexes, and as metabolite sensors. This review aims to provide a perspective on the diverse biochemical features of DEAD-box helicases and connections to structural information. We discuss these data in the context of a model that views the enzymes as integrators of RNA, nucleotide, and protein binding. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: The Biology of RNA helicases - Modulation for life.

Helicase-mediated changes in RNA structure at the single-molecule level

RNA helicases are a diverse group of RNA-dependent ATPases known to play a large number of biological roles inside the cell, such as RNA unwinding, remodeling, export and degradation. Understanding how helicases mediate changes in RNA structure is therefore of fundamental interest. The advent of single-molecule spectroscopic techniques has unveiled with unprecedented detail the interplay of RNA helicases with their substrates. In this review, we describe the characterization of helicase-RNA interactions by single-molecule approaches. State-of-the-art techniques are presented, followed by a discussion of recent advancements in this exciting field.

The DEAD-box helicase eIF4A: paradigm or the odd one out?

DEAD-box helicases catalyze the ATP-dependent unwinding of RNA duplexes. They share a helicase core formed by two RecA-like domains that carries a set of conserved motifs contributing to ATP binding and hydrolysis, RNA binding and duplex unwinding. The translation initiation factor eIF4A is the founding member of the DEAD-box protein family, and one of the few examples of DEAD-box proteins that consist of a helicase core only. It is an RNA-stimulated ATPase and a non-processive helicase that unwinds short RNA duplexes. In the catalytic cycle, a series of conformational changes couples the nucleotide cycle to RNA unwinding. eIF4A has been considered a paradigm for DEAD-box proteins, and studies of its function have revealed the governing principles underlying the DEAD-box helicase mechanism. However, as an isolated helicase core, eIF4A is rather the exception, not the rule. Most helicase modules in other DEAD-box proteins are modified, some by insertions into the RecA-like domains, and the majority by N- and C-terminal appendages. While the basic catalytic function resides within the helicase core, its modulation by insertions, additional domains or a network of interaction partners generates the diversity of DEAD-box protein functions in the cell. This review summarizes the current knowledge on eIF4A and its regulation, and discusses to what extent eIF4A serves as a model DEAD-box protein.

The GyrA-box determines the geometry of DNA bound to gyrase and couples DNA binding to the nucleotide cycle

DNA gyrase catalyses the adenosine triphosphate-dependent introduction of negative supercoils into DNA. The enzyme binds a DNA-segment at the so-called DNA-gate and cleaves both DNA strands. DNA extending from the DNA-gate is bound at the perimeter of the cylindrical C-terminal domains (CTDs) of the GyrA subunit. The CTDs are believed to contribute to the wrapping of DNA around gyrase in a positive node as a prerequisite for strand passage towards negative supercoiling. A conserved seven amino acid sequence motif in the CTD, the so-called GyrA-box, has been identified as a hallmark feature of gyrases. Mutations of the GyrA-box abolish supercoiling. We show here that the GyrA-box marginally stabilizes the CTDs. Although it does not contribute to DNA binding, it is required for DNA bending and wrapping, and it determines the geometry of the bound DNA. Mutations of the GyrA-box abrogate a DNA-induced conformational change of the gyrase N-gate and uncouple DNA binding and adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis. Our results implicate the GyrA-box in coordinating DNA binding and the nucleotide cycle.