Immunopharmacology of Lipid A Mimetics

The dangerous liaisons in innate immunity involving recombinant proteins and endotoxins: Examples from the literature and the Leptospira field

Endotoxins, also known as lipopolysaccharides (LPS), are essential components of cell walls of diderm bacteria such as Escherichia coli. LPS are microbe-associated molecular patterns that can activate pattern recognition receptors. While trying to investigate the interactions between proteins and host innate immunity, some studies using recombinant proteins expressed in E. coli reported interaction and activation of immune cells. Here, we set out to provide information on endotoxins that are highly toxic to humans and bind to numerous molecules, including recombinant proteins. We begin by outlining the history of the discovery of endotoxins, their receptors and the associated signaling pathways that confer extreme sensitivity to immune cells, acting alone or in synergy with other microbe-associated molecular patterns. We list the various places where endotoxins have been found. Additionally, we warn against the risk of data misinterpretation due to endotoxin contamination in recombinant proteins, which is difficult to estimate with the Limulus amebocyte lysate assay, and cannot be completely neutralized (e.g., treatment with polymyxin B or heating). We further illustrate our point with examples of recombinant heat-shock proteins and viral proteins from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, dengue and HIV, for which endotoxin contamination has eventually been shown to be responsible for the inflammatory roles previously ascribed. We also critically appraised studies on recombinant Leptospira proteins regarding their putative inflammatory roles. Finally, to avoid these issues, we propose alternatives to express recombinant proteins in nonmicrobial systems. Microbiologists wishing to undertake innate immunity studies with their favorite pathogens should be aware of these difficulties.

Got milk? Maternal immune activation during the mid-lactational period affects nutritional milk quality and adolescent offspring sensory processing in male and female rats

Previous studies have underscored the importance of breastfeeding and parental care on offspring development and behavior. However, their contribution as dynamic variables in animal models of early life stress are often overlooked. In the present study, we investigated how lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced maternal immune activation (MIA) on postnatal day (P)10 affects maternal care, milk, and offspring development. MIA was associated with elevated milk corticosterone concentrations on P10, which recovered by P11. In contrast, both milk triglyceride and percent creamatocrit values demonstrated a prolonged decrease following inflammatory challenge. Adolescent MIA offspring were heavier, which is often suggestive of poor early life nutrition. While MIA did not decrease maternal care quality, there was a significant compensatory increase in maternal licking and grooming the day following inflammatory challenge. However, this did not protect against disrupted neonatal huddling or later-life alterations in sensorimotor gating, conditioned fear, mechanical allodynia, or reductions in hippocampal parvalbumin expression in MIA offspring. MIA-associated changes in brain and behavior were likely driven by differences in milk nutritional values and not by direct exposure to LPS or inflammatory molecules as neither LPS binding protein nor interleukin-6 milk levels differed between groups. These findings reflected comparable microbiome and transcriptomic patterns at the genome-wide level. Animal models of early life stress can impact both parents and their offspring. One mechanism that can mediate the effects of such stressors is changes to maternal lactation quality which our data show can confer multifaceted and compounding effects on offspring physiology and behavior.

E6020, a TLR4 Agonist Adjuvant, Enhances Both Antibody Titers and Isotype Switching in Response to Immunization with Hapten-Protein Antigens and Is Diminished in Mice with TLR4 Signaling Insufficiency

The mechanisms by which TLR4-based adjuvants enhance immunogenicity are not fully understood. We have taken advantage of a novel knock-in mouse strain that homozygously expresses two single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are homologous to human TLR4 (rs4986790 and rs4986791) and have been associated with LPS hyporesponsiveness in vivo and in vitro. TLR4-SNP (coexpressing mutations D298G/N397I in TLR4) mice that recapitulate the human phenotype were compared with wild-type (WT) mice for their hapten-specific Ab responses after immunization with hapten 4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl acetyl (NP) NP-Ficoll or NP-OVA in the absence or presence of a water-soluble TLR4 analog adjuvant, E6020. IgM and IgG anti-NP responses were comparable in WT and TLR4-SNP mice after immunization with either NP-Ficoll or NP-OVA only. E6020 significantly yet transiently improved the IgM and IgG anti-NP responses of both WT and TLR4-SNP mice to NP-Ficoll (T-independent), with modestly enhanced Ab production in WT mice. In contrast, T-dependent (NP-OVA), adjuvant-enhanced responses showed sustained elevation of NP-specific Ab titers in WT mice, intermediate responses in TLR4-SNP mice, and negligible enhancement in TLR4-/- mice. E6020-enhanced early humoral responses in WT and TLR4-SNP mice to NP-OVA favored an IgG1 response. After a second immunization, however, the immune responses of TLR4-SNP mice remained IgG1 dominant, whereas WT mice reimmunized with NP-OVA and E6020 exhibited increased anti-NP IgG2c titers and a sustained increase in the IgG1 and IgG2c production by splenocytes. These findings indicate that E6020 increases and sustains Ab titers and promotes isotype class switching, as evidenced by reduced titers and IgG1-dominant immune responses in mice with TLR4 insufficiency.

TLR4 biased small molecule modulators

Biased pharmacological modulators provide potential therapeutic benefits, including greater pharmacodynamic specificity, increased efficiency and reduced adverse effects. Therefore, the identification of such modulators as drug candidates is highly desirable. Currently, attention was mainly paid to biased signaling modulators targeting G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The biased signaling modulation of non-GPCR receptors has yet to be exploited. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is one such non-GPCR receptor, which involves MyD88-dependent and TRIF-dependent signaling pathways. Moreover, the dysregulation of TLR4 contributes to numerous diseases, which highlights the importance of biased modulator development targeting TLR4. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the recent progress in the discovery of biased modulators of TLR4. The challenges and methods for the discovery of TLR4 biased modulators are also outlined. Small molecules biasedly modulating the TLR4 signaling axis not only provide probes to fine-tune receptor conformation and signaling but also provide an opportunity to identify promising drug candidates. The discovery of biased modulators of TLR4 would provide insight for the future development of biased modulators for other non-GPCR receptors.

Dissociation of TRIF bias and adjuvanticity

Toll-like receptors (TLRs), a family of "pattern recognition receptors," bind microbial and host-derived molecules, leading to intracellular signaling and proinflammatory gene expression. TLR4 is unique in that ligand-mediated activation requires the co-receptor myeloid differentiation 2 (MD2) to initiate two signaling cascades: the MyD88-dependent pathway is initiated at the cell membrane, and elicits rapid MAP kinase and NF-κB activation, while the TIR-domain containing adaptor inducing interferon-β (TRIF)-dependent pathway is initiated from TLR4-containing endosomes and results in IRF3 activation. Previous studies associated inflammation with the MyD88 pathway and adjuvanticity with the TRIF pathway. Gram-negative lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a potent TLR4 agonist, and structurally related molecules signal through TLR4 to differing extents. Herein, we compared monophosphoryl lipid A (sMPL) and E6020, two synthetic, non-toxic LPS lipid A analogs used as vaccine adjuvants, for their capacities to activate TLR4-mediated innate immune responses and to enhance antibody production. In mouse macrophages, high dose sMPL activates MyD88-dependent signaling equivalently to E6020, while E6020 exhibits significantly more activation of the TRIF pathway (a "TRIF bias") than sMPL. Eritoran, a TLR4/MD2 antagonist, competitively inhibited sMPL more strongly than E6020. Despite these differences, sMPL and E6020 adjuvants enhanced antibody responses to comparable extents, with balanced immunoglobulin (Ig) isotypes in two immunization models. These data indicate that a TRIF bias is not necessarily predictive of superior adjuvanticity.