Traumatic brain injury and frontal lobe plasticity

Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Maturing Brain: An Investigation of Symptoms and Cognitive Performance in Soldiers Returning From Afghanistan and Iraq

OBJECTIVE

The majority of traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are classified as mild and occur in young individuals. The course of recovery varies but can result in chronic or troubling outcomes. The impact of age on TBI outcomes in young adults before complete brain maturation is not well studied.

METHODS

In this study, we compared the effects of mild TBI on cognitive performance and self-reported TBI symptoms and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in 903 soldiers in 3 different age groups: 24 years or younger, 25 to 27 years, and 28 to 40 years. The soldiers had returned from war zones in Iraq and were screened for TBI within a few days of return. Cognitive performance was measured with the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics of Military TBI Version 4 (ANAM4). Symptoms associated with mild TBI were self-reported on the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory, and the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C).

RESULTS

Soldiers with TBI in every age group had significantly higher prevalence of most symptoms than those with no TBI. Soldiers with TBI also reported more chronic pain sites, regardless of age. Soldiers aged 28 to 40 years with TBI had the lowest cognitive performance scores (ANAM) across several subtests, both unadjusted and adjusted. The Global Deficit Score was significantly higher for soldiers aged 28 to 40 years and 25 to 27 years with TBI than for soldiers younger than 24 years with no TBI. After adjusting for PTSD symptoms, education, and number of lifetime TBIs, the overall test battery mean for soldiers aged 28 to 40 years with TBI was significantly lower than for soldiers younger than 24 years with no TBI.

CONCLUSION

Soldiers with mild TBI in the younger age group show more symptoms associated to frontal lobe function while soldiers in the older group suffer more cognitive impairment. This may warrant further study as it may indicate a propensity to later cognitive decline among soldiers who were older at the time of injury.

Bipolar Disorder Due to Traumatic Brain Injury: A Case Report

I report an unusual case in Saudi Arabia of a 28-year-old man who had bipolar disorder due to a traumatic brain injury suffered 10 years previously. He had been evaluated and diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder as well as amphetamine and hash use disorder until recently, when the team noticed a poor response to treatment and the continuation of his cognitive features. After a reevaluation of the history and evidence of the brain lesions on the MRI, the diagnosis was changed to bipolar disorder due to a traumatic brain injury. The patient had shown a fair response to valproate and risperidone. This report emphasizes the significance of ruling out the medical factors contributing to the manifestation of any novel psychiatric symptom, necessitating greater attention to the account of cranial trauma and periods of unconsciousness. Psychiatrists should be aware of these overlooked cases and encourage colleagues in the field to maintain a high index of suspicion and to take a good relevant history of brain injury insults, especially when there are cognitive features and a poor response to medications. The patient exhibited symptoms of inattention, memory difficulties, reasoning deficits, and poor judgment, but he did not meet the criteria for a minor or major cognitive disorder.

HBOT has a better cognitive outcome than NBH for patients with mild traumatic brain injury: A randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Normobaric hyperoxia (NBH) and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) are effective treatment plan for traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of this study was to compare cognitive outcome after mild TBI between NBH and HBOT so as to provide a more suitable treatment strategy for patients with mild TBI.

METHODS

A prospective research was conducted between October 2017 and March 2023, enrolling patients with mild TBI (Glasgow coma scale score: 13-15 points) within 24 hours of injury in Cangzhou Central Hospital. Patients were randomized into 3 groups: group control (C), group NBH and group HBOT. The patients in HBOT group received hyperbaric oxygen therapy in high pressure oxygen chamber and patients in NBH group received hyperbaric oxygen therapy. at 0 minute before NBH or HBOT (T1), 0 minute after NBH or HBOT (T2) and 30 days after NBH or HBOT (T3), level of S100β, NSE, GFAP, HIF-1α, and MDA were determined by ELISA. At the same time, the detection was performed for MoCA and MMSE scores, along with rSO2.

RESULTS

The results showed both NBH and HBOT could improve the score of MoCA and MMSE, as well as the decrease the level of S100β, NSE, GFAP, HIF-1α, MDA, and rSO2 compared with group C. Furthermore, the patients in group HBOT have higher score of MoCA and MMSE and lower level of S100β, NSE, GFAP, HIF-1α, MDA, and rSO2.

CONCLUSION

Both NBH and HBOT can effectively improve cognitive outcome for patients with mild TBI by improving cerebral hypoxia and alleviating brain injury, while HBOT exert better effect than NBH.

Patient-Centered Approaches to Cognitive Assessment in Acute TBI

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The purpose of this article is to help clinicians understand how underlying pathophysiologies and medical comorbidities associated with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) can impact assessment of cognition during the initial stages of recovery. Clinicians can use information from this article to develop assessment plans rooted in patient-centered care.

RECENT FINDINGS

The authors conducted a review of the literature related to the assessment of cognition in acute TBI, focusing on pathophysiology, medical comorbidities, and assessment approaches. Results indicated that TBI pathophysiologies associated with white and gray matter changes make many patients vulnerable to cognitive deficits. Acute comorbidities such as psychological and pain status influence cognitive abilities as well. The current approaches to cognitive assessment can be limited in many ways, though by using the patient's neuropathological profile, noted comorbidities, and other patient specific factors, clinicians can potentially improve the effectiveness of assessment.

Pediatric traumatic brain injury and abusive head trauma

Childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI) commonly occurs during brain development and can have direct, immediately observable neurologic, cognitive, and behavioral consequences. However, it can also disrupt subsequent brain development, and long-term outcomes are a combination of preinjury development and abilities, consequences of brain injury, as well as delayed impaired development of skills that were immature at the time of injury. There is a growing number of studies on mild TBI/sport-related concussions, describing initial symptoms and their evolution over time and providing guidelines for effective management of symptoms and return to activity/school/sports. Mild TBI usually does not lead to long-term cognitive or academic consequences, despite reports of behavioral/psychologic issues postinjury. Regarding moderate to severe TBI, injury to the brain is more severe, with evidence of a number of detrimental consequences in various domains. Patients can display neurologic impairments (e.g., motor deficits, signs of cerebellar disorder, posttraumatic epilepsy), medical problems (e.g., endocrine pituitary deficits, sleep-wake abnormalities), or sensory deficits (e.g., visual, olfactory deficits). The most commonly reported deficits are in the cognitive-behavioral field, which tend to be significantly disabling in the long-term, impacting the development of autonomy, socialization and academic achievement, participation, quality of life, and later, independence and ability to enter the workforce (e.g., intellectual deficits, slow processing speed, attention, memory, executive functions deficits, impulsivity, intolerance to frustration). A number of factors influence outcomes following pediatric TBI, including preinjury stage of development and abilities, brain injury severity, age at injury (with younger age at injury most often associated with worse outcomes), and a number of family/environment factors (e.g., parental education and occupation, family functioning, parenting style, warmth and responsiveness, access to rehabilitation and care). Interventions should identify and target these specific factors, given their major role in postinjury outcomes. Abusive head trauma (AHT) occurs in very young children (most often <6 months) and is a form of severe TBI, usually associated with delay before appropriate care is sought. Outcomes are systematically worse following AHT than following accidental TBI, even when controlling for age at injury and injury severity. Children with moderate to severe TBI and AHT usually require specific, coordinated, multidisciplinary, and long-term rehabilitation interventions and school adaptations, until transition to adult services. Interventions should be patient- and family-centered, focusing on specific goals, comprising education about TBI, and promoting optimal parenting, communication, and collaborative problem-solving.