Role of the neurotologist in posterior fossa meningioma surgery

Combined Anterior (Kawase) and Posterior Petrosectomy (pre-sigmoid/ retro-labyrinthine) for Resection of Post-Radiosurgery Recurrent Cavernous Sinus and Meckel's cave Meningioma; with Simultaneous Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia: 2 Dimensional Operative video, and Review of Literature

BACKGROUND

A 70-year male had previous gamma knife (GK) for left cavernous sinus and Meckel's cave meningioma for facial numbness. He presented 11 years later with facial pain (both typical and atypical) and worsening numbness.

OBSERVATIONS

MRI showed tumor growth and an infratentorial extension. FIESTA MRI showed left superior cerebellar artery (SCA) contact with the V nerve root entry zone (REZ) accounting for Type 1/ lancinating pain. After discussing available options, he opted for surgery. Lumbar drain, and a middle fossa anterior petrosectomy (Kawase) combined with posterior petrosectomy (retrolabyrinthine) approach was employed to perform tumor debulking along with microvascular decompression (mobilization of SCA). SSEP, BAERS, MEP, V nerve monitoring were performed. Fat graft was used for multilayered closure. He experienced resolution of both type 1 & type 2 facial pain, improvement in sensation in V3. Symptomatic improvement was recorded at 11 months follow up.

LESSONS

The combined skull base approach provided visualization of the entire length of V nerve (Cisternal, Meckel's cave, V2 and V3) allowing for decompression at various points to achieve relief of both types of facial pain. The patient provided consent for use of his images and operative video for publication.

The Role of Establishing Neurosurgical Specialist Nurse Working Group in the Recovery and Prevention of Negative Psychological Emotion after Meningioma Surgery

In this research paper, we will explore the role of establishing a neurosurgical specialist nurse working group in the recovery and prevention of negative psychological emotions after meningioma surgery. For this study, 42 meningioma patients who were treated before the establishment of a neurosurgery specialist nurse working group from January 2019 to December 2019. They were selected as the control group. In contrast, 42 meningioma patients admitted after the establishment of the neurosurgery specialist nurse group from January 2020 to December 2020 were selected as the study group. The postoperative recovery (time of stay in the intensive care unit, time of first eating, wakeup time, time of defecation for the first time, and hospitalization time), short-term prognosis, and nursing satisfaction scores of the two groups were calculated, and the post-traumatic stress disorder scale (PTSD-SS), medical coping style questionnaire (MCMQ), and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) were compared. Also, the changes in the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) score contributes to the comprehensive analysis of the role of the establishment of neurosurgical specialist nurse working group in the recovery and prevention of negative psychological emotion after meningioma operation. The satisfaction scores in the study group of patients in physical care, receiving information, support, respect, and nursing process were higher than the control group probability (P < 0.05). The first feeding time, defecation time, out of bed, the stay time in the intensive care unit, and the hospitalization time of the study group were shorter than those of the control group (P < 0.05). Before nursing, there was no difference in NIHSS score, SAS score, and SDS scores between the two groups. However, after nursing, the NIHSS score, SAS score, and SDS score of the study group were fairly lower than the control group. Moreover, the Karnofsky functional status scale (KPS) scores of the two groups increased gradually. The KPS scores of the study group at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after operation were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05). Before nursing, there was no significant difference in the scores of post-traumatic stress disorder between the two groups (P > 0.05). After nursing, the scores of subjective evaluation, symptom avoidance, repeated experience, and social dysfunction in the study group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Before nursing, there was no significant difference in coping scores between the control group and the research group (P > 0.05), but after nursing, the avoidance and compliance scores of the research group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05).Similarly, the scores of avoidance and yield in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). In the study group, 1 patient had an incision infection and 1 patient had epilepsy, and the total incidence of postoperative complications was 4.76%. In the control group, 4 patients had incision infection, 1 case of an intracranial hematoma, 3 cases of deep venous thrombosis, and 3 cases of epilepsy. The total incidence of postoperative complications in the study group was 26.19%, while the incidence of postoperative complications in the study group was lower than in the control group (P < 0.05).

Aesthesiometer-Based Testing for Laryngopharyngeal Hyposensitivity

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To develop a method for threshold estimation of the laryngeal adductor reflex (LAR) response using Cheung-Bearelly monofilaments.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

METHODS

Twenty-two healthy adults (12 men, 10 women) were tested for LAR response outcome using 30 mm 5-0 and 4-0 nylon monofilaments. Tactile stimuli were delivered to the aryepiglottic (AE) fold and medial pyriform sinus (MPS). Dichotomous classifier features and performance (area under the curve (AUC)), the LAR response outcome agreement and disagreement matrix, and test-retest reliability were examined. From those data, a test protocol that would minimize patient burden to estimate the LAR triggering threshold was formulated.

RESULTS

Classifier performance of 5-0 monofilament stimulation of the AE fold (sensitivity = 0.63, specificity = 0.63, PPV = 0.74, NPV = 0.25) and MPS (sensitivity = 0.45, specificity = 0.77, PPV = 0.74, NPV = 0.23,) was slightly below that of 4-0 monofilament stimulation of the AE fold (sensitivity = 0.82, specificity = 0.50, PPV = 0.82, NPV = 0.50) and MPS (sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 0.64, PPV = 0.90, NPV = 0.56), based on AUC. LAR response outcome agreement for 5-0 and 4-0 stimulations was high (93%) for 5-0 positive response, but low (29%) for 5-0 negative response. Aesthesiometer test-retest reliability for LAR response outcome was excellent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Threshold estimation of the LAR response may be operationalized by adopting a decision tree protocol. For negative LAR response to initial 5-0 monofilament stimulation and positive response to subsequent 4-0 monofilament stimulation, the higher threshold is confirmed. Positive LAR response to 5-0 or 4-0 monofilament stimulation is expected in over 90% of asymptomatic adults. Negative LAR response to 4-0 monofilament stimulation identifies patients at risk for laryngopharyngeal hyposensitivity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3b Laryngoscope, 2021.