Quality of life outcomes in meningioma surgery

Domestic Animal Models of Central Nervous System Tumors: Focus on Meningiomas

Intracranial primary tumors (IPTs) are aggressive forms of malignancies that cause high mortality in both humans and domestic animals. Meningiomas are frequent adult IPTs in humans, dogs, and cats, and both benign and malignant forms cause a decrease in life quality and survival. Surgery is the primary therapeutic approach to treat meningiomas, but, in many cases, it is not resolutive. The chemotherapy and targeted therapy used to treat meningiomas also display low efficacy and many side effects. Therefore, it is essential to find novel pharmacological approaches to increase the spectrum of therapeutic options for meningiomas. This review analyzes the similarities between human and domestic animal (dogs and cats) meningiomas by evaluating the molecular and histological characteristics, diagnosis criteria, and treatment options and highlighting possible research areas to identify novel targets and pharmacological approaches, which are useful for the diagnosis and therapy of this neoplasia to be used in human and veterinary medicine.

Long-term postoperative health-related quality of life in patients with subfrontal meningiomas

OBJECTIVE

Subfrontal meningiomas grow insidiously in areas with high cerebral compliance and a relative scarcity of eloquent function. Symptoms develop progressively, are nonspecific, and include anosmia, changes in personality and cognition, depressive symptoms, headaches, visual disturbances, and seizures. Patients with subfrontal meningiomas carry the highest risk of developing psychological symptoms, which makes patient-reported outcome in terms of long-term health-related quality of life (HRQOL), anxiety, and depression of particular importance. This observational study aimed to investigate long-term HRQOL, anxiety, and depression in patients with subfrontal meningiomas who underwent a bifrontal craniotomy (subfrontal) approach between 2008 and 2017 at a single tertiary center. Correlations between preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative factors and HRQOL, anxiety, and depression were analyzed to detect prognostic factors.

METHODS

Seventy-seven consecutive patients who underwent operations at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, between 2008 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were prospectively invited to respond to the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Information regarding preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative factors were collected from the patients' medical records and scans.

RESULTS

Patients with subfrontal meningiomas exhibited better HRQOL and lower levels of anxiety and depression than general populations and other meningioma and glioblastoma cohorts. The only statistically significant prognostic factors for long-term HRQOL were number of symptoms at diagnosis and whether patients were discharged home or to a local hospital postoperatively. Tumor and peritumoral brain edema volumes were not prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with subfrontal meningiomas exhibited better long-term postoperative HRQOL and were less likely to have anxiety or depression than the reference populations. This information on long-term prognosis is very valuable for patients, next of kin, and neurosurgeons and has not been previously studied in detail.

Can Currently Suggested Quality Indicators Be Transferred to Meningioma Surgery?-A Single-Center Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

 Risk stratification based on standardized quality measures has become crucial in neurosurgery. Contemporary quality indicators have often been developed for a wide range of neurosurgical procedures collectively. The accuracy of tumor-inherent characteristics of patients diagnosed with meningioma remains questionable. The objective of this study was the analysis of currently applied quality indicators in meningioma surgery and the identification of potential new measures.

METHODS

 Data of 133 patients who were operated on due to intracranial meningiomas were subjected to a retrospective analysis. The primary outcomes of interest were classical quality indicators such as the 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation, 30-day mortality, 30-day nosocomial infection, and the 30-day surgical site infection rate. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed. The occurrence of a new postoperative neurologic deficit was analyzed as a potential new quality indicator.

RESULTS

 The overall unplanned readmission rate was 3.8%; 13 patients were reoperated within 30 days (9.8%). The 30-day nosocomial infection and surgical site infection rates were 6.8 and 1.5%, respectively. A postoperative new neurologic deficit or neurologic deterioration as a currently assessed quality feature was observed in 12 patients (9.2%). The edema volume on preoperative scans proved to have a significant impact on the occurrence of a new postoperative neurologic deficit (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

 Classical quality indicators in neurosurgery have proved to correlate with considerable deterioration of the patient's health in meningioma surgery and thus should be taken into consideration for application in meningioma patients. The occurrence of a new postoperative neurologic deficit is common and procedure specific. Thus, this should be elucidated for application as a complementary quality indicator in meningioma surgery.