LRRK2: Genetic mechanisms vs genetic subtypes

Low-dose radiation decreases Lrrk2 levels in the striatum of large mammalian brains: New venues to treat Parkinson's disease?

INTRODUCTION

Among gene mutations and variants linked to an increased risk of PD, mutations of leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 gene (LRRK2) are among the most frequently associated with early- and late-onset PD. Clinical and neuropathological characteristics of idiopathic-PD (iPD) and LRRK2-PD are similar, and these similarities suggest that the pathomechanisms between these two conditions are shared. LRRK2 mutations determine a gain-of-function and yield higher levels of lrrk2 across body tissues, including brain. On another side, recent animal studies supported the potential use of low dose radiation (LDR) to modify the pathomechanisms of diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

We assessed if a single total-body LDR (sLDR) exposure in normal swine could alter expression levels of the following PD-associated molecules: alpha-synuclein (α-syn), phosphorylated-α-synuclein (pα-syn), parkin, tyrosine hydroxylase (th), lrrk2, phosphorylated-lrrk2 (pS935-lrrk2), and some LRRK2 substrates (Rab8a, Rab12) across different brain regions. These proteins were measured in frontal cortex, hippocampus, striatum, thalamus/hypothalamus, and cerebellum of 9 radiated (RAD) vs. 6 sham (SH) swine after 28 days from a sLDR of 1.79Gy exposure.

RESULTS

Western Blot analyses showed lowered lrrk2 levels in the striatum of RAD vs. SH swine (p < 0.05), with no differences across the remaining brain regions. None of the other protein levels differed between RAD and SH swine in any examined brain regions. No lrrk2 and p-lrrk2 (S935) levels differed in the lungs of RAD vs. SH swine.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings show a specific striatal lrrk2 lowering effect due to LDR and support the potential use of LDR to interfere with the pathomechanisms of PD.

Recombinant Antibody Fragments for Immunotherapy of Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common age-related neurodegenerative disorder. Multiple genetic and environmental factors leading to progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SN) and consequent depletion of dopamine were described. Current clinical approaches, such as dopamine replacement or deep brain stimulation using surgically implanted probes, provide symptomatic relief but cannot modify disease progression. Therefore, disease-modifying therapeutic tools are urgently needed. Immunotherapy approaches, including passive transfer of protective antibodies and their fragments, have shown therapeutic efficacy in several animal models of neurodegenerative diseases, including PD. Recombinant antibody fragments are promising alternatives to conventional full-length antibodies. Modern computational approaches and molecular biology tools, directed evolution methodology, and the design of tissue-penetrating fusion peptides allowed for the development of recombinant antibody fragments with superior specificity and affinity, reduced immunogenicity, the capacity to target hidden epitopes and cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), higher solubility and stability, the ability to refold after heat denaturation, and inexpensive large-scale production. In addition, antibody fragments do not induce microglia Fcγ receptor (FcγR)-mediated proinflammatory response and tissue damage in the central nervous system (CNS), because they lack the Fc portion of the immunoglobulin molecule. In the present review, we summarized data on recombinant antibody fragments evaluated as immunotherapeutics in preclinical models of PD and discussed their potential for developing therapeutic and preventive protocols for patients with PD.

Recalibrating the Why and Whom of Animal Models in Parkinson Disease: A Clinician's Perspective

Animal models have been used to gain pathophysiologic insights into Parkinson's disease (PD) and aid in the translational efforts of interventions with therapeutic potential in human clinical trials. However, no disease-modifying therapy for PD has successfully emerged from model predictions. These translational disappointments warrant a reappraisal of the types of preclinical questions asked of animal models. Besides the limitations of experimental designs, the one-size convergence and oversimplification yielded by a model cannot recapitulate the molecular diversity within and between PD patients. Here, we compare the strengths and pitfalls of different models, review the discrepancies between animal and human data on similar pathologic and molecular mechanisms, assess the potential of organoids as novel modeling tools, and evaluate the types of questions for which models can guide and misguide. We propose that animal models may be of greatest utility in the evaluation of molecular mechanisms, neural pathways, drug toxicity, and safety but can be unreliable or misleading when used to generate pathophysiologic hypotheses or predict therapeutic efficacy for compounds with potential neuroprotective effects in humans. To enhance the translational disease-modification potential, the modeling must reflect the biology not of a diseased population but of subtypes of diseased humans to distinguish What data are relevant and to Whom.