Clinical and imaging diagnosis for heredodegenerative diseases

New insights in phenomenology and treatment of epilepsy in CDKL5 encephalopathy

Eight patients, seven girls and one boy, had CDKL5 gene mutation, duplication, or deletion. Epileptic spasms started at a mean age of 3.5 months (range = 4 weeks-8 months). In five cases, tonic seizures preceded spasms at a median age of 6 weeks. In one patient who started at 8 months, spasms had a component of terror on awakening, reminding sleep terror. In two patients, electroencephalogram polygraphy of a so-called tonic seizure revealed that the tonic phase was followed by an overlooked clonic phase and then by a cluster of spasms during which each spasm was preceded by a brief clonic jerk revealed by electromyography. This sequence is rather particular and can be an early diagnostic clue. Progressive transition from this seizure type to epileptic spasms in clusters seems to result from increasing expression of the CDKL5 gene, as the child grows older. Five patients responded to the combination of vigabatrin and zonisamide.

Patterns of poststroke brain damage that predict speech production errors in apraxia of speech and aphasia dissociate

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Acquired apraxia of speech (AOS) is a motor speech disorder caused by brain damage. AOS often co-occurs with aphasia, a language disorder in which patients may also demonstrate speech production errors. The overlap of speech production deficits in both disorders has raised questions on whether AOS emerges from a unique pattern of brain damage or as a subelement of the aphasic syndrome. The purpose of this study was to determine whether speech production errors in AOS and aphasia are associated with distinctive patterns of brain injury.

METHODS

Forty-three patients with history of a single left-hemisphere stroke underwent comprehensive speech and language testing. The AOS Rating Scale was used to rate speech errors specific to AOS versus speech errors that can also be associated with both AOS and aphasia. Localized brain damage was identified using structural magnetic resonance imaging, and voxel-based lesion-impairment mapping was used to evaluate the relationship between speech errors specific to AOS, those that can occur in AOS or aphasia, and brain damage.

RESULTS

The pattern of brain damage associated with AOS was most strongly associated with damage to cortical motor regions, with additional involvement of somatosensory areas. Speech production deficits that could be attributed to AOS or aphasia were associated with damage to the temporal lobe and the inferior precentral frontal regions.

CONCLUSIONS

AOS likely occurs in conjunction with aphasia because of the proximity of the brain areas supporting speech and language, but the neurobiological substrate for each disorder differs.

Regional white matter damage predicts speech fluency in chronic post-stroke aphasia

Recently, two different white matter regions that support speech fluency have been identified: the aslant tract and the anterior segment of the arcuate fasciculus (ASAF). The role of the ASAF was demonstrated in patients with post-stroke aphasia, while the role of the aslant tract shown in primary progressive aphasia. Regional white matter integrity appears to be crucial for speech production; however, the degree that each region exerts an independent influence on speech fluency is unclear. Furthermore, it is not yet defined if damage to both white matter regions influences speech in the context of the same neural mechanism (stroke-induced aphasia). This study assessed the relationship between speech fluency and quantitative integrity of the aslant region and the ASAF. It also explored the relationship between speech fluency and other white matter regions underlying classic cortical language areas such as the uncinate fasciculus and the inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF). Damage to these regions, except the ILF, was associated with speech fluency, suggesting synergistic association of these regions with speech fluency in post-stroke aphasia. These observations support the theory that speech fluency requires the complex, orchestrated activity between a network of pre-motor, secondary, and tertiary associative cortices, supported in turn by regional white matter integrity.