Neuroimaging of spine tumors

Imaging of intramedullary tumours of the spinal cord

Intramedullary tumours (IMTs) are the least common neoplasms of the spinal canal. The majority of them are ependymomas and astrocytomas, the third commonest is haemangioblastoma, while other tumours of the spinal cord are relatively rare. This review presents on update on the imaging of spinal cord tumours. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging method of choice in diagnosing IMTs, with other modalities playing a supplementary role. The authors discuss the MRI protocol in IMTs including advanced techniques and present the imaging features of particular tumours. The differentiation of IMTs from other spinal cord diseases is also presented.

Spinal Ependymomas: An Updated WHO Classification and a Narrative Review

Ependymomas are neuroepithelial tumors that develop from ependymal cells found in the brain parenchyma and can spread to any part of the spinal cord. Three to six percent of all malignancies affecting the central nervous system (CNS) are ependymomas. Even the most talented surgeons are challenged by spinal cord ependymomas; as a result, research into this clinical phenomenon should continue. Since 1979, the World Health Organization (WHO) has published a classification and grading system for CNS malignancies to ensure consistent diagnostic standards worldwide. The WHO prepared an update on these tumors, paying particular attention to molecular techniques to categorize the therapeutic management of each patient with greater accuracy and clarity. We thoroughly reviewed the literature on the epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of spinal ependymomas since there has not been a recent review of these tumors. This included modifications to the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System.

Imaging of the Craniocervical Junction: A Pictorial Review

The craniocervical junction (CCJ) is a complex anatomical structure comprising the occiput, the atlas, and the axis. The CCJ plays an important role in maintaining stability, providing protection, and supporting neurovascular structures. The CCJ can be affected by a wide range of congenital variants and traumatic, degenerative, inflammatory, and tumoral pathologies. This pictorial review the normal anatomy of the CCJ and presents the most common anatomical variants and pathologic conditions affecting the CCJ.

Expected motor function change following decompressive surgery for spinal metastatic disease

Background

Motor function in patients with spinal metastatic disease (SMD) directly impacts a patient's ability to receive systemic therapy and overall survival. Spine surgeons may be in the challenging position to advise a patient on expected motor function outcomes and determine a patient's suitability as a surgical candidate. We present this study to provide this critical information on anticipated motor function change to spine surgeons.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing spinal surgery for SMD at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer institute were prospectively enrolled. Patient motor function status before and after surgery was assessed using the standard 0 to 5 five-point muscle strength grading scale. The difference in presurgical and postsurgical motor function (proximal and distal) was used to assess motor function changes following surgery.

Results

A total of 171 patients were included. The mean age was 62.7±10.46 years and 40.9% (70) were female. Common primary malignancy types were lung (49), kidney (28), breast (25), and prostate (23). The average proximal and distal motor function difference was 0.38 (standard deviation=1.02, p<.0001) and 0.32 (standard deviation=0.91, p<.0001) respectively showing an improvement following surgery. Patients with proximal presurgical motor function of 2, 3, and 4 had an improved motor function in 73%, 77%, and 73% of the patients. Patients with distal presurgical motor function of 2, 3, and 4 had an improved motor function in 80%, 89%, and 70% of the patients.

Conclusions

Most patients undergoing surgery for SMD have a modest improvement in motor function following surgery. The degree of improvement in most instances is less than 1 point on a 0 to 5 motor function scale. This is critical knowledge for a spinal surgeon when evaluating SMD patients with significant preoperative motor function deficits. These results aid spinal surgeons in setting expectations and evaluating the need for rapid spinal decompression.

Imaging of Common and Infrequent Extradural Tumors

Spinal extradural tumors, although uncommon, have high morbidity and mortality rates. Radiographs and computed tomography scans are typically used to assess and determine the characteristics of these tumors. However, MR imaging is the preferred method for the evaluation of complications that can increase morbidity, such as spinal cord and nerve compression. Imaging features, such as type of matrix, cortical involvement, and margins, aid in determining the diagnosis. This article discusses common and infrequent extradural spinal tumors, their imaging characteristics, and how age, location, and clinical presentation help in diagnosing these neoplasms.

Primary Bone Tumors of the Spine—Proposal for Treatment Based on a Single Centre Experience

This study reports a large single-center series of primary bone tumors of the spine (PBTs). We aimed to review the concepts for management, as this kind of tumor represents a very rare entity, and also propose a new treatment algorithm. Retrospective analysis revealed 92 patients receiving surgery for PBTs from 2007 to 2019 at our center. They were analyzed based on surgical management and the course of the disease. A total of 145 surgical procedures were performed (50 cervical, 46 thoracic, 28 lumbar, and 21 sacral). Complete tumor resection was achieved in 65%, of which 22% showed tumor recurrence during follow-up (mean time to recurrence 334 days). The five-year mortality rate was significantly lower after complete resection (3% versus 25% after subtotal resection). Most of the patients improved in their symptoms through surgery. Regarding the tumor entity, the most common PBTs were vertebral hemangiomas (20%), osteoid osteomas (15%), and chordomas (16%). The Enneking graduation system showed a good correlation with the risk of recurrence and mortality. Complete resection in PBTs increased survival rates and remains the method of choice. Thus, quality of life—especially with a higher extent of resection—should be considered.

Characterization and Treatment of Spinal Tumors

The prevalence of spinal tumors is rare in comparison to brain tumors which encompass most central nervous system tumors. Tumors of the spine can be divided into primary and metastatic tumors with the latter being the most common presentation. Primary tumors are subdivided based on their location on the spinal column and in the spinal cord into intramedullary, intradural extramedullary, and primary bone tumors. Back pain is a common presentation in spine cancer patients; however, other radicular pain may be present. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality of choice for intradural extramedullary and intramedullary tumors. Plain radiographs are used in the initial diagnosis of primary bone tumors while Computed tomography (CT) and MRI may often be necessary for further characterization. Complete surgical resection is the treatment of choice for spinal tumors and may be curative for well circumscribed lesions. However, intralesional resection along with adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy can be indicated for patients that would experience increased morbidity from damage to nearby neurological structures caused by resection with wide margins. Even with the current treatment options, the prognosis for aggressive spinal cancer remains poor. Advances in novel treatments including molecular targeting, immunotherapy and stem cell therapy provide the potential for greater control of malignant and metastatic tumors of the spine.

Holistic Approach to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Tumor Metastases to the Spine

The treatment of neoplastic spine metastases requires multi-faceted assessment and an interdisciplinary approach to patients. The metastases do not show specific symptoms but are often the first confirmation of the presence of a primary tumor in a patient. The diagnostic process includes imaging and invasive procedures, e.g., biopsy. It is essential to qualify the patient for an appropriate treatment using dedicated scales. Decompression of the spinal cord is a critical issue to save or restore neurological function in a patient with spine metastases. Surgical treatment ought to meet three criteria: release spinal cord and nerve roots, restore the spine’s anatomical relations, and ensure the internal stabilization of the spine. A good result from surgical treatment enables the continuation of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and targeted molecular therapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy are more effective ways of treating spine metastases than conventional external beam radiotherapy. They allow higher doses of radiation, concentrated precisely at the tumor site. Our review summarizes the established and emerging concepts in the treatment of spine metastases. A holistic approach to the patient enables the selection of the appropriate therapy.

Rare presentation of intradural calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition

Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition (CPPD), also known as pseudogout, can have spinal manifestations in roughly one quarter of patients. We present a rare, intradural manifestation of CPPD requiring surgical intervention, with a review of pertinent differential diagnoses on imaging. A 48-year-old male presented with urinary retention, and was found to have an intradural lesion with peripheral enhancement on gadolinium T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Due to the patient's progressive neurological deterioration, he was taken for a minimally invasive approach for resection of the lesion. Histopathological analysis revealed crystal deposits with rhomboidal birefringence consistent with CPPD. The imaging features of this lesion were atypical for any of the traditional intradural extramedullary lesions. Typically seen extradurally, recognizing CPPD as a potential culprit for intradural compression is helpful to recognize for providers.

Evaluating the Clinical Utility and Cost of Imaging Strategies in Adults with Newly Diagnosed Primary Intradural Spinal Tumors

OBJECTIVE

In patients with new primary intradural spinal tumors, the best screening strategy for additional central nervous system (CNS) lesions is unclear. The goal of this study was to document the rate of additional CNS tumors in these patients.

METHODS

Adults with primary intradural spinal tumors were retrospectively reviewed. Imaging strategy at diagnosis was classified as focused spine (cervical, thoracic, or lumbar), total spine, or complete neuraxis (brain and total spine). Tumor pathology, genetic syndromes, and presence of additional CNS lesions at diagnosis or follow-up were collected.

RESULTS

The study comprised 319 patients with mean age of 51 years and mean follow-up of 41 months. In 151 patients with focused spine imaging, 3 (2.0%) were found to have new lesions with 2 (1.4%) requiring treatment. In 35 patients with total spine imaging, there were no additional lesions. In 133 patients with complete neuraxis imaging, 4 (3.0%) were found to have new lesions with 2 (1.5%) requiring treatment. There was no difference in the identification of new lesions (P = 0.542) or new lesions requiring treatment (P = 0.772) across imaging strategies. Among patients without genetic syndromes, rates of new lesions requiring treatment were 1.4% for focused spine, 0% for total spine, and 2.2% for complete neuraxis (P = 0.683). There were no cases of delayed identification causing risk to life or neurological function. Complete neuraxis imaging carried an increased charge of $4420 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients without an underlying genetic syndrome, the likelihood of identifying additional CNS lesions requiring treatment is low. In appropriate cases, focused spine imaging may be a more cost-effective strategy.

Full automation of spinal stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment planning using Varian Eclipse scripting

The purpose of this feasibility study is to develop a fully automated procedure capable of generating treatment plans with multiple fractionation schemes to improve speed, robustness, and standardization of plan quality. A fully automated script was implemented for spinal stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic body radiation therapy (SRS/SBRT) plan generation using Eclipse v15.6 API. The script interface allows multiple dose/fractionation plan requests, planning target volume (PTV) expansions, as well as information regarding distance/overlap between spinal cord and targets to drive decision‐making. For each requested plan, the script creates the course, plans, field arrangements, and automatically optimizes and calculates dose. The script was retrospectively applied to ten computed tomography (CT) scans of previous cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine SBRT patients. Three plans were generated for each patient — simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) 1800/1600 cGy to gross tumor volume (GTV)/PTV in one fraction; SIB 2700/2100 cGy to GTV/PTV in three fractions; and 3000 cGy to PTV in five fractions. Plan complexity and deliverability patient‐specific quality assurance (QA) was performed using ArcCHECK with an Exradin A16 chamber inserted. Dose objectives were met for all organs at risk (OARs) for each treatment plan. Median target coverage was GTV V100% = 87.3%, clinical target volume (CTV) V100% = 95.7% and PTV V100% = 88.0% for single fraction plans; GTV V100% = 95.6, CTV V100% = 99.6% and PTV V100% = 97.2% for three fraction plans; and GTV V100% = 99.6%, CTV V100% = 99.1% and PTV V100% = 97.2% for five fraction plans. All plans (n = 30) passed patient‐specific QA (>90%) at 2%/2 mm global gamma. A16 chamber dose measured at isocenter agreed with planned dose within 3% for all cases. Automatic planning for spine SRS/SBRT through scripting increases efficiency, standardizes plan quality and approach, and provides a tool for target coverage comparison of different fractionation schemes without the need for additional resources.

Decision Making in Patients With Metastatic Spine. The Role of Minimally Invasive Treatment Modalities

Spine metastases affect more than 70% of terminal cancer patients that eventually suffer from severe pain and neurological symptoms. Nevertheless, in the overwhelming majority of the cases, a spinal metastasis represents just one location of a diffuse systemic disease. Therefore, the best practice for treatment of spinal metastases depends on many different aspects of an oncological disease, including the assessment of neurological status, pain, location, and dissemination of the disease as well as the ability to predict the risk of disease progression with neurological worsening, benefits and risks associated to treatment and, eventually, expected survival. To address this need for a framework and algorithm that takes all aspects of care into consideration, we reviewed available evidence on the multidisciplinary management of spinal metastases. According to the latest evidence, the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal metastatic disease is rapidly increasing. Indeed, aggressive surgical resection may provide the best results in terms of local control, but carries a significant rate of post-surgical morbidity whose incidence and severity appears to be correlated to the extent of resection. The multidisciplinary management represents, according to current evidence, the best option for the treatment of spinal metastases. Noteworthy, according to the recent literature evidence, cases that once required radical surgical resection followed by low-dose conventional radiotherapy, can now be more effectively treated by minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) followed by spine SRS with decreased morbidity, improved local control, and more durable pain control. This combination allows also extending this standard of care to patients that would be too sick for an aggressive surgical treatment.

Minimally invasive versus conventional spine surgery for vertebral metastases: a systematic review of the evidence

One of the major determinants of surgical candidacy in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases is the ability of the patient to tolerate the procedure-associated morbidity. In other pathologies, minimally invasive (MIS) procedures have been suggested to have lower intra-operative morbidity while providing similar outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of the PubMed library searching for articles that directly compared the operative and post-operative outcomes of patients treated for symptomatic spinal metastases. Inclusion criteria were articles reporting two or more cases of patients >18 years old treated with MIS or open approaches for spinal metastases. Studies reporting results in spinal metastases patients that could not be disentangled from other pathologies were excluded. Our search returned 1,568 articles, of which 9 articles met the criteria for inclusion. All articles were level III evidence. Patients treated with MIS approaches tended to have lower intraoperative blood loss, shorter operative times, shorter inpatient stays, and fewer complications relative to patients undergoing surgeries with conventional approaches. Patients in the MIS and open groups had similar pain improvement, neurological improvement, and functional outcomes. Recent advances in MIS techniques may reduce surgical morbidity while providing similar symptomatic improvement in patients treated for spinal metastases. As a result, MIS techniques may expand the pool of patients with spinal metastases who are candidates for operative management.

Diagnosis of benign notochordal cell tumor of the spine: is a biopsy necessary?

Benign notochordal cell tumor is a benign intraosseous lesion, demonstrates characteristic imaging features. The lesion demonstrates low-signal intensity in T1-weighted images, high-signal intensity in T2-weighted images, and no enhancement with contrast medium in MRI and slight osteosclerosis in CT. If typical imaging findings are identified, biopsy is not necessary.

Assessment of paraspinal neurogenic tumors with diffusion-weighted MR imaging

PURPOSE

To assess paraspinal neurogenic tumors with diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was done upon 34 patients with paraspinal neurogenic tumors that underwent diffusion-weighted MR imaging. The ADC values of the mediastinal neurogenic tumors were calculated and correlated with biopsy results.

RESULTS

The ADC of benign paraspinal neurogenic tumors (1.5 ± 0.28 × 10^-3 mm²/s) was significantly higher (P = 0.001) than that of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (0.995 ± 0.198 × 10^-3 mm²/s). Selection of 1.15 × 10^-3 mm²/s as a cut-off point for differentiating malignant from benign neurogenic tumors revealed an area under the curve of 0.885, an accuracy of 91.1%, a sensitivity of 90.9%, and specificity of 91.3%. There was significant difference (P = 0.04) in the ADC of schwannomas (1.55 ± 0.29 × 10^-3 mm²/s) from neurofibromas (1.33 ± 0.08 × 10^-3 mm²/s). The cut-off ADC value of 1.44 × 10^-3 mm²/s was used to differentiate schwannomas and neurofibromas with an area under the curve of 0.86, an accuracy of 82.6%, a sensitivity of 100%, and a specificity of 76.5%.

CONCLUSION

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging is imaging parameter that can be used for differentiation of benign from malignant paraspinal neurogenic tumors.