1
|
Liu Y, Chen K, Luo Y, Wu J, Xiang Q, Peng L, Zhang J, Zhao W, Li M, Zhou X. Distinguish bipolar and major depressive disorder in adolescents based on multimodal neuroimaging: Results from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study ®. Digit Health 2022; 8:20552076221123705. [PMID: 36090673 PMCID: PMC9452797 DOI: 10.1177/20552076221123705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder in adolescents are prevalent and are associated with cognitive impairment, executive dysfunction, and increased mortality. Early intervention in the initial stages of major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder can significantly improve personal health. Methods We collected 309 samples from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study, including 116 adolescents with bipolar disorder, 64 adolescents with major depressive disorder, and 129 healthy adolescents, and employed a support vector machine to develop classification models for identification. We developed a multimodal model, which combined functional connectivity of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and four anatomical measures of structural magnetic resonance imaging (cortical thickness, area, volume, and sulcal depth). We measured the performances of both multimodal and single modality classifiers. Results The multimodal classifiers showed outstanding performance compared with all five single modalities, and they are 100% for major depressive disorder versus healthy controls, 100% for bipolar disorder versus healthy control, 98.5% (95% CI: 95.4–100%) for major depressive disorder versus bipolar disorder, 100% for major depressive disorder versus depressed bipolar disorder and the leave-one-site-out analysis results are 77.4%, 63.3%, 79.4%, and 81.7%, separately. Conclusions The study shows that multimodal classifiers show high classification performances. Moreover, cuneus may be a potential biomarker to differentiate major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and healthy adolescents. Overall, this study can form multimodal diagnostic prediction workflows for clinically feasible to make more precise diagnose at the early stage and potentially reduce loss of personal pain and public society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujun Liu
- West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Med-X Center for Informatics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Kai Chen
- School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA
| | - Yangyang Luo
- West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Med-X Center for Informatics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiqiu Wu
- West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Qu Xiang
- West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Med-X Center for Informatics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Li Peng
- West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Med-X Center for Informatics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jian Zhang
- West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Med-X Center for Informatics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Weiling Zhao
- Center for Computational Systems Medicine, School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA
| | - Mingliang Li
- West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Med-X Center for Informatics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaobo Zhou
- Center for Computational Systems Medicine, School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zangiabadi N, Ladino LD, Sina F, Orozco-Hernández JP, Carter A, Téllez-Zenteno JF. Deep Brain Stimulation and Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Review of the Literature. Front Neurol 2019; 10:601. [PMID: 31244761 PMCID: PMC6563690 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Deep brain stimulation is a safe and effective neurointerventional technique for the treatment of movement disorders. Electrical stimulation of subcortical structures may exert a control on seizure generators initiating epileptic activities. The aim of this review is to present the targets of the deep brain stimulation for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. Methods: We performed a structured review of the literature from 1980 to 2018 using Medline and PubMed. Articles assessing the impact of deep brain stimulation on seizure frequency in patients with DRE were selected. Meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies were included. Results: To date, deep brain stimulation of various neural targets has been investigated in animal experiments and humans. This article presents the use of stimulation of the anterior and centromedian nucleus of the thalamus, hippocampus, basal ganglia, cerebellum and hypothalamus. Anterior thalamic stimulation has demonstrated efficacy and there is evidence to recommend it as the target of choice. Conclusion: Deep brain stimulation for seizures may be an option in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Anterior thalamic nucleus stimulation could be recommended over other targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasser Zangiabadi
- Shefa Neuroscience Research Center, Khatam Alanbia Hospital, Tehran, Iran
- Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Lady Diana Ladino
- Epilepsy Program, Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Neuroclinica, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Farzad Sina
- Department of Neurology, Rasool Akram Hospital, IUMS, Tehran, Iran
| | - Juan Pablo Orozco-Hernández
- Departamento de Investigación Clínica, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira-Clínica Comfamiliar, Pereira, Colombia
| | - Alexandra Carter
- Saskatchewan Epilepsy Program, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang Y, Aronson JP, Pilitsis JG, Gee L, Durphy J, Molho ES, Ramirez-Zamora A. Anatomical Correlates of Uncontrollable Laughter With Unilateral Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease. Front Neurol 2018; 9:341. [PMID: 29887826 PMCID: PMC5980955 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2017] [Accepted: 04/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is a well-established treatment for the management of motor complications in Parkinson’s disease. Uncontrollable laughter has been reported as a rare side effect of STN stimulation. The precise mechanism responsible for this unique phenomenon remains unclear. We examined in detail the DBS electrode position and stimulation parameters in two patients with uncontrollable laughter during programming after STN-DBS surgery and illustrated the anatomical correlates of the acute mood changes with STN stimulation. Case report Unilateral STN-DBS induced uncontrollable laughter with activation of the most ventral contacts in both patients. However, the location of the electrodes responsible for this adverse effect differed between the patients. In the first patient, the DBS lead was placed more inferiorly and medially within the STN. In the second patient, the DBS lead was implanted more anteriorly and inferiorly than initially planned at the level of the substantia nigra reticulata (SNr). Conclusion Unilateral STN-DBS can induce acute uncontrollable laughter with activation of electrodes located more anterior, medial, and inferior in relationship with the standard stereotactic STN target. We suggest that simulation of ventral and medial STN, surrounding limbic structures or the SNr, is the most plausible anatomical substrate responsible for this acute mood and behavioral change. Our findings provide insight into the complex functional neuroanatomical relationship of the STN and adjacent structures important for mood and behavior. DBS programming with more dorsal and lateral contacts within the STN should be entertained to minimize the emotional side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yonglu Huang
- Department of Neurology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United States.,Department of Neurology, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Joshua P Aronson
- Department of Surgery, Section of Neurosurgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United States
| | - Julie G Pilitsis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, United States
| | - Lucy Gee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, United States
| | - Jennifer Durphy
- Department of Neurology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, United States
| | - Eric Steven Molho
- Department of Neurology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, United States
| | - Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rossi M, Bruno V, Arena J, Cammarota Á, Merello M. Challenges in PD Patient Management After DBS: A Pragmatic Review. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2018; 5:246-254. [PMID: 30363375 PMCID: PMC6174419 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.12592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2017] [Revised: 01/01/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or internal globus pallidus (GPi) represents an effective and universally applied therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) motor complications. However, certain procedure-related problems and unrealistic patient expectations may detract specialists from indicating DBS more widely despite significant clinical effects. METHODS This review provides a pragmatic educational summary of the most conflicting postoperative management issues in patients undergoing DBS for PD. RESULTS DBS in PD has been associated with certain complications and post-procedural management issues, which can complicate surgical outcome interpretation. Many PD patients consider DBS outcomes negative due to unfulfilled expectations, even when significant motor symptom improvement is achieved. Speech, gait, postural stability, and cognition may worsen after DBS and body weight may increase. Although DBS may induce impulse control disorders in some cases, in others, it may actually improve them when dopamine agonist dosage is reduced after surgery. However, apathy may also arise, especially when dopaminergic medication tapering is rapid. Gradual loss of response with time suggests disease progression, rather than the wearing off of DBS effects. Furthermore, implantable pulse generator expiration is considered a movement disorder emergency, as it may worsen parkinsonian symptoms or cause life-threatening akinetic crises due to malignant DBS withdrawal syndrome. CONCLUSION Major unsolved issues occurring after DBS therapy preclude complete patient satisfaction. Multidisciplinary management at experienced centers, as well as careful and comprehensive delivery of information to patients, should contribute to make DBS outcome expectations more realistic and allow post procedural complications to be better accepted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malco Rossi
- Movement Disorders Section, Neuroscience DepartmentRaul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research (FLENI)Buenos AiresArgentina
| | - Verónica Bruno
- Movement Disorders Section, Neuroscience DepartmentRaul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research (FLENI)Buenos AiresArgentina
- Argentine National Scientific and Technological Research Council (CONICET)Buenos AiresArgentina
| | - Julieta Arena
- Movement Disorders Section, Neuroscience DepartmentRaul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research (FLENI)Buenos AiresArgentina
| | - Ángel Cammarota
- Movement Disorders Section, Neuroscience DepartmentRaul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research (FLENI)Buenos AiresArgentina
| | - Marcelo Merello
- Movement Disorders Section, Neuroscience DepartmentRaul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research (FLENI)Buenos AiresArgentina
- Argentine National Scientific and Technological Research Council (CONICET)Buenos AiresArgentina
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article reviews the recognition and management of neuropsychiatric issues in Parkinson disease (PD), including mood disorders, cognitive impairment, and behavioral disturbances. RECENT FINDINGS Patients with PD frequently develop neuropsychiatric issues, and these issues can greatly affect their quality of life. In recent years, mood, cognitive, and behavioral issues in PD have received greater recognition, with increasing attention directed toward improved screening and therapeutic interventions for symptomatic treatment. Taken together as a group, neuropsychiatric issues can be found throughout the whole course of PD, from early in the disease, potentially even in a premotor stage, to the time of diagnosis and later in the course with more advanced disease. SUMMARY In the comprehensive care of patients with PD, recognition of neuropsychiatric issues is critical. Advances in therapeutics for the different neuropsychiatric symptoms are still needed, although several pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic options are available. Patient management frequently requires a multidisciplinary approach, with collaboration of neurologists with neuropsychologists, psychologists, psychiatrists, and other health professionals.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Given their neuroanatomical similarities to humans and their ability to perform complex behaviors, the nonhuman primate has been an important model for understanding complex systems such as sensory processing, motor control, social interaction, and nervous system disorders. Optogenetics offers cell-type specific neural control with millisecond precision, making it a powerful neural modulation technique. Combining optogenetics with the nonhuman primate model promises to lead to significant advances in both basic and applied research. In the past few years, optogenetics has made considerable progress in the nonhuman primate. Here, we systematically review the current state-of-art of optogenetics in the nonhuman primate with an emphasis on behavioral manipulation. Given its recent successes, we believe that the progress in the nonhuman primate will boost the translation of optogenetics to clinical applications in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunshan Deng
- 1 State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,2 Department of Neurology, Shenzhen People' s Hospital, Second Clinical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hong Yuan
- 1 State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,3 Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ji Dai
- 1 State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,3 Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stefani A, Trendafilov V, Liguori C, Fedele E, Galati S. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation on motor-symptoms of Parkinson's disease: Focus on neurochemistry. Prog Neurobiol 2017; 151:157-174. [PMID: 28159574 DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2016] [Revised: 01/20/2017] [Accepted: 01/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become a standard therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) and it is also currently under investigation for other neurological and psychiatric disorders. Although many scientific, clinical and ethical issues are still unresolved, DBS delivered into the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has improved the quality of life of several thousands of patients. The mechanisms underlying STN-DBS have been debated extensively in several reviews; less investigated are the biochemical consequences, which are still under scrutiny. Crucial and only partially understood, for instance, are the complex interplays occurring between STN-DBS and levodopa (LD)-centred therapy in the post-surgery follow-up. The main goal of this review is to address the question of whether an improved motor control, based on STN-DBS therapy, is also achieved through the additional modulation of other neurotransmitters, such as noradrenaline (NA) and serotonin (5-HT). A critical issue is to understand not only acute DBS-mediated effects, but also chronic changes, such as those involving cyclic nucleotides, capable of modulating circuit plasticity. The present article will discuss the neurochemical changes promoted by STN-DBS and will document the main results obtained in microdialysis studies. Furthermore, we will also examine the preliminary achievements of voltammetry applied to humans, and discuss new hypothetical investigational routes, taking into account novel players such as glia, or subcortical regions such as the pedunculopontine (PPN) area. Our further understanding of specific changes in brain chemistry promoted by STN-DBS would further disseminate its utilisation, at any stage of disease, avoiding an irreversible lesioning approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Stefani
- Department of System Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - V Trendafilov
- Laboratory for Biomedical Neurosciences (LBN), Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland (NSI), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - C Liguori
- Department of System Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - E Fedele
- Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology Unit and Center of Excellence for Biomedical Research, University of Genoa, 16148 Genoa, Italy
| | - S Galati
- Laboratory for Biomedical Neurosciences (LBN), Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland (NSI), Lugano, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abulseoud OA, Kasasbeh A, Min HK, Fields JA, Tye SJ, Goerss S, Knight EJ, Sampson SM, Klassen BT, Matsumoto JY, Stoppel C, Lee KH, Frye MA. Stimulation-Induced Transient Nonmotor Psychiatric Symptoms following Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: Association with Clinical Outcomes and Neuroanatomical Correlates. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2016; 94:93-101. [PMID: 27093641 DOI: 10.1159/000445076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2015] [Accepted: 02/29/2016] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical and neurobiological underpinnings of transient nonmotor (TNM) psychiatric symptoms during the optimization of stimulation parameters in the course of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) remain under intense investigation. METHODS Forty-nine patients with refractory Parkinson's disease underwent bilateral STN-DBS implants and were enrolled in a 24-week prospective, naturalistic follow-up study. Patients who exhibited TNM psychiatric manifestations during DBS parameter optimization were evaluated for potential associations with clinical outcome measures. RESULTS Twenty-nine TNM+ episodes were reported by 15 patients. No differences between TNM+ and TNM- groups were found in motor outcome. However, unlike the TNM- group, TNM+ patients did not report improvement in subsyndromal depression or quality of life. TNM+ episodes were more likely to emerge during bilateral monopolar stimulation of the medial STN. CONCLUSIONS The occurrence of TNM psychiatric symptoms during optimization of stimulation parameters was associated with the persistence of subsyndromal depression and with lower quality of life ratings at 6 months. The neurobiological underpinnings of TNM symptoms are investigated yet remain difficult to explain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osama A Abulseoud
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
AbstractDuring the “DBS Canada Day” symposium held in Toronto July 4-5, 2014, the scientific committee invited experts to discuss three main questions on target selection for deep brain stimulation (DBS) of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). First, is the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or the globus pallidus internus (GPi) the ideal target? In summary, both targets are equally effective in improving the motor symptoms of PD. STN allows a greater medications reduction, while GPi exerts a direct antidyskinetic effect. Second, are there further potential targets? Ventral intermediate nucleus DBS has significant long-term benefit for tremor control but insufficiently addresses other motor features of PD. DBS in the posterior subthalamic area also reduces tremor. The pedunculopontine nucleus remains an investigational target. Third, should DBS for PD be performed unilaterally, bilaterally or staged? Unilateral STN DBS can be proposed to asymmetric patients. There is no evidence that a staged bilateral approach reduces the incidence of DBS-related adverse events.
Collapse
|
10
|
Castrioto A, Lhommée E, Moro E, Krack P. Mood and behavioural effects of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13:287-305. [PMID: 24556007 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70294-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 202] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Deep-brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an established treatment for motor complications in Parkinson's disease. 20 years of experience with this procedure have contributed to improved understanding of the role of the STN in motor, cognitive, and emotional control. In Parkinson's disease, the pathological STN neuronal activity leads to motor, cognitive, and emotional inhibition. Deafferentation of the STN by DBS can reverse such behavioural inhibition. The release of this brake allows both motor and non-motor improvement, but can also be associated with excessive motor, cognitive, and emotional behavioural disinhibition. Conversely, the notable reduction in anti-parkinsonian drug dose allowed by motor improvement can unveil mesolimbic hypodopaminergic behaviours such as apathy, anxiety, or depression. Fine-tuning of stimulation parameters with dopaminergic drugs is necessary to prevent or improve pathological behaviours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Castrioto
- Movement Disorder Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Joseph Fourier University, Grenoble, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Unit 836, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Grenoble, France; Clinica Neurologica, Università di Perugia, Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Eugénie Lhommée
- Movement Disorder Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Joseph Fourier University, Grenoble, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Unit 836, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Elena Moro
- Movement Disorder Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Joseph Fourier University, Grenoble, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Unit 836, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Paul Krack
- Movement Disorder Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Joseph Fourier University, Grenoble, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Unit 836, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.
| |
Collapse
|