Principles of vestibular pharmacotherapy

Histaminergic System and Vestibular Function in Normal and Pathological Conditions

Most neurotransmitter systems are represented in the central and peripheral vestibular system and are thereby involved both in normal vestibular signal processing and the pathophysiology of vestibular disorders. However, there is a special relationship between the vestibular system and the histaminergic system. The purpose of this review is to document how the histaminergic system interferes with normal and pathological vestibular function. In particular, we will discuss neurobiological mechanisms such as neuroinflammation that involve histamine to modulate and allow restoration of balance function in the situation of a vestibular insult. These adaptive mechanisms represent targets of histaminergic pharmacological compounds capable of restoring vestibular function in pathological situations. The clinical use of drugs targeting the histaminergic system in various vestibular disorders is critically discussed.

Vertigoheel improves central vestibular compensation after unilateral peripheral vestibulopathy in rats

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of Vertigoheel on central vestibular compensation and cognitive deficits in rats subjected to peripheral vestibular loss. Young adult male Long Evans rats were subjected to bilateral vestibular insults through irreversible sequential ototoxic destructions of the vestibular sensory organs. Vestibular syndrome characteristics were monitored at several time points over days and weeks following the sequential insults, using a combination of behavioral assessment paradigms allowing appreciation of patterns of change in static and dynamic deficits, together with spatial navigation, learning, and memory processes. Vertigoheel administered intraperitoneally significantly improved maximum body velocity and not moving time relative to its vehicle control on days 2 and 3 and on day 2, respectively, after unilateral vestibular lesion (UVL). It also significantly improved postural control relative to its vehicle 1 day after UVL. Conversely, Vertigoheel did not display any significant effect vs. vehicle on the severity of the syndrome, nor on the time course of other examined parameters, such as distance moved, mean body velocity, meander, and rearing. Spatial cognition testing using Y- and T-maze and eight-radial arm maze did not show any statistically significant difference between Vertigoheel and vehicle groups. However, Vertigoheel potentially enhanced the speed of learning in sham animals. Evaluating Vertigoheel's effect on thigmotaxis during the open-field video tracking test revealed no significant difference between Vertigoheel and its vehicle control groups suggesting that Vertigoheel does not seem to induce sedative or anxiolytic effects that could negatively affect vestibular and memory function. Present observations reveal that Vertigoheel improves central vestibular compensation following the unilateral peripheral vestibular loss as demonstrated by improvement of specific symptoms.

Current and Emerging Medical Therapies for Dizziness

Medical therapies for dizziness are aimed at vertigo reduction, secondary symptom management, or the root cause of the pathologic process. Acute peripheral vertigo pharmacotherapies include antihistamines, calcium channel blockers, and benzodiazepines. Prophylactic pharmacotherapies vary between causes. For Meniere disease, betahistine and diuretics remain initial first-line oral options, whereas intratympanic steroids and intratympanic gentamicin are reserved for uncontrolled symptoms. For cerebellar dizziness and oculomotor disorders, 4-aminopyridine may provide benefit. For vestibular migraine, persistent postural perceptual dizziness and mal de débarquement, treatment options overlap and include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants and calcium channel blockers.

[Update on diagnosis and therapy in frequent vestibular and balance disorders]

The 8 most frequent vestibular disorders account for more than 70% of all presentations of vertigo, dizziness, and imbalance. In acute (and mostly non-repetitive) vestibular disorders acute unilateral vestibulopathy and vestibular stroke are most important, in episodic vestibulopathies benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), Menière's disease and vestibular migraine, and in chronic vestibular disorders bilateral vestibulopathy/presbyvestibulopathy, functional dizziness and cerebellar dizziness. In the last decade, internationally consented diagnostic criteria and nomenclature were established for the most frequent vestibular disorders, which can be easily applied in clinical practice. The diagnostic guidelines are based on history taking (including onset, duration, course, triggers, accomanying symptoms), clinical examination, and only a few apparative tests (by videooculography and audiometry) for securing the diagnosis. Treatment of vestibular disorders includes physical training (repositioning maneuvers, multimodal balance training) and pharmacological approaches (e.g., corticosteroids, antiepileptics, antidepressants, potassium-canal-blockers, drugs enhancing neuroplasticity). For most drugs, high-level evidence from prospective controlled trials is lacking. In clinical practice, the most frequent vestibular disorders can be treated effectively, thus avoiding chronicity and secondary comorbidity (by immobility, falls or psychiatric disorders such as anxiety or depression).

Identification of New Biomarkers of Posturo-Locomotor Instability in a Rodent Model of Vestibular Pathology

The vestibular system plays a crucial role in maintaining postural balance. Unilateral vestibular lesions result in a typical syndrome characterized by postural imbalance, altered locomotor patterns and gaze stabilization, as well as cognitive and neurovegetative disorders. One of the main difficulties encountered in the development of new anti-vertigo drugs is the lack of sensitivity in the evaluation of this syndrome. Qualitative assessments of the vestibular syndrome have been developed, but methods of conducting quantitative evaluations are critically lacking. Recently, assessments with a dynamic weight-bearing device (DWB®, Bioseb) revealed postural alterations in rats subjected to unilateral vestibular neurectomy (UVN). Our team is evaluating a new version of this device capable of quantifying additional parameters of postural and locomotor equilibrium. The objective of this study was to use this device to assess these new posturo-locomotor parameters in a rat model of a vestibular pathology. The biomarkers measured by this device are as follows: the barycenter, the support surface and the weight distribution of the rats when they were moving or stationary. Before UVN, the rats showed a symmetric distribution of their weight along the lateral axis. In the acute phase after UVN on the left side, the rats distributed more weight on the right side than on the left side and then distributed more weight on the left side. These results corroborate those presented in our previous study. The support surface of the rats increased between 1 day and 30 days after UVN, and the barycenter distribution reflected the weight distribution. In addition, our results show smaller changes in the weight distributions when the animals are moving compared with when they are stationary in the acute phase after UVN. This study provides new information on the static and dynamic postural balance patterns observed after unilateral vestibular loss in rats. These data are relevant because they objectively quantify the posturo-locomotor component of vestibular syndrome as well as the compensatory strategies used after vestibular loss. These results may guide the development of rehabilitation protocols for vestibular patients and the validation of pharmacological compounds favoring the restoration of equilibrium.

Advances in pharmacotherapy of vestibular and ocular motor disorders

INTRODUCTION

Vertigo and dizziness are common chief complaints of vestibular and ocular motor disorders (lifetime prevalence 30%). Treatment relies on physical, pharmacological, psychological and rarely surgical approaches. Eight groups of drugs are currently used in vestibular and ocular motor disorders, namely anti-vertiginous, anti-inflammatory, anti-menière's, anti-migrainous medications, anti-depressants, anti-convulsants, aminopyridines and agents that enhance vestibular plasticity.

AREAS COVERED

The purpose of this review is to summarize the pharmacological characteristics and clinical applications of medications that are used for peripheral, central and functional vestibular and ocular motor disorders. The level of evidence for the respective drugs is described alongside the pathophysiological premises supporting their use. The authors place particular focus on translation and back-translation in vestibular pharmacological research and the repurposing of known drugs for new indications and rare disorders.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of drugs in vestibular and ocular motor disorders is often based on open-label, non-controlled studies and expert opinion. In the future, strong evidence derived from RCTs is needed to support the effectiveness and tolerability of these therapies in well-defined vestibular and ocular motor disorders. Vestibular pharmacological research must be guided by a better understanding of the molecular targets relevant in the pathophysiology of vestibular and ocular motor disorders.

Ginkgo biloba Extract EGb 761 Improves Vestibular Compensation and Modulates Cerebral Vestibular Networks in the Rat

Unilateral inner ear damage is followed by behavioral recovery due to central vestibular compensation. The dose-dependent therapeutic effect of Ginkgo biloba extract EGb 761 on vestibular compensation was investigated by behavioral testing and serial cerebral [¹⁸F]-Fluoro-desoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]-FDG)-μPET in a rat model of unilateral labyrinthectomy (UL). Five groups of 8 animals each were treated with EGb 761-supplemented food at doses of 75, 37.5 or 18.75 mg/kg body weight 6 weeks prior and 15 days post UL (groups A,B,C), control food prior and EGb 761-supplemented food (75 mg/kg) for 15 days post UL (group D), or control food throughout (group E). Plasma levels of EGb 761 components bilobalide, ginkgolide A and B were analyzed prior and 15 days post UL. Behavioral testing included clinical scoring of nystagmus, postural asymmetry, head roll tilt, body rotation during sensory perturbation and instrumental registration of mobility in an open field before and 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 15 days after UL. Whole-brain [¹⁸F]-FDG-μPET was recorded before and 1, 3, 7, 15 days after UL. The EGb 761 group A (75 mg/kg prior/post UL) showed a significant reduction of nystagmus scores (day 3 post UL), of postural asymmetry (1, 3, 7 days post UL), and an increased mobility in the open field (day 7 post UL) as compared to controls (group E). Application of EGb 761 at doses of 37.5 and 18.75 mg/kg prior/post UL (groups B,C) resulted in faster recovery of postural asymmetry, but did not influence mobility relative to controls. Locomotor velocity increased with higher plasma levels of ginkgolide A and B. [¹⁸F]-FDG-μPET revealed a significant decrease of the regional cerebral glucose metabolism (rCGM) in the vestibular nuclei and cerebellum and an increase in the hippocampal formation with higher plasma levels of ginkgolides and bilobalide 1 and 3 days post UL. Decrease of rCGM in the vestibular nucleus area and increase in the hippocampal formation with higher plasma levels persisted until day 15 post UL. In conclusion, Ginkgo biloba extract EGb 761 improves vestibulo-ocular motor, vestibulo-spinal compensation, and mobility after UL. This rat study supports the translational approach to investigate EGb 761 at higher dosages for acceleration of vestibular compensation in acute vestibular loss.

Histamine H1 Receptor Contributes to Vestibular Compensation

Vestibular compensation is responsible for the spontaneous recovery of postural, locomotor, and oculomotor dysfunctions in patients with peripheral vestibular lesion or posterior circulation stroke. Mechanism investigation of vestibular compensation is of great importance in both facilitating recovery of vestibular function and understanding the postlesion functional plasticity in the adult CNS. Here, we report that postsynaptic histamine H1 receptor contributes greatly to facilitating vestibular compensation. The expression of H1 receptor is restrictedly increased in the ipsilesional rather than contralesional GABAergic projection neurons in the medial vestibular nucleus (MVN), one of the most important centers for vestibular compensation, in unilateral labyrinthectomized male rats. Furthermore, H1 receptor mediates an asymmetric excitation of the commissural GABAergic but not glutamatergic neurons in the ipsilesional MVN, which may help to rebalance bilateral vestibular systems and promote vestibular compensation. Selective blockage of H1 receptor in the MVN significantly retards the recovery of both static and dynamic vestibular symptoms following unilateral labyrinthectomy, and remarkably attenuates the facilitation of betahistine, whose effect has traditionally been attributed to its antagonistic action on the presynaptic H3 receptor, on vestibular compensation. These results reveal a previously unknown role for histamine H1 receptor in vestibular compensation and amelioration of vestibular motor deficits, as well as an involvement of H1 receptor in potential therapeutic effects of betahistine. The findings provide not only a new insight into the postlesion neuronal circuit plasticity and functional recovery in the CNS, but also a novel potential therapeutic target for vestibular disorders.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Vestibular disorders manifest postural imbalance, nystagmus, and vertigo. Vestibular compensation is critical for facilitating recovery from vestibular disorders, and of great importance in understanding the postlesion functional plasticity in the adult CNS. Here, we show that postsynaptic H1 receptor in the medial vestibular nucleus (MVN) contributes greatly to the recovery of both static and dynamic symptoms following unilateral vestibular lesion. H1 receptor selectively mediates the asymmetric activation of commissural inhibitory system in the ipsilesional MVN and actively promotes vestibular compensation. The findings provide not only a new insight into the postlesion neuronal circuit plasticity and functional recovery of CNS, but also a novel potential therapeutic target for promoting vestibular compensation and ameliorating vestibular disorders.

Are there advances in pharmacotherapy for panic disorder? A systematic review of the past five years

INTRODUCTION

Several effective medications are available for treating panic disorder (PD). However, outcomes are unsatisfactory in a number of patients, suggesting the usefulness of expanding the array of antipanic drugs and improving the quality of response to current recommended treatments.

AREAS COVERED

The authors have performed an updated systematic review of pharmacological studies (phase III onwards) to examine whether advances have been made in the last five years. Only four studies were included. D-cycloserine no longer seemed promising as a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) enhancer. Some preliminary findings concerning the optimization of recommended medications deserved consideration, including: the possibility that SSRIs are more effective than CBT alone in treating panic attacks, combined therapy is preferable when agoraphobia is present, and clonazepam is more potent than paroxetine in decreasing panic relapse.

EXPERT OPINION

Given the lack of novel treatments, expanding a personalized approach to the existing medications seems to be the most feasible strategy to improve pharmacotherapy outcomes regarding PD. Recent technological progress, including wearable devices collecting real-time data, 'big data' platforms, and application of machine learning techniques might help make outcome prediction more reliable. Further research on previously promising novel treatments is also recommended.

Management of Treatment-Resistant Panic Disorder

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Purpose of Review Management of treatment-resistant (TR) panic disorder (PD) is an unresolved issue. In this paper, we provide a brief summary of previous findings, an updated (2015-2017) systematic review of pharmacological/non-pharmacological studies, and our personal perspective on this topic.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent Findings We found a very limited number of recent findings. Quetiapine extended-release augmentation has not been found to be beneficial, in comparison to placebo, in non-responders to previously recommended pharmacotherapy. In non-responders to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), switching to paroxetine/citalopram has been found to be more effective than continuing CBT. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) has shown some improvement in patients' resistance to previous psychological/pharmacological interventions compared with a waiting-list condition.

SUMMARY

Summary Previous and recent findings regarding the treatment of TR PD suffer from several methodological limitations. Available studies provide insufficient evidence to support the use of medications alternative to the recommended medications; the efficacy of ACT needs confirmation with more rigorous methodology. Prolonged pharmacotherapy may produce significant improvement in patients with unsatisfactory response to short-term pharmacotherapy, while switching to pharmacotherapy may help non-responders to CBT. We discuss our personal perspective on the definition of "treatment resistance" as it relates to PD and provide personalized intervention strategies to increase favorable clinical outcomes based on our clinical expertise and review of experimental studies on the pathophysiology of PD.