Management of neuro-oncologic emergencies

Neuro-oncologic Emergencies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with brain and spine tumors are at high risk of presenting cancer-related complications at disease presentation or during active treatment and are usually related to the type and location of the lesion. Here, we discuss presentation and management of the most common emergencies affecting patients with central nervous system neoplastic lesions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tumor-related emergencies encompass complications in patients with central nervous system neoplasms, as well as neurologic complications in patients with systemic malignancies. Brain tumor patients are at high risk of developing multiple complications such as intracranial hypertension, brain herniation, intracranial bleeding, spinal cord compression, and others. Neuro-oncologic emergencies require immediate attention and multi-disciplinary care. These emergent situations usually need rapid decision-making and management on an inpatient basis.

Neuro-Oncologic Emergencies

Cancer and cancer therapies have the potential to affect the nervous system in a host of different ways. Cerebral edema, increased intracranial pressure, cerebrovascular events, status epilepticus, and epidural spinal cord compression are among those most often presenting as emergencies. Neurologic side-effects of cancer therapies are often mild, but occasionally result in serious illness. Immunotherapies cause autoimmune-related neurologic side-effects that are generally responsive to immunosuppressive therapies. Emergency management of neuro-oncologic problems benefits from early identification and close collaboration among interdisciplinary team members and patients or surrogate decision-makers.

Posterior Fossa Metastasis-Associated Obstructive Hydrocephalus in Adult Patients: Literature Review and Practical Considerations from the Neuro-Oncology Club of the French Society of Neurosurgery

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus concerning the management of adult patients with posterior fossa metastasis-associated obstructive hydrocephalus, especially regarding surgical procedures. A literature review was performed to assess the surgical strategy in the management of patients with metastatic brain tumor.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted of PubMed in November 2017 to identify all studies concerning brain metastases and obstructive hydrocephalus in English. All studies (except case reports and pediatric studies) between December 1953 and November 2017 that were about posterior fossa metastasis-associated obstructive hydrocephalus in adult patients were eligible. Eligible studies were classified by level of evidence. We assessed epidemiology, clinical and imaging findings, neurosurgical management, and prognosis of adult patients with posterior fossa metastasis-associated obstructive hydrocephalus. We suggest some practical considerations and a management decision tree on behalf of the Neuro-oncology Club of the French Society of Neurosurgery, with evidence-based analysis.

RESULTS

Direct surgical resection could be considered for patients with asymptomatic obstructive hydrocephalus, and endoscopic third ventriculostomy seems to be a reasonable procedure for patients with symptomatic obstructive hydrocephalus. A ventriculoperitoneal or atrial shunt seems to be a valid alternative when patients have a history of central nervous system infection or ventricular hemorrhage, leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, or unfavorable anatomy for an endoscopic third ventriculostomy to be performed.

CONCLUSIONS

The Neuro-oncology Club of the French Society of Neurosurgery suggests a prospective assessment of these neurosurgical procedures to compare their safety and efficacy.

Non-pharmacological interventions in patients with spinal cord compression: a systematic review

Spinal cord compression is a complex and challenging condition that greatly affects the quality of life. Non-pharmacological techniques have only been studied to a very lesser extent; although they are evidence to be beneficial. We performed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) analysis of the scientific literature in several databases (Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, Cuiden, Pubmed, Lilacs and Embase); using the following keywords: spinal cord compression, spine compression, mobilization, positioning, brace and bracing. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria and were finally included in the systematic review. 3 of them were related to metastatic spinal cord compression, 5 to spinal cord compression due to other causes and the last 3 of them regarded the health professional´s knowledge in oncology patients. In all cases, it seems possible to manage spinal cord compression by using external mobilization and braces and that this treatment is beneficial to patients. Positioning plays a massive role in the disease and can improve or worsen the condition when used improperly; the supine position is overused and can have a negative impact both physically and psychologically. Non-pharmacological interventions could be useful for pain management, cardiovascular alterations and patients' well-being. One randomized clinical trial demonstrated that massage therapy, using either broad compression massage or light contact touch massage improved pain control. There is an urgent need of randomized clinical trials with these interventions in order to achieve an improved care of these patients.