Establishment and interpretation of NODAL and BMP signaling gradients in early vertebrate development

Protein-O-fucosylation of coreceptors may be required for Nodal signaling in Xenopus

Nodal-related ligands of TGF-β family play pivotal roles for mesoderm induction and body axis formation during vertebrate early embryogenesis. Nodal ligands are distinct from most other TGF-β ligands family as they require EGF-CFC factors as coreceptors for signaling, in addition to their cognate type I and type II TGF-β receptors. In amphibian Xenopus laevis embryos, 5 Nodal-related genes (Xnr1/2/4/5/6) and 2 EGF-CFC genes (XCR1, XCR3) play roles in mesoderm induction and the accumulation of phosphorylated Smad2, while in mammalian embryos, 1 Nodal gene and 1 EGF-CFC gene (Cripto) play roles during mesoderm induction. Mammalian EGF-CFC factors are reported to be O-fucosylated at a conserved threonine residue of the EGF-like motif by protein-O-fucosyltransferase 1 (Pofut1), but this O-fucose modification is shown to be dispensable for Nodal signaling in mammalian embryos. In this study, we investigated the developmental roles of Xenopus laevis Pofut1 (XPofut1) and its potential function in Nodal signaling. We found that morpholino antisense-mediated knockdown of XPofut1 causes reduction of Smad2 phosphorylation in late blastula and axial truncation in neurula. We also found that the O-fucosyltransferase activity of XPofut1 is important in the marginal zone, but not in the vegetal pole region, of blastula. Interestingly, XPofut1 is necessary for Smad2 phosphorylation induced by Xnr1 or Xnr2, but not by Xnr5 or Xnr6. Among the Nodal signaling components, only EGF-CFC factors are known to be modified by Pofut1. Therefore, based on our current observation, we propose that XPofut1 regulates signaling of a subset of nodal ligands in pregastrulation embryos possibly through modulating the function of EGF-CFC factors.

'Three signals - three body axes' as patterning principle in bilaterians

In vertebrates, the three orthogonal body axes, anteroposterior (AP), dorsoventral (DV) and left-right (LR) are determined at gastrula and neurula stages by the Spemann-Mangold organizer and its equivalents. A common feature of AP and DV axis formation is that an evolutionary conserved interplay between growth factors (Wnt, BMP) and their extracellular antagonists (e.g. Dkk1, Chordin) creates signaling gradients for axial patterning. Recent work showed that LR patterning in Xenopus follows the same principle, with R-spondin 2 (Rspo2) as an extracellular FGF antagonist, which creates a signaling gradient that determines the LR vector. That a triad of anti-FGF, anti-BMP, and anti-Wnt governs LR, DV, and AP axis formation reveals a unifying principle in animal development. We discuss how cross-talk between these three signals confers integrated AP-DV-LR body axis patterning underlying developmental robustness, size scaling, and harmonious regulation. We propose that Urbilateria featured three orthogonal body axes that were governed by a Cartesian coordinate system of orthogonal Wnt/AP, BMP/DV, and FGF/LR signaling gradients.

Myosin1G promotes Nodal signaling to control zebrafish left-right asymmetry

Myosin1D (Myo1D) has recently emerged as a conserved regulator of animal Left-Right (LR) asymmetry that governs the morphogenesis of the vertebrate central LR Organizer (LRO). In addition to Myo1D, the zebrafish genome encodes the closely related Myo1G. Here we show that while Myo1G also controls LR asymmetry, it does so through an entirely different mechanism. Myo1G promotes the Nodal-mediated transfer of laterality information from the LRO to target tissues. At the cellular level, Myo1G is associated with endosomes positive for the TGFβ signaling adapter SARA. myo1g mutants have fewer SARA-positive Activin receptor endosomes and a reduced responsiveness to Nodal ligands that results in a delay of left-sided Nodal propagation and tissue-specific laterality defects in organs that are most distant from the LRO. Additionally, Myo1G promotes signaling by different Nodal ligands in specific biological contexts. Our findings therefore identify Myo1G as a context-dependent regulator of the Nodal signaling pathway.

Pulling the strings on solid-to-liquid phase transitions in cell collectives

Cell collectives must dynamically adapt to different biological contexts. For instance, in homeostatic conditions, epithelia must establish a barrier between body compartments and resist external stresses, while during development, wound healing or cancer invasion, these tissues undergo extensive remodeling. Using analogies from inert, passive materials, changes in cellular density, shape, rearrangements and/or migration were shown to result in collective transitions between solid and fluid states. However, what biological mechanisms govern these transitions remains an open question. In particular, the upstream signaling pathways and molecular effectors controlling the key physical axes determining tissue rheology and dynamics remain poorly understood. In this perspective, we focus on emerging evidence identifying the first biological signals determining the collective state of living tissues, with an emphasis on how these mechanisms are exploited for functionality across biological contexts.

Context-dependent TGFβ family signalling in cell fate regulation

The transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) family are a large group of evolutionarily conserved cytokines whose signalling modulates cell fate decision-making across varying cellular contexts at different stages of life. Here we discuss new findings in early embryos that reveal how, in contrast to our original understanding of morphogen interpretation, robust cell fate specification can originate from a noisy combination of signalling inputs and a broad range of signalling levels. We compare this evidence with novel findings on the roles of TGFβ family signalling in tissue maintenance and homeostasis during juvenile and adult life, spanning the skeletal, haemopoietic and immune systems. From these comparisons, it emerges that in contrast to robust developing systems, relatively small perturbations in TGFβ family signalling have detrimental effects at later stages in life, leading to aberrant cell fate specification and disease, for example in cancer or congenital disorders. Finally, we highlight novel strategies to target and amend dysfunction in signalling and discuss how gleaning knowledge from different fields of biology can help in the development of therapeutics for aberrant TGFβ family signalling in disease.

An Epigenetic LINE-1-Based Mechanism in Cancer

In the last fifty years, large efforts have been deployed in basic research, clinical oncology, and clinical trials, yielding an enormous amount of information regarding the molecular mechanisms of cancer and the design of effective therapies. The knowledge that has accumulated underpins the complexity, multifactoriality, and heterogeneity of cancer, disclosing novel landscapes in cancer biology with a key role of genome plasticity. Here, we propose that cancer onset and progression are determined by a stress-responsive epigenetic mechanism, resulting from the convergence of upregulation of LINE-1 (long interspersed nuclear element 1), the largest family of human retrotransposons, genome damage, nuclear lamina fragmentation, chromatin remodeling, genome reprogramming, and autophagy activation. The upregulated expression of LINE-1 retrotransposons and their protein products plays a key role in these processes, yielding an increased plasticity of the nuclear architecture with the ensuing reprogramming of global gene expression, including the reactivation of embryonic transcription profiles. Cancer phenotypes would thus emerge as a consequence of the unscheduled reactivation of embryonic gene expression patterns in an inappropriate context, triggering de-differentiation and aberrant proliferation in differentiated cells. Depending on the intensity of the stressing stimuli and the level of LINE-1 response, diverse degrees of malignity would be generated.