Motivation and attention following hemispheric stroke

Improving rehabilitation motivation and motor learning ability of stroke patients using different reward strategies: study protocol for a single-center, randomized controlled trial

Background

Stroke survivors often face challenges in motor learning and motivation during rehabilitation, which can impede their recovery progress. Traditional rehabilitation methods vary in effectiveness, prompting the exploration of novel approaches such as reward strategies. Previous research indicates that rewards can enhance rehabilitation motivation and facilitate motor learning. However, most reward paradigms have utilized fixed reward amounts, which also have limitations. Exploring alternative, more effective reward strategies, such as probabilistic rewards, is warranted to optimize stroke patient rehabilitation.

Methods

A total of 81 stroke patients will be recruited and randomly assigned to control, fixed reward, or probabilistic reward groups at a ratio of 1:1:1 using a randomized number table method. Participants will undergo 10 days of daily hand motor function rehabilitation training, with sessions lasting 20 min each. The training will involve pegboard tests and box and block tests. Control group participants will receive standard training, while fixed reward group members will receive monetary incentives for completing tests, and probabilistic reward group members will have the chance to win monetary rewards through a lottery box. Rehabilitation motivation and motor performance and functional near-infrared spectroscopy brain imaging will be conducted at designated time points. The primary outcome measure is the stroke rehabilitation motivation scale, and the second outcome measures include motor performance, simple test for evaluating hand function, motivation and pleasure scale self-report, and Pittsburgh rehabilitation participation scale.

Discussion

Reward-based training enhance rehabilitation participation and adherence, it also improve motor learning speed and memory retention of stroke patients. The fixed reward applied in the past studies could diminish the sensitivity of stroke patients to rewards, while probabilistic reward may provide unpredictable or variable incentives or reinforcements for motor rehabilitation. This study will compare the efficacy of different reward strategies in enhancing motor learning ability and rehabilitation motivation among stroke patients. By conducting a randomized controlled trial, the study seeks to provide valuable insights into optimizing stroke rehabilitation protocols and improving patient outcomes.Clinical Trial Registration:https://www.chictr.org.cn/, ChiCTR2400082419.

Modulated effectiveness of rehabilitation motivation by reward strategies combined with tDCS in stroke: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Stroke survivors often exhibit low motivation for rehabilitation, hindering their ability to effectively complete rehabilitation training task effectively and participate in daily activities actively. Reward strategies have been identified as an effective method for boosting rehabilitation motivation, but their long-term efficacy remains uncertain. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been recognized as a technique that facilitates plastic changes and functional reorganization of cortical areas. Particularly, tDCS can improve the functional connectivity between brain regions associated with goal-directed behavior when applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). Combing reward strategies with tDCS (RStDCS) has been shown to motivate healthy individuals to exert more effort in task performance. However, research exploring the combined and sustained effects of these strategies on rehabilitation motivation in stroke survivors is lacking.

Methods and design

Eighty-seven stroke survivors with low motivation and upper extremity dysfunction will be randomized to receive either conventional treatment, RS treatment, or RStDCS treatment. The RStDCS group will receive reward strategies combined with anodal tDCS stimulation of the left dlPFC. The RS group will receive reward strategies combined with sham stimulation. The conventional group will receive conventional treatment combined with sham stimulation. tDCS stimulation is performed over 3 weeks of hospitalization, 20 min/time, five times a week. Reward strategies refers to personalized active exercise programs for patients during hospitalization and at home. Patients can voluntarily choose tasks for active exercise and self-report to the therapist so as to punch a card for points and exchange gifts. The conventional group will receive home rehabilitation instructions prior to discharge. Rehabilitation motivation, measured using RMS. RMS, FMA, FIM, and ICF activity and social engagement scale will be compared at baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months post-enrollment to evaluate patients' multifaceted health condition based on the ICF framework.

Discussion

This study integrates knowledge from social cognitive science, economic behavioral science, and other relevant fields. We utilize straightforward and feasible reward strategies, combined with neuromodulation technology, to jointly improve patients' rehabilitation motivation. Behavioral observations and various assessment tools will be used to monitor patients' rehabilitation motivation and multifaceted health condition according to the ICF framework. The aim is to provide a preliminary exploration path for professionals to develop comprehensive strategies for improving patient rehabilitation motivation and facilitating a complete "hospital-home-society" rehabilitation process.

Clinical trial registration

https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=182589, ChiCTR2300069068.

Capability, opportunity, motivation, and social participation after stroke

BACKGROUND

Stroke survivors report limited social participation, despite it being an important rehabilitation outcome. Interdisciplinary interventions for increasing social participation amongst stroke survivors lack theoretical guidance and evidence-based approaches. The Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) theorizes that capability, opportunity, and motivation contribute to behavior change.

OBJECTIVES

This study applied the BCW to understand the relationship between social participation and stroke survivors' capability, opportunity, and motivation.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we recruited 30 community-dwelling adult stroke survivors. Assessments explored the frequency and satisfaction of social participation; physical and psychological capability; environmental accessibility and social opportunity; and motivation. A linear regression analysis was done.

RESULTS

Motivation (R² change = 29.3%, ß = 0.55) and environmental opportunity (R² change = 11%, ß = 0.39) were statistically significant predictors of social participation frequency. Motivation (R² change = 36.9%, ß = 0.61) was the only statistically significant predictor of satisfaction with social performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Motivation and environmental accessibility are statistically significant independent predictors of frequency of social participation after stroke. Motivation is the strongest predictor of satisfaction with social participation. Clinicians may support stroke survivors to promote social participation using approaches that increase motivation and environmental accessibility. Development of such theoretically sound interventions may be guided by the BCW.

Normative data of neuropsychological tests of attention and executive functions in Ecuadorian adult population

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to generate normative data for five tests of attention and executive functions (M-WCST, Stroop test, TMT, BTA, and SDMT), in a group of 322 Ecuadorian adults from Quito between the ages of 18 and 85.

METHOD

Multiple regression analyzes taking into account age, education, and gender were used to generate the normative data.

RESULTS

Age and education were significantly related to test performance such that scores decreased with age and improved as a function of education. An online calculator is provided to generate normative test scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study that presents normative data for tests of executive functions and attention in an Ecuadorian adult population. This data will improve the clinical practice of neuropsychology and help to develop the field in the country.

Normative data for tests of attention and executive functions in a sample of European Portuguese adult population

OBJECTIVE

The main goal of this study was to produce normative data for the Portuguese population on five neuropsychological tests frequently used to assess executive functions and attention: the Modified Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (M-WCST), the Stroop Color and Word Test, the Trail Making Test (TMT), the Brief Test of Attention (BTA), and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT).

METHOD

The study included 300 individuals aged between 18 and 93 years, who had educational backgrounds ranging from 3 to 25 years.

RESULTS

The influence of age, education, and sex was explored for each measure, as well as their contribution to explain the performance variance.

CONCLUSIONS

The normative data are presented as regression-based algorithms to adjust direct and derived test scores for sex, age, and education. This study provides a calculator of normative data, derived from the results of the regression models.

Following the gold trail: Reward influences on spatial exploration in neglect

Spatial attention is guided by the perceived salience and relevance of objects in the environment, a process considered to depend on a broad parieto-frontal cortical network. Signals arising from the limbic and nigrostriatal pathways conveying affective and motivational cues are also known to modulate visual selection, but the nature of this contribution and its relation to spatial attention remain unclear. We investigated the role of reward information in 15 patients with left hemispatial neglect and 15 control subjects playing multiple rounds of a virtual foraging game. Participants' exploration tracked dynamically adjusted underlying reward distributions, largely unbeknownst to them. Both control and neglect participants showed typical exploration/exploitation balance, dependent on abundance or scarcity of rewards. De-reinforcing previously favored, mostly right, regions of space attenuated left space under-exploration in patients. Multiple regression analysis indicates that such reward-based training may benefit mostly patients early after lesion onset, with mild neglect and small lesions sparing subcortical regions. Our findings support the view that spatial exploration recruits heavily right hemispheric visuospatial attentional mechanisms as well as reward signals processed by basal ganglia and prefrontal cortical circuits, which serve to learn about the motivational relevance of environmental stimuli and help prioritize attention and motor response selection.

Reward sensitivity predicts dopaminergic response in spatial neglect

It has recently been revealed that spatial neglect can be modulated by motivational factors including anticipated monetary reward. A number of dopaminergic agents have been evaluated as treatments for neglect, but the results have been mixed, with no clear anatomical or cognitive predictors of dopaminergic responsiveness. Given that the effects of incentive motivation are mediated by dopaminergic pathways that are variably damaged in stroke, we tested the hypothesis that the modulatory influences of reward and dopaminergic drugs on neglect are themselves related. We employed a single-dose, double-blind, crossover design to compare the effects of Co-careldopa and placebo on a modified visual cancellation task in patients with neglect secondary to right hemisphere stroke. Whilst confirming that reward improved visual search in this group, we showed that dopaminergic stimulation only enhances visual search in the absence of reward. When patients were divided into REWARD-RESPONDERs and REWARD-NON-RESPONDERs, we found an interaction, such that only REWARD-NON-RESPONDERs showed a positive response to reward after receiving Co-careldopa, whereas REWARD-RESPONDERs were not influenced by drug. At a neuroanatomical level, responsiveness to incentive motivation was most associated with intact dorsal striatum. These findings suggest that dopaminergic modulation of neglect follows an 'inverted U' function, is dependent on integrity of the reward system, and can be measured as a behavioural response to anticipated reward.

Recent theoretical, neural, and clinical advances in sustained attention research

Models of attention often distinguish among attention subtypes, with classic models separating orienting, switching, and sustaining functions. Compared with other forms of attention, the neurophysiological basis of sustaining attention has received far less notice, yet it is known that momentary failures of sustained attention can have far-ranging negative effects in healthy individuals, and lasting sustained attention deficits are pervasive in clinical populations. In recent years, however, there has been increased interest in characterizing moment-to-moment fluctuations in sustained attention, in addition to the overall vigilance decrement, and understanding how these neurocognitive systems change over the life span and across various clinical populations. The use of novel neuroimaging paradigms and statistical approaches has allowed for better characterization of the neural networks supporting sustained attention and has highlighted dynamic interactions within and across multiple distributed networks that predict behavioral performance. These advances have also provided potential biomarkers to identify individuals with sustained attention deficits. These findings have led to new theoretical models explaining why sustaining focused attention is a challenge for individuals and form the basis for the next generation of sustained attention research, which seeks to accurately diagnose and develop theoretically driven treatments for sustained attention deficits that affect a variety of clinical populations.

How motivation and reward learning modulate selective attention

Motivational stimuli such as rewards elicit adaptive responses and influence various cognitive functions. Notably, increasing evidence suggests that stimuli with particular motivational values can strongly shape perception and attention. These effects resemble both selective top-down and stimulus-driven attentional orienting, as they depend on internal states but arise without conscious will, yet they seem to reflect attentional systems that are functionally and anatomically distinct from those classically associated with frontoparietal cortical networks in the brain. Recent research in human and nonhuman primates has begun to reveal how reward can bias attentional selection, and where within the cognitive system the signals providing attentional priority are generated. This review aims at describing the different mechanisms sustaining motivational attention, their impact on different behavioral tasks, and current knowledge concerning the neural networks governing the integration of motivational influences on attentional behavior.