1
|
Research and Analysis of the Propagation of Vertical Vibrations in the Arrangement of a Vehicle Seat-A Child's Seat. SENSORS 2021; 21:s21248230. [PMID: 34960337 PMCID: PMC8708959 DOI: 10.3390/s21248230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
This paper deals with the issues of the impact of vertical vibrations on a child seated in a child seat during a journey. Its purpose was to assess the impact of fastening the child seats and road conditions on the level of vibrations recorded on child seats. The paper describes the tested child seats, the methodology of the tests and the test apparatus included in the measuring track. The tests were carried out in real road conditions where the child seats were located on the rear seat of a passenger vehicle. One was attached with standard seat belts, and the other with the ISOFIX base. When driving on roads with three types of surface, the following vertical accelerations were measured: seat of the child seats, the rear seat of the vehicle and the ISOfix base. The recorded accelerations were first analyzed in the time domain and then in the frequency domain. Three indexes (r.m.s, rmq and VDV) were used to assess the vibration comfort. Research has shown that the classic method of fastening a child seat with standard seat belts is more advantageous in terms of vibration comfort. Calculated indicators confirmed the negative impact of separating the child seat from the rear seat of the vehicle using the IQ ISOFIX base.
Collapse
|
2
|
Levi S, Lee H, Ren W, McCloskey S, Polson A. Reducing child restraint misuse: national survey of awareness and use of inspection stations. TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION 2020; 21:453-458. [PMID: 32615804 DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1782896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Research indicates that hands-on instruction on installation and use of child restraint systems (CRSs) is an effective method to reduce misuse. However, use of these services is low. The objective of the Awareness and Availability of Child Passenger Safety Information Resources (AACPSIR) Survey was to estimate the degree of awareness caregivers have of CRS inspection stations. The survey also evaluated the relationships among caregiver confidence and risk perceptions as well as potential barriers and facilitators to inspection station use. METHODS The AACPSIR was a web-based cross-sectional survey targeting a nationally representative sample of adults who drove with children aged 0-9 at least twice a month. An address-based sample was selected using a cluster sample design. Caregivers who reported driving frequently with child passengers answered questions on awareness and use of inspection stations, confidence related to CRS use, and barriers and facilitators to inspection station use. RESULTS Data were collected from 1,565 households. In all, 66.9% of respondents were aware of inspection stations, but only 44.2% reported that they had used these services. Most caregivers indicated that they were confident (91.7%) that the car seat was installed correctly. A quarter of the respondents indicated a reason that might prevent them from using an inspection station was that they "don't think it's necessary". A long wait time (66.5%), distance (65.2%), and schedule conflicts (63.9%) were also frequently indicated as potential barriers. Conversely, among inspection station users, most did not need to make an appointment (73%), and over half indicated that the station was five miles or less from their home and within a 15-minute drive. CONCLUSIONS The AACPSIR Survey results suggest a segment of caregivers share a positive safety culture, including knowledge of CPS services and use of those services. Of concern are caregivers who did not access an inspection station because they indicated it was not necessary, they already knew how to install the CRS, or pointed to other inconveniences. Future intervention programs that target caregivers unfamiliar with inspection stations or believe that the services are not necessary have the potential to improve child passenger safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Levi
- Center for Transportation, Technology & Safety Research, Westat, Rockville, Maryland
- School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Isarel
| | - Hyunshik Lee
- Statistics and Evaluation Sciences, Westat, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Weijia Ren
- Statistics and Evaluation Sciences, Westat, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Shawn McCloskey
- Center for Transportation, Technology & Safety Research, Westat, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Adele Polson
- Center for Transportation, Technology & Safety Research, Westat, Rockville, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brown J, Elkington J, Hunter K, Charlton JL, Bilston LE, Hayen A, Keay L. A Process Evaluation Protocol for Examining the Impact of Instructions for Correct Use of Child Car Seats Designed through a Consumer-Driven Process and Evaluated in a Field-Based Randomised Controlled Trial. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17124508. [PMID: 32585923 PMCID: PMC7345236 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17124508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The incorrect use of child car seats is common, with significant negative effects on crash protection for child passengers. There is currently little evidence for effective, practical countermeasures for incorrect use. The provision of clear and comprehensible materials on correct use supplied with restraints at the point of sale could be highly cost-effective and achieve similar benefits to restraint-fitting services or hands-on training; however, routinely supplied instructions in their current form are frequently difficult to understand. We are conducting a randomised controlled trial of the consumer-driven redesign of instructional materials, consisting of an instruction sheet, swing tags and online training videos. This paper presents the protocol that will be used in an innovate process evaluation that will use the primary outcome of overall serious misuse assessed at six months, together with a survey and semi-structured interviews to determine fidelity, dose and outcomes for all intervention participants. The study will assess intervention delivery and external factors that may impact the effectiveness of the intervention, including experience, health literacy, confidence and attitudes. When it has been conducted, this process evaluation will provide enhanced understanding of the mechanisms through which the intervention works or not, aspects of the implementation process key to success of the intervention and insight into how external factors influence the success of the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Brown
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2042, Australia; (J.E.); (K.H.); (L.K.)
- Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA) and Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2031, Australia;
- Correspondence:
| | - Jane Elkington
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2042, Australia; (J.E.); (K.H.); (L.K.)
- Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA) and Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2031, Australia;
| | - Kate Hunter
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2042, Australia; (J.E.); (K.H.); (L.K.)
| | - Judith L. Charlton
- Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia;
| | - Lynne E. Bilston
- Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA) and Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2031, Australia;
| | - Andrew Hayen
- School of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney 2007, Australia;
| | - Lisa Keay
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2042, Australia; (J.E.); (K.H.); (L.K.)
- School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schwebel DC, MacKay JM, Redden D. Study protocol: a randomised non-inferiority trial using interactive virtual presence to remotely assist parents with child restraint installations. Inj Prev 2019; 26:289-294. [PMID: 31727672 DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Revised: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Motor vehicle crashes are the third-leading cause of death to American children aged 1-5 years. When installed correctly, child restraints (car seats) reduce risk of serious injury and death. However, most restraints are installed incorrectly. The current gold standard for correct installation is systematic car seat checks, where certified technicians help parents, but car seat checks are highly underused due to barriers in access, scheduling and resources. METHODS The present study protocol describes plans to evaluate use of interactive virtual presence technology (interactive merged reality)-joint, simultaneous remote verbal and visual interaction and exposure to the same 3D stimuli-to assist remotely located parents installing child restraints. If effective, this technology could supplement or replace in-person checks and revolutionise how government, industry and non-profits help parents install child restraints properly. Building from preliminary studies, we propose a randomised non-inferiority trial to evaluate whether parents who install child restraints while communicating with remote expert technicians via interactive virtual presence on their smartphones achieve installations and learning not inferior in safety to parents who install restraints with on-site technicians. We will randomly assign 1476 caregivers at 7 US sites to install child restraints either via interactive virtual presence or live technicians. Correctness of installation will be assessed using objective checklists, both following installation and again 4 months later. CONCLUSION We aim to demonstrate that child restraint installation is accurate (>90% correct) when conducted remotely, that such installations are not inferior to installation accuracy with live experts and that parents learn and retain information about child restraint installation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Schwebel
- Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | - David Redden
- Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brown J, Elkington J, Hall A, Keay L, Charlton JL, Hunter K, Koppel S, Hayen A, Bilston LE. Can child restraint product information developed using consumer testing sustain correct use 6 months after child restraint purchase? Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Inj Prev 2018. [PMID: 29514847 DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With long-standing and widespread high rates of errors in child restraint use, there is a need to identify effective methods to address this problem. Information supplied with products at the point of sale may be a potentially efficient delivery point for such a countermeasure. The aim of this study is to establish whether product materials developed using a consumer-driven approach reduce errors in restraint use among purchasers of new child restraint systems. METHODS A cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) will be conducted. Retail stores (n=22) in the greater Sydney area will be randomised into intervention sites (n=11) and control sites (n=11), stratified by geographical and socioeconomic indicators. Participants (n=836) will enter the study on purchase of a restraint. Outcome measures are errors in installation of the restraint as observed by a trained researcher during a 6-month follow-up home assessment, and adjustment checks made by the parent when the child is placed into the restraint (observed using naturalistic methods). Process evaluation measures will also be collected during the home visit. An intention-to-treat approach will be used for all analyses. Correct use and adjustment checks made by the parent will be compared between control and intervention groups using a logistic regression model. The number of installation errors between groups will be compared using Poisson regression. DISCUSSION This cRCT will determine the effectiveness of targeted, consumer-driven information on actual error rates in use of restraints. More broadly, it may provide a best practice model for developing safety product information. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12617001252303p; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Brown
- Injury Prevention, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jane Elkington
- Injury Prevention, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexandra Hall
- Injury Prevention, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lisa Keay
- Injury Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Judith L Charlton
- Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kate Hunter
- Injury Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sjaan Koppel
- Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Hayen
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lynne E Bilston
- Injury Prevention, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leonardo JB, Spicer RS, Katradis M, Allison J, Thomas R. Building the Child Safety Collaborative Innovation and Improvement Network: How does it work and what is it achieving? Inj Prev 2018; 24:i46-i51. [PMID: 29453272 PMCID: PMC5992362 DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Revised: 12/06/2017] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study investigated whether the Child Safety Collaborative Innovation and Improvement Network (CS CoIIN) framework could be applied in the field of injury and violence prevention to reduce fatalities, hospitalizations and emergency department visits among 0-19 year olds. SAMPLE Twenty-one states/jurisdictions were accepted into cohort 1 of the CS CoIIN, and 14 were engaged from March 2016 through April 2017. A quality improvement framework was used to test, implement and spread evidence-based change ideas (strategies and programs) in child passenger safety, falls prevention, interpersonal violence prevention, suicide and self-harm prevention and teen driver safety. PROCEDURES Outcome and process measure data were analyzed using run chart rules. Descriptive data were analyzed for participation measures and descriptive statistics were produced. Qualitative data were analyzed to identify key themes. RESULTS Seventy-six percent of CS CoIIN states/jurisdictions were engaged in activities and used data to inform decision making. Within a year, states/jurisdictions were able to test and implement evidence-based change ideas in pilot sites. A small group showed improvement in process measures and were ready to spread change ideas. Improvement in outcome measures was not achieved; however, 25% of states/jurisdictions identified data sources and reported on real-time outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS Evidence indicates the CS CoIIN framework can be applied to make progress on process measures, but more time is needed to determine if this will result in progress on long-term outcome measures of fatalities, hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Seventeen states/jurisdictions will participate in cohort 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rebecca S Spicer
- Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland, USA
| | - Maria Katradis
- Education Development Center, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Rebekah Thomas
- Education Development Center, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Caregivers’ Use of Child Passenger Safety Resources and Quality of Future Child Restraint System Installations. SAFETY 2017. [DOI: 10.3390/safety3040024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
8
|
Hunter K, Keay L, Clapham K, Brown J, Bilston LE, Lyford M, Gilbert C, Ivers RQ. "He's the Number One Thing in My World": Application of the PRECEDE-PROCEED Model to Explore Child Car Seat Use in a Regional Community in New South Wales. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2017; 14:ijerph14101206. [PMID: 28994725 PMCID: PMC5664707 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14101206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2017] [Revised: 09/30/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
We explored the factors influencing the use of age-appropriate car seats in a community with a high proportion of Aboriginal families in regional New South Wales. We conducted a survey and three focus groups with parents of children aged 3–5 years enrolled at three early learning centres on the Australian south-east coast. Survey data were triangulated with qualitative data from focus groups and analysed using the PRECEDE-PROCEED conceptual framework. Of the 133 eligible families, 97 (73%) parents completed the survey including 31% of parents who reported their children were Aboriginal. Use of age-appropriate car seats was reported by 80 (83%) of the participants, and awareness of the child car seat legislation was high (91/97, 94%). Children aged 2–3 years were less likely reported to be restrained in an age-appropriate car seat than were older children aged 4–5 years (60% versus 95%: χ2 = 19.14, p < 0.001). Focus group participants highlighted how important their child’s safety was to them, spoke of the influence grandparents had on their use of child car seats and voiced mixed views on the value of authorised child car seat fitters. Future programs should include access to affordable car seats and target community members as well as parents with clear, consistent messages highlighting the safety benefits of using age-appropriate car seats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Hunter
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
| | - Lisa Keay
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
| | - Kathleen Clapham
- Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
| | - Julie Brown
- Neuroscience Research Australia and University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Lynne E Bilston
- Neuroscience Research Australia and University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Sydney, Australia.
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
| | - Marilyn Lyford
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
| | - Celeste Gilbert
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
| | - Rebecca Q Ivers
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schwebel DC, Tillman MA, Crew M, Muller M, Johnston A. Using interactive virtual presence to support accurate installation of child restraints: Efficacy and parental perceptions. JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH 2017; 62:235-243. [PMID: 28882272 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2017] [Revised: 05/26/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Child restraint systems (car seats) reduce injury risk for young children involved in motor-vehicle crashes, but parents experience significant difficulty installing child restraints correctly. Installation by certified child passenger safety (CPS) technicians yields more accurate installation, but is impractical for broad distribution. A potential solution is use of interactive virtual presence via smartphone application (app), which permits "hands on" teaching through simultaneous and remote joint exposure to 3-dimensional images. METHOD In two studies, we examined the efficacy of remote communication via interactive virtual presence to help parents install child restraints. Study 1 was conducted at existing car seat checkpoints and Study 2 at preschools/daycare centers. In both cases, existing installations were assessed by certified CPS technicians using an objective coding scheme. Participants then communicated with remotely-located certified CPS technicians via a smartphone app offering interactive virtual presence. Technicians instructed participants to install child restraints and then the installation was inspected by on-site technicians. Both before and after the remote interaction, participants completed questionnaires concerning perception of child restraints and child restraint installation, self-efficacy to install child restraints, and perceived risk of injury to children if they were in a crash. RESULTS In both studies, accuracy of child restraint installations improved following the remote interaction between participants and certified CPS technicians. Together, the two samples achieved a weighted average of 90% correct installations across a multi-point inspection. Both samples reported increased self-efficacy to install child restraints and altered perceptions about the accuracy of the child restraint installations in their vehicles. CONCLUSIONS Findings support use of interactive virtual presence as a strategy to realize accurate installation of child restraints. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS Interactive virtual presence between certified CPS technicians and the public via smartphone app has potential to improve proper child restraint installations broadly, including to vulnerable and underserved rural populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Schwebel
- Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
| | | | - Marie Crew
- Safe Kids Alabama, Children's of Alabama, USA
| | | | - Anna Johnston
- Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schwebel DC, Johnston A, Rouse J. Teaching infant car seat installation via interactive visual presence: An experimental trial. TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION 2017; 18:188-192. [PMID: 27576099 DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1225204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2016] [Accepted: 08/12/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A large portion of child restraint systems (car seats) are installed incorrectly, especially when first-time parents install infant car seats. Expert instruction greatly improves the accuracy of car seat installation but is labor intensive and difficult to obtain for many parents. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of 3 ways of communicating instructions for proper car seat installation: phone conversation; HelpLightning, a mobile application (app) that offers virtual interactive presence permitting both verbal and interactive (telestration) visual communication; and the manufacturer's user manual. METHODS A sample of 39 young adults of child-bearing age who had no previous experience installing car seats were recruited and randomly assigned to install an infant car seat using guidance from one of those 3 communication sources. RESULTS Both the phone and interactive app were more effective means to facilitate accurate car seat installation compared to the user manual. There was a trend for the app to offer superior communication compared to the phone, but that difference was not significant in most assessments. The phone and app groups also installed the car seat more efficiently and perceived the communication to be more effective and their installation to be more accurate than those in the user manual group. CONCLUSIONS Interactive communication may help parents install car seats more accurately than using the manufacturer's manual alone. This was an initial study with a modestly sized sample; if results are replicated in future research, there may be reason to consider centralized "call centers" that provide verbal and/or interactive visual instruction from remote locations to parents installing car seats, paralleling the model of centralized Poison Control centers in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Schwebel
- a Department of Psychology , University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , Alabama
| | - Anna Johnston
- a Department of Psychology , University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , Alabama
| | - Jenni Rouse
- a Department of Psychology , University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Elvik R. A theoretical perspective on road safety communication campaigns. ACCIDENT; ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION 2016; 97:292-297. [PMID: 25987353 DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2014] [Revised: 12/12/2014] [Accepted: 04/23/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
This paper proposes a theoretical perspective on road safety communication campaigns, which may help in identifying the conditions under which such campaigns can be effective. The paper proposes that, from a theoretical point of view, it is reasonable to assume that road user behaviour is, by and large, subjectively rational. This means that road users are assumed to behave the way they think is best. If this assumption is accepted, the best theoretical prediction is that road safety campaigns consisting of persuasive messages only will have no effect on road user behaviour and accordingly no effect on accidents. This theoretical prediction is not supported by meta-analyses of studies that have evaluated the effects of road safety communication campaigns. These analyses conclude that, on the average, such campaigns are associated with an accident reduction. The paper discusses whether this finding can be explained theoretically. The discussion relies on the distinction made by many modern theorists between bounded and perfect rationality. Road user behaviour is characterised by bounded rationality. Hence, if road users can gain insight into the bounds of their rationality, so that they see advantages to themselves of changing behaviour, they are likely to do so. It is, however, largely unknown whether such a mechanism explains why some road safety communication campaigns have been found to be more effective than others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rune Elvik
- Institute of Transport Economics, Gaustadalleen 21, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway; Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, Sofiendalsvej 11, DK-9210 Aalborg SV, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hunter K, Keay L, Simpson JM, Brown J, Bilston LE, Fegan M, Cosgrove L, Stevenson M, Ivers RQ. Program fidelity measures associated with an effective child restraint program: Buckle-Up Safely. Am J Public Health 2015; 105:584-90. [PMID: 25602901 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2014.302308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We sought to identify the program fidelity factors associated with successful implementation of the Buckle-Up Safely program, targeting correct use of age-appropriate child car restraints. METHODS In 2010, we conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial of 830 families with children attending preschools and long day care centers in South West Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Families received the Buckle-Up Safely program in the intervention arm of the study (13 services). Independent observers assessed the type of restraint and whether it was used correctly. RESULTS This detailed process evaluation showed that the multifaceted program was implemented with high fidelity. Program protocols were adhered to and messaging was consistently delivered. Results from multilevel and logistic regression analyses show that age-appropriate restraint use was associated with attendance at a parent information session hosted at the center (adjusted odd ratio [AOR]=3.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.61, 8.29) and adversely affected by the child being aged 2 to 3 years (AOR=0.14; 95% CI=0.07, 0.30) or being from a family with more than 2 children (AOR=0.34; 95% CI=0.17, 0.67). CONCLUSIONS Findings highlight the importance of parents receiving hands-on education regarding the proper use of age-appropriate child restraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Hunter
- Kate Hunter, Lisa Keay, and Rebecca Q. Ivers are with the Injury Division, The George Institute for Global Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Judy M. Simpson is with the Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney. Julie Brown and Lynne E. Bilston are with Neuroscience Research Australia, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Louise Cosgrove and Maureen Fegan are with Kids and Traffic Road Safety Education Program, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. Mark Stevenson is with the Accident Research Center, Monash Injury Research Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Himle MB, Wright KA. Behavioral skills training to improve installation and use of child passenger safety restraints. J Appl Behav Anal 2014; 47:549-59. [PMID: 24891092 DOI: 10.1002/jaba.143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2013] [Accepted: 04/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
The risk for serious injury and death to children during motor vehicle accidents can be greatly reduced through the correct use of child passenger safety restraints (CPSRs). Unfortunately, most CPSRs are installed or used incorrectly. This study examined the effectiveness of behavioral skills training (BST) to teach 10 participants to install rear-facing CPSRs correctly using a multiple baseline design. Results show that installation errors were common for all participants during baseline. After BST, all 10 participants were able to install the rear-facing CPSR without error. An extension probe to assess whether the skills taught during BST extended to forward-facing installation showed that each participant made at least 1 critical error.
Collapse
|
14
|
Klinich KD, Manary MA, Flannagan CAC, Ebert SM, Malik LA, Green PA, Reed MP. Effects of child restraint system features on installation errors. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2014; 45:270-277. [PMID: 23731627 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2012] [Revised: 02/06/2013] [Accepted: 04/08/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
This study examined how child restraint system (CRS) features contribute to CRS installation errors. Sixteen convertible CRS, selected to include a wide range of features, were used in volunteer testing with 32 subjects. Subjects were recruited based on their education level (high or low) and experience with installing CRS (none or experienced). Each subject was asked to perform four child restraint installations in the right-rear passenger seat of a 2006 Pontiac G6 sedan using a crash dummy as a child surrogate. Each subject installed two CRS forward-facing (FF), one with LATCH and one with the vehicle seatbelt, and two CRS rear-facing (RF), one with LATCH and one with the seatbelt. After each installation, the experimenter evaluated 42 factors for each installation, such as choice of belt routing path, tightness of installation, and harness snugness. Analyses used linear mixed models to identify CRS installation outcomes associated with CRS features. LATCH connector type, LATCH strap adjustor type, and the presence of belt lockoffs were associated with the tightness of the CRS installation. The type of harness shoulder height adjuster was associated with the rate of achieving a snug harness. Correct tether use was associated with the tether storage method. In general, subject assessments of the ease-of-use of CRS features were not highly correlated with the quality of their installation, suggesting a need for feedback with incorrect installations. The data from this study provide quantitative assessments of some CRS features that were associated with reductions in CRS installation errors. These results provide child restraint designers with design guidelines for developing easier-to-use products. Research on providing effective feedback during the child restraint installation process is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen D Klinich
- University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Naess PA, Hansen TB, Staff T, Stray-Pedersen A. Observational study of child restraining practice on Norwegian high-speed roads: restraint misuse poses a major threat to child passenger safety. ACCIDENT; ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION 2013; 59:479-486. [PMID: 23954682 DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.07.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2013] [Revised: 06/10/2013] [Accepted: 07/17/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Restraint misuse and other occupant safety errors are the major cause of fatal and, severe injuries among child passengers in motor vehicle collisions. The main objectives of the present, study were to provide estimates of restraining practice among children younger than 16 years, traveling on Norwegian high-speed roads, and to uncover the high-risk groups associated with, restraint misuse and other safety errors. METHODS A cross-sectional observational study was performed in conjunction with regular traffic, control posts on high-speed roads. The seating and restraining of child occupants younger than 16, years were observed, the interior environment of the vehicles was examined, and a structured, interview of the driver was conducted according to a specific protocol. RESULTS In total, 1260 child occupants aged 0-15 years were included in the study. Misuse of restraints, was observed in 38% of cases, with this being severe or critical in 24%. The presence of restraint, misuse varied significantly with age (p<0.001), with the frequency being highest among child, occupants in the age group 4-7 years. The most common error in this group was improperly routed, seat belts. The highest frequency of severe and critical errors was observed among child occupants in, the age group 0-3 years. The most common errors were loose or improperly routed harness straps and, incorrect installations of the child restraint system. Moreover, 24% of the children were seated in, vehicles with heavy, unsecured objects in the passenger compartment and/or the trunk that were, likely to move into the compartment upon impact and cause injury. No totally unrestrained children, were observed. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a detailed description of the characteristics of restraint misuse and, the occupant's exposure to unsecured objects. Future education and awareness campaigns should, focus on children aged <8 years. The main challenges are to ensure correct routing and tightness of, harness straps and seat belts, correct installation of child restraints, and avoidance of premature, graduation from child restraints to seat belts only. Information campaigns should also advocate the use, of chest clips and address the potential risks of hard, heavy objects in the passenger compartment and, the importance of the placement and strapping of heavy objects in the trunk.
Collapse
|
16
|
Brown J, Keay L, Hunter K, Bilston LE, Simpson JM, Ivers R. Increase in best practice child car restraint use for children aged 2-5 years in low socioeconomic areas after introduction of mandatory child restraint laws. Aust N Z J Public Health 2013; 37:272-7. [DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.12070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
17
|
Koppel S, Charlton JL, Rudin-Brown CM. The impact of new legislation on child restraint system (CRS) misuse and inappropriate use in Australia. TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION 2013; 14:387-396. [PMID: 23531262 DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2012.700746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The current study aimed to investigate the incidence of child restraint system (CRS) misuse and/or inappropriate use of CRS through an Australian CRS inspection program conducted by CRS fitting specialists between October 2004 and October 2011 and to determine whether CRS misuse and/or inappropriate use of CRS changed following new Australian legislation regarding CRS and motor vehicle restraint use for children aged 7 years and under. METHODS Participants were recruited through an advertisement for free CRS inspections displayed at childcare centers, kindergartens, community centers, hospitals, and child expos. At each inspection, a CRS fitting specialist inspected each child in their CRS while in their vehicle and reported to the owner of the CRS on the installation of the child restraint(s) and/or system(s) and any fitting faults and/or concerns with the fitting and/or use of the child restraint(s) and or system(s). RESULTS Results are based on the inspection of 2674 CRS. Of all of the CRS inspected, the majority (79%) were reported as having at least one instance of misuse and/or inappropriate use. The most common forms of CRS misuse and/or inappropriate use observed were harness strap errors (twisted, poorly adjusted, and/or incorrectly positioned, 41%), seat belt errors (incorrectly routed, twisted, and/or incorrectly adjusted, 32%), and a missing or incorrect fitting of the gated buckle/locking clip (24%). Significant differences were found across the proportion of CRS misuse and/or inappropriate use across restraint types (infant restraint/forward-facing CRS/convertible [birth to 18 kg] CRS/convertible [8-26 kg] CRS/boosters [booster seat/cushion/booster with harness combination]), χ(2)(4) = 147.852, P < .001. CRS misuse and/or inappropriate use were most prevalent among convertible CRS (birth to 18 kg; 87%), forward-facing CRS (85%), and convertible CRS (8-26 kg; 81%), compared to infant restraints (73%) and booster seats (booster seats/cushions/boosters with H-harness combination; 65%). There was no significant difference in the proportion of CRS with misuse and/or inappropriate use across the pre- and post-legislation period (80% vs. 77%), χ(2)(1) = 1.545, P > .5. CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings of the current study, it was concluded that, despite the introduction of new, definitive CRS legislation, CRS misuse and/or inappropriate use remains widespread in Australia. The findings highlight the need for CRS education and legislation that include information on correct CRS use, as well as information on appropriate CRS use, in order to provide specialized protection for child vehicle occupants in the event of a motor vehicle crash.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Koppel
- Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|