A procedure for a mechanical evaluation of an undefined osteo-protective material

Test systems for the biomechanical evaluation of hip protectors: a systematic review

Various mechanical and biomechanical test systems to evaluate the effectiveness of hip protectors designed to prevent hip fracture as a result of falls were examined in this review. The articles considered were selected systematically. The effect of differences in design criteria was demonstrated, and it was observed that the impact energy employed during testing dramatically affects the performance of the hip protector. Over the past three decades, researchers have continuously experimented with various systems to determine the efficacy of various hip protectors. The primary aim has been to make informed decisions in optimizing hip protector design. This article provides a systematic review of various test systems employed in the determination of the biomechanical efficacy of hip protectors. A systematic literature search was carried out, and 28 relevant articles were included to demonstrate the effect of test systems in the evaluation of the biomechanical effectiveness of hip protectors. Methodological studies illustrated the appropriate use of impact testing systems for the simulation of hip anatomy and fall dynamics in evaluating the effectiveness of hip protectors in preventing a hip fracture. This systematic review has demonstrated the effect of the variability of test systems on the evaluation of impact attenuation by various hip protectors. The lack of standardized test systems accounts for the inconsistencies in the test results of the efficacy of hip protectors. This has been a major challenge in the efforts of researchers to optimize the interventions. The standardization of test systems may require needed improvements immediately as opposed to the development of new interventions in order to ensure that only hip protectors with adequately proven efficacies are deployed for clinical trials or for the protection of the hips of vulnerable individuals from sideways impact.

Accuracy of Base of Support Using an Inertial Sensor Based Motion Capture System

The potential of miniature inertial sensors for human balance and gait analysis appears promising. Base of support (BOS), together with its interaction with center of mass, is a critical indicator in above mentioned research fields. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of Xsens MVN BIOMECH, a commercial widely used inertial sensor-based motion capture system, for measuring static BOS and examine the effect of different task complexity on the accuracy. Eleven young males participated in this study and went through eleven different experimental tasks. Results showed there were considerable errors in estimating BOS area (error ranged from −12.6% to +64.6%) from Xsens MVN and a large error in foot separation distance when there was knee flexion. The estimated BOS area from MVN was smaller than the ground truth from footprint when there was no knee flexion, and larger when there was knee flexion, and it increased monotonically along with the knee flexion angles. Wrongly estimated foot separations, mainly caused by knee flexion, and the initial system estimation error on BOS, were two major reasons for error and instability of BOS estimation. The findings suggested that caution should be taken when using Xsens MVN BIOMECH to estimate BOS and foot position-related measurements, especially for postures/motions with knee flexion.