Review of anesthesia in liver transplantation

Cardiovascular manifestation of end-stage liver disease and perioperative echocardiography for liver transplantation: anesthesiologist’s view

Liver transplantation (LT) is the curative therapy for decompensated cirrhosis. However, anesthesiologists can find it challenging to manage patients undergoing LT due to the underlying pathologic conditions of patients with end-stage liver disease and the high invasiveness of the procedure, which is frequently accompanied by massive blood loss. Echocardiography is a non-invasive or semi-invasive imaging tool that provides real-time information about the structural and functional status of the heart and is considered to be able to improve outcomes by enabling accurate and detailed assessments. This article reviews the pathophysiologic changes of the heart accompanied by cirrhosis that mainly affect hemodynamics. We also present a comparative review of the diagnostic criteria for cirrhotic cardiomyopathy published by the World Congress of Gastroenterology in 2005 and the Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy Consortium in 2019. This article discusses the conditions that could affect hemodynamic stability and postoperative outcomes, such as coronary artery disease, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, portopulmonary hypertension, hepatopulmonary syndrome, pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, patent foramen ovale, and ascites. Finally, we cover a number of intraoperative factors that should be considered, including intraoperative blood loss, rapid reaccumulation of ascites, manipulation of the inferior vena cava, post-reperfusion syndrome, and adverse effects of excessive fluid infusion and transfusion. This article aimed to summarize the cardiovascular manifestations of cirrhosis that can affect hemodynamics and can be evaluated using perioperative echocardiography. We hope that this article will provide information about the hemodynamic characteristics of LT recipients and stimulate more active use of perioperative echocardiography.

Excellent Outcome in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Treating Patients With Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a fatal condition, and liver transplantation (LT) is a vital option for these patients. However, the result of living donor LT (LDLT) for ACLF is not well investigated. This study investigated the outcomes of LDLT in patients with ACLF compared with patients without ACLF. This was a single-center, retrospective, matched case-control study. From July 2002 to March 2017, a total of 112 patients with ACLF who underwent LDLT were enrolled according to the consensus of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver. A total of 224 patients were selected for control comparison (non-ACLF) with demographic factors (sex, age, and body mass index) matched (1:2). Patients with ACLF were stratified into ACLF 1, 2, and 3 categories according to the number of organ failures based on the Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. Survival and surgical outcomes after LDLT were analyzed. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores in the ACLF group were significantly higher than those in the non-ACLF group (P < 0.001). The 90-day, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates in the ACLF and non-ACLF groups were 97.3%, 95.5%, 92.9%, respectively, and 96.9%, 94.2%, and 91.1%, respectively (P = 0.58). There was more intraoperative blood loss in the ACLF group than in the non-ACLF group (P < 0.001). The other postoperative complications were not significantly different between the groups. A total of 20 patients (17.9%) in the ACLF group presented with 3 or more organ system dysfunctions (ACLF 3), and the 90-day, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were comparable with those of ACLF 1 and ACLF 2 (P = 0.25). In carefully selected patients, LDLT gives excellent outcomes in patients with ACLF regardless of the number of organs involved. Comprehensive perioperative care and timely transplantation play crucial roles in saving the lives of patients with ACLF.

Pediatric living donor liver transplantation decade progress in Shanghai: Characteristics and risks factors of mortality

BACKGROUND

Pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become the gold standard for patients with end-stage liver disease. With improvements in organ preservation, immunosuppression, surgical and anesthesia techniques, the survival rates and long-term outcomes of patients after LDLT have significantly improved worldwide. However, data on anesthetic management and postoperative survival rate of pediatric LDLT in China are rare.

AIM

To review the status of pediatric LDLT in Shanghai and investigate the factors related to anesthetic management and survival rate in pediatric LDLT.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study to investigate the status of pediatric LDLT in Shanghai by reviewing 544 records of patients who underwent pediatric LDLT since the first operation on October 21, 2006 until August 10, 2016 at Renji Hospital and Huashan Hospital.

RESULTS

The 30-d, 90-d, 1-year, and 2-year survival rates were 95.22%, 93.38%, 91.36%, and 89.34%, respectively. The 2-year patient survival rate after January 1, 2011 significantly improved compared with the previous period (74.47% vs 90.74%; hazard ratio: 2.92; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.16–14.14; P = 0.0004). Median duration of mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) was 18 h [interquartile range (IQR), 15.25–20.25], median ICU length of stay was 6 d (IQR: 4.80–9.00), and median postoperative length of stay was 24 d (IQR: 18.00–34.00). Forty-seven (8.60%) of 544 patients did not receive red blood cell transfusion during the operation.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) score, anesthesia duration, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, and ICU length of stay were independent predictive factors of in-hospital patient survival. Pediatric end-stage liver disease score, operation duration, and ICU length of stay were independent predictive factors of 1-year and 3-year patient survival.

[Anesthesiological aspects of liver transplantation]

Liver transplantation (LTPL) is the only curative option for patients with end stage liver disease (ESLD) or with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Eurotransplant in Leiden, the Netherlands, is responsible for organ allocation. The model of end stage liver disease (MELD) score, which describes the severity of the liver disease, is decisive for organ allocation. The heterogeneous patient collective and hepatic-related comorbidities and their dynamics represent challenges. The anesthesiologist is responsible for evaluating the overall prognosis, whereby cardiac, pulmonary, renal and neurological comorbidities must be taken into consideration. During LTPL surgery is divided into several stages. Besides volume management, heat preservation and coagulation management, major challenges for the anesthesiologist are hemodynamic stabilization and regulation of the acid-base balance.

Comparison of bispectral index targeted end-tidal concentration of desflurane during three phases of orthotopic liver transplantation

Background and Aims:

Reduced inhalational anaesthetic requirement in end-stage liver disease during living donor orthotopic liver transplantation (LD-OLT) is due to increased endogenous opioids. This study evaluated the changes in bi-spectral index (BIS) monitored end-tidal desflurane (ET_Des) requirements during ‘dissection’, ‘anhepatic’, and ‘neohepatic’ phases of LD-OLT.

Methods:

This prospective, cohort study included 40 adults undergoing LD-OLT under general anaesthesia (GA). All patients received BIS-guided desflurane GA. ET_Des requirements in three phases of LD-OLT (primary objective); relationship between inhalational anaesthetic requirements and severity of liver disease; and effect of changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and body temperature on ET_Des concentration for all three phases were also evaluated.

Results:

ET_Des during the ‘dissection’ phase (2.92 ± 0.65%) was > ‘anhepatic’ (2.68 ± 0.85%, P = 0.049) and ‘neohepatic’ phases (2.58 ± 0.71%, P = 0.005). Patients with model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score < 20 returned significantly greater ET_Des than those with MELD score ≥20 during the ‘dissection’ (MELD <20: 3.11 ± 0.49%; MELD ≥20: 2.58 ± 0.77%, P = 0.01) and ‘anhepatic’(MELD <20: 2.96 ± 0.76%; MELD ≥20: 2.17 ± 0.79%, P = 0.003) phases. A positive correlation was observed between ET_Des(r = 0.584, P = 0.001) and temperature in the ‘dissection’ phase only.

Conclusion:

In patients undergoing LD-OLT, BIS monitoring guidance of depth of desflurane GA suggests lower desflurane requirements during ‘anhepatic’ and the ‘neohepatic’ phase of surgery. Also, the desflurane requirement is greater in patients with lesser severity of liver disease.

Intraoperative venesection and isosorbide dinitrate for postreperfusion syndrome during liver transplantation: A case report

RATIONALE

Postreperfusion syndrome is the most severe cardiovascular and metabolic alteration which typically occurs after the declamping of the portal vein of the grafted liver during liver transplantation, and it could affect the mortality and morbidity of the patient.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We report the case of ischemic change in electrocardiogram with substantial increase of central venous pressure, from 6 to 16 mmHg, that developed immediately after reperfusion.

DIAGNOSES

Based on his hemodynamic parameters, it was suspected that this event was caused by sudden volume overload in the right ventricle after reperfusion rather than hypovolemic status, thromboembolism, or any other possibilities.

INTERVENTIONS

He was treated with active venesection of 300 mL and isosorbide dinitrates infusion at the rate of 30 μg/min.

OUTCOMES

The parameter values were restored to normal within 15 to 20 minutes after treatment, and the patient was discharged postoperatively without any significant cardiac sequelae.

LESSONS

Although ischemic ST change during reperfusion reported without any previous cardiac complication is limited, the patient could recover rapidly with careful identification of the cause of PRS and immediate treatment.

Anesthesia Management of Modified Ex Vivo Liver Resection and Autotransplantation

Background

Ex situ liver surgery allows liver resection and vascular reconstruction in patients who have liver tumors located in critical sites. Only a small series of studies about ex situ liver surgery is available in the literature. No anesthesia management experience has been previously published. The aim of the currents study was to summarize our experience with anesthetic management of patients during ex vivo liver surgery.

Material/Methods

The first 43 patients who received ex vivo liver surgery between January 2007 and April 2012 were included. A pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) were used intraoperatively in the patients to monitor the hemodynamic changes. Thromboelastogram and the plasma coagulation test were used to monitor the coagulation changes.

Results

All patients received general anesthesia with rapid sequence induction. The data obtained by PAC, TEE, and PiCOO in these cases showed large changes in hemodynamics during the stages of the first or second vessel reconstruction. The CI decreased about 59%/63% and the MPAP decreased about 49%/37% during the first/second vessel reconstruction. Accurate judgment of the dosage of active drug for vascular support is the key for the stabilization of hemodynamics as quickly as possible. However, a high incidence (35.5%) of prophase fibrinolysis in a long anhepatic phase should be monitored and managed.

Conclusions

Ex vivo liver surgery is no longer experimental and is a therapeutic option for patients with liver cancer in critical sites. Good anesthesia support is an essential element of liver autotransplantation.

Anesthesia Management of a Deceased Cadaveric-Donor Combined Liver and Kidney Transplant for Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1: Report of a Case

Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 is an autosomal recessive disorder that is responsible for the overproduction of oxalate and has an incidence of 1 in 120 000 live births. Indications for combined liver and kidney transplant are still debated. However, combined liver and kidney transplant is preferred in various conditions, including primary hyperoxaluria, liver-based metabolic abnormalities affecting the kidney, and structural diseases affecting both the liver and the kidney, such as congenital hepatic fibrosis and polycystic kidney disease. When compared with sequential liver and kidney transplant, the rejection rate of both liver and kidney allografts was reported to be lower than with combined liver and kidney transplant. With proper anesthesia management, the probable increased complications with combined liver and kidney transplant can be prevented. In this report, we present the anesthesia care of a 22-year-old patient with primary hyperoxaluria type 1 who had deceased-donor combined liver and kidney transplant.