Scribed transparency microplates mounted on a modified standard microplate

Variability in Microplate Surface Properties and Its Impact on ELISA

BACKGROUND

Microplate-based immunoassays are widely used in clinical and research settings to measure a broad range of biomarkers present in complex matrices. Assay variability within and between microplates can give rise to false-negative and false-positive results leading to incorrect conclusions. To date, the contribution of microplates to this variability remains poorly characterized and described. This study provides new insights into variability in immunoassays attributable to surface characteristics of commercial microplates.

METHODS

Well-to-well assay variation in γ-treated and nontreated 96-well opaque microplates suitable for chemiluminescence assays was determined by use of a validated sandwich ELISA. Microplate surface characteristics were assessed by sessile drop contact angle measurements, scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, and atomic force microscopy.

RESULTS

All microplate types tested exhibited vendor-specific assay response profiles; and "rogue" plates with very high intraassay variation and deviant mean assay responses were found. Within-plate, location-dependent bias in assay responses and variability in well contact angle were also observed. We demonstrate substantial differences in well-surface properties with putative effects on protein-coating reproducibility and hence consistency in immunoassay responses. A surface "cleaning" effect on manufacturing residues was attributed to γ-irradiation, and treated microplates manifest increased polar functionalities, surface roughness, and assay responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that tighter control of variability in surface roughness, wettability, chemistry, and level of residual contaminants during microplate preparation is warranted to improve consistency of ELISA assay read out.

A direct heating model to overcome the edge effect in microplates

Array-based tests in a microplate format are complicated by the regional variation in results of the outer against the inner wells of the plate. Analysis of the evaporation mechanics of sessile drops showed that evaporation rate increase with temperature was due to changes in the heat of vaporization, density and diffusion coefficient. In simulations of direct bottom heating of standard microplates, considerable heat transfer via conduction from the side walls was found to be responsible for lower temperatures in the liquid in wells close to the edge. Applying a two temperature heating mode, 304 K at the side compared to 310 K at the bottom, allowed for a more uniform temperature distribution. Transparency microplates were found to inherently possess immunity to the edge effect problem due to the presence of air between the liquid and solid wall.