1
|
Chylinski K, Hubmann M, Hanna RE, Yanchus C, Michlits G, Uijttewaal ECH, Doench J, Schramek D, Elling U. CRISPR-Switch regulates sgRNA activity by Cre recombination for sequential editing of two loci. Nat Commun 2019; 10:5454. [PMID: 31784531 PMCID: PMC6884486 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13403-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas9 is an efficient and versatile tool for genome engineering in many species. However, inducible CRISPR-Cas9 editing systems that regulate Cas9 activity or sgRNA expression often suffer from significant limitations, including reduced editing capacity, off-target effects, or leaky expression. Here, we develop a precisely controlled sgRNA expression cassette that can be combined with widely-used Cre systems, termed CRISPR-Switch (SgRNA With Induction/Termination by Cre Homologous recombination). Switch-ON facilitates controlled, rapid induction of sgRNA activity. In turn, Switch-OFF-mediated termination of editing improves generation of heterozygous genotypes and can limit off-target effects. Furthermore, we design sequential CRISPR-Switch-based editing of two loci in a strictly programmable manner and determined the order of mutagenic events that leads to development of glioblastoma in mice. Thus, CRISPR-Switch substantially increases the versatility of gene editing through precise and rapid switching ON or OFF sgRNA activity, as well as switching OVER to secondary sgRNAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krzysztof Chylinski
- Vienna Biocenter Core Facilities, Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Dr. Bohr Gasse 3, Vienna, Austria
| | - Maria Hubmann
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Dr. Bohr Gasse 3, 1030, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ruth E Hanna
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Connor Yanchus
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Georg Michlits
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Dr. Bohr Gasse 3, 1030, Vienna, Austria
| | - Esther C H Uijttewaal
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Dr. Bohr Gasse 3, 1030, Vienna, Austria
| | - John Doench
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Schramek
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ulrich Elling
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Dr. Bohr Gasse 3, 1030, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kallunki T, Barisic M, Jäättelä M, Liu B. How to Choose the Right Inducible Gene Expression System for Mammalian Studies? Cells 2019; 8:cells8080796. [PMID: 31366153 PMCID: PMC6721553 DOI: 10.3390/cells8080796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Revised: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Inducible gene expression systems are favored over stable expression systems in a wide variety of basic and applied research areas, including functional genomics, gene therapy, tissue engineering, biopharmaceutical protein production and drug discovery. This is because they are mostly reversible and thus more flexible to use. Furthermore, compared to constitutive expression, they generally exhibit a higher efficiency and have fewer side effects, such as cell death and delayed growth or development. Empowered by decades of development of inducible gene expression systems, researchers can now efficiently activate or suppress any gene, temporarily and quantitively at will, depending on experimental requirements and designs. Here, we review a number of most commonly used mammalian inducible expression systems and provide basic standards and criteria for the selection of the most suitable one.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuula Kallunki
- Cell Death and Metabolism, Center for Autophagy, Recycling and Disease, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marin Barisic
- Cell Division and Cytoskeleton, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marja Jäättelä
- Cell Death and Metabolism, Center for Autophagy, Recycling and Disease, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bin Liu
- Cell Death and Metabolism, Center for Autophagy, Recycling and Disease, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ringer KP, Roth MG, Garey MS, Piorczynski TB, Suli A, Hansen JM, Alder JK. Comparative analysis of lipid-mediated CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing techniques. Cell Biol Int 2018; 42:849-858. [PMID: 29457665 DOI: 10.1002/cbin.10952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas technology has revolutionized genome engineering. While Cas9 was not the first programmable endonuclease identified, its simplicity of use has driven widespread adoption in a short period of time. While CRISPR-Cas genome editing holds enormous potential for clinical applications, its use in laboratory settings for genotype-phenotype studies and genome-wide screens has led to breakthroughs in the understanding of many molecular pathways. Numerous protocols have been described for introducing CRISPR-Cas components into cells, and here we sought to simplify and optimize a protocol for genome editing using readily available and inexpensive tools. We compared plasmid, ribonucleoprotein (RNP), and RNA transfection to determine which was method was most optimal for editing cells in a laboratory setting. We limited our comparison to lipofection-mediated introduction because the reagents are widely available. To facilitate optimization, we developed a novel reporter assay to measure gene disruption and the introduction of a variety of exogenous DNA tags. Each method efficiently disrupted endogenous genes and was able to stimulate the introduction of foreign DNA at specific sites, albeit to varying efficiencies. RNP transfection produced the highest level of gene disruption and was the most rapid and efficient method overall. Finally, we show that very short homology arms of 30 base pairs can mediate site-specific editing. The methods described here should broaden the accessibility of RNP-mediated lipofection for laboratory genome-editing experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey P Ringer
- Physiology & Developmental Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 84602, USA
| | - Mark G Roth
- Physiology & Developmental Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 84602, USA
| | - Mitchell S Garey
- Physiology & Developmental Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 84602, USA
| | - Ted B Piorczynski
- Physiology & Developmental Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 84602, USA
| | - Arminda Suli
- Physiology & Developmental Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 84602, USA
| | - Jason M Hansen
- Physiology & Developmental Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 84602, USA
| | - Jonathan K Alder
- Physiology & Developmental Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 84602, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pineda M, Moghadam F, Ebrahimkhani MR, Kiani S. Engineered CRISPR Systems for Next Generation Gene Therapies. ACS Synth Biol 2017; 6:1614-1626. [PMID: 28558198 DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.7b00011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
An ideal in vivo gene therapy platform provides safe, reprogrammable, and precise strategies which modulate cell and tissue gene regulatory networks with a high temporal and spatial resolution. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR), a bacterial adoptive immune system, and its CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9), have gained attention for the ability to target and modify DNA sequences on demand with unprecedented flexibility and precision. The precision and programmability of Cas9 is derived from its complexation with a guide-RNA (gRNA) that is complementary to a desired genomic sequence. CRISPR systems open-up widespread applications including genetic disease modeling, functional screens, and synthetic gene regulation. The plausibility of in vivo genetic engineering using CRISPR has garnered significant traction as a next generation in vivo therapeutic. However, there are hurdles that need to be addressed before CRISPR-based strategies are fully implemented. Some key issues center on the controllability of the CRISPR platform, including minimizing genomic-off target effects and maximizing in vivo gene editing efficiency, in vivo cellular delivery, and spatial-temporal regulation. The modifiable components of CRISPR systems: Cas9 protein, gRNA, delivery platform, and the form of CRISPR system delivered (DNA, RNA, or ribonucleoprotein) have recently been engineered independently to design a better genome engineering toolbox. This review focuses on evaluating CRISPR potential as a next generation in vivo gene therapy platform and discusses bioengineering advancements that can address challenges associated with clinical translation of this emerging technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Pineda
- School
of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281, United States
| | - Farzaneh Moghadam
- School
of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281, United States
| | - Mo R. Ebrahimkhani
- School
of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281, United States
- Center for Regenerative
Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona 85054, United States
| | - Samira Kiani
- School
of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281, United States
| |
Collapse
|