1
|
Strategies of Macrophages to Maintain Bone Homeostasis and Promote Bone Repair: A Narrative Review. J Funct Biomater 2022; 14:jfb14010018. [PMID: 36662065 PMCID: PMC9864083 DOI: 10.3390/jfb14010018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Bone homeostasis (a healthy bone mass) is regulated by maintaining a delicate balance between bone resorption and bone formation. The regulation of physiological bone remodeling by a complex system that involves multiple cells in the skeleton is closely related to bone homeostasis. Loss of bone mass or repair of bone is always accompanied by changes in bone homeostasis. However, due to the complexity of bone homeostasis, we are currently unable to identify all the mechanisms that affect bone homeostasis. To date, bone macrophages have been considered a third cellular component in addition to osteogenic spectrum cells and osteoclasts. As confirmed by co-culture models or in vivo experiments, polarized or unpolarized macrophages interact with multiple components within the bone to ensure bone homeostasis. Different macrophage phenotypes are prone to resorption and formation of bone differently. This review comprehensively summarizes the mechanisms by which macrophages regulate bone homeostasis and concludes that macrophages can control bone homeostasis from osteoclasts, mesenchymal cells, osteoblasts, osteocytes, and the blood/vasculature system. The elaboration of these mechanisms in this narrative review facilitates the development of macrophage-based strategies for the treatment of bone metabolic diseases and bone defects.
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of short RNA molecules that mediate the regulation of gene activity through interactions with target mRNAs and subsequent silencing of gene expression. It has become increasingly clear the miRNAs regulate many diverse aspects of bone biology, including bone formation and bone resorption processes. The role of miRNAs specifically in osteoclasts has been of recent investigation, due to clinical interest in discovering new paradigms to control excessive bone resorption, as is observed in multiple conditions including aging, estrogen deprivation, cancer metastases or glucocorticoid use. Therefore understanding the role that miRNAs play during osteoclastic differentiation is of critical importance. In this review, we highlight and discuss general aspects of miRNA function in osteoclasts, including exciting data demonstrating that miRNAs encapsulated in extracellular vesicles (EVs) either originating from osteoclasts, or signaling to osteoclast from divergent sites, have important roles in bone homeostasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan M Weivoda
- Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Sun-Kyeong Lee
- Department of Medicine, UCONN Center on Aging, University Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, USA
| | - David G Monroe
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhao Y, Jia L, Zheng Y, Li W. Involvement of Noncoding RNAs in the Differentiation of Osteoclasts. Stem Cells Int 2020; 2020:4813140. [PMID: 32908541 PMCID: PMC7468661 DOI: 10.1155/2020/4813140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
As the most important bone-resorbing cells, osteoclasts play fundamental roles in bone remodeling and skeletal health. Much effort has been focused on identifying the regulators of osteoclast metabolism. Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) reportedly regulate osteoclast formation, differentiation, survival, and bone-resorbing activity to participate in bone physiology and pathology. The present review intends to provide a general framework for how ncRNAs and their targets regulate osteoclast differentiation and the important events of osteoclastogenesis they are involved in, including osteoclast precursor generation, early differentiation, mononuclear osteoclast fusion, and multinucleated osteoclast function and survival. This framework is beneficial for understanding bone biology and for identifying the potential biomarkers or therapeutic targets of bone diseases. The review also summarizes the results of in vivo experiments and classic experiment methods for osteoclast-related researches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Zhao
- Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Lingfei Jia
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
- Central Laboratory, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Yunfei Zheng
- Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Weiran Li
- Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Puppo M, Taipaleenmäki H, Hesse E, Clézardin P. Non-coding RNAs in bone remodelling and bone metastasis: Mechanisms of action and translational relevance. Br J Pharmacol 2019; 178:1936-1954. [PMID: 31423566 DOI: 10.1111/bph.14836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2019] [Revised: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Bone metastases are frequent complications in patients with advanced cancer, which can be fatal or may rapidly impede the quality of life of patients. Current treatments for patients with bone metastases are palliative. Therefore, a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms that precede the overt development of skeletal lesions could lead to better therapeutic interventions. In this review, we present evidence that non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) such as long ncRNAs, microRNAs, and circular RNAs are emerging as master regulators of bone metastasis formation. We highlight potential opportunities for the therapeutic targeting of ncRNAs. Furthermore, we discuss the possibility that ncRNAs may be used as biomarkers in the context of bone metastases, which might provide insight for improving the response to current bone-targeting therapies. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue on The molecular pharmacology of bone and cancer-related bone diseases. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v178.9/issuetoc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margherita Puppo
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Hanna Taipaleenmäki
- Molecular Skeletal Biology Laboratory, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Eric Hesse
- Molecular Skeletal Biology Laboratory, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Institute of Molecular Musculoskeletal Research, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Philippe Clézardin
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.,INSERM, Research Unit UMR_S1033, LyOS, Faculty of Medicine Lyon-Est, University of Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Roth L, Wakim J, Wasserman E, Shalev M, Arman E, Stein M, Brumfeld V, Sagum CA, Bedford MT, Tuckermann J, Elson A. Phosphorylation of the phosphatase PTPROt at Tyr 399 is a molecular switch that controls osteoclast activity and bone mass in vivo. Sci Signal 2019; 12:12/563/eaau0240. [PMID: 30622194 DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aau0240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Bone resorption by osteoclasts is essential for bone homeostasis. The kinase Src promotes osteoclast activity and is activated in osteoclasts by the receptor-type tyrosine phosphatase PTPROt. In other contexts, however, PTPROt can inhibit Src activity. Through in vivo and in vitro experiments, we show that PTPROt is bifunctional and can dephosphorylate Src both at its inhibitory residue Tyr527 and its activating residue Tyr416 Whereas wild-type and PTPROt knockout mice exhibited similar bone masses, mice in which a putative C-terminal phosphorylation site, Tyr399, in endogenous PTPROt was replaced with phenylalanine had increased bone mass and reduced osteoclast activity. Osteoclasts from the knock-in mice also showed reduced Src activity. Experiments in cultured cells and in osteoclasts derived from both mouse strains demonstrated that the absence of phosphorylation at Tyr399 caused PTPROt to dephosphorylate Src at the activating site pTyr416 In contrast, phosphorylation of PTPROt at Tyr399 enabled PTPROt to recruit Src through Grb2 and to dephosphorylate Src at the inhibitory site Tyr527, thus stimulating Src activity. We conclude that reversible phosphorylation of PTPROt at Tyr399 is a molecular switch that selects between its opposing activities toward Src and maintains a coherent signaling output, and that blocking this phosphorylation event can induce physiological effects in vivo. Because most receptor-type tyrosine phosphatases contain potential phosphorylation sites at their C termini, we propose that preventing phosphorylation at these sites or its consequences may offer an alternative to inhibiting their catalytic activity to achieve therapeutic benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee Roth
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | - Jean Wakim
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | - Elad Wasserman
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | - Moran Shalev
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | - Esther Arman
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | - Merle Stein
- Institute of Comparative Molecular Endocrinology, University of Ulm, Ulm 89081, Germany
| | - Vlad Brumfeld
- Department of Chemical Research Support, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | - Cari A Sagum
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX 78957, USA
| | - Mark T Bedford
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX 78957, USA
| | - Jan Tuckermann
- Institute of Comparative Molecular Endocrinology, University of Ulm, Ulm 89081, Germany
| | - Ari Elson
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|