Omalizumab versus cyclosporin-A for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria: can we define better-responding endotypes?

A systematic review of sex and gender differences in treatment outcome of inflammatory skin diseases: Is it time for new guidelines?

Gender- and sex-specific differences in medicine were long-time disregarded. Despite numerous indications of gender- and sex-specific influences on the treatment of dermatological conditions, these have not yet been systematically investigated. To meet this unmet need, we conducted the present systematic review on the topic of gender and sex differences in the treatement outcome of skin diseases. Embase (via Ovid), PubMed Medline and Web of Science were searched, in between January 2001 and December 2022. English and german randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohorts and case-control studies that examined differences between men and women in treatment outcomes of skin diseases were included. Two authors independently screened the reports for eligibility, one extracted all data (the second double-checked) and critically appraised the quality and risk of bias of the studies. Eighty-three reports were included. The largest share of the identified publications focused on gender differences in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (n = 49), followed by melanoma (n = 8) and sporadic studies (n < 5) of inflammatory, infectious and autoimmune skin diseases. The main topics in which gender differences could be identified were choice of treatment, time to initiation of treatment, therapy response, adverse events, adherence and treatment satisfaction. For psoriasis, gender differences could be found in all aspects, while for the other skin diseases specific publications on gender differences are still missing. This systematic review shows numerous gender differences but also reveals major gaps in gender-specific care in dermatology which should be narrowed in the upcoming years to optimize a patient-centred, individualized, gender-equal healthcare. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022306626.

A Practical Approach to Diagnosing and Managing Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is an unpredictable inflammatory skin condition characterized by the spontaneous onset of itchy wheals, angioedema, or both, which occurs for longer than 6 weeks overall. Despite the relatively straightforward diagnostic algorithm for CSU, relying primarily on a detailed medical history and only limited laboratory tests, patients often wait years to be diagnosed, with many cycling through different healthcare practitioners before a diagnosis is made. Even then, current treatment options for CSU are limited, with approximately half of patients resistant to standard-of-care second-generation antihistamines at standard or higher doses. As such, there is an unmet need for improved, streamlined management for patients with CSU. Here, we review the evidence-based diagnostic algorithm for CSU, consider the required steps of the diagnostic workup, and provide practical, real-world advice on the management of CSU to improve the timely diagnosis and care of patients with this debilitating disease.

An update on the use of antihistamines in managing chronic urticaria

INTRODUCTION

Urticaria, a mast cell-mediated skin disease, manifests as acute or chronic, with the latter divided into spontaneous and inducible types and requires individualized management, including identifying triggers and comorbidities. Antihistamines, particularly the second generation group, form the mainstay of primary treatment plans consisting of dosage adjustments and/or in combination with other treatment modalities depending on underlying disease control.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted using 'antihistamines,' 'urticaria,' 'pharmacogenomics,' 'genomics,' 'biomarkers' and 'treatment response' as key words. In this review, we focus on the comprehensive understanding and application of antihistamines in managing adult and adolescent patients with chronic urticaria.

EXPERT OPINION

Using antihistamines to treat urticaria is set to change significantly, focusing more on personalized medicine and identifying key biomarkers to enhance treatment response prediction. These changes aim to make treatments more specific and cost-effective by avoiding unnecessary tests. Applying new approaches in everyday clinical care faces challenges like proving the biomarkers' reliability, updating current guidelines, and incorporating individualized treatments into standard procedures. Efforts should now concentrate on finding easy-to-use biomarkers, improving access to pharmacogenomics, understanding why some patients are resistant to treatment, and creating more specific treatment options based on patient needs.

Total IgE as a biomarker of omalizumab response in chronic spontaneous urticaria: A meta-analysis

Background: Omalizumab is approved for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) that is refractory to antihistamines. Total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels have emerged as a possible biomarker to predict response to omalizumab. However, the existing literature is heterogenous, with conflicting conclusions with regard to the role of total IgE levels. Objective: We sought to clarify the role of evaluating total IgE levels in patients with CSU by performing a meta-analysis on the existing literature to determine if meaningful changes exist between responders and nonresponders to omalizumab. Methods: A total of 68 unique citations were returned and screened by two independent reviewers. Editorials, reviews, and case reports were excluded, and a total of 33 original articles were identified and underwent secondary evaluation. Studies that present mean ± standard deviation total IgE levels and/or 95% confidence intervals (CI) were included, whereas studies with < 25 subjects were excluded. Three studies ultimately met these criteria. Results: We found a mean difference in total IgE levels between those who responded to omalizumab versus those without a response of 49.76 (95% CI, 7.13-92.38; p = 0.02), which demonstrated higher mean IgE values in responders compared with nonresponders. Conclusion: This study presents additional evidence that supports evaluation of total IgE levels as it pertains to response to omalizumab therapy in CSU. When considering the current evidence, it seems reasonable to consider the baseline total IgE level as a biomarker to predict the treatment response to omalizumab. Based on the existing literature, we cannot conclude at what threshold nonresponse is more likely to occur.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria: new evidences on the role of autoimmunity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the recent advancements and relevance of the autoimmune theories in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU).

RECENT FINDINGS

Two primary types of autoimmunity, Type I and Type IIb, have emerged as major contributors to CSU, characterized by immunoglobulin E (IgE) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies, respectively. Genetic evidence supports the notion that CSU shares more similarities with other autoimmune diseases rather than atopic diseases. Novel autoallergens such as FcεRI and tissue transglutaminase have been identified, contributed to our understanding of autoimmune mechanisms. Furthermore, the potential overlap between Type I and Type IIb autoimmunity has been recognized. Evaluating the autoimmune status of CSU patients through biomarkers and understanding their clinical implications is vital for effective management. For instance, CSU patients with Type IIb autoimmunity, with or without coexisting Type I autoimmunity, may exhibit resistance to H1-antihistamines and omalizumab treatment but could potentially respond well to cyclosporine or Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

SUMMARY

Further investigations are needed to explore new autoallergens and autoantibodies in CSU, establishing their connection to the development of autoimmunity. The efficacy of novel drugs targeting different mechanisms should be examined to determine their responses in both autoimmune CSU and nonautoimmunity-related CSU.

Super-Responders in Moderate–Severe Psoriasis under Guselkumab Treatment: Myths, Realities and Future Perspectives

A fast skin clearance is the main goal to achieve in psoriasis treatment. Patients that present a fast and exceptional improvement with treatment are called super-responders (SR). There is no consensus on the definition of SR with respect to psoriasis. Included herein is a retrospective analysis of a multicenter, observational study of real clinical practices including patients with moderate-to-severe plaque PSO undergoing treatment with Guselkumab (GUS). This cross-sectional analysis includes information on patients between February 2019 to February 2022. A SR is a patient that achieved a PASI = 0 at weeks 12 and 24. Analyses have been performed “as observed” using GraphPad Prism version 8.3.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA, At baseline, the PASI is significantly correlated with VAS_pruritus, BSA, and DLQI, while DLQI is significantly correlated with VAS_pruritus. Significant correlations increase in number and magnitude over the follow-up time. In relation to the univariate logistic models carried out, only three variables showed a significant association with the super-responder variable: depression, VAS_pruritus, and DLQI.SR patients, who show a faster evolution in PASI and BSA improvement than non-SRs. Based on the results obtained, it would be possible to also include DLQI and VAS_pruritus in the broader concept of the SR.