Screening for Behavioral Risk Factors Is Not Enough to Improve Preventive Services Delivery

Impact of Unmet Social Needs, Scarcity, and Future Discounting on Adherence to Treatment in Children With Asthma: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Asthma is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases of childhood and disproportionately affects children with lower socioeconomic status. Controller medications such as inhaled corticosteroids significantly reduce asthma exacerbations and improve symptoms. However, a large proportion of children still have poor asthma control, in part owing to suboptimal adherence. Financial barriers contribute to hindering adherence, as do behavioral factors related to low income. For example, unmet social needs for food, lodging, and childcare may create stress and worry in parents, negatively influencing medication adherence. These needs are also cognitively taxing and force families to focus on immediate needs, leading to scarcity and heightening future discounting; thus, there is the tendency to attribute greater value to the present than to the future in making decisions.

OBJECTIVE

In this project, we will investigate the relationship between unmet social needs, scarcity, and future discounting as well as their predictive power over time on medication adherence in children with asthma.

METHODS

This 12-month prospective observational cohort study will recruit 200 families of children aged 2 to 17 years at the Asthma Clinic of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, a tertiary care pediatric hospital in Montreal, Canada. The primary outcome will be adherence to controller medication, measured using the proportion of prescribed days covered during follow-up. Exploratory outcomes will include health care use. The main independent variables will be unmet social needs, scarcity, and future discounting, measured using validated instruments. These variables will be measured at recruitment as well as at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Covariates will include sociodemographics, disease and treatment characteristics, and parental stress. Primary analysis will compare adherence to controller medication, measured using the proportion of prescribed days covered, between families with versus those without unmet social needs during the study period using multivariate linear regression.

RESULTS

The research activities of this study began in December 2021. Participant enrollment and data collection began in August 2022 and are expected to continue until September 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

This project will allow the documentation of the impact of unmet social needs, scarcity, and future discounting on adherence in children with asthma using robust metrics of adherence and validated measures of scarcity and future discounting. If the relationship between unmet social needs, behavioral factors, and adherence is supported by our findings, this will suggest the potential for novel targets for integrated social care interventions to improve adherence to controller medication and reduce risk across the life course for vulnerable children with asthma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05278000; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05278000.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/37318.

Early Childhood Referrals by HealthySteps and Community Health Workers

This study explored how a community health worker (CHW) within a primary care team with a HealthySteps (HS) Specialist impacted referrals to social determinant of health resources for families with children aged birth to 5 years. Medical charts with documentation of HS comprehensive services between January and June 2018 were reviewed at 3 primary care clinics: 2 with an HS Specialist (HSS Only) and 1 with an HS Specialist and CHW (HSS + CHW). Eighty-six referrals were identified, 78 of which had documented outcomes. Outcomes were categorized as successful, unsuccessful, and not documented. The HSS + CHW group had a higher rate of successful referrals (96%) than the HSS Only group (74%). Statistical analysis (χ² = 8.37, P = .004) revealed a significant association between the referral outcome and having a CHW on a primary care team with an HS Specialist. Therefore, primary care practices should consider adapting their HS model to include CHWs.

Lifestyle Screening Tools for Children in the Community Setting: A Systematic Review

Screening of children’s lifestyle, including nutrition, may contribute to the prevention of lifestyle-related conditions in childhood and later in life. Screening tools can evaluate a wide variety of lifestyle factors, resulting in different (risk) scores and prospects of action. This systematic review aimed to summarise the design, psychometric properties and implementation of lifestyle screening tools for children in community settings. We searched the electronic databases of Embase, Medline (PubMed) and CINAHL to identify articles published between 2004 and July 2020 addressing lifestyle screening tools for children aged 0–18 years in the community setting. Independent screening and selection by two reviewers was followed by data extraction and the qualitative analysis of findings. We identified 41 unique lifestyle screening tools, with the majority addressing dietary and/or lifestyle behaviours and habits related to overweight and obesity. The domains mostly covered were nutrition, physical activity and sedentary behaviour/screen time. Tool validation was limited, and deliberate implementation features, such as the availability of clear prospects of actions following tool outcomes, were lacking. Despite the multitude of existing lifestyle screening tools for children in the community setting, there is a need for a validated easy-to-administer tool that enables risk classification and offers specific prospects of action to prevent children from adverse health outcomes.

Parental Optimism About Children's Risk of Future Tobacco Use and Excessive Weight Gain

BACKGROUND

Adults tend to underestimate their personal risk of disease, but little is known about parents' perceptions of children's risk.

METHODS

In total, 648 parents of children 0 to 18 years old attending 2 pediatric practices were surveyed about their children's exposure to smoking; 344 parents with children ≥2 years old also were asked about their children's sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption and physical activity. Children were categorized as "at risk" or "not at risk" for each factor. Parents estimated the risk of their child becoming a smoker or gaining excessive weight and were categorized as "optimistic" if they believed their children were less likely than others to use tobacco or gain weight.

RESULTS

Overall, 92% of parents thought their children were at lower risk than average for tobacco use, and 86% believed their children were at lower risk for excessive weight gain. A high frequency of optimistic bias occurred even among parents with "at-risk" children, including parents with children exposed to tobacco use (70.4%), SSB consumption (77.6%), >2 hours of screen time (82.1%), and low physical activity (84.1%). In multivariable analyses, parents with children exposed to tobacco smoke (odds ratio = 0.21, 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.51); or who consumed SSBs daily (odds ratio = 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.20-0.97) were less likely to be optimistic about their child's future tobacco use and excessive weight gain, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Most parents believed their children were at lower risk than average for tobacco use or excessive weight gain. Eliciting parents' optimistic biases might facilitate behavior change counseling in pediatric settings.