Socioeconomic Status and Bronchiolitis Severity Among Hospitalized Infants

Understanding Disparities in the Pediatric ICU: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Health disparities are pervasive in pediatrics. We aimed to describe disparities among patients who are likely to be cared for in the PICU and delineate how sociodemographic data are collected and categorized.

METHODS

Using MEDLINE as a data source, we identified studies which included an objective to assess sociodemographic disparities among PICU patients in the United States. We created a review rubric, which included methods of sociodemographic data collection and analysis, outcome and exposure variables assessed, and study findings. Two authors reviewed every study. We used the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Framework to organize outcome and exposure variables.

RESULTS

The 136 studies included used variable methods of sociodemographic data collection and analysis. A total of 30 of 124 studies (24%) assessing racial disparities used self- or parent-identified race. More than half of the studies (52%) dichotomized race as white and "nonwhite" or "other" in some analyses. Socioeconomic status (SES) indicators also varied; only insurance status was used in a majority of studies (72%) evaluating SES. Consistent, although not uniform, disadvantages existed for racial minority populations and patients with indicators of lower SES. The authors of only 1 study evaluated an intervention intended to mitigate health disparities. Requiring a stated objective to evaluate disparities aimed to increase the methodologic rigor of included studies but excluded some available literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Variable, flawed methodologies diminish our understanding of disparities in the PICU. Meaningfully understanding and addressing health inequity requires refining how we collect, analyze, and interpret relevant data.

Association of Socioeconomic Factors and Severity of Bronchiolitis Hospitalizations

It is unclear if socioeconomic status (SES) factors influence severity of illness of patients hospitalized with bronchiolitis. This study was conducted to identify SES factors including the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Social Vulnerability Composite Index (SVI), estimated income, proportion of minority, proportion of living below poverty, insurance status, and number of household members associated with length of stay (LOS) and intensive care unit admission. Infants hospitalized at a tertiary care urban center for bronchiolitis were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes. Federal information processing system codes were identified from home address and paired with SVI and 2018 census tract. Other measures of SES were obtained from the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. Number of household members, insurance, age, sex, and history of prematurity were recorded from patient chart. Length of stay was modeled with mixed effects negative binomial regression and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission with mixed effects logistic regression with random intercept at the census tract and adjustment for clinical factors. A total of 417 infants had median age of 144 days (interquartile range (IQR): 61, 357) and 136 (33%) were born premature. Median LOS was 62 hours (24, 136) with 97 (23%) patients admitted to the PICU. Median household members were 4 (4, 5). For each increase in household member, there was 7% increase in LOS (incidence rate ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 1-1.14, P = .038). Social Vulnerability Composite Index, subcategories, insurance status, estimated income, percent of minority, and percent of poverty did not show any associations with length of hospitalization or PICU admission. Increasing number of household members may be associated with increased bronchiolitis hospital LOS. We find no associations with other SES measures.

Racial and Ethnic Variation in ECMO Utilization and Outcomes in Pediatric Cardiac ICU Patients

Background

Previous studies have reported racial disparities in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) utilization in pediatric cardiac patients.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to determine if there was racial/ethnic variation in ECMO utilization and, if so, whether mortality was mediated by differences in ECMO utilization.

Methods

This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium clinical registry. Analyses were stratified by hospitalization type (medical vs surgical). Logistic regression models were adjusted for confounders and evaluated the association between race/ethnicity with ECMO utilization and mortality. Secondary analyses explored interactions between race/ethnicity, insurance, and socioeconomic status with ECMO utilization and mortality.

Results

A total of 50,552 hospitalizations from 34 hospitals were studied. Across all hospitalizations, 2.9% (N = 1,467) included ECMO. In medical and surgical hospitalizations, Black race and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with severity of illness proxies. In medical hospitalizations, race/ethnicity was not associated with the odds of ECMO utilization. Hospitalizations of other race had higher odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.22-2.12; P = 0.001). For surgical hospitalizations, Black (aOR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.02-1.50; P = 0.03) and other race (aOR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.17-1.93; P = 0.001) were associated with higher odds of ECMO utilization. Hospitalizations of Hispanic patients had higher odds of mortality (aOR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.03-1.68; P = 0.03). No significant interactions were demonstrated between race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status indicators with ECMO utilization or mortality.

Conclusions

Black and other races were associated with increased ECMO utilization during surgical hospitalizations. There were racial/ethnic disparities in outcomes not explained by differences in ECMO utilization. Efforts to mitigate these important disparities should include other aspects of care.

Blood eosinophils, specific immunoglobulin E, and bronchiolitis severity

BACKGROUND

Bronchiolitis is the leading cause of hospitalization for United States infants. Blood eosinophil and serum specific IgE (sIgE) levels are separately linked to clinical severity but few studies have examined these biomarkers together.

OBJECTIVE

Among infants hospitalized for bronchiolitis, we investigated the association between (1) blood eosinophilia and severity, (2) sIgE sensitization and severity, and (3) interaction between the two biomarkers on severity.

METHODS

We enrolled 1016 infants hospitalized for bronchiolitis between 2011 and 2014 across 17 U.S. hospitals into a prospective cohort study. Of those, 873 (86%) had eosinophils measured and all had sIgE levels from blood collected at hospitalization. We investigated higher bronchiolitis severity using intensive care therapy as the outcome (i.e., intensive care unit admission, intubation, and/or receipt of continuous positive pressure ventilation).

RESULTS

Among 873 infants in the analytic cohort, 18% had blood eosinophilia of ≥3%, and 20% were positive for sIgE. With regard to bronchiolitis severity, 15% received intensive care therapy. In unadjusted analyses, eosinophils ≥3% was not associated with intensive care therapy, while sIgE was associated with a significantly higher risk (odds ratio [OR]: 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-1.92; p = .01). In a multivariable model for intensive care therapy, eosinophilia remained unassociated with severity, and sIgE remained associated (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.05-2.45; p = .03). Also, sIgE did not modify the association between eosinophil level and intensive care therapy (pinteraction  = .14).

CONCLUSION

Blood eosinophilia of ≥3% was not associated with bronchiolitis severity. By contrast, sIgE was independently associated with bronchiolitis severity and did not modify the association between eosinophil level and severity.

A comparison of case definitions for infant atopic dermatitis in a multicenter prospective cohort study

This study identified two infant AD case definitions that were strongly associated with known AD risk factors. These case definitions can be used to study novel AD risk factors in large cohort studies, potentially providing new insights into the epidemiology of infant AD.

Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in paediatric critical care in the USA

In an era of tremendous medical advancements, it is important to characterise and address inequities in the provision of health care and in outcomes. There is a large body of evidence describing such disparities by race or ethnicity and socioeconomic position in critically ill adults; however, this important issue has received less attention in children and adolescents (aged ≤21 years). This Review presents a summary of the available evidence on disparities in outcomes in paediatric critical illness in the USA as a result of racism and socioeconomic privilege. The majority of evidence of racial and socioeconomic disparities in paediatric critical care originates from the USA and is retrospective, with only one prospective intervention-based study. Although there is mixed evidence of disparities by race or ethnicity and socioeconomic position in general paediatric intensive care unit admissions and outcomes in the USA, there are striking trends within some disease processes. Notably, there is evidence of disparities in management and outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, asthma, severe trauma, sepsis, and oncology, and in families' perceptions of care. Furthermore, there is clear evidence that critical care research is limited by under-enrolment of participants from minority race or ethnicity groups. We advocate for rigorous research standards and increases in the recruitment and enrolment of a diverse range of participants in paediatric critical care research to better understand the disparities observed, including the effects of racism and poverty. A clearer understanding of when, where, and how such disparities affect patients will better enable the development of effective strategies to inform practice, interventions, and policy.