Effect of State Legislation on Opioid Prescribing Practices After Surgery at a Pediatric Hospital

Impact of state legislation and institutional protocols on opioid prescribing practices following pediatric tonsillectomy

Objectives

Tonsillectomy is a common pediatric surgery, and pain is an important consideration in recovery. Due to the opioid epidemic, individual states, medical societies, and institutions have all taken steps to limit postoperative opioids, yet few studies have examined the effect of these interventions on pediatric otolaryngology practices. The primary aim of this study was to characterize opioid prescribing practices following North Carolina state opioid legislation and targeted institutional changes.

Methods

This single center retrospective cohort study included 1552 pediatric tonsillectomy patient records from 2014 to 2021. The primary outcome was number of oxycodone doses per prescription. This outcome was assessed over three time periods: (1) Before 2018 North Carolina opioid legislation. (2) Following legislation, before institutional changes. (3) After institutional opioid-specific protocols.

Results

The mean (± standard deviation) number of doses per prescription in Periods 1, 2, and 3 was: 58 ± 53, range 4-493; 28 ± 36, range 3-488; and 23 ± 17, range 1-139, respectively. In the adjusted model, Periods 2 and 3 had lower doses by -41% (95% CI -49%, -32%) and -40% (95% CI -55%, -19%) compared to Period 1. After 2018 North Carolina legislation, dosage decreased by -9% (95% CI -13%, -5%) per year. Despite interventions, ongoing variability in prescription regimens remained in all periods.

Conclusion

Legislative and institution specific opioid interventions was associated with a 40% decrease in oxycodone doses per prescription following pediatric tonsillectomy. While variability in opioid practices decreased post-interventions, it was not eliminated.

Level of evidence

3.

Association Between Initial Opioid Prescription Duration and 30-Day Risk of Receiving Repeat Opioid Among Children

OBJECTIVE

Our study evaluated the association between initial opioid prescription duration and receipt of a repeat opioid prescription in children.

METHODS

Eligible individuals were children between 1 and 17 years of age who enrolled in a Medicaid Managed Care plan and filled an incident opioid prescription during 2013 to 2018. An incident prescription was defined as receipt of an opioid analgesic without a prior use for 12 months. A repeat opioid prescription was defined as receipt of a subsequent opioid prescription within 30 days since the end of incident opioid prescription. A hierarchical multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to test the association between incident opioid prescription duration and the likelihood of receiving a repeat prescription.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 17,086 children receiving an incident opioid prescription in which 6272 (36.7%) received 1 to 3 days' supply, 8442 (49.4%) received 4 to 7 days' supply, 1434 (8.4%) received 8 to 10 days' supply, and 938 (5.5%) received >10 days' supply. Of these incident opioid recipients, 1780 (10.4%) filled a repeat opioid prescription. The multilevel model results indicated that, children receiving 4 to 7 days' supply (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.98 {0.9-1.1}), 8 to 10 days' supply (aOR: 1.03 [0.8-1.3]), and >10 days' supply (aOR: 0.85 [0.7-1.1]) had comparable likelihoods of receiving a repeat prescription as those receiving 1 to 3 days' supply.

DISCUSSION

Nearly 10% of children who filled an opioid prescription for acute pain received a repeat prescription. Initial prescription duration was not associated with the risk of receiving a repeat prescription.