Example of cost calculations for an operating room and a post-anaesthesia care unit

The Effect of Aromatherapy on Anxiety and Pain in Patients Undergoing Oculoplastic Surgery

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of aromatherapy on postoperative anxiety and pain in patients undergoing oculoplastic surgery.

METHODS

A randomized controlled study of 60 patients who underwent monitored anesthesia care sedation for oculoplastic procedures from August 2018 to November 2020. Patients were randomized to an aromatherapy (n = 32) or placebo (n = 28) condition. Anxiety was measured with State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and visual analog scale for anxiety. Pain was measured with a visual analog scale for pain.

RESULTS

Compared with control patients, aromatherapy patients had significantly lower postoperative State-Trait Anxiety Inventory state anxiety (24.1 vs. 29.1; p = 0.05) and visual analog scale pain scores (1.9 vs. 3.2; p = 0.05). Aromatherapy patients also had shorter stays in the postanesthesia care unit than control patients (57.7 vs. 79.4 minutes; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who received aromatherapy reported lower postoperative anxiety and pain. Aromatherapy may be a useful adjuvant analgesic and/or anxiolytic for patients undergoing oculoplastic procedures with monitored anesthesia care sedation.

Association of amisulpride and recovery room length of stay among patients with postoperative nausea and vomiting following outpatient surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common sequela of surgery in patients undergoing general anesthesia. Amisulpride has shown promise in its ability to treat PONV. The objective of this study was to determine if amisulpride is associated with significant changes in PACU efficiency within a fast-paced ambulatory surgery center.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 816 patients at a single ambulatory surgery center who experienced PONV between 2018 and 2023. The two cohorts analyzed were patients who did or did not have amisulpride among their anti-emetic regimens in the PACU during two distinct time periods (before and after amisulpride was introduced). The primary outcome of the study was PACU length of stay. Both unmatched analysis and a linear multivariable mixed-effects model fit by restricted maximum likelihood (random effect being surgical procedure) were used to analyze the association between amisulpride and PACU length of stay. We performed segmented regression to account for cohorts occurring during two time periods.

RESULTS

Unmatched univariate analysis revealed no significant difference in PACU length of stay (minutes) between the amisulpride and no amisulpride cohorts (115 min vs 119 min, respectively; P = 0.07). However, when addressing confounders by means of the mixed-effects multivariable segmented regression, the amisulpride cohort was associated with a statistically significant reduction in PACU length of stay by 26.1 min (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that amisulpride was associated with a significant decrease in PACU length of stay among patients with PONV in a single outpatient surgery center. The downstream cost-savings and operational efficiency gained from this drug's implementation may serve as a useful lens through which this drug's widespread implementation may further be rationalized.

Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet in hand surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

WALANT (Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet) has been widely implemented in hand surgery. We conducted a systematic review from 1979 to 2022, led by a team of anesthesiologist. Only randomized studies comparing WALANT to other types of regional anesthesia were included. The outcomes studied were pain, duration of the procedure, intraoperative bleeding, complications, and patient satisfaction. Twelve articles were included in the analysis. We found a reduction of 2.77 on the VAS (95% CI -3.79; -1.75, I² 93%) for intraoperative pain in the WALANT group. There was no significant difference (MD 0.79, 95% CI 95% -0.11; 1.69, I² 73%) for duration of surgery. Patient satisfaction was consistently high in the WALANT group. Intraoperative bleeding was minimal and not clinically relevant. Compared to other types of regional anesthesia in hand surgery, the WALANT technique decreases pain for the patients without increasing the length of surgery.

Use of a Combination Lavender/Peppermint Aromatherapy Patch During Port Catheter Placement Under Monitored Anesthesia Care Does Not Reduce Time to Discharge Readiness: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Intraoperative anxiety is a common problem when Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) is used instead of general anesthesia during minor surgical procedures such as port catheter placement. Nonpharmacological anxiolytics such as aromatherapy have been studied for their effects on preoperative anxiety, but no placebo-controlled study of aromatherapy during surgeries under MAC has yet been performed. Methods: After IRB approval, 70 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either a lavender/peppermint aromatherapy patch (Elequil Aromatabs®; Beekley Corporation) or a matching placebo patch. The primary outcome, time to readiness for discharge from postoperative acute care units (PACU; min), was assessed every 15 min until a modified postanesthesia recovery score for ambulatory patients (PARSAP) score of 18 or higher was reached. In the preoperative holding area, the assigned patch/placebo was activated and affixed to a folded towel placed aside the subject's head, contralateral to the side of the planned surgery. The towel and patch/placebo were discarded when the subject left the operating room (OR). Results: No difference was found between the treatment and placebo groups on the primary outcome of time to discharge readiness (mean [standard deviation, SD]: 82 [15] vs. 89 [21] min, respectively, p = 0.131). No difference was found between the treatment and placebo groups on the secondary outcomes of intraoperative midazolam dose, intraoperative opioid dose, intraoperative ondansetron dose, or intraoperative promethazine dose. No difference was found between the treatment and placebo groups in the proportion of subjects requiring rescue postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) medication in the PACU or the proportion of subjects requiring opioids in the PACU. No difference was found between the treatment and placebo groups in pain intensity in PACU, average PONV score in PACU, or patient satisfaction in PACU. PACU patient satisfaction was high for both the patch and placebo groups (35/35 [100%] vs. 32/34 [94%] "very satisfied," p = 0.239). Conclusions: Aromatherapy treatment is not indicated intraoperatively to reduce anxiety or the use of antiemetics in patients requiring Port catheter placement. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT05328973.

Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release With Monitored Anesthesia Care Versus Local Anesthesia: Analysis of Operative Times and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Purpose

Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common peripheral nerve compressive neuropathy in clinical practice. Patients who fail nonsurgical management are indicated for carpal tunnel release (CTR), which can be performed open or endoscopically. Efforts have been made to utilize local anesthesia instead of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) for endoscopic release. This study seeks to compare perioperative surgical times and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic CTR with local anesthesia versus MAC.

Methods

This is a 6-year retrospective study of 1,036 patients undergoing isolated endoscopic CTR with MAC (n = 607) versus local (n = 429) anesthesia within an outpatient surgical center. A combination of chi-square and t tests was used to compare the patient characteristics, operative details, and outcomes.

Results

The local cohort demonstrated significantly shorter postoperative time to discharge (15.9 ± 9.8 vs 53.8 ± 11.0 minutes; P < .05), total time spent in surgical center (83.2 ± 18.7 vs 129.3 ± 20.7 minutes; P < .05), shorter total operating room time (26.7 ± 4.3 vs 29.0 ± 4.1 minutes; P < .05) and tourniquet time (12.4 ± 2.5 vs 13.1 ± 2.1 minutes; P < .05). Preoperative and postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores were similar between the cohorts (P > .05); however, PROMIS pain interference improved to a higher degree between pre- and post-op in the local group (-1.5 vs -0.8; P = .02). Early and late surgical complications were similar between the groups (P > .05).

Conclusions

Patients within the MAC cohort demonstrated longer postoperative time to discharge and total time in the surgical center. The MAC cohort had longer operating room and tourniquet time, albeit not clinically significant. Surgical complications and PROMIS scores were similar between the two groups. Our findings suggest that local anesthesia is a safe and effective option for endoscopic CTR and may offer advantages in cost and convenience for patients.

Type of study/level of evidence

Retrospective cohort study/therapeutic III.

Quantifying the effect of shoulder size on operation duration: an analysis of stapes surgery outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of body mass index on hearing outcomes, operative time and complication rates following stapes surgery.

METHOD

This is a five-year retrospective review of 402 charts from a single tertiary otology referral centre from 2015 to 2020.

RESULTS

When the patient's shoulder was adjacent to the surgeon's dominant hand, the average operative time of 40 minutes increased to 70 minutes because of a significant positive association between higher body mass index and longer operative times (normal body mass index group (<25 kg/m2) r = 0.273, p = 0.032; overweight body mass index group (25-30 kg/m2) r = 0.265, p = 0.019). Operative times were not significantly longer upon comparison of low and high body mass index groups without stratification by laterality (54.9 ± 19.6 minutes vs 57.8 ± 19.2 minutes, p = 0.127).

CONCLUSION

There is a clinically significant relationship between body mass index and operating times. This may be due to access limitations imposed by shoulder size.

Association of reintubation and hospital costs and its modification by postoperative surveillance: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

We estimated hospital costs associated with postoperative reintubation and tested the hypothesis that prolonged surveillance in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) modifies the hospital costs of reintubation.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational research study.

SETTING

Two tertiary care academic healthcare networks in the Bronx, New York and Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

PATIENTS

68,125 adult non-cardiac surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia between 2016 and 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

The exposure variable was unplanned reintubation within 7 days of surgery.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was direct hospital costs associated with patient care related activities. We used a multivariable generalized linear model based on log-transformed costs data, adjusting for pre- and intraoperative confounders. We matched our data with data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS). In the key secondary analysis, we examined if prolonged postoperative surveillance, defined as PACU utilization (≥4 h) modifies the association between reintubation and costs of care.

MAIN RESULTS

1759 (2.6%) of patients were re-intubated within 7 days after surgery. Reintubation was associated with higher direct hospital costs (adjusted model estimate 2.05; 95% CI: 2.00-2.10) relative to no reintubation. In the HCUP-NIS matched cohort, the adjusted absolute difference (ADadj) in costs amounted to US$ 18,837 (95% CI: 17,921-19,777). The association was modified by the duration of PACU surveillance (p-for-interaction <0.001). In patients with a shorter PACU length of stay, reintubation occurred later (median of 2 days; IQR 1, 5) versus 1 days (IQR 0, 2; p < .001), and was associated with magnified effects on hospital costs compared to patients who stayed in the PACU longer (ADadj of US$ 23,444, 95% CI: 21,217-25,799 versus ADadj of US$ 17,615, 95% CI: 16,350-18,926; p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative reintubation is associated with 2-fold higher hospital costs. Prolonged surveillance in the recovery room mitigated this effect. The cost-saving effect of longer PACU length of stay was likely driven by earlier reintubation in patients who needed this intervention.

Single-use versus reusable ancillaries for dual mobility cup in total hip replacement. A prospective randomized short-term safety and feasibility comparison

BACKGROUND

Single-use (SU) ancillaries for cup preparation in total hip arthroplasty (THR) aim to reduce the costs of hip replacement surgery. These devices have been recently introduced, but their safety and feasibility have not been studied. Therefore, we performed a prospective randomized study aiming to assess the impact in our department of using these SU ancillaries versus standard reusable ancillaries for dual mobility THR regarding 1) the cost, 2) operative time, 3) quality of primary fixation.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that the use of SU ancillaries for acetabular preparation would reduce maintenance costs, and so optimise the operating procedure, reduce the overall cost of surgery, save time, while maintaining the same quality of prosthesis fitting.

METHOD

We conducted a randomised, controlled, open-label, two-arm, single-centre, prospective therapeutic trial with a medico-economic objective. Inclusions were made prospectively from patients hospitalised and surgically managed in our department for arthrosis over 18 years old treated with dual mobility THR.

RESULTS

In the current study, 18/20 (90%) of the cases required the use of one SU reamer when using SU ancillaries. Only two cases (10%) required a second SU reamer (without SU failure regarding the acetabular implant) because there was too much subchondral bone left and not enough cancellous bone allowing correct cup fitting. We also found that the test implant supplied in the SU kit had a less secure press-fit than the reusable metal test implants. There was one of primary press-fit failure in the SU group requiring a different cup with additional screws. The estimated cost to the supplier per procedure was 20,105 euros using single-use reamers versus 26,666 euros using conventional ancillary kits, a saving of 6561 euros (p<0.001). For the healthcare institution, the median price per intervention on the differentiating points was 2648 euros versus 2580 euros, with no significant difference (p=0.297). The results show an average societal cost of 52,199 euros using single-use and 53,572 euros using reusable ancillary equipment, with a significant difference between the two groups (p<0.003). The average cost of Healthcare Risk Waste (HCRW) disposal in the SU group was 5.2 euros per intervention against 5.1 euros in the RU group, without significant difference (p=0.910). We found a similar result for the cost of disposal of non-HCRW waste per procedure: 0.37 euros in the SU group versus 0.34 in the RU group, without significant difference (p=0.345).

CONCLUSION

SU ancillaries significantly reduce the table set up time and have the potential to facilitate time and cost savings but further research is needed in this direction. Our study shows that the daily workload, operating times, and the number of boxes of instruments to be sterilised are decreased. The associated environmental gain is significant. Nevertheless, the economic promise of these SU ancillaries is only partially supported in this trial owing to the small number of patients. Further work will be needed to obtain a more powerful medico-economic assessment of this promising ancillary product.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II; prospective randomized study.

Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy may be superior to laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy in terms of costs and profit: a retrospective pair-matched cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

A direct comparison of the cost-benefit analysis of retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (RPA) versus the minimally invasive transperitoneal access (LTA) approach is currently lacking. We hypothesized that RPA is more cost effective than LTA; promising significant savings for the healthcare system in an era of ever more limited resources.

METHODS

We performed a monocentric retrospective observational cohort study based on data from our Endocrine Surgery Registry. Patients who were operated upon between 2019 and 2022 were included. After pair-matching, both cohorts (RPA vs. LTA) were compared for perioperative variables and treatment costs (process cost calculation), revenue and profit.

RESULTS

Two homogenous cohorts of 43 patients each (RPA vs. LTA) were identified following matching. Patient characteristics between the cohorts were comparable. In terms of both treatment-associated costs and profit, the RPA procedure was superior to LTA (costs: US$5789.99 for RPA vs. US$6617.75 for LTA, P = 0.043; profit: US$1235.59 for RPA vs. US$653.33 for LTA, P = 0.027). The duration of inpatient treatment and comorbidities significantly influenced the cost of treatment and the overall profit.

CONCLUSIONS

RPA appears not only to offer benefits over LTA in terms of perioperative morbidity and length of hospital stay, but also has a superior financial cost/benefit profile.

Healthcare costs of different treatment options for condylar fractures

Objective

As treatment options for condylar fractures have comparable outcomes, getting insight into associated costs is a first step towards implementing value-based healthcare (VBH). Therefore, we described the actual costs of the different treatment options (surgical, conservative, and expectative treatment) for condylar fractures. We expected surgical treatment to be the most expensive treatment.

Study design

This is a cost-of-illness study, based on estimates from the literature. Firstly, care pathways of all treatment options were described. Secondly, the costs per step were calculated based on the literature and Dutch guidelines for economic evaluations in health care.

Results

The direct treatment costs of surgical treatment (€3721 to €4040) are three to five times higher than conservative treatment (€730 to €1332). When lost productivity costs during the recovery period are included, costs of surgical treatment remain 1.5 times higher (€9511 to €9830 for surgical treatment and €6224 to €6826 for conservative treatment). The costs of expectative treatment (€5436) are lower than both other treatments.

Conclusion

The costs for surgical treatment are considerably higher than those for conservative or expectative treatment, mainly related to direct treatment cost. Future research should focus on the patients' perspective, to support implementation of VBH in treating condylar fractures.

Early versus delayed postoperative adductor canal block in total knee arthroplasty

Background

We hypothesized that patients who received an adductor canal block (ACB) in the operating room following unilateral total knee arthroplasty would have a lower oral morphine milligram equivalent (MME) consumption during the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) phase 1 recovery period compared to patients who received an ACB in the PACU.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent robotic-assisted unilateral total knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia between March 1, 2020, and February 28, 2021, and received postoperative ACB either in the operating room or the PACU.

Results

A total of 36 and 178 patients received postoperative ACB in the operating room and PACU, respectively, and had median and interquartile range MME consumption in the PACU of 22.5 (20-40) mg and 30.0 (20-40) mg (P = 0.76), respectively. Patients who had an ACB performed in the operating room and PACU had median and interquartile ranges of time spent in the PACU of 101 (75-178) minutes and 186 (125-272) minutes (P < 0.01), respectively.

Conclusion

Patients who received an ACB in the operating room did not have a lower OME consumption than patients who received an ACB in the PACU but did have a shorter PACU length of stay.

Efficacy of regional anesthesia in hip preservation surgeries: a systematic review

The purpose of this study was to review the current literature on perioperative pain management in hip arthroscopy, periacetabular osteotomy and surgical hip dislocation. A systematic review of the literature published from January 2000 to December 2022 was performed. Selection criteria included published randomized controlled trials, prospective reviews and retrospective reviews of all human subjects undergoing hip preservation surgery. Exclusion criteria included case reports, animal studies and studies not reporting perioperative pain control protocols. Thirty-four studies included hip arthroscopy in which peripheral nerve blocks were associated with a significant reduction in pain score (P = 0.037) compared with general anesthesia alone. However, no pain control modality was associated with a significant difference in postanesthesia care unit opioid use (P = 0.127) or length of stay (P = 0.251) compared with general anesthesia alone. Falls were the most common complication reported, accounting for 37% of all complications. Five studies included periacetabular osteotomy and surgical hip dislocation in which peripheral nerve blocks were associated with an 18% reduction in pain on postoperative Day 2, a 48% reduction in cumulative opioid use on postoperative Day 2 and a 40% reduction in hospital stay. Due to the low sample size of the periacetabular osteotomy and surgical hip dislocation studies, we were unable to determine the significant difference between the means. Due to significant between-study heterogeneity, additional studies with congruent outcome measures need to be conducted to determine the efficacy of regional anesthesia in hip arthroscopy, periacetabular osteotomy and surgical hip dislocation.

Same-Day Discharge After Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Is It Worth It?

Introduction and Objective: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has traditionally been performed as an inpatient procedure; however, recent studies have suggested the feasibility of same-day discharge (SDD) after RAPN. We aimed to evaluate the safety and cost-effectiveness of SDD for RAPN. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients undergoing RAPN between January 2015 and July 2021. Comparison before and after the implementation of an SDD protocol was assessed through differences in postanesthesia care unit (PACU) time, length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, 30-day return to emergency department (ED) rates, unplanned office visits (OVs), and need for secondary procedures. A cost-efficacy model was generated to estimate the difference in expenditure between SDD and inpatient RAPN. Results: In total, 192 patients underwent RAPN with 74 being SDD and 118 being admitted postoperatively. After SDD protocol implementation, the percentage of patients discharged from the PACU increased from 0% to 76%. The safety profile of SDD was similar to the inpatient group, with no differences in readmission rates (1.4% vs 5.1%, p = 0.18) or return to ED (5.4% vs 9.3%, p = 0.33). Compared with inpatient RAPN, SDD was associated with increased time in PACU (375 vs 251 minutes, p < 0.001), resulting in an additional expenditure of $1,622 per patient. SDD patients were more likely to return for one or more unplanned OVs (17.6% vs 6.8%, p = 0.02). Overall, the total cost of SDD was significantly lower than inpatient RAPN ($5,222 per patient vs $8,425, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Despite a shorter postoperative monitoring period, SDD appears safe, with equivalent readmission rates, return to ED, and secondary procedures. SDD for RAPN saves ∼$3,000 per patient. In implementing an SDD protocol, clinicians should be cognizant of increased demands on PACU infrastructure and be willing to provide additional support in the office setting.

Cost Analysis of Radiofrequency Ablation for Adrenal Adenoma in Patients with Primary Aldosteronism and Hypertension: Results from the ADERADHTA Pilot Study and Comparison with Surgical Adrenalectomy

PURPOSE

Primary Aldosteronism (PA) is increasingly considered as a common disease affecting up to 10% of the hypertensive population. Standard of care comprises laparoscopic total adrenalectomy but innovative treatment such as RadioFrequency Ablation (RFA) constitutes an emerging promising alternative to surgery. The main aim of this study is to analyse the cost of RFA versus surgery on aldosterone-producing adenoma patient from the French National Health Insurance (FNHI) perspective.

METHODS

The ADERADHTA study was a prospective pilot study aiming to evaluate both safety and efficacy of the novel use of adrenal RFA on the patients with PA. This study conducted on two French sites and enrolled adult patients, between 2016 and 2018, presenting hypertension and underwent the RFA procedure. Direct medical (inpatient and outpatient) and non-medical (transportation, daily allowance) costs were calculated over a 6-month follow-up period. Moreover, the procedure costs for the RFA were calculated from the hospital perspective. Descriptive statistics were implemented.

RESULTS

Analysis was done on 21 patients in RFA groups and 27 patients in the surgery group. The difference in hospital costs between the RFA and surgery groups was €3774 (RFA: €1923; Surgery: €5697 p < 0.001) in favour of RFA. Inpatient and outpatient costs over the 6-month follow-up period were estimated at €3,48 for patients who underwent RFA. The production cost of implementing the RFA procedure was estimated at €1539 from the hospital perspective.

CONCLUSION

Our study was the first to show that RFA is 2 to 3 times less costly than surgery. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the number NCT02756754.

Rescue Treatment of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: A Systematic Review of Current Clinical Evidence

Although prophylactic antiemetics are commonly used perioperatively, an estimated 30% of surgical patients still suffer from postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Very few prospective trials have studied rescue treatment of PONV after failure of prophylaxis, providing limited evidence to support clinical management. In patients who have failed PONV prophylaxis, administering a rescue antiemetic from the same drug class has been reported to be ineffective. For many antiemetics currently used in PONV rescue, significant uncertainty remains around the effective dose range, speed of onset, duration of effect, safety, and overall risk-benefit ratio. As prompt, effective PONV rescue after failure of prophylaxis is important to optimize postoperative recovery and resource utilization, we conduct this systematic review to summarize the current evidence available on the topic.

Bypassing the post‐anaesthesia care unit after elective hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort safety study

Following knee and hip arthroplasty, transfer to a recovery area immediately following surgery and before going to ward might be unnecessary in low-risk patients. Avoiding the recovery area in this way could allow for more targeted use of resources for higher risk patients, which may improve operating theatre flow and productivity. A prospective single-centre cohort study on the safety of criteria for bypassing the post-anaesthesia care unit in elective hip and knee arthroplasty was designed. Criteria were: ASA physical status < 3; peri-operative bleeding < 500 ml; low postoperative discharge-score (modified Aldrete-score); and an uncomplicated surgical and neuraxial anaesthesia procedure. The primary outcome was the number of patients in need of secondary readmission to the post-anaesthesia care unit. Events within the first 24 postoperative hours were recorded, along with readmission and complication rates. A total of 696 patients were included, with 287 (41%) undergoing total hip arthroplasty, 274 (39%) undergoing total knee arthroplasty and 135 (19%) undergoing unicompartmental knee-arthroplasty. Of these, 207 (44%) bypassed the post-anaesthesia care unit. Patients all received multimodal analgesia without peripheral nerve blockade. Only one patient in the ward group required secondary readmission to the post-anaesthesia care unit. Within 24 h, 151 events were reported, with 41 (27%) in the ward group and 110 (73%) in the post-anaesthesia care unit group. Two events in each group occurred within 2 hours of surgery. No complications were attributed to bypassing the post-anaesthesia care unit. The use of simple pragmatic criteria for bypassing the post-anaesthesia care unit for patients undergoing knee and hip arthroplasty with spinal anaesthesia is possible and associated with significant reduction of post-anaesthesia care unit admission and without apparent safety issues. Confirmation is needed from other studies and external validity should be interpreted cautiously in centres with different peri-operative regimens, organisational and staffing structures.

The process of estimating the cost of surgery: Providing a practical framework for surgeons

Over the last decades, health care costs have been increasing at an alarming, exponential rate which is considered unsustainable. Surgical care utilizes one-third of health care costs. Estimating, evaluating, and understanding the cost of surgery is a vital step towards cost management and reduction. Current cost estimation studies and cost-effectiveness studies have vast disparities in their methodology, with published costs of Operating Room varying from as low as $7 and as high as $113 per minute. Costs in surgery are distinguished as direct and indirect. Allocation of direct costs involves identification, measurement, and valuation processes. Allocation of indirect costs involves the allocation of capital and overhead costs and of indirect department costs. Annualised capital costs and overhead hospital costs are then allocated to surgery by either the cost-centre allocation or the activity-based allocation frameworks. Indirect department costs are allocated to a specific surgery by weighted service allocation or hourly rate allocation or inpatient day allocation, or marginal markup allocation. The growing societal, financial and political pressure for cost reduction has brought cost analysis to the forefront of healthcare discussions. Thus, we believe that almost every single surgeon will eventually enter the field of healthcare economics by necessity. This review aims to provide surgeons with a practical framework for engaging in cost estimation studies.

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Mesorectal Excision for Cancer of the High Rectum: A Single-Center Study with Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of robotic surgery for partial mesorectal excision (PME) in patients with high rectal cancer (RC) remains unexplored. This study aimed to compare the operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic (R-PME) versus laparoscopic (L-PME) PME for high RC.

METHODS

This was a single-center propensity score cohort study of consecutive patients diagnosed with RC in the high rectum (>10 to 15 cm from the anal verge) who underwent surgery between September 2012 and May 2019.

RESULTS

Of 131 selected patients (50 R-PME and 81 L-PME), 88 were matched using propensity score (44 per group). Operative and postoperative variables were similar between R-PME and L-PME patients, except for operative time (220 min and 190 min, respectively; p < 0.0001). No conversion was needed. Overall morbidity was 15.9%; 4 patients (4.5%) developed anastomotic leakage. The mean hospital stay was 7.25 days for R-PME vs. 7.64 days for L-PME (p = 0.597). R0 resection was achieved in 100% of R-PME and 90.9% of L-PME (p = 0.116). Only 3 patients (1 R-PME, 2 L-PME) received a permanent stoma (p = 1). No group differences were observed for overall or disease-free survival rates at 5 years. The costs of R-PME were significantly higher than those of L-PME.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive surgery can be performed safely for PME in high RC. No difference can be detected between R-PME and L-PME for both short- and long-term outcomes, leaving the choice of the surgical approach to the surgeon's experience. Specific health economic studies are needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery for RC.

Failure rates and clinical outcomes after treatment for long-head biceps brachii tendon pathology: a comparison of three treatment types

Hypothesis/Background

Treatment options for the biceps brachii tendon include tenotomy, arthroscopic tenodesis, and open tenodesis. Few studies to date have compared all treatment options in the context of a rotator cuff repair.

Methods

A retrospective review of 100 patients who underwent arthroscopic supraspinatus repair between 2013 and 2018 with a minimum of one-year follow-up was performed. Patients were separated into the following 4 groups: (1) 57 had isolated supraspinatus repair with no biceps tendon surgery (SSP); (2) 16 had supraspinatus repair and biceps tenotomy; (3) 18 had supraspinatus repair and arthroscopic biceps tenodesis; (4) 9 had supraspinatus repair and an open biceps tenodesis (SSP + OT). The primary outcome was operative time. The secondary outcomes were cost analysis, complications, patient-reported outcome measures, range of motion, and strength testing.

Results

The operative time for the SSP + OT group was significantly longer than that of the SSP group (P < .05) but was not significantly longer than that of the other groups. The cost for the SSP group was significantly less than the cost for the SSP + OT and supraspinatus repair and arthroscopic biceps tenodesis groups (P < .05 for both), whereas the cost for the supraspinatus repair and biceps tenotomy group was significantly less than the cost for the SSP + OT group (P < .05). There were no significant differences between groups for complications, all patient-reported outcome measues, all range of motion, and all strength parameters.

Discussion/Conclusion

Operative time is the longest in open biceps tenodesis and is significantly longer than that of isolated supraspinatus repair. No significant differences in operative times or costs were identified in patients undergoing arthroscopic vs. open biceps tenodesis. All patients, irrespective of the type of biceps tendon procedure, had excellent clinical and functional outcomes at least one year after surgery. There was no difference in clinical or functional outcomes, or complications, among the 4 groups.

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: cost-effectiveness analysis of trend modifications of the technique

The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different modifications of the trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) repair of groin hernia. Data were collected prospectively for all consecutive patients who underwent TAPP unilateral inguinal hernia repair between November 2017 and March 2019, and who completed a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Costs and quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained were collected. Three TAPP variations were assessed: mesh fixation and peritoneal closure with staples (group 1); mesh fixation with fibrin glue and peritoneal closure with sutures (group 2); and mesh fixation and peritoneal closure with fibrin glue (group 3). A matched group of open repairs was established. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and main intra-operative and post-operative outcomes were assessed. Overall 120 patients were included (group 1 n = 31; group 2 n = 27; group 3 n = 33; open group: 29). Operative time was shorter for groups 2 and 3, and the main post-operative outcomes were similar. The overall mean total cost of the open group (1185.95€) was lower compared with the laparoscopic group (group 1: 1682.39; group 2: 1538.54€; group 3: 1510.1€) (p = 0.026). However, the mean ICERs of groups 2 and 3 were significantly higher compared with group 1 (p = 0.021) and the open group (p = 0.032). At simulations analysis, the probability of cost-effectiveness was 33.32%, 36.26%, and 36.7% in TAPP groups 1, 2, and 3. In the long term, laparoscopic repair of groin hernia is cost-effective compared with open surgery. The use of fibrin glue for mesh fixation and/or for closing the peritoneum is the most cost-effective option and shortens operative times.

A Novel Absorbable Stapler Provides Patient-Reported Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness Noninferior to Subcuticular Skin Closure: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Deep dermal suturing is critical for scar quality outcomes. The authors evaluated a new, fast medical device for dermal suturing, with the hypothesis of noninferiority with regard to clinical scar and cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

A prospective, patient-blind, randomized, multicenter noninferiority study in 26 French hospitals was conducted. Patients were randomized 1:1 to suturing with conventional thread or a semiautomatic stapler. The Patient Scar Assessment Scale was rated at 3 months for primary endpoint effectiveness. Secondary endpoints were cost-effectiveness of the two suturing methods, prevalence of complications, suturing/operating time, Observer Scar Assessment Scale and Patient Scar Assessment Scale score, scar aesthetic quality 18 months after surgery, and occupational exposure to blood during surgery.

RESULTS

Six hundred sixty-four patients were enrolled, 660 were randomized, and 649 constituted the full analysis (stapler arm, n = 324; needle arm, n = 325). Primary endpoint Patient Scar Assessment Scale score in the stapler arm was not inferior to that in the needle arm at 3 months or after 18 months. The mean operating time was 180 minutes in the stapler arm and 179 minutes in the needle arm (p = not significant). The mean suturing time was significantly lower in the stapler arm (p < 0.001). There were seven occupational exposures to blood in the needle arm and one in the stapler arm. The two arms did not differ significantly in terms of complications (p = 0.41). The additional cost of using the device was &OV0556;51.57 for the complete-case population.

CONCLUSION

Wound healing outcome was no worse than with conventional suturing using a semiautomatic stapler and associated with less occupational exposure to blood.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, I.

Opioid-Free Anesthesia in the Perioperative Setting-A Preliminary Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Anesthesiologists have long used multimodal analgesia for effective pain control. Opioid-sparing anesthetics are gaining popularity among practitioners in light of increasing concerns for both immediate opioid side effects and the long-term opioid misuse among susceptible patients. Currently, there is a critical gap in knowledge regarding outcomes after an opioid-free anesthetic (OFA) during general anesthesia. We hypothesized that an opioid-free general anesthetic will not be inferior to a traditional opioid anesthetic (OA) as measured by the perioperative outcomes of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) duration, 12-hour postoperative summed pain intensity (SPI12) scores, total morphine equivalent doses (MEDs) utilized in the 12-hour postoperative inpatient (MED12) and total MEDs utilized in the 90-day outpatient periods (MED90).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were included if they were  ≥18 years old, met criteria for American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I-IV, received general endotracheal anesthesia from a single anesthesia provider for a surgical operation in 2016, did not receive intraoperative administration of opioids, and were recovered in the PACU. A total of 25 patients were included in the OFA group and 29 control patients in the OA group (n = 54). A retrospective chart review of intraoperative records, perioperative pain scores, and medication utilization (inpatient and outpatient) was performed to obtain the data for the analysis of the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

In both OFA and OA groups, the continuous outcomes were not normally distributed. Subsequent bivariate tests of the indicated OA versus OFA age (d = 0.58), surgery duration (d = 0.24), and preoperative pain score (d = 0.51) warranted inclusion in the multinomial regression. Surgical duration was not significantly associated with the primary outcomes. However, the continuous variables of age and preoperative Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale score were associated with differences in primary outcomes. Every 1-year increase in the age was associated with a 5.06 increase in SPI12 and 5.73 mg increase in MED12. Every 1-point increase in the preoperative Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale score was associated with an 8.45 minutes increase in PACU duration, 11.25 increase in SPI12, 17.85 mg increase in MED12, and 20.83 mg increase in MED90. In regard to the primary outcomes, there was a lack of significant differences between the OFA and OA groups in all outcomes (PACU duration, mean SPI12, MED12, and MED90).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first matched cohort study directly comparing an OFA with a traditional anesthetic for general anesthesia in a wide range of surgical and clinical scenarios. There was no significant difference in SPI12 between the OFA group and OA group, suggesting that patients' subjective pain was similar immediately after surgery whether or not they received intraoperative opioids. Concurrently, no "catch-up" effect was observed as the PACU duration; MED12 and MED90 were not different between the OFA and OA groups. However, there were many covariates identified in this study because of the small sample size or each group. Additional research is needed to explore if these findings can be extrapolated to a larger more heterogeneous population. Our preliminary work suggests that eliminating patient exposure to opioids in the intraoperative period does not have a deleterious effect on perioperative patient outcomes.

Italian cost analysis of free flap surgery in head and neck reconstruction using the activity-based costing (ABC)

The aim of the study is to evaluate costs of free flap surgery for head and neck (H & N) reconstructions using the time-driven activity-based costing (ABC) method and to compare them with the refund provided by the Italian National Health System (NHS) amounting to 11,891€. We retrospectively selected 29 consecutive patients underwent free flap reconstruction in 2013 at IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza. Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 (n = 10) included patients receiving radial forearm free flap (RFFF), Group 2 (n = 10) receiving anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap, and Group 3 (n = 9) composed of patients having fibular free flap. For each patient, costs were calculated using the ABC and divided into instay, surgical, and services costs. We observed an overall mean total cost of 27,802.40€. The mean costs related to hospital stay were 9,800.70€. The mean costs for surgery were 13,097.60€ and amounted to 4,904.10€ for services. RFFF appears to be less costing (25,175.40€) compared with ALT (29,191.60€) and fibula free flap (29,040.20€). ABC is an appropriate method to determine actual costs of free flap surgery by correctly allocating the resources used. The Italian NHS tariff seems to be inadequate to cover the real cost of this type of surgery.

A single-institution analysis of factors affecting costs in the arthroscopic treatment of glenohumeral instability

Background

Although surgical shoulder stabilization is a substantial cost nationally within the United States, little information exists to analyze this cost. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with variation in direct costs with the arthroscopic treatment of glenohumeral instability.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of all patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment of glenohumeral instability between January 12, 2012 and July 11, 2017. Patient and procedure factors were collected. Direct perioperative costs were collected using a validated internal tool. Patient and procedure characteristics significantly associated with costs were identified using multivariate generalized linear models.

Results

The study included 302 patients, of whom 12% were undergoing revision and 32% were contact or collision athletes. Anterior instability was present in 73%, whereas 14% had posterior and 10% had multidirectional instability. Of the patients, 67% were recurrent dislocators and 33% were first-time dislocators or subluxators. Remplissage was performed in 13%; biceps tenodesis, 5%; and rotator cuff repair, 3%. An average of 4.0 ± 1.4 anchors were used. Of costs, 39% were operative facility utilization costs and 41% were implant costs. Factors associated with cost increase included an increased number of anchors (P < .0001), posterior vs. anterior instability (P = .001), recurrent instability vs. first-time dislocation (P = .025), remplissage (P = .006), rotator interval closure (P = .021), bicep tenodesis (P = .020), rotator cuff repair (P < .0001), an inpatient stay (P = .003), and repair of humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligaments (P = .012).

Conclusion

Most perioperative costs associated with the arthroscopic treatment of glenohumeral instability are facility utilization and implant costs. Nonmodifiable factors associated with increased cost included posterior direction of instability and recurrent instability. Modifiable factors included additional procedures and inpatient stay.

Implementation of strategies to prevent and treat postoperative delirium in the post-anesthesia caring unit : A German survey of current practice

Postoperative delirium is associated with worse outcome. The aim of this study was to understand present strategies for delirium screening and therapy in German Post-Anesthesia-Caring-Units (PACU). We designed a German-wide web-based questionnaire which was sent to 922 chairmen of anesthesiologic departments and to 726 anesthetists working in ambulatory surgery. The response rate was 30% for hospital anesthesiologists. 10% (95%-confidence interval: 8–12) of the anesthesiologists applied a standardised screening for delirium. Even though not on a regular basis, in 44% (41–47) of the hospitals, a recommended and validated screening was used, the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (NuDesc) or the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). If delirium was likely to occur, 46% (43–50) of the patients were examined using a delirium tool. 20% (17–23) of the patients were screened in intensive care units. For the treatment of delirium, alpha-2-agonists (83%, 80–85) were used most frequently for vegetative symptoms, benzodiazepines for anxiety in 71% (68–74), typical neuroleptics in 77% (71–82%) of patients with psychotic symptoms and in 20% (15–25) in patients with hypoactive delirium. 45% (39–51) of the respondents suggested no therapy for this entity. Monitoring of delirium is not established as a standard procedure in German PACUs. However, symptom-oriented therapy for postoperative delirium corresponds with current guidelines.

Peri-operative pain management in hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of the literature

The purpose of this article was to review current literature on peri-operative pain management in hip arthroscopy. A systematic review of the literature on pain control in hip arthroscopy published January 2008 to December 2018 was performed. Inclusion criteria consisted of English language or articles with English translations, subjects undergoing hip arthroscopy with documented peri-operative pain control protocols in studies reporting Level I to IV evidence. Exclusion criteria were non-English articles, animal studies, prior systematic review or meta-analyses, studies not reporting peri-operative pain control protocols, studies documenting only pediatric (<18 years of age) patients, studies with Level V evidence and studies including less than five subjects. Statistical analysis was performed to assess pain protocols on narcotic consumption in PACU, VAS score on discharge, time to discharge from PACU and incidence of complications. Seventeen studies were included, comprising 1674 patients. Nerve blocks were administered in 50% of patients (n = 838 of 1674), of which 88% (n = 740 of 838) received a pre-operative block while 12% (n = 98 of 838) post-operative block. Sixty-eight complications were recorded: falls (54%, n = 37), peripheral neuritis (41%, n = 28), seizure (1.5%, n = 1), oxygen desaturation and nausea (1.5%, n = 1) and epidural spread resulting in urinary retention (1.5%, n = 1). No significant differences in narcotic consumption, VAS score at discharge, time until discharge or incidence of complication was found based on pain control modality utilized. No statistically significant difference in PACU narcotic utilization, VAS pain scores at discharge, time to discharge or incidence of complications was found between peri-operative pain regimens in hip arthroscopy.

Minimally-Invasive midline posterior interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws compares favorably to traditional open transforaminal interbody fusion

Objective

Posterior interbody fusion is commonly performed for degenerative lumbar conditions. A minimally invasive technique of midline exposure limited only to the facets and fixation with laterally directed cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws was introduced with the intent of decreasing surgical morbidity. The purpose of this study was to determine if posterior interbody fusion with this limited midline exposure will have less blood loss and shorter operative times (i.e., can be considered minimally invasive) compared to traditional open transforaminal interbody fusion.

Methods

A consecutive single-surgeon series of patients who underwent posterior interbody fusion with either a navigated, midline only exposure (MidLIF) or full, traditional open, exposure of the transverse processes with a posterolateral fusion (open TLIF) were identified. Demographic, peri-operative data, patient reported outcomes (PROs), and reoperation/readmission rates were collected and compared.

Results

There were 29 cases in the MidLIF and 27 in the open TLIF group. Both groups were similar with respect to surgical indications, age, BMI, gender, ASA grade and operative level. The MidLIF group had significantly lower estimated blood loss (266 vs. 446 cc, p = 0.003), shorter operative time (170 vs. 210 minutes, p = 0.003), and shorter length of hospital stay (2.9 vs. 3.7 days, p = 0.016) compared to the open TLIF group. A sub-analysis of single-level cases showed similar findings with significantly lower estimated blood loss (247 vs. 411 cc, p = 0.10), shorter operative time (159 vs. 199 min, p = 0.003), and shorter length of hospital stay (2.9 vs. 3.7 days, p = 0.023) in the MidLIF group. Patient reported outcomes at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-operative favored MidLIF with significantly greater ODI improvements at both 6 weeks and 12 months; and lower ODI and back pain at both 12 months and 24 months.

Conclusions

MidLIF had lower blood loss and shorter operative time compared to the traditional open TLIF technique. These differences compare well to reported values in the literature for tubular minimally-invasive TLIF. Patient reported outcomes from 6 weeks to 24 months post-operative, hospital length of stay, and reoperation/readmission rates all favored MidLIF compared to traditional open TLIF.

Application of computer-assisted virtual surgical procedures and three-dimensional printing of patient-specific pre-contoured plates in bicolumnar acetabular fracture fixation

INTRODUCTION

With the rapid development of three-dimensional (3D) printing and computer technology, adopting computer-assisted virtual surgical procedures and 3D printing of patient-specific pre-contoured plates can greatly reduce surgical invasiveness and operative time and simplify the procedure.

HYPOTHESIS

Use of computer-assisted virtual surgical procedures and 3D printing of patient-specific pre-contoured plates reduce the operative time and blood loss in bicolumnar acetabular fracture fixation.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed for 52 bicolumnar acetabular fracture cases treated surgically in our department from January 2013 to January 2017. According to the patients' willingness to accept 3D printing services, 52 patients were divided into groups A and B. In group A (28 patients), computer-assisted virtual surgical procedures and 3D printing of patient-specific pre-contoured plates were adopted. In group B (24 patients), the conventional method was adopted. Fracture type, operative blood loss, surgical time, complications, radiographic quality of reduction, and hip function were compared between groups. All patients were operated by the same surgeon.

RESULTS

The real surgical procedure of all patients in group A was almost identical to the preoperative virtual operation. Operative time and intraoperative blood loss were significantly reduced in group A than in group B (p<0.05), while the postoperative fracture reduction quality and hip function obtained slightly higher levels of satisfaction in group A.

CONCLUSIONS

Computer-assisted virtual surgical procedures, 3D printing technology and patient-specific pre-contoured plates can reduce the operative time and blood loss with less surgical invasiveness and ensure completely satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, promotion of this technology requires additional work.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, therapeutic study.

Effect of an additional neurosurgical resident on procedure length, operating room time, estimated blood loss, and post-operative length-of-stay

Introduction: Neurosurgical residency training is costly, with expenses largely borne by the academic institutions that train residents. One expense is increased operative duration, which leads to poorer patient outcomes. Although other studies have assessed the effect of one resident assisting, none have investigated two residents; thus, we sought to investigate if two residents versus one scrubbed-in impacted operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and length-of-stay (LOS).Methods: In this retrospective review of patients who underwent a neurosurgical procedure involving one or two residents between January 2013 and April 2016, we performed multivariable linear regression to determine if there was an association between resident participation and case length, operating room time, EBL, and LOS. We also included patient demographics, attending surgeon, day of the week, start time, pre-operative LOS, procedure performed, and other variables in our model. Only procedures performed at least 40 times during the study period were analyzed.Results: Of 860 procedures that met study criteria, 492 operations were one of six procedures performed at least 40 times, which were anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt insertion, CSF shunt revision, lumbar laminectomy, intracranial hematoma evacuation, and non-skull base, supratentorial parenchymal brain tumor resection. An additional resident was associated with a 35.1-min decrease (p = .01) in operative duration for lumbar laminectomies. However, for intracranial hematoma evacuations, an extra resident was associated with a 24.1 min increase (p = .03) in procedural length. There were no significant differences observed in the other four surgeries.Conclusion: An additional resident may lengthen duration of intracranial hematoma evacuations. However, two residents scrubbed-in were associated with decreased lumbar laminectomy duration. Overall, an extra resident does not increase procedural duration, total operating room utilization, EBL, or post-operative LOS. Allowing two residents to scrub in may be a safe and cost-effective method of educating neurosurgical residents.

An analysis of costs associated with shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with variation in direct costs with shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of all shoulder arthroplasties performed at a single facility between July 1, 2011, and November 30, 2016. We collected patient factors, indications, procedure (including implant details), implant brand (A, B, and other), and complications. We collected direct costs over a 90-day period using a validated internal tool. We identified patient and procedure characteristics associated with costs using multivariable generalized linear models.

RESULTS

A total of 361 patients were included, 19% with revision arthroplasty procedures, 32% with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties, and 66% with reverse total shoulder arthroplasties (RTSAs). Of total costs, 13% were operative facility utilization costs and 58% were operative supply costs. Factors associated with increased total cost included younger age (P = .002) and an indication for surgery of other, that is, not osteoarthritis, a failed arthroplasty, or the sequelae of a rotator cuff tear (P = .030). Factors associated with increased operative costs included younger age (P = .002), use of an RTSA (P < .001), use of a bone graft (P < .001), implant brand B (P = .098), implant brands other than A and B (P = .04), the sequelae of a rotator cuff tear as an indication for surgery (P = .041), or an indication for surgery of other (P = .007).

CONCLUSION

Most short-term (90-day) costs with shoulder arthroplasty are operative costs. Nonmodified factors associated with increased cost included younger age and less common indications for surgery, whereas potentially modifiable factors included the intraoperative use of a bone graft, implant brand, and RTSA use.

Operative Time and Cost Vary by Surgeon: An Analysis of Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Children

Operative time is a critical driver of cost in orthopedics and an important target for improving value in health care. This study used an archetypal pediatric orthopedic procedure to identify surgeon-dependent variability in operative time. The authors reviewed patients 12 years or younger treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures. Variability in operative time across surgeons was assessed. Surgeon experience at the time of the procedure and case volume (quarterly) were evaluated to explain variations in operative time. A total of 1472 patients were reviewed (57% Gartland type II and 43% type III fractures). Procedures were performed by 12 fellowship-trained pediatric orthopedists with 2 weeks to 32.8 years of experience. For individual surgeons, the mean operative time ranged from 20.4 to 33.7 minutes for type II fractures and from 31.0 to 46.8 minutes for type III fractures. There was significant variation across surgeons in mean operative time and cost (P<.001). Analysis showed no significant effect of surgeon experience or quarterly case volume. Surgeons' mean operative time for type II fractures was strongly positively correlated with their mean operative time for type III fractures (r²=0.74). Mean operative time and cost for supracondylar humerus fracture closed reduction and percutaneous pinning vary significantly between surgeons, but this variation is not explained by experience or volume. Surgeons who required more time for type II fractures were also slower for type III fractures. Because of the high per minute cost of the operating room, surgeon variability significantly impacts cost. Identification and modification of sources of variation in surgeon behavior will allow for reduction in the cost of surgical care. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(3):e317-e321.].

A Cost Analysis of Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery Performed Wide Awake versus under Sedation

BACKGROUND

Hand surgery under local anesthesia only has been used more frequently in recent years. The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative time and cost for carpal tunnel release performed under local anesthesia ("wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet," or WALANT) only to carpal tunnel release performed under intravenous sedation.

METHODS

A retrospective comparison of intraoperative (operating room) surgical time and postoperative (postanesthesia care unit) time for consecutive carpal tunnel release procedures performed under both intravenous sedation and wide-awake local anesthesia was undertaken. All operations were performed by the same surgeon using the same mini-open surgical technique. A cost analysis was performed by means of standardized anesthesia billing based on base units, time, and conversion rates.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of total operative time, 28 minutes in the intravenous sedation group versus 26 minutes in the wide-awake local anesthesia group. Postanesthesia care unit times were significantly longer in the intravenous sedation group (84 minutes) compared to the wide-awake local anesthesia group (7 minutes). Depending on conversion rates used, a total of $139 to $432 was saved in each case performed with wide-awake local anesthesia by not using anesthesia services. In addition, a range of $1320 to $1613 was saved for the full episode of care, including anesthesia costs, operating room time, and postanesthesia care unit time for each patient undergoing wide-awake local anesthesia carpal tunnel release.

CONCLUSION

Carpal tunnel release surgery performed with the wide-awake local anesthesia technique offers significant reduction in cost for use of anesthesia and postanesthesia care unit resources.

Continuous Versus Interrupted Sutures for Primary Cleft Palate Repair

Background:

Cleft palate is a common congenital problem. It is traditionally surgically repaired with interrupted sutures between the ages of 6 and 18 months, with the aim of achieving closure of both nasal and oral layers. In various fields of surgery, continuous, rather than interrupted, sutures are the norm. There are no reports, however, of continuous suture repair for cleft palate.

Methods:

A comparative study was designed at Clapp Hospital Lahore, to compare the effectiveness of 2 techniques. A total of 152 patients were included in the study over a period of 3 years. Per-operatively, the duration of surgery (time for nasal and oral layer closure) and the number of suture materials used were noted and compared between the 2 groups. Postoperatively, we compared the rate of wound dehiscence and fistula formation between the 2 groups.

Results:

Out of 152 patients, 84 patients were operated on by continuous technique and 68 patients by interrupted technique. The mean duration of nasal layer closure in group A was 7.08 minutes, whereas that in group B was 11.50 minutes. The mean number of sutures required for the continuous suture group was 2.12, whereas that for the interrupted suture group was 4.59 (P < 0.05). There were no differences seen in either of the 2 postoperative outcomes compared in this study.

Conclusion:

A continuous closure technique can be utilized in palate repair, as it us more cost-effective and time-efficient.

A Dedicated Pediatric Spine Deformity Team Significantly Reduces Surgical Time and Cost

BACKGROUND

As high-quality health care becomes increasingly expensive, improvement projects are focused on reducing cost and increasing value. To increase value by reducing operating room (OR) utilization, we studied the effect of a dedicated team approach for posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for scoliosis.

METHODS

With institutional support, an interdisciplinary, dedicated team was assembled. Members developed standardized protocols for anesthetic management and patient transport, positioning, preparation, draping, imaging, and wake-up. These protocols were initially implemented with a small interdisciplinary team, including 1 surgeon (Phase 1), and then were expanded to include a second surgeon and additional anesthesiology staff (Phase 2). We compared procedures performed with a dedicated team (the Dedicated Team cases) and procedures performed without a such a team (the Casual Team cases). Because of the heterogeneous nature of PSF for scoliosis, we developed a case categorization system: Category 1 was relatively homogeneous and indicated patients with fusion of ≤12 levels, no osteotomies, and a body mass index (BMI) of <25 kg/m, and Category 2 was more heterogeneous and indicated patients with fusion of >12 levels and/or ≥1 osteotomy and/or a BMI of ≥25 kg/m.

RESULTS

In total, 89 Casual Team and 78 Dedicated Team cases were evaluated: 71 were in Category 1 and 96 were in Category 2. Dedicated Team cases used significantly less OR time for both Categories 1 and 2 (p < 0.001). In Category-1 cases, the average reduction was 111.4 minutes (29.7%); in Category-2 cases, it was 76.9 minutes (18.5%). The effect of the Dedicated Team was scalable: the reduction in OR time was significant in both Phase 1 and Phase 2 (p < 0.001). The Dedicated Team cases had no complications. Cost reduction averaged approximately $8,900 for Category-1 and $6,000 for Category-2 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

By creating a dedicated team and standardizing several aspects of PSFs for scoliosis, we achieved a large reduction in OR time. This increase in team efficiency was significant, consistent, and scalable. As a result, we can routinely complete 2 Category-1 PSFs in the same OR with the same team without exceeding standard block time.

Which method of distal pancreatectomy is cost-effective among open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery?

Background

The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and economic impact of robotic distal pancreatectomy, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy, and open distal pancreatectomy.

Methods

All consecutive patients who underwent distal pancreatic resection for benign and malignant diseases between January 2012 and December 2015 were prospectively included. Cost analysis was performed; all charges from patient admission to discharge were considered.

Results

There were 21 robotic (RDP), 25 laparoscopic (LDP), and 43 open (ODP) procedures. Operative time was longer in the RDP group (RDP =345 minutes, LDP =306 min, ODP =251 min, P=0.01). Blood loss was higher in the ODP group (RDP =192 mL, LDP =356 mL, ODP =573 mL, P=0.0002). Spleen preservation was more frequent in the RDP group (RDP =66.6%, LDP =61.9%, ODP =9.3%, P=0.001). The rate of patients with Clavien-Dindo > grade III was higher in the ODP group (RDP =0%, LDP =12%, ODP =23%, P=0.01), especially for non-surgical complications, which were more frequent in the ODP group (RDP =9.5%, LDP =24%, ODP =41.8%, P=0.02). Length of hospital stay was increased in the ODP group (ODP =19 days, LDP =13 days, RDP =11 days, P=0.007). The total cost of the procedure, including the surgical procedure and postoperative course was higher in the ODP group (ODP =30,929 Euros, LDP =22,150 Euros, RDP =21,219 Euros, P=0.02).

Conclusions

Cost-effective results of RDP seem to be similar to LDP with some better short-term outcomes.

Sugammadex: Appropriate Use in the Context of Budgetary Constraints

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to assess how sugammadex impacts postoperative residual curarization using appropriate doses based on neuromuscular transmission monitoring and whether the advantages of sugammadex versus neostigmine outweigh its higher cost.

Recent Findings

An accurate assessment of neuromuscular blockade with monitoring is necessary before selecting neostigmine versus sugammadex for reversal at the end of surgery to overcome incomplete neuromuscular recovery. The main advantages of sugammadex over neostigmine are its predictability and its ability to extend the range of blockade reversal. The cost of sugammadex is greater when higher doses of sugammadex are required for antagonism of deep block. Sugammadex probably has the potential to be cost-effective compared with neostigmine if its time savings are put to productive use in clinical practice. However, to date, the economic benefits of the drug are unknown.

Summary

With sugammadex, almost any degree of neuromuscular block can be antagonized within 2–3 min; neostigmine is the only reversal agent effective against benzylisoquinolines and can ideally be used for reversal of lower levels of residual paralysis. The performance of the more expensive sugammadex on improving patient outcomes may depend on several elements of clinical strategy.

Curriculum Using the In-Situ Operating Room Setting

OBJECTIVE

The American College of Surgeons/Association of Program Directors in Surgery is a comprehensive, simulation-based curriculum for General Surgery residents which exists in 3 phases. While phases 1 and 2 deal with core skills and advanced procedures respectively, phase 3 targets team-based skills. To date, the 3rd phase of this curriculum has not seen wide scale implementation. This is a pilot study to verify the feasibility of implementing the phase 3 curriculum in the in-situ setting.

DESIGN

In our initial attempt to implement Phase 3 at our institution, we chose to perform the training in an in-situ setting within an operating room (OR) at our main hospital, despite our having a separate simulation center. By choosing the in-situ OR environment for this training we were able to minimize concerns regarding resident and faculty availability and able to successfully complete 8 separate sessions during the academic year. During 7 sessions, 2 separate scenarios were performed while a single scenario was performed in 1 session. This single session was excluded from analysis, leaving a total of 14 scenarios to evaluate. The unique scenarios included laparoscopic crisis, postoperative myocardial infarction, anaphylaxis, and postoperative hypotension. All sessions were audiovisually recorded. In order to evaluate the effect of the training, the videos were viewed by 3 independent reviewers and all surgery, anesthesia and nursing participants were rated using the NOTECHs II scale. Degree of inter-rater agreement was established. The difference between the first and second simulations on the same day was then assessed. In addition, participant opinions of the simulations were assessed through electronic surveys following the training.

SETTING

Tertiary Care University Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

We performed a total of 8 sessions, for a total of 15 scenarios. Eight surgery residents at the postgraduate year 1 (PGY1)-PGY3 level, 16 anesthesia residents at the PGY3-PGY4 level, 16 nurses and 13 ancillary staff participated.

RESULTS

From the first to the second scenario, the total team NOTECHs II score increased from 69.4 ± 1.4 to 77.3 ± 0.5 (p = 0.007). The NOTECHs II scores for each subteam also improved, from 24.2 ± 0.6 to 26.4 ± 0.5 (p = 0.007) for surgery residents, 23.7 ± 0.9 to 26.7 ± 0.4 (p = 0.03) for anesthesia, and 21.6 ± 0.3 to 24.3 ± 0.5 (p = 0.01) for nursing. The inter-rater reliability as measured by Kendall's coefficient of concordance was modest for the whole team score. Most of the participant responses were either favorable or strongly favorable.

CONCLUSION

The in-situ OR environment is both a unique and effective setting to perform team-based training. Furthermore, training in the in-situ setting minimizes or removes many of the logistic issues involved in designing and implementing team-based training curricula for general surgery residency programs. However, we found that administrative and departmental (surgery, anesthesia, and nursing) "buy in" as well as protected faculty time for education were all necessary for in-situ training to be successful. NOTECHs II is an established scale for the evaluation of teams in this simulation setting and appears to be a valid tool based on the results of this study. However, further assessment of inter-rater reliability as well as improved training of evaluators are necessary to determine if inter-rater reliability can improve.

Simultaneous Bilateral Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Low Cost, Fast, and Successful Method

The etiology of primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction is largely unknown, and this disease may occur bilaterally in a small percentage of patients. In this retrospective study, the authors aimed to discuss the cost, operation time, complications, and success rate of simultaneous bilateral endonasal endoscopic surgery. Twenty-eight patients (16 female, 12 male) were enrolled in this study, with a mean age of 55 years old (range: 43-76). The success rate was 91% (51/56), and the mean operation time was 44 minutes. Only minor and transient complications were observed in 2 of the patients. Overall, the authors believe that a bilateral endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy would be useful in a single session, based on its advantages of low morbidity, low cost, and high success.