Anaesthetic and peri-operative management for thrombectomy procedures in stroke patients

Anaesthesia modality on endovascular therapy outcomes in patients with large infarcts: a post hoc analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT trial

OBJECTIVES

Endovascular therapy (EVT) now penetrates the once obscure realm of large infarct core volume acute ischaemic stroke (LICV-AIS). This research aimed to investigate the potential correlation between different anaesthetic approaches and post-EVT outcomes in LICV-AIS patients.

METHODS

Between October 2020 and May 2022, the China ANGEL-Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (ASPECT) trial studied patients with LICV-AIS, randomly assigning them to the best medical management (BMM) or BMM with EVT. This post hoc subgroup analysis categorised subjects receiving BMM with EVT into general anaesthesia (GA) and non-GA groups based on anaesthesia type. We applied multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the relationship between anaesthesia during EVT and patient functional outcomes, as measured by the modified Rankin scale (mRS), in addition to the occurrence of complications. Further adjustment for selection bias was achieved through propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

In total, 230 patients with LICV-AIS were enrolled (GA 84 vs Non-GA 146). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of the proportion of patients who achieved an mRS score of 0-2 at 90 days (27.4% for the GA group vs 31.5% for the non-GA group, p=0.51). However, the GA group had significantly longer median surgical times (142 min vs 122 min, p=0.03). Furthermore, GA was associated with an increased risk of postoperative pneumonia (adjusted OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.98). The results of PSM analysis agreed with the results of the multivariate regression analysis. No significant difference in intracranial haemorrhage incidence or mortality rate was observed between the groups.

CONCLUSION

This post hoc analysis of subgroups of the ANGEL-ASPECT trial suggested that there may be no significant association between the choice of anaesthesia and neurological outcomes in LICV-AIS patients. However, compared with non-GA, GA prolongs the duration of EVT and is associated with a greater postoperative pneumonia risk.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04551664.

Continuous non-invasive vs. invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring during neuroradiological procedure: a comparative, prospective, monocentric, observational study

BACKGROUND

In the perioperative setting, the most accurate way to continuously measure arterial blood pressure (ABP) is using an arterial catheter. Surrogate methods such as finger cuff have been developed to allow non-invasive measurements and are increasingly used, but need further evaluation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and clinical concordance between two devices for the measurement of ABP during neuroradiological procedure.

METHODS

This is a prospective, monocentric, observational study. All consecutive patients undergoing a neuroradiological procedure were eligible. Patients who needed arterial catheter for blood pressure measurement were included. During neuroradiological procedure, ABP (systolic, mean and diatolic blood pressure) was measured with two different technologies: radial artery catheter and Nexfin. Bland-Altman and error grid analyses were performed to evaluate the accuracy and clinical concordance between devices.

RESULTS

From March 2022 to November 2022, we included 50 patients, mostly ASA 3 (60%) and required a cerebral embolization (94%) under general anaesthesia (96%). Error grid analysis showed that 99% of non-invasive ABP measures obtained with the Nexfin were located in the risk zone A or B. However, 65.7% of hypertension events and 41% of hypotensive events were respectively not detected by Nexfin. Compared to the artery catheter, a significant relationship was found for SAP (r2 = 0.78) and MAP (r2 = 0.80) with the Nexfin (p < 0.001). Bias and limits of agreement (LOA) were respectively 9.6 mmHg (- 15.6 to 34.8 mmHg) and - 0.8 mmHg (- 17.2 to 15.6 mmHg), for SAP and MAP.

CONCLUSIONS

Nexfin is not strictly interchangeable with artery catheter for ABP measuring. Further studies are needed to define its clinical use during neuroradiological procedure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, registration number: NCT05283824.

Arterial hypotension "magnitude" and neurological outcome during mechanical thrombectomy under general anesthesia

INTRODUCTION

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard of care for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO), but unfavorable outcomes remain common. Procedural arterial hypotension is associated with poor patient outcome. This study aimed to assess the impact of arterial hypotension "magnitude" (a combination of the depth, defined as the percentage relative to baseline arterial blood pressure, and the duration of hypotensive episodes)" during MT on neurological outcome.

METHODS

This is a monocentric retrospective study. Charts were reviewed between January 2018 and June 2021. "Patients were eligible if they were 18 years or older, anterior LVO was diagnosed on cerebral imaging" and MT performed under general anesthesia. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was recorded every 5 min throughout the procedure, and the arterial hypotension "magnitude" was estimated by the area under the curve (AUC) for different thresholds of MAP drops.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days.

MAIN RESULTS

Among the 117 patients analyzed, 46% had poor neurological outcome. Our study showed correlations between poor outcome and a greater procedural AUC of arterial hypotension for the different thresholds: 5% (k 0.18; 95% CI 0.06-0.30; P = 0.007), 10% (k 0.18; 95% CI 0.05-0.30; P = 0.008), 15% (k 0.18; 95% CI 0.04-0.30; P = 0.011), 20% (k 0.18; 95% CI 0.05-0.30; P = 0.010) and 30% (k 0.19; 95% CI 0.05-0.31; P = 0.010). This association persisted after controlling for age, baseline NIHSS score, and ASPECT score.

CONCLUSION

The magnitude of hypotension during MT under general anesthesia for AIS is an independent factor of poor outcome at 90 days. These associations have been observed in patients with mild and severe hypotensive episodes.