Performance evaluation of a PCR panel (FilmArray® Pneumonia Plus) for detection of respiratory bacterial pathogens in respiratory specimens: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical evaluation of a highly multiplexed CRISPR-based diagnostic assay for diagnosing lower respiratory tract infection: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Accurate and rapid identification of causative pathogens is essential to guide the clinical management of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). Here we conducted a single-centre prospective study in 284 patients suspected of lower respiratory tract infections to evaluate the utility of a nucleic acid test based on highly multiplexed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and CRISPR-Cas12a.

METHODS

We determined the analytical and diagnostic performance of the CRISPR assay using a combination of reference standards, including conventional microbiological tests (CMTs), metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS), and clinical adjudication by a panel of experts on infectious diseases and microbiology.

RESULTS

The CRISPR assay showed a higher detection rate (63.0%) than conventional microbiological tests (38.4%) and was lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (72.9%). In detecting polymicrobial infections, the positivity rate of the CRISPR assay (19.4%) was higher than conventional microbiological tests (3.5%) and lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (28.9%). The overall diagnostic sensitivity of the CRISPR assay (67.8%) was higher than conventional microbiological tests (41.8%), and lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (93.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the low cost, ease of operation, short turnaround time, and broad range of pathogens detected in a single test, the CRISPR assay has the potential to be implemented as a screening tool for the aetiological diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections patients, especially in cases where atypical bacteria or coinfections are suspected.

New methods to detect bacterial or viral infections in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

INTRODUCTION

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are frequently colonized and infected by respiratory pathogens. Identifying these infectious etiologies is critical for understanding the microbial dynamics of COPD and for the appropriate use of antimicrobials during exacerbations.

AREAS COVERED

Traditional methods, such as bacterial and viral cultures, have been standard in diagnosing respiratory infections. However, these methods have significant limitations, including lack of sensitivity and prolonged turnaround time. Modern molecular approaches offer rapid, sensitive, and specific detection, though they also come with their own challenges. This review explores and evaluates the clinical utility of the latest advancements in detecting bacterial and viral respiratory infections in COPD, encompassing molecular techniques, biomarkers, and emerging technologies.

EXPERT OPINION

In the evolving landscape of COPD management, integrating molecular diagnostics and emerging technologies holds great promise. The enhanced sensitivity of molecular techniques has significantly advanced our understanding of the role of microbes in COPD. However, many of these technologies have primarily been developed for pneumonia diagnosis or research applications, and their clinical utility in managing COPD requires further evaluation.

Rapid Molecular Diagnostics of Pneumonia Caused by Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Clinician's Review

With approximately half a billion events per year, lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) represent a major challenge for the global public health. Among LRTI cases, those caused by Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) are associated with a poorer prognostic. Standard-of-care etiologic diagnostics is lengthy and difficult to establish, with more than half of cases remaining microbiologically undocumented. Recently, syndromic molecular diagnostic panels became available, enabling simultaneous detection of tens of pathogen-related and antimicrobial-resistance genetic markers within a few hours. In this narrative review, we summarize the available data on the performance of molecular diagnostics in GNB pneumonia, highlighting the main strengths and limitations of these assays, as well as the main factors influencing their clinical utility. We searched MEDLINE and Web of Science databases for relevant English-language articles. Molecular assays have higher analytical sensitivity than cultural methods, and show good agreement with standard-of-care diagnostics regarding detection of respiratory pathogens, including GNB, and identification of frequent patterns of resistance to antibiotics. Clinical trials reported encouraging results on the usefulness of molecular assays in antibiotic stewardship. By providing early information on the presence of pathogens and their probable resistance phenotypes, these assays assist in the choice of targeted therapy, in shortening the time from sample collection to appropriate antimicrobial treatment, and in reducing unnecessary antibiotic use.

Antimicrobial stewardship and molecular diagnostics: a symbiotic approach to combating resistance in the ED and ICU

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to evaluate the incorporation of rapid molecular diagnostics (RMD) in antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) in the management of patients in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU), highlighting a shift from conventional microbiological diagnostic tests to RMD strategies to optimize antimicrobial use and improve patient outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent advances in RMD have demonstrated the superior accuracy of RMD in identifying pathogens, combined with shorter turnaround times. RMD allows speeding up of antimicrobial decision making in the ED and facilitates faster escalation when empirical therapy was inappropriate, as well as more efficient de-escalation of empirical therapy later in the course of the treatment. Implementation of RMD however may be challenging.

SUMMARY

RMD hold great value in simplifying patient management and mitigating antimicrobial exposure, particularly in settings with high levels of antimicrobial resistance where the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials is high. While the impact on the use of antimicrobials is significant, the impact on patient outcomes is not yet clear. Successful integration of RMD in clinical decision making in the ED and ICU requires a team approach and continued education, and its use should be adapted to the local epidemiology and infrastructure.

Microbial aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalised adults: A prospective study utilising comprehensive molecular testing

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to describe the microbial aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adults admitted to a tertiary care hospital and assess the impact of syndromic polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panels on pathogen detection.

METHODS

Conducted at Haukeland University Hospital, Norway, from September 2020 to April 2023, this prospective study enrolled adults with suspected CAP. We analysed lower respiratory tract samples using both standard-of-care tests and the BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Plus Panel (FAP plus). The added value of FAP Plus in enhancing the detection of clinically relevant pathogens, alongside standard-of-care diagnostics, was assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 3238 patients screened, 640 met the inclusion criteria, with 384 confirmed to have CAP at discharge. In these patients, pathogens with proven or probable clinical significance were identified in 312 (81.3%) patients. Haemophilus influenzae was the most prevalent pathogen, found in 118 patients (30.7%), followed by SARS-CoV-2 in 74 (19.3%), and Streptococcus pneumoniae in 64 (16.7%). Respiratory viruses were detected in 186 (48.4%) patients. The use of FAP plus improved the pathogen detection rate from 62.8% with standard-of-care methods to 81.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathogens were identified in 81% of CAP patients, with Haemophilus influenzae and respiratory viruses being the most frequently detected pathogens. The addition of the FAP plus panel, markedly improved pathogen detection rates compared to standard-of-care diagnostics alone.

Breaking Boundaries in Pneumonia Diagnostics: Transitioning from Tradition to Molecular Frontiers with Multiplex PCR

The advent of rapid molecular microbiology testing has revolutionized infectious disease diagnostics and is now impacting pneumonia diagnosis and management. Molecular platforms offer highly multiplexed assays for diverse viral and bacterial detection, alongside antimicrobial resistance markers, providing the potential to significantly shape patient care. Despite the superiority in sensitivity and speed, debates continue regarding the clinical role of multiplex molecular testing, notably in comparison to standard methods and distinguishing colonization from infection. Recent guidelines endorse molecular pneumonia panels for enhanced sensitivity and rapidity, but implementation requires addressing methodological differences and ensuring clinical relevance. Diagnostic stewardship should be leveraged to optimize pneumonia testing, emphasizing pre- and post-analytical strategies. Collaboration between clinical microbiologists and bedside providers is essential in developing implementation strategies to maximize the clinical utility of multiplex molecular diagnostics in pneumonia. This narrative review explores these multifaceted issues, examining the current evidence on the clinical performance of multiplex molecular assays in pneumonia, and reflects on lessons learned from previous microbiological advances. Additionally, given the complexity of pneumonia and the sensitivity of molecular diagnostics, diagnostic stewardship is discussed within the context of current literature, including implementation strategies that consider pre-analytical and post-analytical modifications to optimize the clinical utility of advanced technologies like multiplex PCR.

Clinical evaluation of the BioFire Respiratory Pathogen Panel for the guidance of empirical antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia: A multicenter, quality improvement project

BACKGROUND

We aimed to determine whether implementing antimicrobial stewardship based on multiplex bacterial PCR examination of respiratory fluid can enhance outcomes of critically ill patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP).

METHODS

We conducted a quality improvement study in two hospitals in France. Adult patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation with a diagnosis of HAP were included. In the pre-intervention period (August 2019 to April 2020), antimicrobial therapy followed European guidelines. In the «intervention» phase (June 2020 to October 2021), treatment followed a multiplex PCR-guided protocol. The primary endpoint was a composite endpoint made of mortality on day 28, clinical cure between days 7 and 10, and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation on day 28. The primary outcome was analyzed with a DOOR strategy.

RESULTS

A total of 443 patients were included in 3 ICUs from 2 hospitals (220 pre-intervention; 223 intervention). No difference in the ranking of the primary composite outcome was found (DOOR: 50.3%; 95%CI, 49.9%-50.8%). The number of invasive mechanical ventilation-free days at day 28 was 10.0 [0.0; 19.0] in the baseline period and 9.0 [0.0; 20.0] days during the intervention period (p = 0.95). The time-to-efficient antimicrobial treatment was 0.43 ± 1.29 days before versus 0.55 ± 1.13 days after the intervention (p = 0.56).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of Rapid Multiplex PCR to guide empirical antimicrobial therapy for critically ill patients with HAP was not associated with better outcomes. However, adherence to stewardship was low, and the study may have had limited power to detect a clinically important difference.

Present and Future Non-Culture-Based Diagnostics: Stewardship Potentials and Considerations

The medical microbiologist plays a key role in the transition from culture-based to molecular test methods for diagnosis of infectious diseases. They must understand the scientific and technical bases underlying these tests along with their associated benefits and limitations and be able to educate administrators and patient providers on their proper use. Coordination of testing practices between clinical departments and the spectrum of public health and research laboratories is essential to optimize health care delivery.

Impact of Multiplex PCR in the Therapeutic Management of Severe Bacterial Pneumonia

Pneumonia is a common and severe illness that requires prompt and effective management. Advanced, rapid, and accurate tools are needed to diagnose patients with severe bacterial pneumonia, and to rapidly select appropriate antimicrobial therapy, which must be initiated within the first few hours of care. Two multiplex molecular tests, Unyvero HPN and FilmArray Pneumonia+ Panel, have been developed using the multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) technique to rapidly identify pathogens and their main antibiotic resistance mechanisms from patient respiratory specimens. Performance evaluation of these tests showed strong correlations with reference techniques. However, good knowledge of their indications, targets, and limitations is essential. Collaboration with microbiologists is, therefore, crucial for their appropriate use. Under these conditions, and with standardized management, these rapid tests can improve the therapeutic management of severe pneumonia faster, more precisely, and with narrow-spectrum antibiotic therapy. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to address the many unanswered questions about multiplex rapid molecular testing during the diagnosis and the management of severe pneumonia. This narrative review will address the current knowledge, advantages, and disadvantages of these tests, and propose solutions for their routine use.

Optimized Antibiotic Management of Critically Ill Patients with Severe Pneumonia Following Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing: A Prospective Clinical Exploratory Trial

Molecular diagnostic testing is assumed to enable fast respiratory pathogen identification and contribute to improved pneumonia management. We set up a prospective clinical trial at a tertiary hospital intensive care unit including adult patients suspected of severe pneumonia from whom a lower respiratory tract sample could be obtained. During control periods (CPs), routine testing was performed, and during intervention periods (IPs), this testing was completed with the FilmArray Pneumonia Panel plus test (FA-PNEU) executed 24/7. The main objective was to measure the impact of FA-PNEU results in terms of reduced time to targeted antimicrobial treatment administration. Over a 10-month period, analysis was performed on 35 CP and 50 IP patients. The median time to targeted antimicrobial treatment administration was reduced to 4.3 h in IPs compared to 26.4 h in CPs, with 54% of IP patients having FA-PNEU results that led to a treatment modification, of which all but one were targeted. Modifications included 10 (37%) de-escalations, 7 (25.9%) escalations, 3 (11.1%) regimen switches, and 7 (25.9%) complete antimicrobial discontinuations. FA-PNEU results were available with a 42.3 h gain compared to routine identification. This prospective study confirmed retrospective data demonstrating the benefit of FA-PNEU testing in severe pneumonia management of critically ill patients through improved antimicrobial use.

Robust airway microbiome signatures in acute respiratory failure and hospital-acquired pneumonia

Respiratory microbial dysbiosis is associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in critically ill patients. However, we lack reproducible respiratory microbiome signatures that can increase our understanding of these conditions and potential treatments. Here, we analyze 16S rRNA sequencing data from 2,177 respiratory samples collected from 1,029 critically ill patients (21.7% with ARDS and 26.3% with HAP) and 327 healthy controls, sourced from 17 published studies. After data harmonization and pooling of individual patient data, we identified microbiota signatures associated with ARDS, HAP and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Microbiota signatures for HAP and prolonged mechanical ventilation were characterized by depletion of a core group of microbes typical of healthy respiratory samples, and the ARDS microbiota signature was distinguished by enrichment of potentially pathogenic respiratory microbes, including Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus. Using machine learning models, we identified clinically informative, three- and four-factor signatures that predicted ARDS, HAP and prolonged mechanical ventilation with relatively high accuracy (area under the curve of 0.751, 0.72 and 0.727, respectively). We validated the signatures in an independent prospective cohort of 136 patients on mechanical ventillation and found that patients with microbiome signatures associated with ARDS, HAP or prolonged mechanical ventilation had longer times to successful extubation than patients lacking these signatures (hazard ratios of 1.56 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-2.27), 1.51 (95% CI 1.02-2.23) and 1.50 (95% CI 1.03-2.18), respectively). Thus, we defined and validated robust respiratory microbiome signatures associated with ARDS and HAP that may help to identify promising targets for microbiome therapeutic modulation in critically ill patients.