Importancia médica del glucocáliz endotelial. Parte 2: su papel en enfermedades vasculares y complicaciones de la diabetes mellitus

Systematic literature review and network Meta-analysis of sulodexide and other drugs in chronic venous disease

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical efficacy of sulodexide, including a comparison with venoactive drugs (VAD) (micronized purified flavonoid fraction, MPFF; hydroxy-ethyl-rutosides, HR; calcium dobesilate;Ruscus extract combined with hesperidin methyl chalcone and vitamin C, Ruscus+HMC+VitC; horse chestnut seed extract, HCSE) and pentoxifylline in patients with chronic venous disease.

METHODS

We performed a literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Proportion of patients with complete venous ulcer healing was the primary outcome and lower leg volume, foot volume, ankle circumference and symptoms were the secondary outcomes. Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was perfomed with random effects models using only RCTs. A meta-analysis of observational studies was performed for sulodexide because no RCT could be included in NMA for symptoms or signs.

RESULTS

Forty-five RCTs and eighteen observational studies were identified. Sulodexide was included only in a single NMA for the proportion of patients with complete ulcer healing and it showed to have the highest probability of being the best treatment (48%) compared with pentoxifylline (37%) and MPFF (16%). MPFF was the most effective treatment in reducing lower leg volume, CIVIQ-20 score and pain VAS scale while calcium dobesilate and Ruscus+HMC+VitC were the most effective in reducing foot volume and ankle circumference respectively.Meta-analyses of observational studies for sulodexide showed that it improves significantly the scoring of pain, feeling of swelling, heaviness and parasthesiae measured by Likert scales.

CONCLUSIONS

Sulodexide is at least as effective as pentoxifylline and more effective than MPFF in improving the rate of ulcer healing in patients with CVD. VADs are effective in improving venous symptoms and signs, as was also shown by sulodexide in the meta-analysis of observational studies. The relative effectiveness of sulodexide and VADs needs to be evaluated by an RCT in order to better inform clinical practice.

Sulodexide in the Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency: Results of the All-Russian Multicenter ACVEDUCT Program

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacotherapy is a mainstay of treatment for lower limb chronic venous disease (CVD) and its complications. However, therapeutic agents with evidence-based efficacy for the treatment of CVD are limited. Sulodexide (registered as Vessel Due F in Russia) has confirmed therapeutic efficacy in patients with moderately severe or late-stage CVD, but real-world evidence of its use in Russian patients with initial manifestations of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) remains scarce.

METHODS

Data concerning the use of sulodexide in Russian patients with CVD in routine clinical practice were collected and assessed within the framework of the ACVEDUCT program. This observational, prospective, non-controlled multicenter program included patients routinely prescribed sulodexide, as a solution for injections and/or soft capsules, by their physician in accordance with the registered Russian Federation instructions for use.

RESULTS

In total, 2263 patients took part in the program. The majority of patients were diagnosed as having CEAP class C3 (38.4%) or class C4 (35.6%) CVD. Sulodexide was associated with decreased symptom severity in 56.4% of patients and a decreased number of symptoms in 42.8%. Thus, improvements were observed in 99.2% overall, with the drug effects being apparent as early as 15-20 days after starting treatment. The highest rate of CVD symptom regression was observed in patients aged 30-40 years. There was a significant positive correlation between sulodexide efficacy and treatment duration and the use of capsules during follow-up. A negative correlation was found between treatment efficacy and patient age at diagnosis, CEAP class, the total number of symptoms, and a combination of risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Sulodexide was an effective, safe, well-tolerated, and pathogenetically substantiated pharmacologic agent for the treatment of patients with lower limb CVD, and therefore should be recommended in patients with early-stage CVD. Patients with venous trophic ulcers require higher doses and prolonged administration of the drug.

Sulodexide for the Symptoms and Signs of Chronic Venous Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Chronic venous disease (CVD) is a common condition associated with valvular dysfunction, venous hypertension and endothelial inflammation. Sulodexide facilitates the healing of venous ulcers and is frequently used in patients with CVD without ulcer. This review assessed the efficacy and safety of sulodexide for treatment of signs and symptoms of lower extremity CVD.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and AMED as well as the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the World Health Organisation (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal. We also manually searched potentially relevant journals, conference proceedings and journal supplements. Any study monitoring any effect of sulodexide in patients with CVD at any stage of the disease, classified or non-classified, was considered. Treatment effects were estimated using standardised mean differences (SMDs), mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RRs), as appropriate. We calculated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and heterogeneity (Q, tau and I²).

RESULTS

The search found 64 studies, but only 23 provided data on 7153 participants (mean age 55 years; 68% female). The 13 studies providing extractable quantitative information included 1901 participants (mean age 55.2 years; 65% female). Sulodexide decreased the intensity of pain, cramps, heaviness, oedema and total symptom score and reduced inflammatory mediators in patients with CVD. The risk of adverse events (AEs) was not different between sulodexide and placebo or heparan sulphate (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.74-2.32; I² = 0%; 270 participants). The overall risk of AEs with sulodexide was low: 3% (95% CI 1-4%) estimated from 3656 participants.

CONCLUSION

Sulodexide was found to have a beneficial venoactive effect on the major signs and symptoms of CVD such as pain, cramps, heaviness and oedema without increasing the risk of AEs. It is also likely to exert a systemic effect on the course of CVD by interfering with inflammatory chemokines.

Effect of Sulodexide on Vascular Responses and Liver Mitochondrial Function in Diabetic Rats

This study investigates the effects of long-term treatment with sulodexide (SLX) on norepinephrine (NE)-induced contractions, acetylcholine(Ach)-induced relaxations, acute cyclooxygenase blockade by diclofenac (DIC) in isolated femoral arteries (FA) and the parameters of oxidative phosporylation in liver mitochondria. 15-weeks old Wistar rats were divided into four groups: control (C; injected with saline solution), treated control (C+SLX), diabetic (DM) and treated diabetic (DM+SLX). Diabetes was induced with a single i.v. dose of streptozotocin (STZ) 45 mg.kg-1. SLX was administered i.p., at dose 100 IU.kg-1 daily for 5 weeks. Vascular responses of isolated femoral arteries were measured using Mulvany-Halpern myograph. Respiratory function of the mitochondria was determined using voltamperometric method on oxygraph Gilson. In diabetic rats the amplitude of maximal response to NE was elevated. DIC pretreatment decreased the amplitudes of NE-induced contractions in all groups of rats. SLX treatment decreased sensitivity of FA to NE and caused higher relaxatory responses to Ach in C and DM. Oxygen consumption and phosphorylation rates ([QO2(S3)], [QO2(S4)] and (OPR)) and respiratory control ratio (RCR) were decreased in the mitochondria of DM rats. Mitochondria of C rats were not affected with SLX treatment. Administration of SLX in DM rats was associated with increase of RCR, other parameters were not affected. Our findings suggest that SLX treatment might be associated with vasculoprotective effects during diabetes and improvement of mitochondrial function.