An evaluation of postoperative epidural analgesia in acute pain service in an Indian cancer hospital (a preliminary experience of patient satisfaction survey)

Does an acute pain service improve the perception of postoperative pain management in patients undergoing lower limb surgery? A prospective controlled non-randomized study

Background and Aim:

An acute pain service (APS) has been running in our institute since April 2013 and is managed by the Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care. However, it is not clear to what extent the patients feel benefited from the APS. The aim of the study was to compare the perception of postoperative pain management in patients receiving care under APS with those receiving routine postoperative pain relief following lower limb surgery.

Material and Methods:

This was a prospective, hospital-based, controlled non-randomized study. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades I–III patients with age 18–75 years undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery were prospectively recruited into APS (index group) or routine postoperative care (control group) (n = 55 each). Postoperatively, American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire-Revised (APS-POQ-R) and Short Form (SF-12) were used to evaluate the outcome of postoperative pain management at 24 h and health-related quality of life after 4 weeks respectively.

Results:

Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic data. Patients in the index group had statistically significant better perception of care than the control group. Index group scored significantly higher than control group on median patient satisfaction score (9; interquartile range [IQR] [7–10] vs. 5 [3–6]; P < 0.001). In index group, there was significant reduction of worst pain in first 24 h along with decreased frequency of severe pain.

Conclusion:

Implementation of acute pain service plays an important role in improving the quality of postoperative pain relief, perception of care, and patient satisfaction.

Patient controlled analgesia: redefining its role in an Indian cancer hospital

This report describes a noninterventional audit of current patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) use in an Indian cancer hospital over a 1-year period. Because there appeared to be an underutilization of PCA in the authors' hospital, they performed this audit. A major reason to start PCA was inadequate analgesia despite ongoing epidural or standard PRN analgesic regimes, especially in thoracic, major abdominal, and pelvic bone surgeries. PCA was used for an average 52.13 hours. The reason to stop the PCA in 72 patients was minimal usage due to decreased need after the second postoperative day. Multiple triggers at the same time were a common problem encountered in 21 patients. A blocked intravenous (IV) line was encountered in 12 patients. Thirty-one patients ranked their pain relief with PCA as excellent and 39 patients stated it as good. Their protocols shall be suitably amended to ensure that PCA shall be used in immediate postoperative period as a principal modality of pain relief, especially in the above-mentioned group in absence of epidural analgesia.

Development of acute pain service in an Indian cancer hospital

Postoperative pain relief continues to be a major challenge for all health care professionals caring for such patients in India. Acute pain services are almost nonexistent, even in large private and university hospitals. As per our estimate not more than 10 such services are available. Tata Memorial Hospital is a tertiary care cancer center that started one of the first Acute Pain Services (APS) in India in 2002 to provide safe and effective postoperative pain management. APS guidelines and protocols have since been implemented and patients are monitored by a team of a consultant physician, a nurse, and a medical resident. Audits are done at regular intervals to evaluate the efficacy of service and patient satisfaction. Pain scores declined yet the patient satisfaction has not improved. Postoperative outcome studies are yet to be undertaken. The development and current activities of the APS that can be implemented in a country that does not have sophisticated acute pain management teams are described.