Triage of patients with suspected coronary artery disease using multislice computed tomography

On mixed reality environments for minimally invasive therapy guidance: systems architecture, successes and challenges in their implementation from laboratory to clinic

Mixed reality environments for medical applications have been explored and developed over the past three decades in an effort to enhance the clinician's view of anatomy and facilitate the performance of minimally invasive procedures. These environments must faithfully represent the real surgical field and require seamless integration of pre- and intra-operative imaging, surgical instrument tracking, and display technology into a common framework centered around and registered to the patient. However, in spite of their reported benefits, few mixed reality environments have been successfully translated into clinical use. Several challenges that contribute to the difficulty in integrating such environments into clinical practice are presented here and discussed in terms of both technical and clinical limitations. This article should raise awareness among both developers and end-users toward facilitating a greater application of such environments in the surgical practice of the future.

Determining optimal acquisition parameters for computed tomography coronary angiography: evaluation of a software-assisted, breathhold exam simulation

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Scanning parameters used in multislice computed tomographic (MSCT) coronary angiography should be adapted to patients' heart rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of success of a software-assisted scan simulation to determine optimal gantry rotation time prior to MSCT coronary angiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 218 64-slice MSCT coronary angiographic studies were retrospectively analyzed. Prior to the MSCT examination, a scan had been simulated by giving a breath-hold command, after which a software program recorded the patient's heart rate from an electrocardiogram over the expected scanning time and predicted optimal scanning parameters. The success rate in predicting optimal parameters for the subsequent MSCT examination and the resulting acquisition window width were analyzed.

RESULTS

There was a wide range of heart rates among the patients. The mean intraindividual variation during scan simulation and examination was 4.8 beats/min. Optimal scan parameters were selected in 179 of 218 cases (82%). The median acquisition window width achieved in this group was 174 ms (range, 100-200), compared with 192 ms (range, 149-225) in cases in which suboptimal settings were selected (P < .001). Correct prediction occurred significantly more often in patients with low heart rates (<66 beats/min) than in those with higher heart rates (>or=66 beats/min) (93% vs 66%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The software-assisted scan simulation was a fast and simple procedure that allowed the selection of optimal computed tomographic parameters in >80% of patients. The procedure may be a useful adjunct to avoid unwanted synchronicity of gantry rotation and heart cycle and optimize temporal resolution in MSCT coronary angiography.

Is there a gender difference in noninvasive coronary imaging? Multislice computed tomography for noninvasive detection of coronary stenoses

BACKGROUND

Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) coronary angiography is the foremost alternative to invasive coronary angiography.

METHODS

We sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of MSCT in female and male patients with suspected coronary disease. Altogether 50 women and 95 men underwent MSCT with 0.5 mm detector collimation. Coronary artery stenoses of at least 50% on conventional coronary angiography were considered significant.

RESULTS

The coronary vessel diameters of all four main coronary artery branches were significantly larger in men than in women. The diagnostic accuracy of MSCT in identifying patients with coronary artery disease was significantly lower for women (72%) compared with men (89%, p < 0.05). Also sensitivity (70% vs. 95%), positive predictive value (64% vs. 93%), and the rate of nondiagnostic examinations (14% vs. 4%, all: p < 0.05) were significantly worse for women. The effective radiation dose of MSCT coronary angiography was significantly higher in the examination of women (13.7 +/- 1.2 mSv) than of men (11.7 +/- 0.9 mSv, p < 0.001), mainly as a result of the fact that the radiosensitive female breast (contributing 24.5% of the dose in women) is in the x-ray path.

CONCLUSION

Noninvasive coronary angiography with MSCT might be less accurate and sensitive for women than men. Also, women are exposed to a significantly higher effective radiation dose than men.