CAD-associated reader error in CT colonography

Evaluation of computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems

Computer-aided detection and diagnosis (CAD) systems are increasingly being used as an aid by clinicians for detection and interpretation of diseases. Computer-aided detection systems mark regions of an image that may reveal specific abnormalities and are used to alert clinicians to these regions during image interpretation. Computer-aided diagnosis systems provide an assessment of a disease using image-based information alone or in combination with other relevant diagnostic data and are used by clinicians as a decision support in developing their diagnoses. While CAD systems are commercially available, standardized approaches for evaluating and reporting their performance have not yet been fully formalized in the literature or in a standardization effort. This deficiency has led to difficulty in the comparison of CAD devices and in understanding how the reported performance might translate into clinical practice. To address these important issues, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) formed the Computer Aided Detection in Diagnostic Imaging Subcommittee (CADSC), in part, to develop recommendations on approaches for assessing CAD system performance. The purpose of this paper is to convey the opinions of the AAPM CADSC members and to stimulate the development of consensus approaches and "best practices" for evaluating CAD systems. Both the assessment of a standalone CAD system and the evaluation of the impact of CAD on end-users are discussed. It is hoped that awareness of these important evaluation elements and the CADSC recommendations will lead to further development of structured guidelines for CAD performance assessment. Proper assessment of CAD system performance is expected to increase the understanding of a CAD system's effectiveness and limitations, which is expected to stimulate further research and development efforts on CAD technologies, reduce problems due to improper use, and eventually improve the utility and efficacy of CAD in clinical practice.

Development and evaluation of a software tool for the generation of virtual liver lesions in multidetector-row CT datasets

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Development and evaluation of a software tool for the insertion of simulated hypodense liver lesions in multidetector-row computed tomography (CT) datasets.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty software-generated hypodense liver lesions were inserted at random locations in 20 CT datasets by using the "alpha blending" technique and compared with 40 real metastatic lesions. The location, diameter (5-20 mm) and density of the simulated lesions were individually adjusted to closely resemble real lesions in each patient. Three blinded readers evaluated all 80 lesions twice in a 2-week interval using a five-point Likert confidence scale under standardized conditions. Nonparametric tests were used to statistically evaluate possible differences in scoring between real and simulated lesions. The correctness of the observer rating for real and simulated lesions was compared to chance distribution using the chi-squared statistics. The inter- and intraobserver variability was determined using Kendall's coefficient of concordance.

RESULTS

The observer study did not reveal significant differences between the scoring for real versus simulated lesions for any of the readers (P > .05). The distribution of correct and false scoring of the lesions was not significantly different from chance distribution (P > .05). Inter- and intraobserver agreement was poor (Kendall W coefficient = 0.12/0.13).

CONCLUSION

The proposed algorithm is suitable for creating realistic virtual liver lesions in CT datasets.