1
|
Ye Z, Nguyen TL, Dite GS, MacInnis RJ, Hopper JL, Li S. Mammographic Texture versus Conventional Cumulus Measure of Density in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction: A Literature Review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024; 33:989-998. [PMID: 38787323 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-1365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Mammographic textures show promise as breast cancer risk predictors, distinct from mammographic density. Yet, there is a lack of comprehensive evidence to determine the relative strengths as risk predictor of textures and density and the reliability of texture-based measures. We searched the PubMed database for research published up to November 2023, which assessed breast cancer risk associations [odds ratios (OR)] with texture-based measures and percent mammographic density (PMD), and their discrimination [area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC)], using same datasets. Of 11 publications, for textures, six found stronger associations (P < 0.05) with 11% to 508% increases on the log scale by study, and four found weaker associations (P < 0.05) with 14% to 100% decreases, compared with PMD. Risk associations remained significant when fitting textures and PMD together. Eleven of 17 publications found greater AUCs for textures than PMD (P < 0.05); increases were 0.04 to 0.25 by study. Discrimination from PMD and these textures jointly was significantly higher than from PMD alone (P < 0.05). Therefore, different textures could capture distinct breast cancer risk information, partially independent of mammographic density, suggesting their joint role in breast cancer risk prediction. Some textures could outperform mammographic density for predicting breast cancer risk. However, obtaining reliable texture-based measures necessitates addressing various issues. Collaboration of researchers from diverse fields could be beneficial for advancing this complex field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhoufeng Ye
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Tuong L Nguyen
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Gillian S Dite
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Genetic Technologies Limited, Fitzroy, Australia
| | - Robert J MacInnis
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, East Melbourne, Australia
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Shuai Li
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ahn S, Chang Y, Kwon R, Kang J, Choi J, Lim GY, Kwon MR, Ryu S, Shin J. Mammography-based deep learning model for coronary artery calcification. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2024; 25:456-466. [PMID: 37988168 DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jead307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Mammography, commonly used for breast cancer screening in women, can also predict cardiovascular disease. We developed mammography-based deep learning models for predicting coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores, an established predictor of coronary events. METHODS AND RESULTS We evaluated a subset of Korean adults who underwent image mammography and CAC computed tomography and randomly selected approximately 80% of the participants as the training dataset, used to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict detectable CAC. The sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and overall accuracy of the model's performance were evaluated. The training and validation datasets included 5235 and 1208 women, respectively [mean age, 52.6 (±10.2) years], including non-zero cases (46.8%). The CNN-based deep learning prediction model based on the Resnet18 model showed the best performance. The model was further improved using contrastive learning strategies based on positive and negative samples: sensitivity, 0.764 (95% CI, 0.667-0.830); specificity, 0.652 (95% CI, 0.614-0.710); AUROC, 0.761 (95% CI, 0.742-0.780); and accuracy, 70.8% (95% CI, 68.8-72.4). Moreover, including age and menopausal status in the model further improved its performance (AUROC, 0.776; 95% CI, 0.762-0.790). The Framingham risk score yielded an AUROC of 0.736 (95% CI, 0.712-0.761). CONCLUSION Mammography-based deep learning models showed promising results for predicting CAC, performing comparably to conventional risk models. This indicates mammography's potential for dual-risk assessment in breast cancer and cardiovascular disease. Further research is necessary to validate these findings in diverse populations, with a particular focus on representation from national breast screening programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangil Ahn
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066, Seobu-Ro, Jangan-Gu, Suwon 16149, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoosoo Chang
- Center for Cohort Studies, Total Healthcare Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 04514, Republic of Korea
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Main Building B2, 250, Taepyung-ro 2ga, Jung-gu, Seoul 04514, Republic of Korea
- Department of Clinical Research Design & Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Ria Kwon
- Center for Cohort Studies, Total Healthcare Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 04514, Republic of Korea
- Institute of Medical Research, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeonggyu Kang
- Center for Cohort Studies, Total Healthcare Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 04514, Republic of Korea
| | - JunHyeok Choi
- School of Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Republic of Korea
| | - Ga-Young Lim
- Center for Cohort Studies, Total Healthcare Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 04514, Republic of Korea
- Institute of Medical Research, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
| | - Mi-Ri Kwon
- Department of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seungho Ryu
- Center for Cohort Studies, Total Healthcare Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 04514, Republic of Korea
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Main Building B2, 250, Taepyung-ro 2ga, Jung-gu, Seoul 04514, Republic of Korea
- Department of Clinical Research Design & Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Jitae Shin
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066, Seobu-Ro, Jangan-Gu, Suwon 16149, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lip G, O'Regan DP. Can machine learning predict cardiac risk using mammography? Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2024; 25:467-468. [PMID: 38262145 DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gerald Lip
- North East of Scotland Breast Screening Program, Foresterhill Road, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Declan P O'Regan
- MRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Edmonds CE, O'Brien SR, Conant EF. Mammographic Breast Density: Current Assessment Methods, Clinical Implications, and Future Directions. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2023; 44:35-45. [PMID: 36792272 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Mammographic breast density is widely accepted as an independent risk factor for the development of breast cancer. In addition, because dense breast tissue may mask breast malignancies, breast density is inversely related to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Given the risks associated with breast density, as well as ongoing efforts to stratify individual risk and personalize breast cancer screening and prevention, numerous studies have sought to better understand the factors that impact breast density, and to develop and implement reproducible, quantitative methods to assess mammographic density. Breast density assessments have been incorporated into risk assessment models to improve risk stratification. Recently, novel techniques for analyzing mammographic parenchymal complexity, or texture, have been explored as potential means of refining mammographic tissue-based risk assessment beyond breast density.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine E Edmonds
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Sophia R O'Brien
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Emily F Conant
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Styła M, Giżewski T. The Study of Usefulness of a Set of Fractal Parameters to Build Classes of Disease Units Based on Images of Pigmented Skin Lesions. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:1773. [PMID: 34679471 PMCID: PMC8535145 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11101773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Dermatoscopic images are also increasingly used to train artificial neural networks for the future to provide fully automatic diagnostic systems capable of determining the type of pigmented skin lesion. Therefore, fractal analysis was used in this study to measure the irregularity of pigmented skin lesion surfaces. This paper presents selected results from individual stages of preliminary processing of the dermatoscopic image on pigmented skin lesion, in which fractal analysis was used and referred to the effectiveness of classification by fuzzy or statistical methods. Classification of the first unsupervised stage was performed using the method of analysis of scatter graphs and the fuzzy method using the Kohonen network. The results of the Kohonen network learning process with an input vector consisting of eight elements prove that neuronal activation requires a larger learning set with greater differentiation. For the same training conditions, the final results are at a higher level and can be classified as weaker. Statistics of factor analysis were proposed, allowing for the reduction in variables, and the directions of further studies were indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Styła
- Chair and Department of Biophysics, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Electrotechnologies, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland;
| | - Tomasz Giżewski
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Electrotechnologies, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gastounioti A, Oustimov A, Keller BM, Pantalone L, Hsieh MK, Conant EF, Kontos D. Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representations. Med Phys 2017; 43:5862. [PMID: 27806604 DOI: 10.1118/1.4963810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE With raw digital mammograms (DMs), which retain the relationship with x-ray attenuation of the breast tissue, not being routinely available, processed DMs are often the only viable means to acquire imaging measures. The authors investigate differences in quantitative measures of breast density and parenchymal texture, shown to have value in breast cancer risk assessment, between the two DM representations. METHODS The authors report data from 8458 pairs of bilateral raw ("FOR PROCESSING") and processed ("FOR PRESENTATION") DMs acquired from 4278 women undergoing routine screening evaluation, collected with DM units from two different vendors. Breast dense tissue area and percent density (PD), as well as a range of quantitative descriptors of breast parenchymal texture (statistical, co-occurrence, run-length, and structural descriptors), were measured using previously validated, fully automated software. Feature measurements were compared using matched-pairs Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, correlation (r), and linear-mixed-effects (LME) models, where potential interactions with woman- and system-specific factors were also assessed. The authors also compared texture feature correlations with the established risk factors of the Gail lifetime risk score (rG) and breast PD (rPD), and evaluated the within woman intraclass feature correlation (ICC), a measure of bilateral breast-tissue symmetry, in raw versus processed images. RESULTS All density measures and most of the texture features were strongly (r ≥ 0.6) or moderately (0.4 ≤ r < 0.6) correlated between raw and processed images. However, measurements were significantly different between the two imaging formats (Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, pw < 0.05). The association between measurements varied across features and vendors, and was substantially modified by woman- and system-specific image acquisition factors, such as age, BMI, and mAs/kVp, respectively. The strongest correlation, combined with minimal LME-model interactions, was observed for structural texture features. Overall, texture measures from either image representation were weakly associated with Gail lifetime risk (-0.2 ≤ rG ≤ 0.2), weakly to moderately associated with breast PD (-0.6 ≤ rPD ≤ 0.6), and had overall strong bilateral symmetry (ICC ≥ 0.6). CONCLUSIONS Differences in measures from processed versus raw DM depend highly on the feature, the DM vendor, and image acquisition settings, where structural features appear to be more robust across the different DM settings. The reported findings may serve as a reference in the design of future large-scale studies on mammographic features and breast cancer risk assessment involving multiple DM representations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimilia Gastounioti
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Rm D702 Richards Bldg., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
| | - Andrew Oustimov
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Rm D702 Richards Bldg., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
| | - Brad M Keller
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Rm D702 Richards Bldg., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
| | - Lauren Pantalone
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Rm D702 Richards Bldg., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
| | - Meng-Kang Hsieh
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Rm D702 Richards Bldg., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
| | - Emily F Conant
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Rm D702 Richards Bldg., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
| | - Despina Kontos
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Rm D702 Richards Bldg., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Conant EF, Keller BM, Pantalone L, Gastounioti A, McDonald ES, Kontos D. Agreement between Breast Percentage Density Estimations from Standard-Dose versus Synthetic Digital Mammograms: Results from a Large Screening Cohort Using Automated Measures. Radiology 2017; 283:673-680. [PMID: 28121523 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016161286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate agreement between automated estimates of breast density made from standard-dose versus synthetic digital mammograms in a large cohort of women undergoing screening. Materials and Methods This study received institutional review board approval with waiver of consent. A total of 3668 negative (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 1 or 2) digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening examinations consecutively performed over a 4-month period at one institution for which both standard-dose and synthetic mammograms were available for analysis were retrospectively analyzed. All mammograms were acquired with a Selenia Dimensions system (Hologic, Bedford, Mass), and synthetic mammograms were generated by using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved "C-View" software module. The "For Presentation" standard-dose mammograms and synthetic images were analyzed by using a fully automated algorithm. Agreement between density estimates was assessed by using Pearson correlation, linear regression, and Bland-Altman analysis. Differences were evaluated by using the paired Student t test. Results Breast percentage density (PD) estimates from synthetic and standard-dose mammograms were highly correlated (r = 0.92, P < .001), and the 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement between PD estimates were -6.4% to 9.9%. Synthetic mammograms had PD estimates by an average of 1.7% higher than standard-dose mammograms (P < .001), with a larger disagreement by 1.56% in women with highly dense breast tissue (P < .0001). Conclusion Fully automated estimates of breast density made from synthetic mammograms are generally comparable to those made from standard-dose mammograms. This may be important, as standard two-dimensional mammographic images are increasingly being replaced by synthetic mammograms in DBT screening in an attempt to reduce radiation dose. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily F Conant
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Room D702, Richards Bldg, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Brad M Keller
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Room D702, Richards Bldg, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Lauren Pantalone
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Room D702, Richards Bldg, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Aimilia Gastounioti
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Room D702, Richards Bldg, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Elizabeth S McDonald
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Room D702, Richards Bldg, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Despina Kontos
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Room D702, Richards Bldg, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li H, Weiss WA, Medved M, Abe H, Newstead GM, Karczmar GS, Giger ML. Breast density estimation from high spectral and spatial resolution MRI. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2017; 3:044507. [PMID: 28042590 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.3.4.044507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2016] [Accepted: 12/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
A three-dimensional breast density estimation method is presented for high spectral and spatial resolution (HiSS) MR imaging. Twenty-two patients were recruited (under an Institutional Review Board--approved Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant protocol) for high-risk breast cancer screening. Each patient received standard-of-care clinical digital x-ray mammograms and MR scans, as well as HiSS scans. The algorithm for breast density estimation includes breast mask generating, breast skin removal, and breast percentage density calculation. The inter- and intra-user variabilities of the HiSS-based density estimation were determined using correlation analysis and limits of agreement. Correlation analysis was also performed between the HiSS-based density estimation and radiologists' breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) density ratings. A correlation coefficient of 0.91 ([Formula: see text]) was obtained between left and right breast density estimations. An interclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 ([Formula: see text]) indicated high reliability for the inter-user variability of the HiSS-based breast density estimations. A moderate correlation coefficient of 0.55 ([Formula: see text]) was observed between HiSS-based breast density estimations and radiologists' BI-RADS. In summary, an objective density estimation method using HiSS spectral data from breast MRI was developed. The high reproducibility with low inter- and low intra-user variabilities shown in this preliminary study suggest that such a HiSS-based density metric may be potentially beneficial in programs requiring breast density such as in breast cancer risk assessment and monitoring effects of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Li
- University of Chicago , Department of Radiology, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 2026, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
| | - William A Weiss
- University of Chicago , Department of Radiology, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 2026, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
| | - Milica Medved
- University of Chicago , Department of Radiology, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 2026, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
| | - Hiroyuki Abe
- University of Chicago , Department of Radiology, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 2026, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
| | - Gillian M Newstead
- University of Chicago , Department of Radiology, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 2026, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
| | - Gregory S Karczmar
- University of Chicago , Department of Radiology, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 2026, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
| | - Maryellen L Giger
- University of Chicago , Department of Radiology, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 2026, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gastounioti A, Conant EF, Kontos D. Beyond breast density: a review on the advancing role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk assessment. Breast Cancer Res 2016; 18:91. [PMID: 27645219 PMCID: PMC5029019 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-016-0755-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The assessment of a woman's risk for developing breast cancer has become increasingly important for establishing personalized screening recommendations and forming preventive strategies. Studies have consistently shown a strong relationship between breast cancer risk and mammographic parenchymal patterns, typically assessed by percent mammographic density. This paper will review the advancing role of mammographic texture analysis as a potential novel approach to characterize the breast parenchymal tissue to augment conventional density assessment in breast cancer risk estimation. MAIN TEXT The analysis of mammographic texture provides refined, localized descriptors of parenchymal tissue complexity. Currently, there is growing evidence in support of textural features having the potential to augment the typically dichotomized descriptors (dense or not dense) of area or volumetric measures of breast density in breast cancer risk assessment. Therefore, a substantial research effort has been devoted to automate mammographic texture analysis, with the aim of ultimately incorporating such quantitative measures into breast cancer risk assessment models. In this paper, we review current and emerging approaches in this field, summarizing key methodological details and related studies using novel computerized approaches. We also discuss research challenges for advancing the role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk stratification and accelerating its clinical translation. CONCLUSIONS The objective is to provide a comprehensive reference for researchers in the field of parenchymal pattern analysis in breast cancer risk assessment, while indicating key directions for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimilia Gastounioti
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Emily F Conant
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Despina Kontos
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ray S, Chen L, Keller BM, Chen J, Conant EF, Kontos D. Association between Breast Parenchymal Complexity and False-Positive Recall From Digital Mammography Versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Preliminary Investigation in the ACRIN PA 4006 Trial. Acad Radiol 2016; 23:977-86. [PMID: 27236612 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2016] [Accepted: 02/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES We investigate associations between measures of mammographic parenchymal complexity and false-positive (FP) recall from screening with digital mammography (DM) versus digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 541 women recruited by the American College of Radiology Imaging Network 4006 trial, designed to evaluate callback and detection rates from screening with DM versus combined DM and DBT. Of these, 68 and 56 were FPs based on DM alone versus the combined DM/DBT readings, respectively. Mammographic complexity was quantified with computerized texture analysis and percent density. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate associations between extracted features and FP recall, after adjusting for age and number of previous benign biopsies. Odds ratios and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic were used to assess association strength. RESULTS For DM, age, previous benign biopsies and texture features of correlation, inverse difference moment, sum average, and sum variance were deemed as significant predictors (P <.05) of FP recall, with an AUC = 0.77. For DBT, age was the only significant predictor of FP recall with AUC = 0.64. Using exploratory receiver operating characteristic thresholds for which no true-positives would be missed, a potential FP reduction of 23.5% and 8.9% was demonstrated, respectively, for DM alone versus DM/DBT. CONCLUSION Measures of breast complexity measured on 2D digital mammograms are indicative of the likelihood for FP recall from screening with DM, and could help identify women who could benefit from supplemental screening, including DBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shonket Ray
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Silverstein Bldg., 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia PA 19104
| | - Lin Chen
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Silverstein Bldg., 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia PA 19104
| | - Brad M Keller
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Silverstein Bldg., 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia PA 19104
| | - Jinbo Chen
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Emily F Conant
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Silverstein Bldg., 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia PA 19104
| | - Despina Kontos
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 1 Silverstein Bldg., 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia PA 19104.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tan M, Zheng B, Leader JK, Gur D. Association Between Changes in Mammographic Image Features and Risk for Near-Term Breast Cancer Development. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING 2016; 35:1719-28. [PMID: 26886970 PMCID: PMC4938728 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2016.2527619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop and test a new computerized model for predicting near-term breast cancer risk based on quantitative assessment of bilateral mammographic image feature variations in a series of negative full-field digital mammography (FFDM) images. The retrospective dataset included series of four sequential FFDM examinations of 335 women. The last examination in each series ("current") and the three most recent "prior" examinations were obtained. All "prior" examinations were interpreted as negative during the original clinical image reading, while in the "current" examinations 159 cancers were detected and pathologically verified and 176 cases remained cancer-free. From each image, we initially computed 158 mammographic density, structural similarity, and texture based image features. The absolute subtraction value between the left and right breasts was selected to represent each feature. We then built three support vector machine (SVM) based risk models, which were trained and tested using a leave-one-case-out based cross-validation method. The actual features used in each SVM model were selected using a nested stepwise regression analysis method. The computed areas under receiver operating characteristic curves monotonically increased from 0.666±0.029 to 0.730±0.027 as the time-lag between the "prior" (3 to 1) and "current" examinations decreases. The maximum adjusted odds ratios were 5.63, 7.43, and 11.1 for the three "prior" (3 to 1) sets of examinations, respectively. This study demonstrated a positive association between the risk scores generated by a bilateral mammographic feature difference based risk model and an increasing trend of the near-term risk for having mammography-detected breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxine Tan
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of
Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019 USA
| | - Bin Zheng
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of
Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019 USA
| | - Joseph K. Leader
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
15213 USA
| | - David Gur
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
15213 USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Keller BM, Chen J, Conant EF, Kontos D. Breast density and parenchymal texture measures as potential risk factors for Estrogen-Receptor positive breast cancer. PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE--THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR OPTICAL ENGINEERING 2014; 9035:90351D. [PMID: 25075270 DOI: 10.1117/12.2043710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Accurate assessment of a woman's risk to develop specific subtypes of breast cancer is critical for appropriate utilization of chemopreventative measures, such as with tamoxifen in preventing estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer. In this context, we investigate quantitative measures of breast density and parenchymal texture, measures of glandular tissue content and tissue structure, as risk factors for estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. Mediolateral oblique (MLO) view digital mammograms of the contralateral breast from 106 women with unilateral invasive breast cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Breast density and parenchymal texture were analyzed via fully-automated software. Logistic regression with feature selection and was performed to predict ER+ versus ER- cancer status. A combined model considering all imaging measures extracted was compared to baseline models consisting of density-alone and texture-alone features. Area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Delong's test were used to compare the models' discriminatory capacity for receptor status. The density-alone model had a discriminatory capacity of 0.62 AUC (p=0.05). The texture-alone model had a higher discriminatory capacity of 0.70 AUC (p=0.001), which was not significantly different compared to the density-alone model (p=0.37). In contrast the combined density-texture logistic regression model had a discriminatory capacity of 0.82 AUC (p<0.001), which was statistically significantly higher than both the density-alone (p<0.001) and texture-alone regression models (p=0.04). The combination of breast density and texture measures may have the potential to identify women specifically at risk for estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer and could be useful in triaging women into appropriate risk-reduction strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brad M Keller
- Dept. of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3600 Market St. Suite 360, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Jinbo Chen
- Dept. of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Blockley Hall Rm 203, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Emily F Conant
- Dept. of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3600 Market St. Suite 360, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Despina Kontos
- Dept. of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3600 Market St. Suite 360, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| |
Collapse
|