Breast density evaluation using spectral mammography, radiologist reader assessment, and segmentation techniques: a retrospective study based on left and right breast comparison

Influence of Acquisition Parameters on Silver Sulfide Nanoparticle Contrast in Photon-Counting Digital Mammography: A Phantom Study

Photon-counting mammography is an emerging modality that allows for spectral imaging and provides a differentiation of material compositions. The development of photon-counting mammography-specific contrast agents has yet to be explored. In this study, the contrast, sensitivity, and organ dose between silver sulfide nanoparticles (Ag2S-NPs) and a clinically approved iodinated agent (iopamidol) were investigated using a contrast-embedded gradient ramp phantom and a prototype scanner. For a given agent, the signal intensity increased with concentration, tube voltage (kV), and high bin fraction, while remaining constant with the tube current exposure time product (mAs). Moreover, Ag2S-NPs produced significantly stronger contrast and improved sensitivity compared to iodine, especially when imaged at lower tube energies. Therefore, the use of photon-counting techniques and a silver-based contrast agent may markedly increase the contrast and contrast-to-noise ratios or reduce the radiation dose for contrast-enhanced mammography. Silver may be better suited than iodine for contrast agent development for spectral photon-counting mammography.

Implementing Multilabeling, ADASYN, and ReliefF Techniques for Classification of Breast Cancer Diagnostic through Machine Learning: Efficient Computer-Aided Diagnostic System

Multilabel recognition of morphological images and detection of cancerous areas are difficult to locate in the scenario of the image redundancy and less resolution. Cancerous tissues are incredibly tiny in various scenarios. Therefore, for automatic classification, the characteristics of cancer patches in the X-ray image are of critical importance. Due to the slight variation between the textures, using just one feature or using a few features contributes to inaccurate classification outcomes. The present study focuses on five different algorithms for extracting features that can extract further different features. The algorithms are GLCM, LBGLCM, LBP, GLRLM, and SFTA from 8 image groups, and then, the extracted feature spaces are combined. The dataset used for classification is most probably imbalanced. Additionally, another focal point is to eradicate the unbalanced data problem by creating more samples using the ADASYN algorithm so that the error rate is minimized and the accuracy is increased. By using the ReliefF algorithm, it skips less contributing features that relieve the burden on the process. Finally, the feedforward neural network is used for the classification of data. The proposed method showed 99.5% micro, 99.5% macro, 0.5% misclassification, 99.5% recall rats, specificity 99.4%, precision 99.5%, and accuracy 99.5%, showing its robustness in these results. To assess the feasibility of the new system, the INbreast database was used.

Quantification of water and lipid density with dual-energy mammography: validation in postmortem breasts

OBJECTIVES

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and the second leading cause of cancer death. It is well known that breast density is an important risk factor for breast cancer and also can be used to personalize screening and for assessment of treatment response. Breast density has previously been correlated to volumetric water density. The purpose of this study is to validate the accuracy and precision of dual-energy mammography in measuring water density in postmortem breasts.

METHODS

Twenty pairs of postmortem breasts were imaged using dual-energy mammography with energy-sensitive photon-counting detectors. Chemical analysis was used as the reference standard to assess the accuracy of dual-energy mammography in measuring volumetric water and lipid density. Images from different views and contralateral breasts were used to assess estimate of precision for water and lipid volumetric density measurements.

RESULTS

The measured volumetric water and lipid density from dual-energy mammography and chemical analysis were in good agreement, where the standard errors of estimates (SEE) of both were calculated to be 2.1%. Volumetric water and lipid density measurements from different views were also in good agreement, with a SEE of 1.3% and 1.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that dual-energy mammography can be used to accurately measure volumetric water and lipid density in breast tissue. Accurate quantification of volumetric water density is expected to enhance its utility as a risk factor for breast cancer and for assessment of response to therapy.

KEY POINTS

• Dual-energy mammography can be used to accurately measure water and lipid volumetric density in breast tissue. • Improved quantification of volumetric water density is expected to enhance its utility for assessment of response to therapy and as a risk factor for breast cancer.

Breast density: why all the fuss?

The term "breast density" or mammographic density (MD) denotes those components of breast parenchyma visualised at mammography that are denser than adipose tissue. MD is composed of a mixture of epithelial and stromal components, notably collagen, in variable proportions. MD is most commonly assessed in clinical practice with the time-honoured method of visual estimation of area-based percent density (PMD) on a mammogram, with categorisation into quartiles. The computerised semi-automated thresholding method, Cumulus, also yielding area-based percent density, is widely used for research purposes; however, the advent of fully automated volumetric methods developed as a consequence of the widespread use of digital mammography (DM) and yielding both absolute and percent dense volumes, has resulted in an explosion of interest in MD recently. Broadly, the importance of MD is twofold: firstly, the presence of marked MD significantly reduces mammographic sensitivity for breast cancer, even with state-of-the-art DM. Recognition of this led to the formation of a powerful lobby group ('Are You Dense') in the US, as a consequence of which 32 states have legislated for mandatory disclosure of MD to women undergoing mammography. Secondly, it is now widely accepted that MD is in itself a risk factor for breast cancer, with a four-to sixfold increased relative risk in women with PMD in the highest quintile compared to those with PMD in the lowest quintile. Consequently, major research efforts are underway to assess whether use of MD could provide a major step forward towards risk-adapted, personalised breast cancer prevention, imaging, and treatment.

Qualitative Versus Quantitative Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: Applications for the US and Abroad

Mammographic breast density (MBD) has been proven to be an important risk factor for breast cancer and an important determinant of mammographic screening performance. The measurement of density has changed dramatically since its inception. Initial qualitative measurement methods have been found to have limited consistency between readers, and in regards to breast cancer risk. Following the introduction of full-field digital mammography, more sophisticated measurement methodology is now possible. Automated computer-based density measurements can provide consistent, reproducible, and objective results. In this review paper, we describe various methods currently available to assess MBD, and provide a discussion on the clinical utility of such methods for breast cancer screening.