Artificial Intelligence and Radiology: Have Rumors of the Radiologist's Demise Been Greatly Exaggerated?

Stakeholders' perspectives on the future of artificial intelligence in radiology: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to impact clinical practice and healthcare delivery. AI is of particular significance in radiology due to its use in automatic analysis of image characteristics. This scoping review examines stakeholder perspectives on AI use in radiology, the benefits, risks, and challenges to its integration.

METHODS

A search was conducted from 1960 to November 2019 in EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and grey literature. Publications reflecting stakeholder attitudes toward AI were included with no restrictions.

RESULTS

Commentaries (n = 32), surveys (n = 13), presentation abstracts (n = 8), narrative reviews (n = 8), and a social media study (n = 1) were included from 62 eligible publications. These represent the views of radiologists, surgeons, medical students, patients, computer scientists, and the general public. Seven themes were identified (predicted impact, potential replacement, trust in AI, knowledge of AI, education, economic considerations, and medicolegal implications). Stakeholders anticipate a significant impact on radiology, though replacement of radiologists is unlikely in the near future. Knowledge of AI is limited for non-computer scientists and further education is desired. Many expressed the need for collaboration between radiologists and AI specialists to successfully improve patient care.

CONCLUSIONS

Stakeholder views generally suggest that AI can improve the practice of radiology and consider the replacement of radiologists unlikely. Most stakeholders identified the need for education and training on AI, as well as collaborative efforts to improve AI implementation. Further research is needed to gain perspectives from non-Western countries, non-radiologist stakeholders, on economic considerations, and medicolegal implications.

KEY POINTS

Stakeholders generally expressed that AI alone cannot be used to replace radiologists. The scope of practice is expected to shift with AI use affecting areas from image interpretation to patient care. Patients and the general public do not know how to address potential errors made by AI systems while radiologists believe that they should be "in-the-loop" in terms of responsibility. Ethical accountability strategies must be developed across governance levels. Students, residents, and radiologists believe that there is a lack in AI education during medical school and residency. The radiology community should work with IT specialists to ensure that AI technology benefits their work and centres patients.

U-shaped GAN for Semi-Supervised Learning and Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in High Resolution Chest Radiograph Segmentation

Deep learning has achieved considerable success in medical image segmentation. However, applying deep learning in clinical environments often involves two problems: (1) scarcity of annotated data as data annotation is time-consuming and (2) varying attributes of different datasets due to domain shift. To address these problems, we propose an improved generative adversarial network (GAN) segmentation model, called U-shaped GAN, for limited-annotated chest radiograph datasets. The semi-supervised learning approach and unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) approach are modeled into a unified framework for effective segmentation. We improve GAN by replacing the traditional discriminator with a U-shaped net, which predicts each pixel a label. The proposed U-shaped net is designed with high resolution radiographs (1,024 × 1,024) for effective segmentation while taking computational burden into account. The pointwise convolution is applied to U-shaped GAN for dimensionality reduction, which decreases the number of feature maps while retaining their salient features. Moreover, we design the U-shaped net with a pretrained ResNet-50 as an encoder to reduce the computational burden of training the encoder from scratch. A semi-supervised learning approach is proposed learning from limited annotated data while exploiting additional unannotated data with a pixel-level loss. U-shaped GAN is extended to UDA by taking the source and target domain data as the annotated data and the unannotated data in the semi-supervised learning approach, respectively. Compared to the previous models dealing with the aforementioned problems separately, U-shaped GAN is compatible with varying data distributions of multiple medical centers, with efficient training and optimizing performance. U-shaped GAN can be generalized to chest radiograph segmentation for clinical deployment. We evaluate U-shaped GAN with two chest radiograph datasets. U-shaped GAN is shown to significantly outperform the state-of-the-art models.

Healthcare Digitalisation and the Changing Nature of Work and Society

Digital technologies have profound effects on all areas of modern life, including the workplace. Certain forms of digitalisation entail simply exchanging digital files for paper, while more complex instances involve machines performing a wide variety of tasks on behalf of humans. While some are wary of the displacement of humans that occurs when, for example, robots perform tasks previously performed by humans, others argue that robots only perform the tasks that robots should have carried out in the very first place and never by humans. Understanding the impacts of digitalisation in the workplace requires an understanding of the effects of digital technology on the tasks we perform, and these effects are often not foreseeable. In this article, the changing nature of work in the health care sector is used as a case to analyse such change and its implications on three levels: the societal (macro), organisational (meso), and individual level (micro). Analysing these transformations by using a layered approach is helpful for understanding the actual magnitude of the changes that are occurring and creates the foundation for an informed regulatory and societal response. We argue that, while artificial intelligence, big data, and robotics are revolutionary technologies, most of the changes we see involve technological substitution and not infrastructural change. Even though this undermines the assumption that these new technologies constitute a fourth industrial revolution, their effects on the micro and meso level still require both political awareness and proportional regulatory responses.

Artificial Intelligence: Is It Armageddon for Breast Radiologists?

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has taken radiology by storm, in particular, mammogram interpretation, and we have seen a recent surge in the number of publications on potential uses of AI in breast radiology. Breast cancer exerts a lot of burden on the National Health Service (NHS) and is the second most common cancer in the UK as of 2018. New cases of breast cancer have been on the rise in the past decade, while the survival rate has been improving. The NHS breast cancer screening program led to an improvement in survival rate. The expansion of the screening program led to more mammograms, thereby putting more work on the hands of radiologists, and the issue of double reading further worsens the workload. The introduction of computer-aided detection (CAD) systems to help radiologists was found not to have the expected outcome of improving the performance of readers. Unreliability of CAD systems has led to the explosion of studies and development of applications with the potential use in breast imaging. The purported success recorded with the use of machine learning in breast radiology has led to people postulating ideas that AI will replace breast radiologists. Of course, AI has many applications and potential uses in radiology, but will it replace radiologists? We reviewed many articles on the use of AI in breast radiology to give future radiologists and radiologists full information on this topic. This article focuses on explaining the basic principles and terminology of AI in radiology, potential uses, and limitations of AI in radiology. We have also analysed articles and answered the question of whether AI will replace radiologists.

Implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in radiology: hindering and facilitating factors

Objective

The objective was to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in clinical radiology in The Netherlands.

Materials and methods

Using an embedded multiple case study, an exploratory, qualitative research design was followed. Data collection consisted of 24 semi-structured interviews from seven Dutch hospitals. The analysis of barriers and facilitators was guided by the recently published Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework for new medical technologies in healthcare organizations.

Results

Among the most important facilitating factors for implementation were the following: (i) pressure for cost containment in the Dutch healthcare system, (ii) high expectations of AI’s potential added value, (iii) presence of hospital-wide innovation strategies, and (iv) presence of a “local champion.” Among the most prominent hindering factors were the following: (i) inconsistent technical performance of AI applications, (ii) unstructured implementation processes, (iii) uncertain added value for clinical practice of AI applications, and (iv) large variance in acceptance and trust of direct (the radiologists) and indirect (the referring clinicians) adopters.

Conclusion

In order for AI applications to contribute to the improvement of the quality and efficiency of clinical radiology, implementation processes need to be carried out in a structured manner, thereby providing evidence on the clinical added value of AI applications.

Key Points

• Successful implementation of AI in radiology requires collaboration between radiologists and referring clinicians.

• Implementation of AI in radiology is facilitated by the presence of a local champion.

• Evidence on the clinical added value of AI in radiology is needed for successful implementation.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-06946-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.