Assessing Competence in Emergency Radiology Using an Online Simulator

Ultrasound Simulation Training for Radiology Residents-Curriculum Design and Implementation

Medical simulation training can be used to improve clinician performance, teach communication and professionalism skills, and enhance team training. Radiology residents can benefit from simulation training in diagnostic ultrasound, procedural ultrasound, and communication skills prior to direct patient care experiences. This paper details a weeklong ultrasound simulation training curriculum for radiology residents during the PGY-1 clinical internship. The organization of established teaching methods into a dedicated course early in radiology residency training with the benefit of a multi-disciplinary approach makes this method unique. This framework can be adapted to fit learners at different skill levels or with specific procedural needs.

I.C.A.R.U.S. in Flight: A Radiology Simulator Teaches Imaging Appropriateness, Anatomy, and Image Interpretation Skills

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The Interactive Clinical Anatomy and Radiology Utilization Simulator (ICARUS) was created in 2012 as a novel simulation program with 25 peer reviewed electronic modules combining simulated patient encounters, American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria, radiologic anatomy, and basic imaging interpretation and patient safety topics. ICARUS integrates a gaming approach to improve student engagement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ICARUS modules have been used in the undergraduate medical curriculum at the lead author's institution since its pilot in 2012. Since completion of the full complement of 25 modules, modules have been used in the radiology clerkship (2012- 2015), in the integrated longitudinal curriculum (2015-present), and in various radiology electives (2015-present), including the inaugural virtual radiology electives at all authors' institutions (July 2020-present). Student evaluations were formally solicited in 2014 and again in 2020.

RESULTS

During the introductory radiology clerkship in 2014, 107 students were enrolled. Students were assigned 4 ICARUS modules. During the 2-week virtual elective from July-October 2020, 26 students were enrolled. Students were assigned all 25 modules. The majority of survey respondents "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that the modules were interactive, enjoyable, and self-directed, fostered critical thinking, provided practical value, met goals and objectives of the course, and seemed practical to their future practice.

CONCLUSION

ICARUS integrates key educational concepts in radiology with high fidelity simulation of clinical decision support software and PACS simulation image display to create a highly engaging learning environment that most accurately reflects future clinical experiences.

The effectiveness of collaborative teaching in an introductory online radiology session for master of nursing students

AIM

The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the collaborative teaching of a multi- disciplinary team on the introductory online radiology session for the Master of Nursing students.

BACKGROUND

The teaching method for basic radiology reading for the Master of Nursing program was delivered via a 4-hour didactic face-to-face lesson and was ineffective as evidenced by the students' feedback and evaluation. Therefore, a multi-disciplinary team consisting of nursing, medical and radiology staff developed a 4-week online radiology session to enhance knowledge, attitudes and confidence of the Master of Nursing students in interpreting basic chest radiographs, abdominal radiographs and computed tomographic brain scans.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental study design using pre-test and post-test was adopted. The effectiveness of the online radiology session was evaluated on the students' knowledge, attitudes, and confidence. Forty Master of Nursing program students completed the pre-test and post-test questionnaires (response rate 74%) and responded to the open-ended questions in the post-test. IBM-SPSS was used to analyse the quantitative data and quantifying qualitative data technique was used to analyse the qualitative data.

RESULTS

The participants demonstrated an improvement in knowledge and confidence mean scores of the post-test compared to pre-test. There was improved self-rated proficiency in reading and interpreting a film radiograph but no difference in the way they perceived the importance of radiological investigations vis-à-vis the physical examination and routine laboratory testing. Quantifying quantitative data technique showed that majority of participants appreciated the learning process as it could be done at their own pace and the lectures could be replayed again. However, participants hoped for improved interaction with the tutor during learning and the use of real-life cases in the scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Collaborative teaching using an online radiology session shows promise over a traditional didactic method of teaching but requires further refinement in terms of participant interaction and the use of case examples.