Pelvic MRI for Endometriosis: A Diagnostic Challenge for the Inexperienced Radiologist. How Much Experience Is Enough?

Validation of an In Vitro Diagnostic Test for Endometriosis: Impact of Confounding Medical Conditions and Lesion Location

With the aim to shorten the time for diagnosis and accelerate access to correct management, a non-invasive diagnostic test for endometriosis was developed and validated. The IVD test combines an ELISA test kit to quantify CA125 and BDNF concentrations in serum and a data treatment algorithm hosted in medical software processing results from the ELISA test and responses to six clinical variables. Serum samples and clinical variables extracted from psychometric questionnaires from 77 patients were collected from the Oxford Endometriosis CaRe Centre biobank (UK). Case/control classification was performed based on laparoscopy and histological verification of the excised lesions. Biomarkers serum concentrations and clinical variables were introduced to the software, which generates the qualitative diagnostic result ("positive" or "negative"). This test allowed the detection of 32% of cases with superficial endometriosis, which is an added value given the limited efficacy of existing imaging techniques. Even in the presence of various confounding medical conditions, the test maintained a specificity of 100%, supporting its suitability for use in patients with underlying medical conditions.

Bowel wall thickness measured by MRI is useful for early diagnosis of bowel endometriosis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate MRI features of bowel endometriosis (BE) and verify its clinical significance compared with pathological diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Since 2018, patients clinically diagnosed with deep endometriosis (DE) and planned to undergo surgery were enrolled prospectively. MRI parameters including traction, thickening sign of the rectum, obliteration of the Douglas Pouch, sign of adenomyosis, and pelvic adhesion were extracted. Uni- and multi-variate analyses were performed to explore their association with pathological diagnosis of BE. ROC curve was utilized to ascertain the appropriate cutoff value for predicting the presence and assessing the severity of BE.

RESULTS

A total of 226 patients with DE were recruited, and 154 BE cases were pathologically confirmed. Logistic regression analysis revealed that thickness of the rectal wall, traction sign of the rectum, and obliteration of the Douglas Pouch were independent factors to predict the presence of BE with the OR 1.59 (95% CI: 1.29-1.96), 0.24 (95% CI: 0.09-0.67), and 0.17 (95% CI: 0.07-0.40), respectively (p all < 0.01). A cutoff value of 6.0 mm for the thickness of rectal wall resulted in the highest predictive value of BE (specificity: 90.3%; sensitivity: 78.6%). For patients with measured thickness of the rectal wall over 6.0 mm, 72.1% (93/129) was confirmed BE with lesions infiltrated more than muscular layer.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study indicates that based on precise definition of visualized features on MRI images, BE could be recognized pre-operatively. DE patients with thickness of rectal wall exceeding 6.0 mm have a greater probability of BE.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Based on precise definition of visualized features and accurate measurement on MRI images, bowel infiltrating among deep endometriosis patients could be recognized pre-operatively.

KEY POINTS

• Precise definition of measurable MRI parameters made it possible for early detection of bowel endometriosis. • Thickening sign, traction sign of the rectum, and obliteration of the Douglas Pouch were typical radiological indicators for bowel endometriosis. • Bowel involvement is more sensitive to be detected among pelvic deep endometriosis patients with the thickness of the rectal wall over 6.0 mm.

Transvaginal Ultrasound vs. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Value in Endometriosis Diagnosis

(1) Background: Endometriosis is a widespread gynecological condition that causes chronic pelvic discomfort, dysmenorrhea, infertility, and impaired quality of life in women of reproductive age. Clinical examination, transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are significant preoperative non-invasive diagnosis procedures for the accurate assessment of endometriosis. Although TVS is used as the primary line for diagnosis, MRI is commonly utilized to achieve a better anatomical overview of the entire pelvic organs. The aim of this systematic review article is to thoroughly summarize the research on various endometriosis diagnosis methods that are less invasive. (2) Methods: To find relevant studies, we examined electronic databases, such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, choosing 70 papers as references. (3) Results: The findings indicate that various approaches can contribute to diagnosis in different ways, depending on the type of endometriosis. For patients suspected of having deep pelvic endometriosis, transvaginal sonography should be the first line of diagnosis. Endometriosis cysts are better diagnosed with TVS, whereas torus, uterosacral ligaments, intestine, and bladder endometriosis lesions are best diagnosed using MRI. When it comes to detecting intestine or rectal nodules, as well as rectovaginal septum nodules, MRI should be the imaging tool of choice. (4) Conclusions: When diagnosing DE (deep infiltrative endometriosis), the examiner’s experience is the most important criterion to consider. In the diagnosis of endometriosis, expert-guided TVS is more accurate than routine pelvic ultrasound, especially in the deep infiltrative form. For optimal treatment and surgical planning, accurate preoperative deep infiltrative endometriosis diagnosis is essential, especially because it requires a multidisciplinary approach.

Assessing the knowledge of endometriosis diagnostic tools in a large, international lay population: an online survey

OBJECTIVE

To assess the general population's knowledge regarding the utility and availability of tools to diagnosis endometriosis, with a focus on ultrasound.

DESIGN

An international cross-sectional online survey study was performed between August and October 2019.

SETTING AND POPULATION

5301 respondents, representing 73 countries.

METHODS

In all, 23 questions survey focused on knowledge of endometriosis diagnosis distributed globally via patient- and community-endometriosis groups using social media.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Descriptive data of the knowledge of diagnostic tools for diagnosing endometriosis, including details about diagnosis using ultrasound.

RESULTS

In all, 84.0% of respondents had been previously diagnosed with endometriosis, 71.5% of whom had been diagnosed at the time of surgery. Ultrasound and MRI were the methods of diagnosis in 6.5% and 1.8%, respectively. A total of 91.8%, 28.8% and 16.6% of respondents believed surgery, ultrasound and MRI could diagnose endometriosis, respectively (more than one answer allowed). In those diagnosed by surgery, 21.7% knew about ultrasound as a diagnosis method, whereas in those diagnosed non-surgically, 51.5% knew (P < 0.001). In all, 14.7%, 31.1% and 18.2% stated superficial, ovarian and deep endometriosis could be diagnosed with ultrasound (32.9% stated they did not know which phenotypes of endometriosis could be diagnosed). Lastly, 58.4% of respondents do not believe they could access an advanced ultrasound in their region.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a limited appreciation for the role of non-surgical diagnostic tests for endometriosis among lay respondents to this survey.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

International survey shows limited awareness of lay respondents about non-surgical endometriosis diagnostic tools.

A short anogenital distance on MRI is a marker of endometriosis

STUDY QUESTION

Could the anogenital distance (AGD) as assessed by MRI (MRI-AGD) be a diagnostic tool for endometriosis?

SUMMARY ANSWER

A short MRI-AGD is a strong diagnostic marker of endometriosis.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

A short clinically assessed AGD (C-AGD) is associated with the presence of endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

This study is a re-analysis of previously published data from a case-control study.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

Women undergoing pelvic surgery from January 2018 to June 2019 and who had a preoperative pelvic MRI were included. C-AGD was measured at the beginning of the surgery by a different operator who was unaware of the endometriosis status. MRI-AGD was measured retrospectively by a senior radiologist who was blinded to the final diagnosis. Two measurements were made: from the posterior wall of the clitoris to the anterior edge of the anal canal (MRI-AGD-AC), and from the posterior wall of the vagina to the anterior edge of the anal canal (MRI-AGD-AF).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The study compared MRI-AGD of 67 women with endometriosis to 31 without endometriosis (controls). Average MRI-AGD-AF measurements were 13.3 mm (±3.9) and 21.2 mm (±5.4) in the endometriosis and non-endometriosis groups, respectively (P < 10-5). Average MRI-AGD-AC measurements were 40.4 mm (±7.3) and 51.1 mm (±8.6) for the endometriosis and non-endometriosis groups, respectively (P < 10-5). There was no difference of MRI-AGD in women with and without endometrioma (P = 0.21), or digestive involvement (P = 0.26). Moreover, MRI-AGD values were independent of the revised score of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine and the Enzian score. The diagnosis of endometriosis was negatively associated with both the MRI-AGD-AF (β = -7.79, 95% CI (-9.88; -5.71), P < 0.001) and MRI-AGD-AC (β = -9.51 mm, 95% CI (-12.7; 6.24), P < 0.001) in multivariable analysis. Age (β = +0.31 mm, 95% CI (0.09; 0.53), P = 0.006) and BMI (β = +0.44 mm, 95% CI (0.17; 0.72), P = 0.001) were positively associated with the MRI-AGD-AC measurements in multivariable analysis. MRI-AGD-AF had an AUC of 0.869 (95% CI (0.79; 0.95)) and outperformed C-AGD. Using an optimal cut-off of 20 mm for MRI-AGD-AF, a sensitivity of 97.01% and a specificity of 70.97% were noted.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

This was a retrospective analysis and no adolescents had been included.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This study is consistent with previous works associating a short C-AGD with endometriosis and the absence of correlation with the disease phenotype. MRI-AGD is more accurate than C-AGD in this setting and could be evaluated in the MRI examination of patients with suspected endometriosis.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

N/A.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The protocol was approved by the 'Groupe Nantais d'Ethique dans le Domaine de la Santé' and registered under reference 02651077.