Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values for Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: current development, challenges, and clinical perspectives

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are highly heterogeneous and potentially malignant tumors arising from secretory cells of the neuroendocrine system. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are the most common subtype of NENs. Historically, GEP-NENs have been regarded as infrequent and slow-growing malignancies; however, recent data have demonstrated that the worldwide prevalence and incidence of GEP-NENs have increased exponentially over the last three decades. In addition, an increasing number of studies have proven that GEP-NENs result in a limited life expectancy. These findings suggested that the natural biology of GEP-NENs is more aggressive than commonly assumed. Therefore, there is an urgent need for advanced researches focusing on the diagnosis and management of patients with GEP-NENs. In this review, we have summarized the limitations and recent advancements in our comprehension of the epidemiology, clinical presentations, pathology, molecular biology, diagnosis, and treatment of GEP-NETs to identify factors contributing to delays in diagnosis and timely treatment of these patients.

Clinical feasibility of deep learning reconstruction in liver diffusion-weighted imaging: Improvement of image quality and impact on apparent diffusion coefficient value

PURPOSE

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the liver suffers from low resolution, noise, and artifacts. This study aimed to investigate the effect of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) on image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) quantification of liver DWI at 3 Tesla.

METHOD

In this prospective study, images of the liver obtained at DWI with b-values of 0 (DWI0), 50 (DWI50) and 800 s/mm2 (DWI800) from consecutive patients with liver lesions from February 2022 to February 2023 were reconstructed with and without DLR (non-DLR). Image quality was assessed qualitatively using Likert scoring system and quantitatively using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and liver/parenchyma boundary sharpness from region-of-interest (ROI) analysis. ADC value of lesion were measured. Phantom experiment was also performed to investigate the factors that determine the effect of DLR on ADC value. Qualitative score, SNR, CNR, boundary sharpness, and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) for DWI were compared using paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients with 170 lesions were included. DLR group showed a higher qualitative score than the non-DLR group. for example, with DWI800 the score was 4.77 ± 0.52 versus 4.30 ± 0.63 (P < 0.001). DLR group also showed higher SNRs, CNRs and boundary sharpness than the non-DLR group. DLR reduced the ADC of malignant tumors (1.105[0.904, 1.340] versus 1.114[0.904, 1.320]) (P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in the diagnostic value of malignancy for DLR and non-DLR groups (P = 57.3). The phantom study confirmed a reduction of ADC in images with low resolution, and a stronger reduction of ADC in heterogeneous structures than in homogeneous ones (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

DLR improved image quality of liver DWI. DLR reduced the ADC value of lesions, but did not affect the diagnostic performance of ADC in distinguishing malignant tumors on a 3.0-T MRI system.

Liver Metastases: Correlation between Imaging Features and Pathomolecular Environments

A wide range of imaging manifestations of liver metastases can be encountered, as various primary cancers preferably metastasize to the liver (organ-specific metastases), with the imaging characteristics largely depending on various primary tumor-specific factors such as histopathologic category, degree of tumor differentiation, histologic behavior, and intratumor alterations. Characteristic imaging features potentially can help provide a more precise diagnosis in some clinical settings. These settings include those of (a) primary cancers of hollow organs such as gastrointestinal organs, the lungs, and the bladder, owing to the appearance of metastases that cannot be applied to the liver, which is a parenchymal organ; (b) unknown primary tumors; (c) more than one primary tumor; (d) another emergent malignancy; and (e) transformation to a different histopathologic tumor subtype. The characteristic features include the target sign on T2-weighted MR images or during the hepatobiliary phase of hypovascular metastasis, the peripheral rim washout sign on delayed phase images, peritumor hyperintensity during the hepatobiliary phase, hypervascular metastasis, a cystic appearance with marked hyperintensity on T2-weighted images, marked hyperintensity on T1-weighted images, calcification, capsular retraction, absence of the vessel-penetrating sign, distribution of liver metastases, and rare intraductal forms of metastases. In addition to various factors associated with the primary cancer, desmoplastic reactions around the tumor-which can be observed in adenocarcinomas with peripheral and peritumor enhancement, distinct arterioportal shunts with metastases from pancreatic ductal carcinoma, and pseudocirrhosis-also can affect these findings. The authors review the characteristic imaging findings of liver metastases from various primary cancers, with a focus on the mechanisms that underlie organ-specific liver metastases. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Distinction Between Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Hypervascular Liver Metastases in Non-cirrhotic Patients Using Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Purpose: This study aims to identify the hallmarks of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from hypervascular liver metastases (HLMs). Methods: Between January 2008 and October 2020, among patients who underwent gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI, those who met the following criteria were retrospectively included: without chronic hepatitis or liver stiffness ≤ 2.5 kPa on magnetic resonance elastography or F0/F1 on pathological assessment. Two blinded radiologists reviewed the imaging findings to judge the presence or absence of the enhancing capsule, nonperipheral washout, corona enhancement, hypointensity in the transitional/hepatobiliary phase (HBP), hyperintensity on T2-weighted/diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), mosaic architecture, and blood products/fat in mass. The lesion-to-liver signal intensity ratios in HBP and DWI were also calculated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the imaging hallmarks distinguishing HCC from HLM. Interobserver agreement was calculated using kappa values and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: The final study cohort comprised 72 lesions in 44 patients (mean age, 65.0±11.9 years). Univariate analysis revealed higher frequencies of the following features in HCC than in HLM (P < .10): nonperipheral washout, corona enhancement, transitional phase hypointensity, mosaic architecture, and fat in mass (P = .002-.073). Multivariate analysis revealed that nonperipheral washout and mosaic architecture favored the diagnosis of HCC over that of HLM with odds ratios of 7.66 and 14.6, respectively (P = .038 and .029, respectively). The interobserver agreement for each item was moderate or substantial (kappa or ICC = .447-.792). Conclusion: Peripheral washout and mosaic architecture may be reliable imaging hallmarks for distinguishing HCC from HLM.

Radiological Imaging of Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. The Review of Current Literature Emphasizing the Diagnostic Value of Chosen Imaging Methods

Despite development of radiologic imaging, detection and follow-up of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) still pose a diagnostic challenge, due to the heterogeneity of NEN, their relatively long-term growth, and small size of primary tumor. A set of information obtained by using different radiological imaging tools simplifies a choice of the most appropriate treatment method. Moreover, radiological imaging plays an important role in the assessment of metastatic lesions, especially in the liver, as well as, tumor response to treatment. This article reviews the current, broadly in use imaging modalities which are applied to the diagnosis of GEP-NETs, (the most common type of NENs) and put emphasis on the strengths and limitations of each modality.