|
1
|
Kang Z, Xiao E, Li Z, Wang L. Deep Learning Based on ResNet-18 for Classification of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Category 3 Lesions. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:2412-2423. [PMID: 38302387 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.12.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 12/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To explore the classification and prediction efficacy of the deep learning model for benign prostate lesions, non-clinically significant prostate cancer (non-csPCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2015 to December 2021, lesions diagnosed with PI-RADS 3 by multi-parametric MRI or bi-parametric MRI were retrospectively included. They were classified as benign prostate lesions, non-csPCa, and csPCa according to the pathological results. T2-weighted images of the lesions were divided into a training set and a test set according to 8:2. ResNet-18 was used for model training. All statistical analyses were performed using Python open-source libraries. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the predictive effectiveness of the model. T-SNE was used for image semantic feature visualization. The class activation mapping was used to visualize the area focused by the model. RESULTS A total of 428 benign prostate lesion images, 158 non-csPCa images and 273 csPCa images were included. The precision in predicting benign prostate disease, non-csPCa and csPCa were 0.882, 0.681 and 0.851, and the area under the ROC were 0.875, 0.89 and 0.929, respectively. Semantic feature analysis showed strong classification separability between csPCa and benign prostate lesions. The class activation map showed that the deep learning model can focus on the area of the prostate or the location of PI-RADS 3 lesions. CONCLUSION Deep learning model with T2-weighted images based on ResNet-18 can realize accurate classification of PI-RADS 3 lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Kang
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Enhua Xiao
- Department of Radiology, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
| | - Zhen Li
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Liang Wang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Ramacciotti LS, Hershenhouse JS, Mokhtar D, Paralkar D, Kaneko M, Eppler M, Gill K, Mogoulianitis V, Duddalwar V, Abreu AL, Gill I, Cacciamani GE. Comprehensive Assessment of MRI-based Artificial Intelligence Frameworks Performance in the Detection, Segmentation, and Classification of Prostate Lesions Using Open-Source Databases. Urol Clin North Am 2024; 51:131-161. [PMID: 37945098 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2023.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Numerous MRI-based artificial intelligence (AI) frameworks have been designed for prostate cancer lesion detection, segmentation, and classification via MRI as a result of intrareader and interreader variability that is inherent to traditional interpretation. Open-source data sets have been released with the intention of providing freely available MRIs for the testing of diverse AI frameworks in automated or semiautomated tasks. Here, an in-depth assessment of the performance of MRI-based AI frameworks for detecting, segmenting, and classifying prostate lesions using open-source databases was performed. Among 17 data sets, 12 were specific to prostate cancer detection/classification, with 52 studies meeting the inclusion criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Storino Ramacciotti
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Artificial Intelligence Center at USC Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Center for Image-Guided and Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer, Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jacob S Hershenhouse
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Artificial Intelligence Center at USC Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Center for Image-Guided and Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer, Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Mokhtar
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Artificial Intelligence Center at USC Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Center for Image-Guided and Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer, Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Divyangi Paralkar
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Artificial Intelligence Center at USC Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Center for Image-Guided and Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer, Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Masatomo Kaneko
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Artificial Intelligence Center at USC Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Center for Image-Guided and Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer, Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Michael Eppler
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Artificial Intelligence Center at USC Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Center for Image-Guided and Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer, Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Karanvir Gill
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Artificial Intelligence Center at USC Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Center for Image-Guided and Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer, Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Vasileios Mogoulianitis
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Vinay Duddalwar
- Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andre L Abreu
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Artificial Intelligence Center at USC Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Center for Image-Guided and Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer, Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Inderbir Gill
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Artificial Intelligence Center at USC Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Center for Image-Guided and Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer, Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Giovanni E Cacciamani
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Artificial Intelligence Center at USC Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Center for Image-Guided and Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer, Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|