The Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound on BI-RADS Category 4 Breast Lesions

Improving ultrasound diagnostic Precision for breast cancer and adenosis with modality-specific enhancement (MSE) - Breast Net

Adenosis is a benign breast condition whose lesions can mimic breast carcinoma and is evaluated for malignancy with the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). We construct and validate the performance of modality-specific enhancement (MSE)-Breast Net based on multimodal ultrasound images and compare it to the BI-RADS in differentiating adenosis from breast cancer. A total of 179 patients with breast carcinoma and 229 patients with adenosis were included in this retrospective, two-institution study, then divided into a training cohort (institution I, n = 292) and a validation cohort (institution II, n = 116). In the training cohort, the final model had a significantly greater AUC (0.82; P < 0.05) than B-mode-based model (0.69, 95% CI [0.49-0.90]). In the validation cohort, the AUC of the final model was 0.81, greater than that of the BI-RADS (0.75, P < 0.05). The multimodal model outperformed the individual and bimodal models, reaching a significantly greater AUC of 0.87 (95% CI = 0.69-1.0) (P < 0.05). MSE-Breast Net, based on multimodal ultrasound images, exhibited better diagnostic performance than the BI-RADS in differentiating adenosis from breast cancer and may contribute to clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Combining Potential Strain Elastography and Radiomics for Diagnosing Breast Lesions in BI-RADS 4: Construction and Validation a Predictive Nomogram

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To develop a nomogram by integrating B-mode ultrasound (US), strain ratio (SR), and radiomics signature (RS) effectively differentiating between benign and malignant lesions in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively recruited 709 consecutive patients who were assigned a BI-RADS 4 and underwent curative resection or biopsy between 2017 and 2022. US images were collected before surgery. A RS was developed through a multistep feature selection and construction process. Histology findings served as the gold standard. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were employed to analyze the clinical and US characteristics and identify variables for developing a nomogram. The calibration and discrimination of the nomogram were conducted to evaluate its performance.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 709 patients, with 497 in the training set and 212 in the validation set. In the training set, the B-mode US had an AUC of 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80, 0.87). The SR demonstrated an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.74, 0.82), while the RS showed an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81, 0.88). Notably, the nomogram exhibited superior performance compared to the conventional US, SR, and RS (AUC=0.93, both p < 0.05, as per the Delong test). The clinical usefulness of the nomogram was favorable.

CONCLUSION

The calibrated nomogram can be specifically designed to predict the malignancy of breast lesions in the BI-RADS 4 category.