Deep Learning Accelerated Image Reconstruction of Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Sequence in Brain Imaging: Reduction of Acquisition Time and Improvement of Image Quality

Prospective Deployment of Deep Learning Reconstruction Facilitates Highly Accelerated Upper Abdominal MRI

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare a conventional T1 volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) with SPectral Attenuated Inversion Recovery (SPAIR) fat saturation and a deep learning (DL)-reconstructed accelerated VIBE sequence with SPAIR fat saturation achieving a 50 % reduction in breath-hold duration (hereafter, VIBE-SPAIRDL) in terms of image quality and diagnostic confidence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study enrolled consecutive patients referred for upper abdominal MRI from November 2023 to December 2023 at a single tertiary center. Patients underwent upper abdominal MRI with acquisition of non-contrast and gadobutrol-enhanced conventional VIBE-SPAIR (fourfold acceleration, acquisition time 16 s) and VIBE-SPAIRDL (sixfold acceleration, acquisition time 8 s) on a 1.5 T scanner. Image analysis was performed by four readers, evaluating homogeneity of fat suppression, perceived signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), edge sharpness, artifact level, lesion detectability and diagnostic confidence. A statistical power analysis for patient sample size estimation was performed. Image quality parameters were compared by a repeated measures analysis of variance, and interreader agreement was assessed using Fleiss' κ.

RESULTS

Among 450 consecutive patients, 45 patients were evaluated (mean age, 60 years ± 15 [SD]; 27 men, 18 women). VIBE-SPAIRDL acquisition demonstrated superior SNR (P < 0.001), edge sharpness (P < 0.001), and reduced artifacts (P < 0.001) with substantial to almost perfect interreader agreement for non-contrast (κ: 0.70-0.91) and gadobutrol-enhanced MRI (κ: 0.68-0.87). No evidence of a difference was found between conventional VIBE-SPAIR and VIBE-SPAIRDL regarding homogeneity of fat suppression, lesion detectability, or diagnostic confidence (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Deep learning reconstruction of VIBE-SPAIR facilitated a reduction of breath-hold duration by half, while reducing artifacts and improving image quality.

SUMMARY

Deep learning reconstruction of prospectively accelerated T1 volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination for upper abdominal MRI enabled a 50 % reduction in breath-hold time with superior image quality.

KEY RESULTS

1) In a prospective analysis of 45 patients referred for upper abdominal MRI, accelerated deep learning (DL)-reconstructed VIBE images with spectral fat saturation (SPAIR) showed better overall image quality, with better perceived signal-to-noise ratio and less artifacts (all P < 0.001), despite a 50 % reduction in acquisition time compared to conventional VIBE. 2) No evidence of a difference was found between conventional VIBE-SPAIR and accelerated VIBE-SPAIRDL regarding lesion detectability or diagnostic confidence.

Multidisciplinary quantitative and qualitative assessment of IDH-mutant gliomas with full diagnostic deep learning image reconstruction

Rationale and Objectives: Diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic decision-making for IDH-mutant gliomas in tumor board reviews are based on MRI and multidisciplinary interactions.

Materials and Methods

This study explores the feasibility of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) in MRI for IDH-mutant gliomas. The research utilizes a multidisciplinary approach, engaging neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, neuro-oncologists, and radiotherapists to evaluate qualitative aspects of DLR and conventional reconstructed (CR) sequences. Furthermore, quantitative image quality and tumor volumes according to Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0 standards were assessed.

Results

All DLR sequences consistently outperformed CR sequences (median of 4 for all) in qualitative image quality across all raters (p < 0.001 for all) and revealed higher SNR and CNR values (p < 0.001 for all). Preference for all DLR over CR was overwhelming, with ratings of 84 % from the neuroradiologist, 100 % from the neurosurgeon, 92 % from the neuro-oncologist, and 84 % from the radiation oncologist. The RANO 2.0 compliant measurements showed no significant difference between the CR and DRL sequences (p = 0.142).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the clinical feasibility of DLR in MR imaging of IDH-mutant gliomas, with significant time savings of 29.6 % on average and non-inferior image quality to CR. DLR sequences received strong multidisciplinary preference, underscoring their potential for enhancing neuro-oncological decision-making and suitability for clinical implementation.

Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction of 3D T1 SPACE Vessel Wall Imaging Provides Improved Image Quality with Reduced Scan Times: A Preliminary Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intracranial vessel wall imaging is technically challenging to implement, given the simultaneous requirements of high spatial resolution, excellent blood and CSF signal suppression, and clinically acceptable gradient times. Herein, we present our preliminary findings on the evaluation of a deep learning-optimized sequence using T1-weighted imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical and optimized deep learning-based image reconstruction T1 3D Sampling Perfection with Application optimized Contrast using different flip angle Evolution (SPACE) were evaluated, comparing noncontrast sequences in 10 healthy controls and postcontrast sequences in 5 consecutive patients. Images were reviewed on a Likert-like scale by 4 fellowship-trained neuroradiologists. Scores (range, 1-4) were separately assigned for 11 vessel segments in terms of vessel wall and lumen delineation. Additionally, images were evaluated in terms of overall background noise, image sharpness, and homogeneous CSF signal. Segment-wise scores were compared using paired samples t tests.

RESULTS

The scan time for the clinical and deep learning-based image reconstruction sequences were 7:26 minutes and 5:23 minutes respectively. Deep learning-based image reconstruction images showed consistently higher wall signal and lumen visualization scores, with the differences being statistically significant in most vessel segments on both pre- and postcontrast images. Deep learning-based image reconstruction had lower background noise, higher image sharpness, and uniform CSF signal. Depiction of intracranial pathologies was better or similar on the deep learning-based image reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary findings suggest that deep learning-based image reconstruction-optimized intracranial vessel wall imaging sequences may be helpful in achieving shorter gradient times with improved vessel wall visualization and overall image quality. These improvements may help with wider adoption of intracranial vessel wall imaging in clinical practice and should be further validated on a larger cohort.

Accelerating FLAIR imaging via deep learning reconstruction: potential for evaluating white matter hyperintensities

PURPOSE

To evaluate deep learning-reconstructed (DLR)-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images generated from undersampled data, compare them with fully sampled and rapidly acquired FLAIR images, and assess their potential for white matter hyperintensity evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined 30 patients with white matter hyperintensities, obtaining fully sampled FLAIR images (standard FLAIR, std-FLAIR). We created accelerated FLAIR (acc-FLAIR) images using one-third of the fully sampled data and applied deep learning to generate DLR-FLAIR images. Three neuroradiologists assessed the quality (amount of noise and gray/white matter contrast) in all three image types. The reproducibility of hyperintensities was evaluated by comparing a subset of 100 hyperintensities in acc-FLAIR and DLR-FLAIR images with those in the std-FLAIR images. Quantitatively, similarities and errors of the entire image and the focused regions on white matter hyperintensities in acc-FLAIR and DLR-FLAIR images were measured against std-FLAIR images using structural similarity index measure (SSIM), regional SSIM, normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), and regional NRMSE values.

RESULTS

All three neuroradiologists evaluated DLR-FLAIR as having significantly less noise and higher image quality scores compared with std-FLAIR and acc-FLAIR (p < 0.001). All three neuroradiologists assigned significantly higher frontal lobe gray/white matter visibility scores for DLR-FLAIR than for acc-FLAIR (p < 0.001); two neuroradiologists attributed significantly higher scores for DLR-FLAIR than for std-FLAIR (p < 0.05). Regarding white matter hyperintensities, all three neuroradiologists significantly preferred DLR-FLAIR (p < 0.0001). DLR-FLAIR exhibited higher similarity to std-FLAIR in terms of visibility of the hyperintensities, with 97% of the hyperintensities rated as nearly identical or equivalent. Quantitatively, DLR-FLAIR demonstrated significantly higher SSIM and regional SSIM values than acc-FLAIR, with significantly lower NRMSE and regional NRMSE values (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

DLR-FLAIR can reduce scan time and generate images of similar quality to std-FLAIR in patients with white matter hyperintensities. Therefore, DLR-FLAIR may serve as an effective method in traditional magnetic resonance imaging protocols.

Deep learning for efficient reconstruction of highly accelerated 3D FLAIR MRI in neurological deficits

OBJECTIVE

To compare compressed sensing (CS) and the Cascades of Independently Recurrent Inference Machines (CIRIM) with respect to image quality and reconstruction times when 12-fold accelerated scans of patients with neurological deficits are reconstructed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve-fold accelerated 3D T2-FLAIR images were obtained from a cohort of 62 patients with neurological deficits on 3 T MRI. Images were reconstructed offline via CS and the CIRIM. Image quality was assessed in a blinded and randomized manner by two experienced interventional neuroradiologists and one experienced pediatric neuroradiologist on imaging artifacts, perceived spatial resolution (sharpness), anatomic conspicuity, diagnostic confidence, and contrast. The methods were also compared in terms of self-referenced quality metrics, image resolution, patient groups and reconstruction time. In ten scans, the contrast ratio (CR) was determined between lesions and white matter. The effect of acceleration factor was assessed in a publicly available fully sampled dataset, since ground truth data are not available in prospectively accelerated clinical scans. Specifically, 451 FLAIR scans, including scans with white matter lesions, were adopted from the FastMRI database to evaluate structural similarity (SSIM) and the CR of lesions and white matter on ranging acceleration factors from four-fold up to 12-fold.

RESULTS

Interventional neuroradiologists significantly preferred the CIRIM for imaging artifacts, anatomic conspicuity, and contrast. One rater significantly preferred the CIRIM in terms of sharpness and diagnostic confidence. The pediatric neuroradiologist preferred CS for imaging artifacts and sharpness. Compared to CS, the CIRIM reconstructions significantly improved in terms of imaging artifacts and anatomic conspicuity (p < 0.01) for higher resolution scans while yielding a 28% higher SNR (p = 0.001) and a 5.8% lower CR (p = 0.04). There were no differences between patient groups. Additionally, CIRIM was five times faster than CS was. An increasing acceleration factor did not lead to changes in CR (p = 0.92), but led to lower SSIM (p = 0.002).

DISCUSSION

Patients with neurological deficits can undergo MRI at a range of moderate to high acceleration. DL reconstruction outperforms CS in terms of image resolution, efficient denoising with a modest reduction in contrast and reduced reconstruction times.

Ultrafast Brain MRI at 3 T for MS: Evaluation of a 51-Second Deep Learning-Enhanced T2-EPI-FLAIR Sequence

In neuroimaging, there is no equivalent alternative to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, image acquisitions are generally time-consuming, which may limit utilization in some cases, e.g., in patients who cannot remain motionless for long or suffer from claustrophobia, or in the event of extensive waiting times. For multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, MRI plays a major role in drug therapy decision-making. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether an ultrafast, T2-weighted (T2w), deep learning-enhanced (DL), echo-planar-imaging-based (EPI) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence (FLAIRUF) that has targeted neurological emergencies so far might even be an option to detect MS lesions of the brain compared to conventional FLAIR sequences. Therefore, 17 MS patients were enrolled prospectively in this exploratory study. Standard MRI protocols and ultrafast acquisitions were conducted at 3 tesla (T), including three-dimensional (3D)-FLAIR, turbo/fast spin-echo (TSE)-FLAIR, and FLAIRUF. Inflammatory lesions were grouped by size and location. Lesion conspicuity and image quality were rated on an ordinal five-point Likert scale, and lesion detection rates were calculated. Statistical analyses were performed to compare results. Altogether, 568 different lesions were found. Data indicated no significant differences in lesion detection (sensitivity and positive predictive value [PPV]) between FLAIRUF and axially reconstructed 3D-FLAIR (lesion size ≥3 mm × ≥2 mm) and no differences in sensitivity between FLAIRUF and TSE-FLAIR (lesion size ≥3 mm total). Lesion conspicuity in FLAIRUF was similar in all brain regions except for superior conspicuity in the occipital lobe and inferior conspicuity in the central brain regions. Further findings include location-dependent limitations of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) as well as artifacts such as spatial distortions in FLAIRUF. In conclusion, FLAIRUF could potentially be an expedient alternative to conventional methods for brain imaging in MS patients since the acquisition can be performed in a fraction of time while maintaining good image quality.

DeepFLAIR: A neural network approach to mitigate signal and contrast loss in temporal lobes at 7 Tesla FLAIR images

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Higher magnetic field strength introduces stronger magnetic field inhomogeneities in the brain, especially within temporal lobes, leading to image artifacts. Particularly, T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images can be affected by these artifacts. Here, we aimed to improve the FLAIR image quality in temporal lobe regions through image processing of multiple contrast images via machine learning using a neural network.

METHODS

Thirteen drug-resistant MR-negative epilepsy patients (age 29.2 ± 9.4y, 5 females) were scanned on a 7 T MRI scanner. Magnetization-prepared (MP2RAGE) and saturation-prepared with 2 rapid gradient echoes, multi-echo gradient echo with four echo times, and the FLAIR sequence were acquired. A voxel-wise neural network was trained on extratemporal-lobe voxels from the acquired structural scans to generate a new FLAIR-like image (i.e., deepFLAIR) with reduced temporal lobe inhomogeneities. The deepFLAIR was evaluated in temporal lobes through signal-to-noise (SNR), contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratio, the sharpness of the gray-white matter boundary and joint-histogram analysis. Saliency mapping demonstrated the importance of each input image per voxel.

RESULTS

SNR and CNR in both gray and white matter were significantly increased (p < 0.05) in the deepFLAIR's temporal ROIs, compared to the FLAIR. The gray-white matter boundary sharpness was either preserved or improved in 10/13 right-sided temporal regions and was found significantly increased in the ROIs. Multiple image contrasts were influential for the deepFLAIR reconstruction with the MP2RAGE second inversion image being the most important.

CONCLUSIONS

The deepFLAIR network showed promise to restore the FLAIR signal and reduce contrast attenuation in temporal lobe areas. This may yield a valuable tool, especially when artifact-free FLAIR images are not available.

Speeding Up and Improving Image Quality in Glioblastoma MRI Protocol by Deep Learning Image Reconstruction

A fully diagnostic MRI glioma protocol is key to monitoring therapy assessment but is time-consuming and especially challenging in critically ill and uncooperative patients. Artificial intelligence demonstrated promise in reducing scan time and improving image quality simultaneously. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance, the impact on acquisition acceleration, and the image quality of a deep learning optimized glioma protocol of the brain. Thirty-three patients with histologically confirmed glioblastoma underwent standardized brain tumor imaging according to the glioma consensus recommendations on a 3-Tesla MRI scanner. Conventional and deep learning-reconstructed (DLR) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and T2- and T1-weighted contrast-enhanced Turbo spin echo images with an improved in-plane resolution, i.e., super-resolution, were acquired. Two experienced neuroradiologists independently evaluated the image datasets for subjective image quality, diagnostic confidence, tumor conspicuity, noise levels, artifacts, and sharpness. In addition, the tumor volume was measured in the image datasets according to Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0, as well as compared between both imaging techniques, and various clinical-pathological parameters were determined. The average time saving of DLR sequences was 30% per MRI sequence. Simultaneously, DLR sequences showed superior overall image quality (all p < 0.001), improved tumor conspicuity and image sharpness (all p < 0.001, respectively), and less image noise (all p < 0.001), while maintaining diagnostic confidence (all p > 0.05), compared to conventional images. Regarding RANO 2.0, the volume of non-enhancing non-target lesions (p = 0.963), enhancing target lesions (p = 0.993), and enhancing non-target lesions (p = 0.951) did not differ between reconstruction types. The feasibility of the deep learning-optimized glioma protocol was demonstrated with a 30% reduction in acquisition time on average and an increased in-plane resolution. The evaluated DLR sequences improved subjective image quality and maintained diagnostic accuracy in tumor detection and tumor classification according to RANO 2.0.

Deep learning-accelerated image reconstruction in back pain-MRI imaging: reduction of acquisition time and improvement of image quality

INTRODUCTION

Low back pain is a global health issue causing disability and missed work days. Commonly used MRI scans including T1-weighted and T2-weighted images provide detailed information of the spine and surrounding tissues. Artificial intelligence showed promise in improving image quality and simultaneously reducing scan time. This study evaluates the performance of deep learning (DL)-based T2 turbo spin-echo (TSE, T2DLR) and T1 TSE (T1DLR) in lumbar spine imaging regarding acquisition time, image quality, artifact resistance, and diagnostic confidence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective monocentric study included 60 patients with lower back pain who underwent lumbar spinal MRI between February and April 2023. MRI parameters and DL reconstruction (DLR) techniques were utilized to acquire images. Two neuroradiologists independently evaluated image datasets based on various parameters using a 4-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Accelerated imaging showed significantly less image noise and artifacts, as well as better image sharpness, compared to standard imaging. Overall image quality and diagnostic confidence were higher in accelerated imaging. Relevant disk herniations and spinal fractures were detected in both DLR and conventional images. Both readers favored accelerated imaging in the majority of examinations. The lumbar spine examination time was cut by 61% in accelerated imaging compared to standard imaging.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the utilization of deep learning-based image reconstruction techniques in lumbar spinal imaging resulted in significant time savings of up to 61% compared to standard imaging, while also improving image quality and diagnostic confidence. These findings highlight the potential of these techniques to enhance efficiency and accuracy in clinical practice for patients with lower back pain.

Deep learning-accelerated image reconstruction in MRI of the orbit to shorten acquisition time and enhance image quality

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study explores the use of deep learning (DL) techniques in MRI of the orbit to enhance imaging. Standard protocols, although detailed, have lengthy acquisition times. We investigate DL-based methods for T2-weighted and T1-weighted, fat-saturated, contrast-enhanced turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences, aiming to improve image quality, reduce acquisition time, minimize artifacts, and enhance diagnostic confidence in orbital imaging.

METHODS

In a 3-Tesla MRI study of 50 patients evaluating orbital diseases from March to July 2023, conventional (TSES ) and DL TSE sequences (TSEDL ) were used. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed the image datasets for image quality, diagnostic confidence, noise levels, artifacts, and image sharpness using a randomized and blinded 4-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

TSEDL significantly reduced image noise and artifacts, enhanced image sharpness, and decreased scan time, outperforming TSES (p < .05). TSEDL showed superior overall image quality and diagnostic confidence, with relevant findings effectively detected in both DL-based and conventional images. In 94% of cases, readers preferred accelerated imaging.

CONCLUSION

The study proved that using DL for MRI image reconstruction in orbital scans significantly cut acquisition time by 69%. This approach also enhanced image quality, reduced image noise, sharpened images, and boosted diagnostic confidence.

Shortening Acquisition Time and Improving Image Quality for Pelvic MRI Using Deep Learning Reconstruction for Diffusion-Weighted Imaging at 1.5 T

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact on acquisition time reduction and image quality of a deep learning (DL) reconstruction for accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the pelvis at 1.5 T compared to standard DWI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 55 patients (mean age, 61 ± 13 years; range, 27-89; 20 men, 35 women) were consecutively included in this retrospective, monocentric study between February and November 2022. Inclusion criteria were (1) standard DWI (DWIS) in clinically indicated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 T and (2) DL-reconstructed DWI (DWIDL). All patients were examined using the institution's standard MRI protocol according to their diagnosis including DWI with two different b-values (0 and 800 s/mm2) and calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Image quality was qualitatively assessed by four radiologists using a visual 5-point Likert scale (5 = best) for the following criteria: overall image quality, noise level, extent of artifacts, sharpness, and diagnostic confidence. The qualitative scores for DWIS and DWIDL were compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

The overall image quality was evaluated to be significantly superior in DWIDL compared to DWIS for b = 0 s/mm2, b = 800 s/mm2, and ADC maps by all readers (P < .05). The extent of noise was evaluated to be significantly less in DWIDL compared to DWIS for b = 0 s/mm2, b = 800 s/mm2, and ADC maps by all readers (P < .001). No significant differences were found regarding artifacts, lesion detectability, sharpness of organs, and diagnostic confidence (P > .05). Acquisition time for DWIS was 2:06 minutes, and simulated acquisition time for DWIDL was 1:12 minutes.

CONCLUSION

DL image reconstruction improves image quality, and simulation results suggest that a reduction in acquisition time for diffusion-weighted MRI of the pelvis at 1.5 T is possible.

Standardized brain tumor imaging protocols for clinical trials: current recommendations and tips for integration

Standardized MRI acquisition protocols are crucial for reducing the measurement and interpretation variability associated with response assessment in brain tumor clinical trials. The main challenge is that standardized protocols should ensure high image quality while maximizing the number of institutions meeting the acquisition requirements. In recent years, extensive effort has been made by consensus groups to propose different "ideal" and "minimum requirements" brain tumor imaging protocols (BTIPs) for gliomas, brain metastases (BM), and primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCSNL). In clinical practice, BTIPs for clinical trials can be easily integrated with additional MRI sequences that may be desired for clinical patient management at individual sites. In this review, we summarize the general concepts behind the choice and timing of sequences included in the current recommended BTIPs, we provide a comparative overview, and discuss tips and caveats to integrate additional clinical or research sequences while preserving the recommended BTIPs. Finally, we also reflect on potential future directions for brain tumor imaging in clinical trials.