1
|
Schmitz L, Wahn B, Krüger M. Attention allocation in complementary joint action: How joint goals affect spatial orienting. Atten Percept Psychophys 2023:10.3758/s13414-023-02779-1. [PMID: 37684501 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02779-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
When acting jointly, individuals often attend and respond to the same object or spatial location in complementary ways (e.g., when passing a mug, one person grasps its handle with a precision grip; the other receives it with a whole-hand grip). At the same time, the spatial relation between individuals' actions affects attentional orienting: one is slower to attend and respond to locations another person previously acted upon than to alternate locations ("social inhibition of return", social IOR). Achieving joint goals (e.g., passing a mug), however, often requires complementary return responses to a co-actor's previous location. This raises the question of whether attentional orienting, and hence the social IOR, is affected by the (joint) goal our actions are directed at. The present study addresses this question. Participants responded to cued locations on a computer screen, taking turns with a virtual co-actor. They pursued either an individual goal or performed complementary actions with the co-actor, in pursuit of a joint goal. Four experiments showed that the social IOR was significantly modulated when participant and co-actor pursued a joint goal. This suggests that attentional orienting is affected not only by the spatial but also by the social relation between two agents' actions. Our findings thus extend research on interpersonal perception-action effects, showing that the way another agent's perceived action shapes our own depends on whether we share a joint goal with that agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Schmitz
- Institute of Sports Science, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Basil Wahn
- Institute of Educational Research, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Melanie Krüger
- Institute of Sports Science, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kritikos A, Chandler-Mather N, Sparks S, Welsh T. Biological motion elicits between-person Inhibition of Return in temporal and spatial movement parameters. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2022; 230:103747. [PMID: 36148738 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study was designed to gain a deeper understanding of the processing of biological motion stimuli. To this end, we investigated if the inhibition of return (IoR) effect emerges in initiation times and trajectories of pointing movements to targets in left and right space where the preceding cues were pointing movement of a human model or a dot with the same biological motion. Targets were randomly presented in the same or opposite side from the direction of the motion cue. It was hypothesised that the visuomotor system should resonate with the biological motion of a dot, but that the human model should exaggerate the effect. Thus, the human model should trigger stronger attention shifts compared with the dot model and lead to more robust IoR effects in both spatial (movement) and temporal parameters of the observer's pointing responses. Initiation times and the spatial parameters (angle of the hand trajectory) of the pointing movements were analysed. Results indicate that facilitation and IoR effects triggered by human and dot stimuli did not differ. Based on these findings, it seems that the crucial feature of motion cues that generate shifts in attention is biological motion, rather than human appearance per se.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ada Kritikos
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
| | - Ned Chandler-Mather
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
| | - Samuel Sparks
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
| | - Timothy Welsh
- The Centre for Motor Control, Faculty of Kinesiology & Physical Education, University of Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tufft MR, Gobel MS. Gender and perceived cooperation modulate visual attention in a joint spatial cueing task. VISUAL COGNITION 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2021.1976892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Miles R.A. Tufft
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dalmaso M, Castelli L, Scatturin P, Galfano G. Can attitude similarity shape social inhibition of return? VISUAL COGNITION 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2021.1922566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Dalmaso
- Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Luigi Castelli
- Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Pietro Scatturin
- Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Giovanni Galfano
- Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Focusing on the face or getting distracted by social signals? The effect of distracting gestures on attentional focus in natural interaction. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH 2020; 85:491-502. [DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01383-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
6
|
Nafcha O, Morshed-Sakran A, Shamay-Tsoory S, Gabay S. The effect of co-actor group membership on the social inhibition of return effect. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2020; 208:103119. [PMID: 32580036 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Revised: 05/31/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Being part of a group is a crucial factor in human social interaction. In the current study we explored whether group membership affects reflexive automatic cognitive functioning, and specifically the social inhibition of return effect (SIOR; Welsh et al., 2005). SIOR is characterized by slower reaction times (RTs) to a location already searched by another agent. To examine whether group membership modulates SIOR, we recruited Muslim and Jewish students from the University of Haifa to perform a task with either an in-group member or an out-group member. Both IOR and SIOR were suggested to act as a foraging facilitator (Klein, 2000; Welsh et al., 2005). Accordingly, we predicted that the SIOR effect would be larger when performing the task with an in-group member than with an out-group member. The results confirmed our prediction by indicating that the co-actor's group membership modulated the SIOR effect. These findings are consistent with the notion that social factors play a critical role in producing the SIOR effect and provide a novel indication of the influence of social factors such as group membership on basic reflexive cognitive processes.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
A large number of studies have now described the various ways in which the observation of another person's dynamic movement can influence the speed with which the observer is able to prepare a motor action themselves. The typical results are most often explained with reference to theories that link perception and action. Such theories argue that the cognitive structures associated with each share common representations. Consequently, action preparation and action observation are often said to be functionally equivalent. However, the dominance of these theories in explaining action observation effects has masked the potential contribution from processes associated with the detection of low-level "transients" resulting from observing a body movement, such as motion and sound. In the present review, we describe work undertaken in one particular action observation phenomenon ("social inhibition of return") and show that the transient account provides the best explanation of the effect. We argue that future work should consider attention capture and orienting as a potential contributing factor to action observation effects more broadly.
Collapse
|
8
|
Nafcha O, Shamay-Tsoory S, Gabay S. The sociality of social inhibition of return. Cognition 2020; 195:104108. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
9
|
Visual attention and action: How cueing, direct mapping, and social interactions drive orienting. Psychon Bull Rev 2018; 25:1585-1605. [PMID: 28808932 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1354-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Despite considerable interest in both action perception and social attention over the last 2 decades, there has been surprisingly little investigation concerning how the manual actions of other humans orient visual attention. The present review draws together studies that have measured the orienting of attention, following observation of another's goal-directed action. Our review proposes that, in line with the literature on eye gaze, action is a particularly strong orienting cue for the visual system. However, we additionally suggest that action may orient visual attention using mechanisms, which gaze direction does not (i.e., neural direct mapping and corepresentation). Finally, we review the implications of these gaze-independent mechanisms for the study of attention to action. We suggest that our understanding of attention to action may benefit from being studied in the context of joint action paradigms, where the role of higher level action goals and social factors can be investigated.
Collapse
|
10
|
Constable MD, Pratt J, Welsh TN. "Two Minds Don't Blink Alike": The Attentional Blink Does Not Occur in a Joint Context. Front Psychol 2018; 9:1714. [PMID: 30258390 PMCID: PMC6143683 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Typically, when two individuals perform a task together, each partner monitors the other partners' responses and goals to ensure that the task is completed efficiently. This monitoring is thought to involve a co-representation of the joint goals and task, as well as a simulation of the partners' performance. Evidence for such "co-representation" of goals and task, and "simulation" of responses has come from numerous visual attention studies in which two participants complete different components of the same task. In the present research, an adaptation of the attentional blink task was used to determine if co-representation could exert an influence over the associated attentional mechanisms. Participants completed a rapid serial visual presentation task in which they first identified a target letter (T1) and then detected the presence of the letter X (T2) presented one to seven letters after T1. In the individual condition, the participant identified T1 and then detected T2. In the joint condition, one participant identified T1 and the other participant detected T2. Across two experiments, an attentional blink (decreased accuracy in detecting T2 when presented three letters after T1) was observed in the individual condition, but not in joint conditions. A joint attentional blink may not emerge because the co-representation mechanisms that enable joint action exert a stronger influence at information processing stages that do not overlap with those that lead to the attentional blink.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merryn D Constable
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jay Pratt
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Centre for Motor Control, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Timothy N Welsh
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Centre for Motor Control, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Langton SRH. I Don't See It Your Way: The Dot Perspective Task Does Not Gauge Spontaneous Perspective Taking. Vision (Basel) 2018; 2:E6. [PMID: 31735870 PMCID: PMC6835483 DOI: 10.3390/vision2010006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2017] [Revised: 01/29/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Data from studies employing the dot-perspective task have been used to support the theory that humans are capable of automatically computing the visual perspective of other individuals. Recent work has challenged this interpretation, claiming instead that the results may arise through the automatic reorienting of attention triggered by observed head and gaze cues. The two experiments reported here offer a stronger test of the perspective taking account by replacing the computer-generated avatars used in previous research with, respectively, photo-realistic stimuli and socially co-present individuals in a "live", face-to-face version of the task. In each study observers were faster to judge the number of dots in a display when either a digitized image depicting a human "gazer" (Experiment 1), or a socially co-present gazer (Experiment 2) could see the same number of dots as the observer, than when the number of dots visible to each was different. However, in both experiments this effect was also obtained in conditions where barriers clearly occluded the gazers' view of the target dots so that the perspectives of participants and gazers were always different. These results offer no support for the idea that participants are engaged in spontaneous perspective taking in the dot perspective task. It is argued that, instead, the results are likely caused by a spontaneous redirection of a viewer's attention by the observed gazes, which is unlikely to involve representations of the gazer's mental state.
Collapse
|
13
|
Gobel MS, Tufft MRA, Richardson DC. Social Beliefs and Visual Attention: How the Social Relevance of a Cue Influences Spatial Orienting. Cogn Sci 2017; 42 Suppl 1:161-185. [PMID: 29094383 PMCID: PMC5969099 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2016] [Revised: 05/28/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
We are highly tuned to each other's visual attention. Perceiving the eye or hand movements of another person can influence the timing of a saccade or the reach of our own. However, the explanation for such spatial orienting in interpersonal contexts remains disputed. Is it due to the social appearance of the cue—a hand or an eye—or due to its social relevance—a cue that is connected to another person with attentional and intentional states? We developed an interpersonal version of the Posner spatial cueing paradigm. Participants saw a cue and detected a target at the same or a different location, while interacting with an unseen partner. Participants were led to believe that the cue was either connected to the gaze location of their partner or was generated randomly by a computer (Experiment 1), and that their partner had higher or lower social rank while engaged in the same or a different task (Experiment 2). We found that spatial cue‐target compatibility effects were greater when the cue related to a partner's gaze. This effect was amplified by the partner's social rank, but only when participants believed their partner was engaged in the same task. Taken together, this is strong evidence in support of the idea that spatial orienting is interpersonally attuned to the social relevance of the cue—whether the cue is connected to another person, who this person is, and what this person is doing—and does not exclusively rely on the social appearance of the cue. Visual attention is not only guided by the physical salience of one's environment but also by the mental representation of its social relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias S Gobel
- SAGE Center for the Study of the Mind, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California at Santa Barbara
| | - Miles R A Tufft
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Janczyk M, Welsh TN, Dolk T. A role of goals for social inhibition of return? Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2016; 69:2402-2418. [DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1112417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
The social inhibition of return (sIOR) effect refers to the finding that response initiation times are longer if a movement is executed to a location where another person has responded to just before. Previous studies have examined the influence of the goal of the action on sIOR. In these studies, however, the movement endpoint and to-be-attained goal (e.g., touching/pressing a response key) were at the same spatial location. In the present two experiments, we disentangled movement endpoint and goal's identity and locations by means of introducing action effects that followed directly from a movement. Similar methods were previously shown powerful enough to clearly show the importance of action goals for other phenomena—a finding consistent with effect-based theories of action control, such as the ideomotor theory. The results of the present study revealed that sIOR was shaped by the movement endpoint location, not the goal's identity or location. That is, in both experiments, an sIOR effect was observed, but the magnitude of the sIOR effect was not modulated by repetitions/switches of goals or their locations. Thus, results indicate that goals play a negligible role in the emergence of the sIOR and, consequently, highlight the importance of action observation for the emergence of the sIOR effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Janczyk
- Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Timothy N. Welsh
- Centre for Motor Control, Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thomas Dolk
- Department of Psychology, Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
- Faculty of Human Science, Research Group: Diversity and Inclusion, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Manzone J, Cole GG, Skarratt PA, Welsh TN. Response-specific effects in a joint action task: social inhibition of return effects do not emerge when observed and executed actions are different. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH 2016; 81:1059-1071. [DOI: 10.1007/s00426-016-0794-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2016] [Accepted: 08/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
16
|
Abstract
Abstract. An important development in cognitive psychology in the past decade has been the examination of visual attention during real social interaction. This contrasts traditional laboratory studies of attention, including “social attention,” in which observers perform tasks alone. In this review, we show that although the lone-observer method has been central to attention research, real person interaction paradigms have not only uncovered the processes that occur during “joint attention,” but have also revealed attentional processes previously thought not to occur. Furthermore, the examination of some visual attention processes almost invariably requires the use of real person paradigms. While we do not argue for an increase in “ecological validity” for its own sake, we do suggest that research using real person interaction has greatly benefited the development of visual attention theories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gustav Kuhn
- Department of Psychology, University of London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dalmaso M, Castelli L, Scatturin P, Carli L, Todisco P, Palomba D, Galfano G. Altered social attention in anorexia nervosa during real social interaction. Sci Rep 2016; 6:23311. [PMID: 26984784 PMCID: PMC4794739 DOI: 10.1038/srep23311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2015] [Accepted: 02/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The capacity to devote attentional resources in response to body-related signals provided by others is still largely unexplored in individuals with Anorexia Nervosa (AN). Here, we tested this capacity through a novel paradigm that mimics a social interaction with a real partner. Healthy individuals (Experiment 1) and individuals with AN (Experiment 2) completed a task with another person which consisted in performing, alternatively, rapid aiming movements to lateralised targets. Generally, this task leads to a form of Inhibition of Return (IOR), which consists of longer reaction times when an individual has to respond to a location previously searched by either himself (individual IOR) or by the partner (social IOR) as compared to previously unexplored locations. IOR is considered as an important attentional mechanism that promotes an effective exploration of the environment during social interaction. Here, healthy individuals displayed both individual and social IOR that were both reliable and of the same magnitude. Individuals with AN displayed a non-significant individual IOR but a reliable social IOR that was also significantly stronger than individual IOR. These results suggest the presence of a reduced sensitivity in processing body-related stimuli conveyed by oneself in individuals with AN which is reflected in action-based attentional processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Dalmaso
- Dipartimento di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e della Socializzazione, Università di Padova, Italy
| | - Luigi Castelli
- Dipartimento di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e della Socializzazione, Università di Padova, Italy.,Centro di Neuroscienze Cognitive, Università di Padova, Italy
| | - Pietro Scatturin
- Dipartimento di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e della Socializzazione, Università di Padova, Italy
| | - Lorenza Carli
- Centro per i Disturbi del Comportamento Alimentare, Casa di Cura Villa Margherita, Arcugnano, Italy
| | - Patrizia Todisco
- Centro per i Disturbi del Comportamento Alimentare, Casa di Cura Villa Margherita, Arcugnano, Italy
| | - Daniela Palomba
- Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università di Padova, Italy.,Centro di Neuroscienze Cognitive, Università di Padova, Italy
| | - Giovanni Galfano
- Dipartimento di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e della Socializzazione, Università di Padova, Italy.,Centro di Neuroscienze Cognitive, Università di Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Action or attention in social inhibition of return? PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH 2015; 81:43-54. [DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0738-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2015] [Accepted: 12/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
19
|
Mussi DR, Marino BFM, Riggio L. The Influence of Social and Nonsocial Variables on the Simon Effect. Exp Psychol 2015; 62:215-31. [DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract. Recently, the Simon effect (SE) has been observed in social contexts when two individuals share a two-choice task. This joint SE (JSE) has been interpreted as evidence that people co-represent their actions. However, it is still not clear if the JSE is driven by social factors or low-level mechanisms. To address this question, we applied a common paradigm to a joint Simon task (Experiments 1 and 4), a standard Simon task (Experiment 2), and a go/no-go task (Experiment 3). The results showed that both the JSE and the SE were modulated by the repetition/non-repetition of task features. Moreover, the JSE was differently modulated by the gender composition of the two individuals involved in the shared task and by their interpersonal relationship. Taken together, our results do not support a pure social explanation of the JSE, nevertheless, they show the independent role of different social factors in modulating the effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide R. Mussi
- Dipartimento di Lettere, Arti, Storia e Società, Università degli Studi di Parma, Italy
| | - Barbara F. M. Marino
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Università degli Studi di Parma, Italy
- Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
| | - Lucia Riggio
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Università degli Studi di Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cole GG, Wright D, Doneva SP, Skarratt PA. When your decisions are not (quite) your own: action observation influences free choices. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0127766. [PMID: 26024480 PMCID: PMC4449193 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2014] [Accepted: 04/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
A growing number of studies have begun to assess how the actions of one individual are represented in an observer. Using a variant of an action observation paradigm, four experiments examined whether one person’s behaviour can influence the subjective decisions and judgements of another. In Experiment 1, two observers sat adjacent to each other and took turns to freely select and reach to one of two locations. Results showed that participants were less likely to make a response to the same location as their partner. In three further experiments observers were asked to decide which of two familiar products they preferred or which of two faces were most attractive. Results showed that participants were less likely to choose the product or face occupying the location of their partner’s previous reaching response. These findings suggest that action observation can influence a range of free choice preferences and decisions. Possible mechanisms through which this influence occurs are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoff G. Cole
- Centre for Brain Science, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Damien Wright
- Centre for Brain Science, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex, United Kingdom
| | - Silviya P. Doneva
- Centre for Brain Science, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex, United Kingdom
| | - Paul A. Skarratt
- Department of Psychology, University of Hull, Hull, Yorkshire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Welsh TN, Manzone J, McDougall L. Knowledge of response location alone is not sufficient to generate social inhibition of return. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2014; 153:153-9. [PMID: 25463556 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2014] [Revised: 10/13/2014] [Accepted: 10/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous research has revealed that the inhibition of return (IOR) effect emerges when individuals respond to a target at the same location as their own previous response or the previous response of a co-actor. The latter social IOR effect is thought to occur because the observation of co-actor's response evokes a representation of that action in the observer and that the observation-evoked response code subsequently activates the inhibitory mechanisms underlying IOR. The present study was conducted to determine if knowledge of the co-actor's response alone is sufficient to evoke social IOR. Pairs of participants completed responses to targets that appeared at different button locations. Button contact generated location-contingent auditory stimuli (high and low tones in Experiment 1 and colour words in Experiment 2). In the Full condition, the observer saw the response and heard the auditory stimuli. In the Auditory Only condition, the observer did not see the co-actor's response, but heard the auditory stimuli generated via button contact to indicate response endpoint. It was found that, although significant individual and social IOR effects emerged in the Full conditions, there were no social IOR effects in the Auditory Only conditions. These findings suggest that knowledge of the co-actor's response alone via auditory information is not sufficient to activate the inhibitory processes leading to IOR. The activation of the mechanisms that lead to social IOR seems to be dependent on processing channels that code the spatial characteristics of action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy N Welsh
- Centre for Motor Control, Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Canada.
| | - Joseph Manzone
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Is social inhibition of return due to action co-representation? Acta Psychol (Amst) 2014; 150:85-93. [PMID: 24859672 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2013] [Revised: 03/28/2014] [Accepted: 04/09/2014] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
When two individuals alternate reaching responses to visual targets presented on a shared workspace, one individual is slower to respond to targets occupying the same position as their partner's previous response. This phenomenon is thought to be due to processes that inhibit the initiation of a movement to a location recently acted upon. However, two distinct forms of the inhibition account have been posited, one based on inhibition of an action, the other based on inhibition of an action and location. Furthermore, an additional recent explanation suggests the phenomenon is due to mechanisms that give rise to action congruency effects. Thus the three different theories differ in the degree to which action co-representation plays a role in the effect. The aim of the present work was to examine these competing accounts. Three experiments demonstrated that when identical actions are made, the effect is modulated by the configuration of the visual stimuli acted upon and the perceptual demands of the task. In addition, when the co-actors perform different actions to the same target, the effect is still observed. These findings support the hypothesis that this particular joint action phenomenon is generated via social cues that induce location-based inhibition of return rather than being due to shared motor co-representations.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
The most common explanation for joint-action effects has been the action co-representation account in which observation of another's action is represented within one's own action system. However, recent evidence has shown that the most prominent of these joint-action effects (i.e., the Social Simon effect), can occur when no co-actor is present. In the current work we examined whether another joint-action phenomenon (a movement congruency effect) can be induced when a participant performs their part of the task with a different effector to that of their co-actor and when a co-actor's action is replaced by an attention-capturing luminance signal. Contrary to what is predicted by the action co-representation account, results show that the basic movement congruency effect occurred in both situations. These findings challenge the action co-representation account of this particular effect and suggest instead that it is driven by bottom-up mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silviya P. Doneva
- Department of Psychology, University of Essex, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Geoff G. Cole
- Department of Psychology, University of Essex, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Reid C, Wong L, Pratt J, Morgan C, Welsh TN. IOR Effects in a Social Free-Choice Task. J Mot Behav 2013; 45:307-11. [DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2013.794767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
26
|
Skarratt PA, Cole GG, Kuhn G. Visual cognition during real social interaction. Front Hum Neurosci 2012; 6:196. [PMID: 22754521 PMCID: PMC3386564 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2012] [Accepted: 06/14/2012] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Laboratory studies of social visual cognition often simulate the critical aspects of joint attention by having participants interact with a computer-generated avatar. Recently, there has been a movement toward examining these processes during authentic social interaction. In this review, we will focus on attention to faces, attentional misdirection, and a phenomenon we have termed social inhibition of return (Social IOR), that have revealed aspects of social cognition that were hitherto unknown. We attribute these discoveries to the use of paradigms that allow for more realistic social interactions to take place. We also point to an area that has begun to attract a considerable amount of interest-that of Theory of Mind (ToM) and automatic perspective taking-and suggest that this too might benefit from adopting a similar approach.
Collapse
|
27
|
Cole GG, Skarratt PA, Billing RC. Do action goals mediate social inhibition of return? PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH 2011; 76:736-46. [PMID: 22143901 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0395-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2010] [Accepted: 11/15/2011] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Geoff G Cole
- Centre for Brain Science, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, CO4 3 SQ, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Seeing other minds: attributed mental states influence perception. Trends Cogn Sci 2010; 14:376-82. [PMID: 20576464 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2010] [Revised: 05/21/2010] [Accepted: 05/24/2010] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|