Pieloplastia laparoscópica en pacientes pediátricos. Nuestros primeros casos y lecciones aprendidas

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: technique and results in 80 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVE

To present our long-term results with the Anderson-Hynes laparoscopic pyeloplasty, performed by a single surgeon.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between August 1999 and December 2009, 79 patients (80 procedures) were operated for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. We use the Anderson-Hynes technique by a transperitoneal approach. Patients were evaluated with Ultrasound, Excretory urography and dynamic renal scintigraphy (Mag-3). The perioperative characteristics, complications and results were reviewed.

RESULTS

We performed 80 laparoscopic pyeloplasties in 79 patients. Mean operative time was 93.2 minutes (60-180). Crossing vessels were found in 38 of 82 (46.3%) renal units. Kidney abnormalities occurred in 4 patients (1 double ureteropelvic system, one associated retrocaval ureter, 1 horseshoe kidney and one pelvic kidney). Complications occurred in 5 procedures (6.5%): an immediately postoperative bleeding (Clavien 3b), 1 cecal volvulus (Clavien 3b), 1 urosepsis (Clavien 4th) and 1 urinary fistula (Clavien 3a). In this series there was neither mortality nor conversion to open surgery There was recurrence in 3 out of 80 patients (3.7%). They were resolved as follows: 1 percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy, 1 secondary laparoscopic pyeloplasty and 1 robotic pyeloplasty. There was a 96.3%. of primary overall success rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that laparoscopic pyeloplasty compares favorably with the result achieved by open surgery. We believe that laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a good surgical alternative for the management of primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

[Animal model for training in laparoscopic pyeloplasty]

OBJECTIVE

With the coming of the laparoscopy, multiple surgical techniques have been developed that have revolutionized the urological practice. The laparoscopic pyeloplasty has been one of the techniques most developed. However, there are very few training models that permit the surgeon to decrease the learning curve. An animal model of training for the laparoscopic pyeloplasty technique is described.

METHODS

Eight procedures of laparoscopic pyeloplasty were performed using the animal model (Gallus gallus) in the laparoscopic practice laboratory of the Urology Service of the University Hospital of Caracas. The preparation times of the model and the operation times of each surgeon were compared. The statistical analysis was made calculating the mean operation time, standard deviation, frequencies and percentages. A significant value was considered as p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The laparoscopic pyeloplasty procedure was performed successfully in all of the cases by two surgeons. The preparation time ranged from a maximum of 14 minutes to a minimum of 6 minutes, this being the same for both surgeons in the fourth case. The operation time ranged from a maximum of 65 minutes to a minimum of 43 minutes, observing significant differences when comparing the times individually for each surgeon. Only one case had filtration when comparing the patency of the specimen.

CONCLUSIONS

The animal model of training of laparoscopic pyeloplasty that is described is economical, reproducible, of easy availability and it makes it possible to develop laparoscopic surgical skills and competency necessary for reconstructive surgery and techniques that warrant intracorporeal suture.