The Patient's Comorbidity Burden Correlates with the Erectile Dysfunction Severity

Downstream Revenue Realized by Facilities Placing Inflatable Penile Prosthesis in Medicare Beneficiaries to Treat Erectile Dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the incremental downstream revenue generated from subsequent treatment of men who received an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) to treat erectile dysfunction (ED), compared to men without ED.

METHODS

The 100% Medicare Standard Analytic Files were used to conduct a retrospective claims analysis of the 5-year revenue generated by patients receiving IPP to treat their ED, compared to a propensity-matched cohort of men without ED. Men aged 65 years or older with ED who underwent IPP implantation (Current Procedural Terminology 54405) in a hospital outpatient setting between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021, and who had continuous Medicare Parts A and B enrollment for 12 months pre-index IPP and 5 years post-index IPP discharge date were included in the study. Men without ED but with comparable characteristics were identified and used as a comparator group. Revenue received by hospitals from Medicare was defined as the sum of payments for patient services, other payor-paid amounts, patient deductibles, copayments, and coinsurance. Revenue was inflated to 2022 US dollars. The mean values and their corresponding standard deviations (SD) are reported.

RESULTS

After matching, there were 2905 men with ED who received an IPP and 7462 men without ED. The IPP cohort showed a significantly higher 5-year cumulative revenue (mean=$34,571 [SD=$50,234]) compared to the men without ED (mean=$3189 [SD=$11,527]). When stratified by diagnosis type, the differences in revenue were $10,258 for circulatory disease, $2646 for diabetes, $2013 for urology, and $1043 for prostate cancer. Significantly more IPP patients had at least 1 health encounter for these conditions over the 5-year follow-up period than their matched controls (55.0% vs 7.8% for circulatory, 46.7% vs 16.8% for urology, 19.3% vs 3.6% for diabetes, and 19.0% vs 3.0% for prostate cancer).

CONCLUSION

Men with ED who received IPP generated substantially higher revenue for the healthcare system over a 5-year period, nearly 10 times as much, compared to men without ED, excluding the initial cost of the IPP procedure. The presence of ED, coupled with IPP usage, is associated with significantly increased healthcare revenue across a range of medical conditions compared to men without ED. These findings emphasize the financial implications for advanced ED programs to improve access to necessary care for these patients. Healthcare facilities may leverage these insights to effectively allocate resources to deliver critical healthcare to men with ED.

Are Radial Pressure Waves Effective for the Treatment of Moderate or Mild to Moderate Erectile Dysfunction? A Randomized Sham Therapy Controlled Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

Radial wave therapy is commercialized as an option for the management of erectile dysfunction. However, the mechanism of action of the radial waves differs substantially from shock waves, so the evidence gathered for shock wave therapy cannot be extrapolated, and there are very few clinical trials with the radial wave.

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of radial wave therapy compared with sham therapy for the treatment of moderate and mild to moderate erectile dysfunction.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was realized. Eighty patients with moderate erectile dysfunction, without sickle cell anemia, anticoagulation treatment, comorbidities, or conditions associated with secondary erectile dysfunction were included. The efficacy and safety were assessed at 6 and 10 weeks after randomization. Patients were randomized 1:1 to 1 of 2 arms: (i) 6 weekly sessions of radial wave therapy (RW group) or (ii) 6 weekly sessions of sham therapy (control group). All patients received sildenafil 25 mg.

OUTCOME

The primary outcome was the mean change in the International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain score at 6 weeks after randomization.

RESULTS

Eighty men were randomized. The average baseline IIEF-EF score was 16.3 (Standard Deviation - SD 3.2), and the median baseline Erection Hardness Score (EHS) was 3 (IQR 1). At 6 weeks after randomization, the mean change in the IIEF-EF score was 3.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-5.2) in the RW group and 4.2 (95% CI 2.5-5.9) in the control group. No differences were observed between groups (P value =.742). No change was observed in the median EHS score in the evaluations. No serious adverse events occurred in 2 (5%) patients after radial wave therapy, and in 1 (2.5%) patient after sham therapy.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Knowledge of the effectiveness of radial waves protocols used for the treatment of moderate erectile dysfunction, helps doctors and patients in making decisions about the use of this therapy.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

One strength is conducting the study with high methodological standards to minimize risk biases. Our results are limited to the evaluation of 1 specific protocol in moderate and mild to moderate erectile dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

No difference was found in this study between men with moderate and mild to moderate erectile dysfunction treated with radial waves and men treated with placebo sham therapy. Studies with different protocols of radial waves are necessary. Sandoval-Salinas C, Saffon JP, Martínez JM, et al. Are Radial Pressure Waves Effective for the Treatment of Moderate or Mild to Moderate Erectile Dysfunction? A Randomized Sham Therapy Controlled Clinical Trial. J Sex Med 2022;19:738-744.

The willingness of Saudi men with type 2 diabetes to discuss erectile dysfunction with their physicians and the factors that influence this

OBJECTIVES

The study's objectives were to find out the proportion of Saudi men with type 2 diabetes who have been asked by their physicians about erectile dysfunction (ED) in the last year, to determine the willingness of Saudi men with type 2 diabetes to discuss ED, and to explore the factors that may be related to their willingness to discuss ED with their physicians.

METHODS

This study employed a cross-sectional survey design using a quantitative self-administered questionnaire among 309 Saudi men with type 2 diabetes. The study was conducted in hospital-based primary care clinics at King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia during the period from July to September 2015.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 60.2 years with the mean duration of diabetes approximately 12.5 years. Few of the patients (9.7%) had been asked by their physicians about ED within the last year of attending the clinics although most patients (84.8%) were willing to discuss this issue. The presence of ED among the respondents was 89%. Two participants' characteristics were associated with a willingness to discuss ED with the physicians. These characteristics were age above 60 (OR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.11-0.55), and having severe ED (OR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08-0.85). The respondents' main barriers to discussing ED with their physicians were embarrassing the doctor, ED is a personal issue, too old or too sick to address ED issues now, no effective treatment available, and the doctor is too young to discuss ED with.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients who have type 2 diabetes are not asked about ED within the last year of attendance even though most are willing to discuss it with their physicians. Being older and suffering more severe ED will result in being less willing to discuss ED with their doctor. Further research is needed to explore the barriers which prevent physicians from discussing ED with their patients who have diabetes.

The Brief Sexual Symptom Checklist as a Screening Tool for Sex-Related Problems in the Primary Care Setting: Focus on Erectile Dysfunction

PURPOSE

To assess the performance of the Brief Sexual Symptom Checklist for men (BSSC-M) questionnaire in General Practitioner's (GP) consults in Spain.

METHODS

Multicenter, cross-sectional study conducted in Spain among men ≥50 years, visiting a GP for any reason, and being able to answer self-administered questionnaires. Patients receiving medicines for erectile dysfunction (ED) and those with poor functional status were excluded. Sexual satisfaction was assessed by the BSSC-M, ED by the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM), and quality of life (QoL) using a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

In all, 770 men met all the selection criteria and 556 patients (72.2%) reported sexually related problems, ED being the most frequent (n = 427; 55.5%). The SHIM score decreased progressively with the number of causes of sexual dissatisfaction. Prevalence of ED (SHIM ≤21) was greater in patients who referred problems with erection in the BSSC-M questionnaire (76 vs. 14%; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis for ED prediction revealed that sexual dissatisfaction, QoL (average or low/very low), and the presence of 3 or more comorbidities significantly influenced the chances of having ED.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results encourage the use of the BSSC-M for identifying suspicion of ED and other sexual problems in patients > 50 who visit their GP for a routine follow-up.