Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (adenomectomy): Experience in 59 consecutive patients

Outcomes of minimally invasive simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

(1) To assess the outcomes of minimally invasive simple prostatectomy (MISP) for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia in men with large prostates and (2) to compare them with open simple prostatectomy (OSP).

METHODS

A systematic review of outcomes of MISP for benign prostatic hyperplasia with meta-analysis was conducted. The article selection process was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven observational studies with 764 patients were analyzed. The mean prostate volume was 113.5 ml (95 % CI 106-121). The mean increase in Qmax was 14.3 ml/s (95 % CI 13.1-15.6), and the mean improvement in IPSS was 17.2 (95 % CI 15.2-19.2). Mean duration of operation was 141 min (95 % CI 124-159), and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 284 ml (95 % CI 243-325). One hundred and four patients (13.6 %) developed a surgical complication. In comparative studies, length of hospital stay (WMD -1.6 days, p = 0.02), length of catheter use (WMD -1.3 days, p = 0.04) and estimated blood loss (WMD -187 ml, p = 0.015) were significantly lower in the MISP group, while the duration of operation was longer than in OSP (WMD 37.8 min, p < 0.0001). There were no differences in improvements in Qmax, IPSS and perioperative complications between both procedures. The small study sizes, publication bias, lack of systematic complication reporting and short follow-up are limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

MISP seems an effective and safe treatment option. It provides similar improvements in Qmax and IPSS as OSP. Despite taking longer, it results in less blood loss and shorter hospital stay. Prospective randomized studies comparing OSP, MISP and laser enucleation are needed to define the standard surgical treatment for large prostates.

The surgical treatment of a large prostatic adenoma: the laparoscopic approach--a systematic review

PURPOSE

To present a critical overview of the current literature on the role of laparoscopy for the surgical treatment of patients with large prostatic adenomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A MedLine search for peer-reviewed studies on laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (LSP) was performed. The clinical studies that reported most of the following information were included: number of patients, prostate volume, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and the duration of catheterization, as well as functional outcomes and complications. Articles reporting a mean total prostate volume of <80 mL or a mean prostatic adenoma of <60 mL were excluded. The review was performed according to the PRISMA statement.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles on LSP were included in this systematic review with a total of 626 patients treated. Both transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches, as well as transvesical and transcapsular routes, have been described. Eleven articles were case-series and three were comparative retrospective nonrandomized studies. When compared with open simple prostatectomy (OP), LSP is associated with a less blood loss and a reduced irrigation requirement, a shorter postoperative catheterization period, and a shorter hospital stay, at the expense of an extended operative time. The limited number of patients treated, the selection biases due to the retrospective nature of several published articles on LSP, and the short follow-up periods are evident limits of the literature. I-square test demonstrated a high heterogeneity (93%) and consequently a high variability in the intervention effects in terms of maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax).

CONCLUSIONS

Even if LSP seems feasible and safe, there is still limited evidence regarding its long-term outcomes compared with OP.