Impact of 3D vision on mental workload and laparoscopic performance in inexperienced subjects

Laparoscopic skills training: the effects of viewing mode (2D vs. 3D) on skill acquisition and transfer

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional (3D) visual displays have been suggested to aid laparoscopic skills training by providing the depth cues not present in traditional two-dimensional (2D) displays. However, few studies have robustly investigated the impact of viewing mode (2D vs. 3D) on learning outcomes.

PURPOSE

To examine how viewing mode (2D vs. 3D) impacts the acquisition and transferability of basic laparoscopic skills by comparing performance between transfer and control groups on a complete proficiency-based training program.

METHOD

A counterbalanced between-subjects design was employed. Each participant was randomly allocated to one of four groups, comprising two transfer groups (trained in one viewing mode and tested in the alternate mode: the 2D → 3D and 3D → 2D groups) and two control groups (trained and tested in one viewing mode: the 2D → 2D and 3D → 3D groups). Participants completed proficiency-based training in six laparoscopic training tasks. Testing included two further repetitions of all tasks under test conditions. Objective performance measures included the total number of repetitions to reach proficiency, and total performance scores (i.e. time + error penalties across all repetitions) in training and testing.

RESULTS

The groups trained in 3D demonstrated superior training performance (i.e. less time + errors) and took fewer repetitions to reach proficiency than the groups trained in 2D. The groups tested in 3D also demonstrated superior test performance compared to those tested in 2D. However, training mode did not yield significant test differences between the groups tested in 2D (i.e. 2D → 2D vs. 3D → 2D), or between the groups tested in 3D (i.e. 3D → 3D vs. 2D → 3D).

CONCLUSION

Novices demonstrate superior performance in laparoscopic skills training using a 3D viewing mode compared to 2D. However, this does not necessarily translate to superior performance in subsequent testing or enhanced learning overall. Rather, test performance appears to be dictated by the viewing mode used during testing, not that of prior training.

EEG Cortical Activities and Networks Altered by Watching 2D/3D Virtual Reality Videos

Abstract. Virtual reality (VR), which can represent real-life events and situations, is being increasingly applied to many fields, such as education, entertainment, and medical rehabilitation. Correspondingly, the neural information processing of VR has attracted attention. However, the underlying neural mechanisms of VR environments have not yet been fully revealed. The purpose of this study was to examine the possible differences in brain activities and networks between the less immersive 2D and the fully immersive 3D VR environments. 3D VR videos and the same 2D scenes were presented to the participants and the scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded, respectively. Power spectral density (PSD) and the functional connectivity of these EEG signals were analyzed. The results showed that 3D VR videos significantly enhanced the PSD of θ rhythm (4–7 Hz) in the frontal lobe; decreased the PSD of α rhythm (8–13 Hz) in the parietal and the occipital lobes; increased the PSD of β rhythm (14–30 Hz) in the frontal, the parietal, the temporal, and the occipital lobes, relative to 2D VR watching. Furthermore, 3D versus 2D VR-induced alterations in the patterns of brain networks were similar to the patterns of PSD. Specifically, for the θ rhythm, 3D VR significantly enhanced the frontal and the temporal brain functional connectivity; for the α rhythm, 3D VR increased the parietal and the occipital networks; for the β rhythm, 3D VR remarkably increased the frontal, the occipital, the frontal-temporal and the frontal-occipital brain functional connectivity, relative to 2D VR. These significant differences between 3D and 2D VR video-watching suggest that the neural information processing of cortical activities and networks is correlated to the degree of immersion. The present results, collected with previous researches, implicate that some visual-related information processes, such as visual attention, visual perception, and visual immersion are more robust in 3D VR environments.

Three-dimensional endoscopy: The future of nasoendoscopic training

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Three-dimensional (3D) endoscopy is an emerging tool in surgery that provides real-time depth perception. Its benefits have been investigated in surgical training, but the current literature lacks significant objective outcome data. We aimed to objectively compare the efficacy of two-dimensional (2D) versus 3D high-definition endoscopes in novice users.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized crossover study.

METHODS

Ninety-two novice medical students who used both 2D and 3D endoscopes to complete two validated tasks in a box trainer participated in the study. Time taken and error rates were measured, and subjective data were collected.

RESULTS

Wilcoxon tests showed 3D technology was significantly faster than 2D (78 vs. 95 seconds, P = .004), and errors per task were significantly lower (3 vs. 5, P < .001). Sixty-nine percent of participants preferred the 3D endoscope.

CONCLUSIONS

3D high-definition endoscopy could be instrumental in training the next generation of endoscopic surgeons. Further research is required in a clinical setting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2b Laryngoscope, 129:1280-1285, 2019.

2D vs. 3D imaging in laparoscopic surgery-results of a prospective randomized trial

PURPOSE

3D imaging is an upcoming technology in laparoscopic surgery, and recent studies have shown that the modern 3D technique is superior in an experimental setting. However, the first randomized controlled clinical trial in this context dates back to 1998 and showed no significant difference between 2D and 3D visualization using the first 3D generation technique, which is now more than 15 years old.

METHODS

Positive results measured in an experimental setting considering 3D imaging on surgical performance led us to initiate a randomized controlled pragmatic clinical trial to validate our findings in daily clinical routine. Standard laparoscopic operations (cholecystectomy, appendectomy) were preoperatively randomized to a 2D or 3D imaging system. We used a surgical comfort scale (Likert scale) and the Raw NASA Workload TLX for the subjective assessment of 2D and 3D imaging; the duration of surgery was also measured.

RESULTS

The results of 3D imaging were statistically significant better than 2D imaging concerning the parameters "own felt safety" and "task efficiency"; the difficulty level of the procedures in the 2D and 3D groups did not differ. Overall, the Raw NASA Workload TLX showed no significance between the groups.

CONCLUSION

3D imaging could be a possible advantage in laparoscopic surgery. The results of our clinical trial show increased personal felt safety and efficiency of the surgeon using a 3D imaging system. Overall of the procedures, the findings assessed using Likert scales in terms of own felt safety and task efficiency were statistically significant for 3D imaging. The individually perceived workload assessed with the Raw NASA TLX shows no difference. Although these findings are subjective impressions of the performing surgeons without a clear benefit for 3D technology in clinical outcome, we think that these results show the capability that 3D laparoscopy can have a positive impact while performing laparoscopic procedures.