Exercise echocardiography in severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis

Watchful waiting care or early intervention in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: Where we are

Aortic stenosis, the most common valvular heart disease in Western countries, affects predominantly older people. Prompt aortic valve replacement is undoubtedly indicated in symptomatic patients. Management of asymptomatic patients is nowadays shifting from a conservative approach to early aortic valve replacement, as multimodality imaging is increasingly available. However, multimodality imaging has led to multiple prognostic parameters and complex algorithms, as well as a new staging classification that has left patients and physicians somewhat puzzled. We highlight the value of thorough serial clinical examinations, Doppler echocardiography and exercise testing when caring for a growing aortic stenosis population, including that has no or limited access to multimodality imaging. Evidence for early aortic valve replacement versus conservative management in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis is biased by the lack of serial stress testing evaluation; 30% of so-called asymptomatic patients were in fact symptomatic, and thus were clear candidates for aortic valve replacement in the above-mentioned studies. Randomized trials of aortic valve replacement versus conservative management that include serial stress testing evaluation are needed to ascertain whether early aortic valve replacement actually improves clinical outcome in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis. Less interventional medicine and healthcare resource utilization can result in better health.

[Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Evaluation by exercise test: which results and which decision?]

Aortic stenosis is the most common valvular heart disease in Europe and North America and it is a real public health problem. Its prevalence increases with population aging. Symptomatic patients require surgery (class I, level of evidence B). In asymptomatic patients, a stress test with or without imaging is recommended to unmask the false asymptomatic patients and refine risk stratification of occurrence of major events. This support remains difficult and makes the optimal timing for surgery controversial in the absence of prospective data on the determinants of aortic stenosis progression, multicenter studies on risk stratification or randomized studies on patient management. The complexity of care arises from the balance between the spontaneous disease risk (risk of sudden death and irreversible left ventricular dysfunction) and the risk of surgery and prosthetic complications. It is therefore crucial to identify subgroups of patients at risk of pejorative progression in whom prophylactic surgery may be considered. This article focuses on evaluating during exercise asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. We will explain how to perform the test, determine which echocardiographic measurements should be obtained, focusing on the diagnostic and prognostic value of these measurements and discuss indications for surgery according to new practice guidelines.

Comparison of the heart function adaptation in trained and sedentary men after 50 and before 35 years of age

The effects of aging and of sustained athletic activity on the heart in men aged >50 years are unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the adaptation of the heart in athletic and sedentary men aged <35 and ≥50 years. Echocardiograms recorded at rest and during submaximal exercise were analyzed in 59 athletic seniors (S(ATH) group) and 16 sedentary seniors (S(SED) group) (age ≥50 years) and in 18 athletic youth (Y(ATH) group) and 27 sedentary youth (Y(SED) group) (age <35 years). All subjects were healthy. The reproducibility of measurements was examined, and the echocardiographic characteristics were compared among the study groups. No differences were found in baseline characteristics between the Y(ATH) and Y(SED) groups and between the S(ATH) and S(SED) groups, except for their exercise routines, consisting of >8 hours of bicycling per week in the athletic groups. Left ventricular mass was greater in the Y(ATH) than in the S(ATH) group (p <0.01) and greater in the S(ATH) than in the S(SED) group (p <0.001). Likewise, left ventricular volumes were greater in the athletic than in the sedentary groups (p <0.05), although they were smaller in the seniors than in youth (p <0.01). Left ventricular stroke volume was greater in the athletic than in the sedentary groups (p <0.001); global longitudinal strain during exercise was -20.0 ± 2.4% in the S(ATH) group and -22.1 ± 2.1% in the Y(ATH) group, compared to -19.2 ± 3.4% in the S(SED) group and -20.2 ± 2.4% in the Y(SED) group (p <0.05, athletic vs sedentary). The e' velocities recorded at the septal and lateral mitral annulus were higher at rest and during exercise (p <0.01) in the youth than in the senior groups. In conclusion, systolic and diastolic myocardial adaptation to regular exercise was significantly more prominent in young than in senior volunteers.