Remote magnetic navigation and arrhythmia ablation

Feasibility of a novel mapping system combined with remote magnetic navigation for catheter ablation of premature ventricular contractions

BACKGROUND

Remote magnetic navigation (RMN) is often used in combination with a 3-dimensional mapping system to perform catheter ablations. This study aim to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of a novel 3D-mapping system, EnSite Precision, combined with RMN for catheter ablation of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), and compared it to the procedures performed by CARTO3 with RMN.

METHODS

Forty-three consecutive PVC patients were either ablated with the guidance of EnSite Precision (n = 22) or CARTO (n = 21) navigated by RMN. Procedure-related details, acute and long-term success were assessed.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics between both the groups were similar (age: 47.1 ± 19.8 vs 47.1 ± 12.7, female: 63.6% vs 57.1%). No significant difference was found in the procedure time (99.5 ± 30.4 vs 92.9 ± 24.8 min, P = 0.436), mapping time (18.6 ± 12.8 vs 15.5 ± 10.2 min, P = 0.390), radiofrequency ablation time (333.4 ± 267.0 vs 469.3 ± 343.1 s, P = 0.154), fluoroscopy time (4.0 ± 1.9 vs 3.8 ± 2.0 min, P = 0.635), and X-ray dose (1.8 ± 1.4 vs 2.0 ± 1.2 Gycm2, P = 0.649) between the two groups. No significant procedural complication occurred in either group. In addition, there was no significant differences regarding the acute success rate (90.9% vs 90.5%, P = 0.961) and long-term success rate (86.4% vs 81.0%, P = 0.631) after 16.2 ± 6.2 months of follow-up between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

RMN combined with EnSite Precision mapping system is effective and safe for catheter ablation of PVCs.

Estimation-Based Control of a Magnetic Endoscope without Device Localization

Magnetically controlled catheters and endoscopes can improve minimally invasive procedures as a result of their increased maneuverability when combined with modern magnetic steering systems. However, such systems have two distinct shortcomings: they require continuous information about the location of the instrument inside the human body and they rely on models that accurately capture the device behavior, which are difficult to obtain in realistic settings. To address both of these issues, we propose a control algorithm that continuously estimates a magnetic endoscope’s response to changes in the actuating magnetic field. Experiments in a structured visual environment show that the control method is able to follow image-based trajectories under different initial conditions with an average control error that measures 1.8 % of the trajectory length. The usefulness for medical procedures is demonstrated with a bronchoscopic inspection task. In a proof-of-concept study, a custom 2[Formula: see text]mm diameter miniature camera endoscope is navigated through an anatomically correct lung phantom in a clinician-controlled manner. This represents the first demonstration of the controlled manipulation of a magnetic device without localization, which is critical for a wide range of medical procedures.

A prospective study on safety of catheter ablation procedures: contact force guided ablation could reduce the risk of cardiac perforation

BACKGROUND

Contact force (CF) sensing catheters provide advantages with regard to safety and efficacy. This study aimed to evaluate if CF catheters reduce cardiac perforations and other major complications and offer equal safety compared to the magnetic navigation system (MNS).

METHODS

Data from 1.517 ablation procedures from our prospective registry was analyzed. Ablations were performed using either CF guided catheters (CF group, n=248), non-CF catheters (NCF group, n=813), or MNS (n=456). Four subgroups were analyzed: atrial fibrillation (AF, n=557), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT, n=715), ventricular tachycardia (VT, n=190) and patients with congenital heart defects (CHD, n=55). The primary endpoint of this study was incidence of cardiac perforation. Secondary endpoints were major and minor complications within 30 days of the procedure.

RESULTS

Complications occurred in 11.3% (n=172) of the procedures. In 2.8% (n=43) a major complication occurred, 0.9% (n=13) had a perforation, 8.5% (n=129) had a minor complication and 2 patients died (0.1%). No cardiac perforation occurred in the CF group, which was significantly different from NCF procedures (0.0% vs. 1.6%; relative risk 0.76, 95% CI 0.74-0.79, P=0.031) and equal to MNS (0.0%). This was also observed in the AF subgroup (0.0% vs. 3.3%; RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.63-0.72, P=0.021), and the occurrence of major complications was lower for CF versus NCF procedures (2.1% vs. 7.8%, P=0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

CF-guided catheter ablation is superior to NCF with regard to procedural safety and avoidance of cardiac perforation. This difference is due to a reduction of cardiac perforation and major complications in the AF subgroup.